Tags
6th Mass Extinction, Addiction to Fossil Fuels, Anishnabek, Capitalism, Casino Capitalism, Chris Christie's Traffic-Gate, Climate Change, Clive Hamilton, Collapse of Industrial Civilization, Commodification of Nature, Consumerism, Death of Languages, Eco-Apocalypse, Ecocide, Extinction of Man, Genocide, Geoengineering, Loss of Biodiversity, Mass Die Off, Monoculture Farming, Murphy's Law, Native Wisdom, Ojibwe, Runaway Climate Change, Rust Cohle of 'True Detective', Techno-Optimists, The Limits to Growth, The Rat Race, The Seventh Fire Prophecy
“I think human consciousness is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware. Nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself. We are creatures that shouldn’t exist under natural law… The honorable thing for our species to do is to stop reproducing and walk hand in hand, brothers and sisters, into extinction — one last midnight.”
~ Rust Cohle, ‘True Detective‘
Sitting comfortably within their climate-controlled homes and buildings, a tiny percentage of eco-conscience humans watches with morbid fascination as large numbers of animals drop like flies in a bug zapper. In the latest die-off, bats rain down from Australian skies; parrots, kangaroos and emus perish from heat exhaustion. Ominous signs of an unraveling web of life are everywhere to see, but the industrial world has become utterly disconnected from nature and pays little heed to such warnings. Rather, what holds their interest is Chris Christie’s Traffic-Gate. That our fate is bound to the well-being of Earth is a belief lost with the genocide of so many indigenous cultures. Capitalist carbon man resides in a totally fabricated world — he eats food mass-produced from fossil fuel inputs, drinks ‘purified’ water bottled in plastic, and at bedtime drowns out the noise of energy-gluttonous cities with the electronic recordings of ocean waves and forest sounds. But most absurdly, he ‘communes with nature’ through staged wildlife TV shows and eco-trip adventures. Rather than allow poachers and farmers free rein, the capitalists thought it wiser to extract profit out of the Earth’s dying ecosystems by tapping into the “green” industry of eco-tourism, another in a lost list of anthropocentric oxymorons.
Relentless marketing on TV, internet, radio, billboards, print, etc has created an unending cycle of desire and consumption, fueling the trivialization of life that feeds its commodification. The individual is reduced to a “buying unit” by the skyscrapers, institutions, and bureaucracy of capitalism, but in a future world of spent resources and civilization-destroying weather, the market won’t have much use for so many “buying units”. Introspection by many rational, sober, and clear-minded people since the publication of ‘The Limits to Growth’ has not altered the course of history to date; why would I think the human species would suddenly alter their behavior after having tripped so many ecological tipping points and feedback loops? Hindsight is 20/20 only if a lesson was learned the first time.
“…The basic truth between the lines of this press event [National Research Council (NRC) briefing on abrupt climate change] was that we are facing a world that is becoming increasingly hostile to humankind.
We are literally making the planet into a wasteland like this is some post-apocalyptic science fiction story. It is just shocking. And the most horrifying aspect of it all is that we’ve waited to reduce emissions so long that we’re exiting the win-win field of possible climate responses. We’re now headed into a world of lose-lose. That’s the news nobody wants to convey – or hear. But there it is.” – link
The cancer of hyper consumption and economic growth for never-ending profit has trashed the planet, but blind faith in the markets and techno-optimism are the siren’s call beguiling industrial civilization over the cliff. Capitalism likes efficiency; in its quest for greater efficiency, diversity – the essence of life – is being exterminated. Monoculture is death. More biodiversity means more resilience. A recent scientific paper purports to prove this long-held maxim:
“…when a lot of species are interacting and competing in an ecosystem, the ‘average’ interactions that any one species experiences are likely to be weaker than in a simpler, less diverse system. When there are a lot of different niches occupied by different species, we also expect different responses to environmental fluctuations among the community, meaning that some species inherently do better than others depending on the specific disturbance. Species-rich systems also tend to have more of what we call ‘functional redundancy‘, meaning that if one species providing an essential ecosystem function (e.g., like predation) goes extinct, there’s another, similar species ready to take its place…”
Biodiversity loss is not the only aspect of life being degraded. The planet is also losing cultural diversity – languages, crafts, religions, histories, ancient knowledge, etc. are disappearing as globalization reduces all of life to the status of a marketable commodity. Thousands of languages were once spoken in North and South America before the invasion of European powers. It’s interesting to note that in the Ojibwe language, and perhaps in most if not all native languages of North America, there exists no word to describe “greed” or the concept of personal property, but there are endless numbers of verbs to describe “every movement and temperature and visual sense of water.” After a few hundred years of progress, the white man has Wall Street and the natives have gambling casinos.
“In the Seventh Fire prophecy of the Anishnabek, each of the seven fires represent an era in human history. We are now in the time of the Seventh Fire. The task of the people of this age, including the Anishnabek and other red people, the yellow people, the black and the white, is to come together through choosing the road of cooperation. Without this, there will be no Eighth Fire, or future for Natives and others…
…Today, in the age of the Seventh Fire, the races are again faced with a choice. The two roads are the black road of technology and overdevelopment leading to environmental catastrophe, the other is the red road of spirituality and respect for the earth. Together, people of the world have to choose the right road, be of one mind, or the earth cannot survive…” ~ The Seventh Fire (Ojibwe) Prophecy
The “black road of technology and overdevelopment” is paved with the fallout of dead bodies and poisoned landscapes —nuclear meltdowns, oil and chemical spills, factory fires and explosions, etc., but to a very tool-centric species just itching to keep this omnicidal train going, geoengineering looks like the perfect ticket. It promises to allow industrial civilization to continue burning carbon while avoiding the nasty side-effect of catastrophic climate change. Unfortunately, human error and miscalculation, the bane of so many other industrial endeavors, will undoubtedly come into play. The ‘hacking’ of the Earth’s entire climate system represents the peak of hubris for modern man. Describing the conceit of our technological domination of the planet, Clive Hamilton states:
“Pursuing abatement is an admission that industrial society has harmed nature, while engineering the Earth’s climate would be confirmation of our mastery over it — final proof that, whatever minor errors made on the way, human ingenuity and faith in our own abilities will always triumph. Geoengineering promises to turn failure into triumph.”
The Earth’s carbon sinks are filling up and the twin problem of ocean acidification will need a techno-fix too. Complexity begets even more complicated problems. Our culture avoids the simple fact that humanity is vulnerable and dependent on the Earth, that life is fragile and interconnected, and that the importance of Murphy’s law is amplified exponentially when playing GOD with technology. Let’s also hope that the psychological effects of climate change don’t make the nuclear powers lose their cool.
…A warm dry wind is all that breaks the silence
The highways quiet scars across the land
People lie, eyes closed, no longer dreaming
The earth dies screaming…
There’s an excellent work on human capacity for denial published 2013: Denial: Self-Deception, False Beliefs, and the Origins of the Human Mind by Ajit Varki and Danny Brower. Basically, denial is the psychological mechanism any fully self-aware being must develop and propagate to remain sane once mortality is recognized. There are lots of self-aware animals, however only humans have made this leap apparently under unique circumstances, which explains why other critters aren’t as intelligent. Denials has positive benefits, but as Varki points out in his book, the negatives are poised to overwhelm our species.
LikeLike
“…Humans are clearly not the only creatures to deceive. Many animal signals are not honest but were selected to deceive predators, prey, or competitors. This deception is not limited to simple mimicry but includes various curious behaviors and even counterdeception. Some primates, especially our closest living relatives, appear to engage in quite flexible “tactical” forms of deception (Whiten & Byrne 1988). Do they hence have the prerequisites for the purported arms race between deception and deception detection?
One important aspect of deception that nonhuman animals may not be capable of is lying…
LikeLike
“…A second purportedly unique skill that may have played an important role in the evolution of human deception and self-deception is mental time travel (Suddendorf & Corballis 1997). Humans can flexibly imagine a range of potential future episodes (and hence can plan complex deceptive ploys) and can also mentally reconstruct past events (and hence can uncover past deceptive ploys). These travels in both temporal directions are closely linked in mind and brain (e.g., Addis et al. 2007; Suddendorf & Corballis 2007)…”
LikeLike
Perception of time is another apparently unique characteristic of homo-sapiens, and a good case for the evolution of that capacity is given in “Sex, Time, and Power: How Women’s Sexuality Shaped Human Evolution” by Leonard Shlain 2003. To summarize: “Natural selection allowed for the adaptation of the human female to this environmental stress by reconfiguring her hormonal cycles, entraining them with the periodicity of the moon. The results, however, did much more than ensure our existence; they imbued women with the concept of time, and gave them control over sex—a power that males sought [still seek!] to reclaim.”
LikeLike
There’s a huge difference between deception and self-deception. All animals – including humans – practice deception in one form or another. No known animal has the capacity for self-deception. Only a very few species can even pass the “mirror test” indicating self-awareness (all great apes, bottlenose dolphins and orcas, elephants, European magpies). The great leap apparently made uniquely by homo sapiens was not only self-awareness, but awareness of the self-awareness of others.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Another great post xraymike79! This should be required reading for all those in positions of power. I just saw that the Doomsday clock is STILL at 5 min. til midnight.
What a joke. I mean with Fukushima, the methane releases, big-time diseases on the rise, super storms, massive flooding and huge heat waves, not to mention the other two dozen feedback loops we’ve tipped – we’re at about a minute before, IF THAT!
i’ll post more tomorrow.
LikeLike
Man never had choice in the usage of technology. Homo sapiens evolved to become one of the key elements in its own complex adaptive technological system. Early on the species wasn’t conscious of its course and even today remains largely in the dark upon that “black industrial road”. Success in biology does not always equal longevity and reproducibility, ask any cancer you meet. But aren’t cancers unconscious?” you might ask, and you might also ask the same about Homo sapiens. Humans perceive stimuli and process resources and information but are largely unaware of the nature of their emergence and the likely termination of their unbridled experiment in linearity. Man has created feel good myths regarding both past and future while mercilessly butchering the ecosystem on the metastatic road to greater glory.
I don’t think there is much to be done now. How do you stop an unconscious cancer whose members want to take more and more from the body, dump their metabolic shit into the bloodstream and live forever. After every technological trick is tried, the poor damned human still up and died. Now his body lays in a metal box, his life was given to the clocks. His tombstone reads “GDP”, work, work, work will set you free. The bankers laughed at their cruel joke until the grim reaper removed his cloak. Tomorrow again the clocks will turn, GDP, earn, earn, earn.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Love the rat in the wheel, Mike. I wonder if it should read: No stopping at any time.
I had another meeting with the ‘new’ mayor this morning, and supplied him with the report which points out that:
‘Application of elementary laws of mathematics, physics and chemistry to extant global and local economic-social-political arrangements readily demonstrates that they are totally unsustainable, and that complete collapse of extant arrangements is inevitable. The current state of numerous crucial factors, particularly Energy Return On Energy Invested, the net-energy Hubbert’s Curve, debt-to-resources ratios, and rapidly declining climate stability clearly indicate that a substantial collapse, or a complete collapse, of existing global economic-social-political arrangements will occur over the coming decade, i.e. the period 2014 to 2024.
In practice, the collapse of historic arrangements has already commenced, though the bulk of the populace remains ignorant and complacent, or chooses to deny it. This state of ignorant complacency and denial is largely a consequence of misinformation promulgated by government departments and the near-complete avoidance of all basic truth by the short-term-profit-driven corporate media; in other words propaganda and censorship. The combination of propaganda and censorship results in the bulk of the populace being unreachable and unwilling to read or view anything that does not conform to the faux narrative presented by local government and the media of ‘happy days forever’.
The collapse of extant living arrangements will accelerate as fundamental factors necessary for industrial societies to function continue to deteriorate. Interaction between ever-worsening fundamental factors may result in the rapid, cascading global collapse of industrial civilisation. However, those who are profiting from present arrangements and plan to maximise short-term wealth acquisition throughout the collapse phase are likely to attempt to ensure the economic collapse is as slow as they can possibly facilitate. It should be noted that, irrespective of deterioration of fundamental factors and political manipulation, ‘black swan’ events would cause very rapid unravelling of the present living arrangements of most people in ‘developed’ nations, including those in Taranaki.
Such is the nature of the economic system that short-term attempts to prop-up existing arrangements are inherently counterproductive and will result in a more catastrophic collapse when the [delayed] full-magnitude collapse does finally occur. The later that significant collapse occurs, the greater the level of suffering (both numerically and by intensity). This is true both globally and locally.
In addition to the collapse of existing socio-economic-political arrangements, humanity faces major shifts in the global environment, frequently referred to as environmental collapse, due to severe disruption of physical, chemical and biological systems that make life-as-we-know-it possible. Humanity is witnessing, and is causing, the Sixth Great Extinction Event, and the portion of humanity engaged in industrial living (using fossil fuels) is largely responsible for this accelerating event.’
And a lot more. 80 pages of detailed analysis and data, in fact.
LikeLike
Do you have a link to your full document? I could upload it here to make it available for everyone under my ‘Notes and Documents‘ at the left side of the website.
LikeLike
I had trouble emailing it as an attachment, In fact I could not at all after trying several times. I’m not sure what the problem is -too much data, too many hyperlinks? So this morning I delivered it in disc form.
I’ll send it to you if I can, Or a condensed version.
This is just the beginning of something big, one way or the other. Either certain people will grow spines and throw off the yokes that have them stymied, and do so in the next few weeks, or we are totally screwed. There is no halfway point anymore, nor is there time for procrastination or prevarication.
We will know for certain, one way or the other, by the end of April.
.
.
LikeLike
Good luck, Kevin. I hope you aren’t banging your head against a brick wall. I am starting to agree with Nicole Foss when she says,” I have zero faith in the ability of the political system to address any systemic threat in a constructive way.”
LikeLike
I think radioactive fallout will accelerate climate change, killing phytoplankton, and slowing plant growth. I’m not terribly concerned with climate change, because i think the radiation will do us in first.
It’s probably not news to most of you, but i just learned that at least 71% of law enforcement agencies in the united states have license plate tracking technology. Apparently, when your car enters their cameras’ line-of-sight…blip- your license plate is scanned. They know everywhere you go when you’re in your car. I don’t want to drive anymore. Everyone thinks it’s crazy that i don’t want to own a vehicle.
I don’t think i’ll be able to come back to the site for a while. I won’t have internet access where i’m going. I wish everyone good luck. If anyone knows somebody who is hiring in the north or east San Francisco bay area, please let me know because i’ll need a job. I’m 22, and a hard worker, but technically unskilled, and never went to college. I have a good amount of knowledge about gardening and soil, and have experience in landscaping, but i’m not trying to landscape anymore. I’m also going to be working on an invention to draw moisture out of the atmosphere to supply drinking water, and in theory could double as a solar cooker, thereby eliminating the need for people in arid regions to burn plant matter for cooking fuel. If anyone is interested, or can direct me to employment, please email me. I will be stone broke for a bit, so i may not be able to get back to you the same day, or even for a few days. Thanks! 🙂
LikeLike
Good luck with your plans! Keep us updated periodically when you can on how you’re doing and your experiences.
LikeLike
Filthy croaking evil
Kissinger Gave the “Green Light” for Argentina’s Dirty War
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/01/new-memo-kissinger-gave-green-light-argentina-dirty-war
LikeLike
I visit the site daily, sometimes more than once. I have found the essays and comments both reassuring and maddening; reassuring in that I see others here who get it which means I’m not quite as insane as I thought; maddening in that it becomes increasingly clear that I don’t know what to do – in fact what I can do.
I do not want this feeling of helplessness to paralyze me into inaction. I have people who depend on me, who trust me to make the correct decisions. I feel the pressure to act well for them. Otherwise I believe that I would take up heavy drinking and break guitar strings for the rest of my life. Sounds good to me. Yet, I can’t.
I am beginning to understand the abyss which we all face. It has just recently come home to me in a real way. Now what? I suspect that my story can be multiplied by millions. Scary thought that. I believe that this year all of us will find out what we are made of. I’m at least going to give myself the chance to fail by staying in the game. Besides, my curiosity outweighs my ennui.
LikeLike
Atta way buz: action is the antidote to despair. Like with the Alamo we’ll go down fighting (only we’ll be fighting the corporations and our “owned” government).
https://www.rebelmouse.com/ThreeEsEmail/390160845.html
Neil Young Stands With First Nations on Anti-Tar Sands Tour |
http://www.projectcensored.org/economic-power-corruption-american-political-system/
ECONOMIC POWER AND THE CORRUPTION OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM
Kevin: I truly hope your outstanding writing is actually read (and understood) by the audience you wish to influence. I’d be amazed if they decided it was time to do things differently (it would be stunning and could go global if done right), but at this point what alternative is there? Power down sounds good, but it’ll take years if not decades to transition to some other (sustainable, green, whatever) power source, have everyone up and running on growing their own food (especially with the heat you’ve got going on there – might have to move all gardens indoors eventually), and making education about survival and mitigation strategies rather than the complete waste of time it is now (i’m an educator so i’m familiar with what’s being taught – 99% of it is useless to the future these kids will be facing).
LikeLike
The problem we have locally is that the council administration and all the hangers-on are something akin to what US president Andrew Jackson described as a ‘den of vipers’, and they will do their utmost to maintain the various rorts and dubious arrangements, and self-congratulatory nonsense they have set up for themselves.
The crucial battle that has to be won concerns the relative status of the mayor and the CEO. Technically the mayor stands well above the CEO. However, in this city the CEO has elevated herself (been elevated by unseen powers) to the point of standing over the mayor. Apart from being totally incompetent, the last mayor (Duynhoven) was a puppet of corporations and money-lenders (was an MP for many years).
An interesting aspect for me is the scientifically and financially illiteracy aspect. Both of previous mayors of this district were scientifically and financially illiterate. Although the present mayor is not a professional scientist, he is not scientifically illiterate. Also, the previous two mayors had ‘no’ morals.
Most of the actions and policy decisions of NPDC over the past decade have been in clear breach of Local Government Acts. However, since the entire system is set up to protect looters-and-polluters there is no mechanism for addressing that aspect.
I have now brought the Taranaki Regional Council Environment Officer, Gary Bedford, into the firing line: he has ‘sat on his hands’ and done nothing to protect the environment, or address any of the key issues of the times. He has a science degree,, I believe, so cannot be scientifically illiterate.
So, the big question is this: will people with some degree of power and who understand where we are headed -down the drain financially, socially and, environmentally- continue to support the system which is destroying their own children’s future (or if they are under 60, their own future)? Will they continue to defend the indefensible?
These are the most interesting times in all of human history for all the wrong reasons.
.
.
LikeLike
Today, 15 January 2014, WikiLeaks released the secret draft text for the entire TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Environment Chapter and the corresponding Chairs’ Report. The TPP transnational legal regime would cover 12 countries initially and encompass 40 per cent of global GDP and one-third of world trade.
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-BREAKING-NEWS-January-15th-WIKILEAKS-Releases-TPP-Environment-Files
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
“We fear death, we shudder at life’s instability, we grieve to see the flowers wilt again and again, and the leaves fall, and in our hearts we know that we, too, are transitory and will soon disappear. When artists create pictures and thinkers search for laws and formulate thoughts, it is in order to salvage something from the great dance of death, to make something last longer than we do.”
— Hermann Hesse, Narcissus and Goldmund
LikeLike
“As long as states apply all their resources to their vain and violent schemes of expansion, thus incessantly obstructing the slow and laborious efforts of their citizens to cultivate their minds, and even deprive them of all support in these efforts, no progress in this direction can be expected. For a long internal process of careful work on the part of each commonwealth is necessary for the education of its citizens. But all good enterprises which are not grafted on to a morally good attitude of mind are nothing but illusion and outwardly glittering misery.”
— Immanuel Kant, Idea for a Universal History; Seventh Proposition; trans. Allen Wood
LikeLike
LikeLike
h/t Colorado Bob:

LikeLike
If you’re not already in tears, then you’re either not paying attention, or your dead already.
I can barely sleep at night. The onslaught of unchecked ‘civilization’ against planetary habitability and future is the greatest crime of all.
Technology is not going to save us. It’s far too late for that. All we can possibly do now is screw things up even more. That is perfectly clear.
LikeLike
If we found “the cure” for everything – we’d still fuck it up.
I keep coming back to this. There ain’t no cure for monkey-stupid. Monkey is too stupid to know just how stupid monkey is.
So monkey pretend he not stupid. He convince himself that of all life found in the whole Universe, it is monkey-man who isn’t stupid.
Monkey is special.
Monkey tells himself this over and over again and it becomes monkey-religion.
Now monkey is real special.
Monkey-religion becomes mandatory for all monkeys. No other monkey-religion is allowed. No other way of life. All heretics are killed.
Now monkey got the place all to himself! But monkey get bored with that. All that killing, well that was fun for monkey.
So monkey kill everything else. Now monkey happy!
Soon, monkey all alone. Monkey wonder why? But not many monkey’s care or notice. Being a monkey is just so much fun!
Soon the End comes. Monkey bewildered. How did this happen?
Monkey frantic. Party more than before. Maybe party make monkey-madness get better!
Monkey fornicate and monkey party like mad. Real monkey madness!
Monkey go faster, faster, faster! Maybe make it all go away if monkey go fast enough!
But monkey wrong again!
But monkey still think he special! Monkey-book says so! And monkey-man in book promised!
And so it goes. Monkey keep saying he special. Monkeys are everywhere. More monkeys now then anything. There isn’t anything else, just more monkeys. Monkeys everywhere!
Then there is nothing else. But monkey really stupid. Monkey can’t count anymore. He can only count monkeys – yep, everything is still a-ok. Monkey just too stupid to know how stupid monkey really is.
Monkey soon gone.
Goodbye monkey.
Say hello to the monkey-less future.
LikeLike
Boy, I think we’ve insulted those monkeys we keep in zoos. 😯
LikeLike
I hear ya John… I have not been at peace for many decades…
WOW! That monkey business was well done Sir! Almost made me laugh cynically out loud! 😉
LikeLike
The fire burns yet
“…As an anthropologist, I am a scientist, and profess the standard commitment to search for objective truth via observation and reason; I cheerfully accept established scientific laws. Yet this commitment has often been challenged by my experiences among Native communities involving the natural world, which I am unable to explain by scientific reason. I have come to believe that such experiences point towards a different, genuinely sustainable relationship with nature. But taking account of them means listening much more carefully to other people’s world views than we have done to date.
As the world starts to feel the effects of burgeoning human populations, declining biodiversity, climate warming, sea-level rise, and severe weather events, humanity seems helpless. Our global economy is geared to endless growth, and the in-tandem consumption of resources and production of unmanageable waste. Well-meaning initiatives multiply with each passing day, but typically founder against the unthinkable prospect that we might actually change fundamental aspects of our behaviour.
Of course, our cumulative ‘Western’ knowledge, our science, indeed our technology, has produced many wonderful things, not least modern medicine. But the current organisation of our global economy, and its obsession with endless — often trivial — innovation keeps us stuck on a path that might easily lead to the demise of both our species and its habitat. Can we do no better? After 200,000 years of Homo sapiens, and less than two centuries of living in industrial states geared to exponential technological innovation, must we just shrug in the face of the inevitable? Have another martini and watch our own sunset? Or are there other models from which we might learn?…”
LikeLike
Kevin:
When it’s all said and done, we lay our claims before the Supreme Court to decide.
This is what we get:
http://planetark.org/enviro-news/item/70843
Monsanto critics denied U.S. Supreme Court hearing on seed patents
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Monsanto Co’s biotech seed patents on Monday, dealing a blow to a group of organic farmers and other activists trying to stop the biotech company from suing farmers if their fields contain a few plants containing the company’s genetically modified traits.
The Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and a group of dozens of organic and conventional family farmers, seed companies and public advocacy interests sued Monsanto in March 2011. The suit sought to prohibit the company from suing farmers whose fields became inadvertently contaminated with corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and other crops containing Monsanto’s genetic modifications.
Monsanto has genetically engineered its specialty seeds to withstand dousings of glyphosate, the main ingredient in the company’s Roundup herbicide.
The group asked Monsanto for a pledge not to sue, but the company refused, saying: “A blanket covenant not to sue any present or future member of petitioners’ organizations would enable virtually anyone to commit intentional infringement.”
The biotech crops are widely used throughout the United States. Monsanto has sued more than 100 farmers for patent infringement, winning judgments against those found to have made use of its seed without paying required royalties.
The group of Monsanto critics lost in district court and in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
“Monsanto never has and has committed it never will sue if our patented seed or traits are found in a farmer’s field as a result of inadvertent means,” said Kyle McClain, the company’s chief litigation counsel.
“The lower courts agreed there was no controversy between the parties,” McClain added, “and the Supreme Court’s decision not to review the case brings closure on this matter.”
OSGATA President Jim Gerritsen said he was disappointed in the high court’s refusal to hear the case.
“The Supreme Court failed to grasp the extreme predicament family farmers find themselves in,” said Gerritsen, a Maine organic seed farmer. “The Court of Appeals agreed our case had merit. However, … safeguards they ordered are insufficient to protect our farms and our families.”
The case is Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, et al., v. Monsanto Company, et al. Supreme Court Case No. 13-303.
_________
How are we ever going to change anything for the better, or saying it the other way:
how are we going to stop the steady decline of civilization and the biosphere from greedy, self-promoting special interests with deep pockets, BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE?
(I firmly believe it’s already WAAAAAY too late).
LikeLike
Shoot them. This is the only answer that remains.
All the pretense (and defeat) that we’re going to “stop them” in the courts or by peaceful protests is total bullshit. The evidence is “in”.
LikeLike
and, here’s more of the black road we’re examining in this post:
http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2014/01/15/u-s-spy-agency-infiltrates-personal-computers-worldwide/
U.S. Spy Agency infiltrates personal computers worldwide
January 15, 2014 – TECHNOLOGY – The U.S. National Security Agency is reported to have implanted malicious software in nearly 100,000 computers worldwide, allowing the U.S. to conduct surveillance on those machines while creating a digital highway for launching cyber attacks. The New York Times reported that the N.S.A. inserts most of the software by gaining access to computer networks, but has also increasingly made use of a secret technology that enables it to enter and alter data in computers even if they are not connected to the internet. The report, which cites N.S.A. documents, U.S. officials and computer experts, said the technology relies on a covert channel of radio waves that can be transmitted from tiny circuit boards and memory cards physically inserted into the computer. The Times also said that the N.S.A. has successfully implanted the software into such targets as Russian military networks, systems used by Mexican police and drug cartels, trade groups inside the European Union, and anti-terrorism partners such as Saudi Arabia, India and Pakistan. The newspaper claimed that there is so far no evidence the N.S.A has implanted its software or used the radio frequency technology inside the United States. The details of the N.S.A.’s surveillance efforts are part of the scores of documents leaked by former N.S.A. contractor Edward Snowden that created a firestorm of criticism. President Barack Obama will deliver a speech Friday outlining what steps he will take to reform the agency’s practices. -VOA
_________
Obama’s speech, coming on the anniversary of the famous Eisenhower military/industrial complex warning speech, should prove how Orwellian we’ve become in such a short time. He’ll say a lot of words and maybe do a little to make it look like he’s changing things, but it won’t matter – the MIC has become a force of its own and has now gone rogue. They can do whatever they want and we’re powerless to stop them.
LikeLike
So much for “green energy”. Let’s put the pedal to the metal like Thelma and Louise:
GREEN FADE-OUT: EUROPE TO DITCH CLIMATE PROTECTION GOALS
By Gregor Peter Schmitz, reposted from Spiegel Online International, Jan 15, 2014
Europe may be backing away from its ambitious climate protection goals.
The climate between Brussels and Berlin is polluted, something European Commission officials attribute, among other things, to the “reckless” way German Chancellor Angela Merkel blocked stricter exhaust emissions during her re-election campaign to placate domestic automotive manufacturers like Daimler and BMW. This kind of blatant self-interest, officials complained at the time, is poisoning the climate.
But now it seems that the climate is no longer of much importance to the European Commission, the EU’s executive branch, either. Commission sources have long been hinting that the body intends to move away from ambitious climate protection goals. On Tuesday, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported as much.
At the request of Commission President José Manuel Barroso, EU member states are no longer to receive specific guidelines for the development of renewable energy. The stated aim of increasing the share of green energy across the EU to up to 27 percent will hold. But how seriously countries tackle this project will no longer be regulated within the plan. As of 2020 at the latest — when the current commitment to further increase the share of green energy expires — climate protection in the EU will apparently be pursued on a voluntary basis.
Climate Leaders No More?
With such a policy, the European Union is seriously jeopardizing its global climate leadership role. Back in 2007, when Germany held the European Council presidency, the body decided on a climate and energy legislation package known as the “20-20-20″ targets, to be fulfilled by the year 2020. They included:
All of the goals were formulated relative to 1990 levels. And the targets could very well be met. But in the future, European climate and energy policy may be limited to just a single project: reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Commission plans also set no new binding rules for energy efficiency.
Welcome, Frackers
In addition, the authority wants to pave the way in the EU for the controversial practice of fracking, according to the daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. The report says the Commission does not intend to establish strict rules for the extraction of shale gas, but only minimum health and environmental standards. MORE
LikeLike
It is even worse! They plan to tax to Production of your own clean energy. After Spain comes Germany…now we soon will see taxation of Tiny Houses and Bikes. Then you go into jail when you make your own Food or cook at home. So go drive your Car to the next Drive In and work as a Slave to Pay maximum taxes to give the taxes the Military and Technocrats. The Industry is going wild and try to keep all the sheeps under the halluzinary mindcontrolling advertising industry.
LikeLike
Check out this new article from CommonDreams:
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/01/16
Published on Thursday, January 16, 2014 by Common Dreams
Geoengineering Global Cooling: ‘Insane, Utterly Mad and Delusional’
Al Gore sounds off on plans to seed the clouds or “suck out” bad air to reverse climate change
– Jon Queally, staff writer
LikeLike
The great siphoning financial ponzi scheme cannot serve its devotees any longer. The organization that funnels money towards the center still exists, even though the wealth and numbers of new borrowers/players at the margin are diminishing. The result is a greater and greater income disparity. On the outer rings of the ponzi, initiates are sold the dreams of great wealth and success and are tricked into the bondage of higher education debt, even though the opportunities to serve the financial masters become more limited every day. Little debt bombs are going off all over the ponzi periphery as the net energy resource and energy growth dynamic fails. Those bad loans owed to the center of the ponzi are made good by government and the Federal Reserve, for now, because they’re “too big to fail.” No politician wants to deal with an angry electorate when they lose their incomes, property and dreams, so they make a deal with the devils of Wall St. and the one percent enrichment game goes on a little longer. Those winners are little aware that the game is a lethally toxic one and that there will be no safe harbor for them in a wasted and destabilized world.
“Hey, we got rich, you can get rich too. Just keep your nose to the grindstone and paying on those loans. Your day will come.”
LikeLike
Thanks for your continued incisive comments. 💡
LikeLike
LikeLike
“There are no profits on a dead planet.”
Unfortunately, there are huge profits to be made converting a living planet into a dead planet. And most of the laws and the processes of government are geared to that end.
I see the California drought has intensified. Sadly, I believe it will only be utter catastrophe in the near future that will trigger the long-overdue paradigm shift. There certainly won’t be much ‘free trade’ if California cannot grow stuff. Of course, there could be 3 months worth of rain in February if historic climate patterns have been sufficiently messed up. That would be ‘interesting’.
From US Drought Monitor.
Despite the arrival of rain and high-elevation snow in the Northwest, drought persisted or intensified across the region. The most notable drought increases were from central California into the Pacific Northwest.
In northern portions of the region, a surge of Pacific moisture generated rain and mountain snow from the Cascades into the northern Rockies. Precipitation totals were highly variable, with 2- to 7-inch totals (liquid equivalent) in the northern Cascades contrasting with amounts generally less than 2 inches over southern portions of the range. Despite the moisture, the post-event statistics highlighted the intensifying drought in the region. The updated water-year precipitation totals stood at a meager 15 to 25 percent of normal in the Salmon Mountains of northwestern California, 25 to 55 percent in western Oregon, while northern portions of the Cascades (Washington) averaged 55 to 85 percent of normal precipitation for the water year. Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the Cascades of Oregon averaged 10 to 35 percent of normal, while the mountains of western Washington fared slightly better (30 to 60 percent of normal). Consequently, Severe Drought (D2) was expanded northward — despite the precipitation — to account for SWE rankings in the 15th percentile or lower (locally below the 5th percentile). SWE rankings in the eastern portions of Washington’s Cascades are likewise mostly in the 20th percentile or lower (locally in the lowest 5th percentile), reflecting the abnormally warm weather which has resulted in much of the precipitation falling as rain. Moderate Drought (D1) was also expanded across the Columbia River Valley in northern Oregon and central Washington due to increasing short-term dryness (water-year precipitation at 20 to 45 percent of normal) and declining soil moisture.
Farther south, a disappointing water year continued, with warm, dry weather firmly entrenched from central and southern California into the Great Basin. Most notably, Extreme Drought (D3) expanded across much of central and northern California into northwestern Nevada. Water-year precipitation in most of the D3 area was now less than 20 percent of normal, with locales from the southern San Joaquin Valley to the Pacific Coast reporting less than 10 percent of normal. Mountain snowpacks in the Sierra Nevada continued to dwindle as well, with SWE averaging between 10 and 30 percent of normal (10th percentile or lower, with many locations now in the bottom 5th percentile). Soil moisture across the northern two-thirds of California remained in very short supply, with similar moisture shortages noted in northwestern Nevada.
In the Four Corners region, changes to this week’s drought depiction were minimal. Minor increases were noted in D0 (Abnormal Dryness) across southwestern Colorado, while locally heavy precipitation (1 to 2 inches liquid equivalent, locally more) led to some D0 reduction in north-central Colorado. Otherwise the region remained mostly in a holding pattern with respect to drought intensification, with drought concerns most pronounced (water-year precipitation less than 50 percent of normal) from southeastern Arizona into central and eastern New Mexico.
LikeLike
Check out this vimeo flick about feedback loops.
Cute, but scary.
LikeLike
pfgetty: yeah, I saw that video earlier. It’s “fair” (I did’t like it), but doesn’t finish honestly – as usual. There’s always the hopium part at the end (“now’s the time to act” is long, long past) to spur people to action, I suppose. i like the straight dope – it’s fucking over and we’re living a slow motion train wreck – until it gets to your local area or impacts you directly, just ignore the steady signs coming in every day that the environment is ditching us because we chose the wrong road. That’s the real message; with the Arctic methane situation, it could just ramp up suddenly over the next bunch of years and bingo, the whole system unravels and chaos abounds.
There are so many factors influencing our dilemma – like the over 2 dozen irreversible feedback loops, Fukushima, the uptick in global volcanic and earthquake events, ominous new diseases on the rise, sinkholes, flooding, the awful HEAT in Australia indicates we here in the U.S. may have a similar spring and summer season (but no one really knows any more because the weather is now much harder to predict), then we add in all the financial problems and social dissolution to the mix (especially when food becomes scarce – as the CA drought situation deepens) and it looks like an unprecedented disaster coming right at us. There is no “solution.”
Everyone just blithely goes along like it’s always going to be okay. One day it won’t be. It’s practically guaranteed.
LikeLike
All true, and I agree. The big thing here is that this information, even with the hopium, is getting out….that global warming has the potential to destroy life on earth.
We, here, understand that we are on a suicidal course and there is not much we can do about it. But it astounds me that finally the idea that catastrophe is just decades away is being presented in many venues.
This is a huge change from a couple years ago.
LikeLike
http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/awap/temp/index.jsp?colour=colour
Tony Abbott has the answer. Burn coal to generate electricity to run cooling units. It’s all so much simpler when you are a fuckwit like him and all the other ‘leaders’ voted into power by fuckwits.
LikeLike
I’m sure the Laws of Thermodynamics mitigate against using (more) energy to solve concentrations of excess heat. But when one thinks about it, this is essentially what we do when we use energy to keep workplaces and homes within a narrow band of comfort (not the same as habitability). Like other uses of energy, the protracted slope is toward heat death. That doesn’t mean overheating. Rather, paraphrasing Wikipedia, a diminished environment having no useful thermodynamic energy that is unable to sustain processes that consume energy. It’s a relatively simple principle, but as you say, halfwits juss doan geddit.
LikeLike
I think the human population of the planet is far too large to be sustainable. The incessant pre-occupation with ‘growth’ is because the population keeps rising, so we need to keep consuming more and more resources, more land, more energy, more raw materials etc. just to stand still, let alone to have ‘progress’. An end to growth means everyone gets poorer over time and mortality rises – might be good for the planet but who’s going to vote for that? We can aim to live in a more sustainable way but I think that’s only possible with a much smaller population, both in terms of physically having the resources to survive (e.g. land and fresh water), and doing negligible harm to the natural world.
So it seems there is no easy and painless way out of this predicament, despite the laudable enthusiasm for permaculture, low impact living and so on.
LikeLike
The Cove won 2010’s Best Documentary Oscar, helped halve the number of dolphins and porpoises killed in Japan, and arguably laid the groundwork for popular SeaWorld expose Blackfish (which in a just world would be this year’s Best Doc). Now The Cove’s director, Louie Psihoyos, is back with a new film he promises is even better.
“The Cove was just a warm-up act for a much, much more ambitious project,” Psihoyos said in the Kickstarter video for the new documentary (code-named The Heist). “We’re taking on the biggest threat humanity has ever faced: mass extinction of species.”
We’re curious to see his team’s take on mass extinction — it’s not exactly the most personal or provocative topic on people’s minds (compared to, say, fracking, GMOs, the Koch brothers, school lunches, etc.). Yet in a recent interview with Ecorazzi, Psihoyos promised that the film is equal parts heart-tugging and Ocean’s 11-style spy thriller:
The film is a result of watching too many Jacques Cousteau specials and James Bond movies. The opening scene feels like a Bond opening …
We just screened a rough cut of the first 75% of the film for a big festival — I shouldn’t say which one yet, but there wasn’t a dry eye in the house. Let’s just say the ending will be spectacular, like nothing that’s ever been done before.
Exciting yet super vague! The film is currently in post-production — cross your fingers that it comes out this year.
LikeLike
It’s hard for me to know where my stuff is appearing on Facebook, but I did find this one from OccupytheBronx:
LikeLike
LikeLike
Yes, we know the problems are far worse than what anyone is telling us:
“Considerable uncertainty surrounds projections of climate change and its ecological consequences. We surveyed 2329 environmental biologists and found that greater expertise is associated with projections of greater climatic change and more severe consequences. The opinions of scientists with greater expertise converge, and they expect larger temperature increases, higher percentages of species extinctions, and a high percentage of species’ ranges will change in response to climate change over the next 100 years. Importantly, even the highest of these estimates is at the lower bounds of many published projections of climate change and threats to biodiversity. These findings suggest that experts are relatively conservative and discerning about the magnitude of climate change and its biodiversity effects, but even their conservative estimates are substantial…” – link
LikeLike
Guy McPherson speaking with Michael Mountain
LikeLike
http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/vivienne-westwood-law-ecocide-european
Vivienne Westwood is right: we need a law against ecocide
The economic and legal system rewards corporations that bulldoze, stripmine and burn. A new law against ecocide could halt this destruction
Designer Vivienne Westwood expressed anguish and alarm at the worsening state of the planet, at a press conference yesterday. “The acceleration of death and destruction is unimaginable,” she said, “and it’s happening quicker and quicker.”
Speaking in support of the European Citizens’ Initiative to End Ecocide, her words echo a growing sentiment that we have to do something. One thing we can do is to enshrine the sanctity of the biosphere in law.
That ecocide – the destruction of ecosystems – is even a concept bespeaks a momentous change in industrial civilisation’s relationship to the planet. To kill something, like Earth, presupposes that it is even alive in the first place. Today we are beginning to see the planet and all its subsystems as beings deserving of life, and no longer mere resource piles and waste dumps. As the realisation grows that we are part of an interdependent, living planet, concepts such as “rights of nature” and “law of ecocide” will become common sense.
Unfortunately, we live in an economic and legal system that contradicts that realisation. With legal impunity and at great profit, corporations bulldoze and cut, frack and drill, stripmine and burn, wreaking ecocide at every turn. It is tempting to blame corporate greed for these horrors, but what do we expect in a legal and economic system that condones and rewards them? Besides, all of us (in industrial society at least) are complicit. That’s why we need a law of ecocide: a concrete emblem of the growing consensus that this must stop.
In moral terms the matter is clear, but what about economic terms? Is ending ecocide practical? Is it affordable? The economic objection implies, “Yes, we should stop killing the planet – but not now. We have to wait till the economy improves and we can afford it.” Is this to say that we must accelerate our headlong depletion of natural capital in order that, in some mythical future, we will be rich enough to restore it? Does anyone really believe that we should preserve a living planet only if it doesn’t disrupt business-as-usual?
The unvarnished truth that environmentalists might not like to admit is that a law of ecocide would hurt the economy as we know it, which depends on an ever-growing volume of goods and services, increased consumption so demand can keep pace with rising productivity at full employment. Today, that requires stripping more and more minerals, timber, fish, oil, gas, and so on from the Earth, with the inevitable loss of habitats, species, and ultimately the health and viability of the entire biosphere.
Changing that is no trivial matter. What about the estimated 500,000 jobs to be created by the ecologically devastating Albertan tar sands exploitation? We need to change our economic system so that employment needn’t depend on participating in the conversion of nature into product. We will have to pay people to do things that do not generate goods and services as we know them today – to replant forests, for example, instead of clearcutting them; to restore wetlands instead of developing them. Every facet of modern life contributes to ecocide; we should expect, then, that every aspect of life will change in the post-ecocidal era.
It is more accurate to say that, instead of hurting the economy, a law of ecocide would transform the economy. It is part of a transition to an economy with less throwaway stuff, and more things made with great care, more bikes and fewer cars, more gardens and fewer supermarkets, more leisure and less production, more recycling and fewer landfills, more sharing and less owning.
What about the argument that if Europe criminalised ecocide, it would be put at a competitive disadvantage with countries that allow it? It is often the case that the rapid stripping of natural capital brings high short-term profits.
How can sustainably harvested lumber from one place compete with cheap, clearcut lumber from another? It can’t – unless the principle of ending ecocide is also written into international trade agreements and tariff policies. Sadly, international trade agreements under negotiation today, such as the Transpacific Trade Partnership (TPP) and Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TPIP), threaten to do the opposite: corporations could have ecocide laws invalidated as barriers to trade.
We need to reverse that trend. A European anti-ecocide law would establish a new moral and legal basis for a global consensus to end ecocide and preserve the planet for future generations. Even if the law isn’t enacted immediately, the initiative puts the idea on the radar screen. Sooner or later, such a law is coming, and far-sighted businesses that anticipate the changes it will bring will thrive in the long run, even if that requires difficult short-term transitions.
The European ecocide initiative has so far been signed by about 100,000 people – far short of the one million threshold required to compel the European Commission to consider it formally. Will future generations look back from a ruined planet and wonder why only 0.02% of Europeans exercised their democratic rights to stop ecocide? We can do better than that.
[i’m not so sure about that last statement.]
LikeLike
Would Ms. Westwood like to hear that we should outlaw “fashion?”
LikeLike
An essay worth reading here: Requiem for a Species talking about Clive Hamilton’s book:
“…In Chapter 7, Clive explains what we can expect, based on the latest projections, when runaway climate change hits us full-bore over the next few decades:
He dismisses human plans for resilience and adaptation in the face of such catastrophic (and specifically unpredictable) events, and says instead we must prepare for “a process of continuous transformation” of the way we live — societies and cultures in a constants state of rapid flux. He confesses:
It was only in September 2008, after reading a number of new books, reports and scientific papers, that I finally allowed myself to make the shift and admit that we simply are not going to act with anything like the urgency required… The climate crisis for the human species is now an existential one. On one level I felt relief: relief at finally admitting what my rational brain had been telling me; relief at no longer having to spend energy on false hopes; and relief at being able to let go of some anger at the politicians, business executives and climate sceptics who are largely responsible for delaying action against global warming until it became too late…
We [now] have no chance of preventing emissions rising well above a number of critical tipping points that will spark uncontrollable climate change. The Earth’s climate [will now] enter a chaotic era lasting thousands of years before natural processes eventually establish some sort of equilibrium. Whether human beings [will] still be a force on the planet, or even survive, is a moot point. One thing seems certain: there will be far fewer of us…”
LikeLike
Looks like ulvfugl and others who brought this up are correct, because it’s coming to light now:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/453381/Female-MP-abused-boy-in-care
Female MP abused boy in care
A FORMER female MP was involved in a paedophile network at the heart of government, police have been told. [read the details]
_________
It’s probably the same for many of the governments around the world, since these people would be easily manipulated (via threat of exposure) by the powers that be.
This, then, adds another layer of complexity to the already daunting task of wresting the levers of government from the corruption of wealthy power brokers.
Are we at “hopeless” yet? Do we have the kind of time and political will to “out” all this corruption, radically change the suicidal course we’re on with industrial civilization, change economics so that it takes into account the silent essentials provided by a (now compromised) free ecological system, shut down all the nuclear plants (and do something about the waste), get the world off fossil fuels and power down to “sustainability,” while at the same time reducing our human population to some number that would be more in line with the carrying capacity of the planet?
LikeLike
What is our moral obligation to a society that grows within the ecosystem as a cancer and creates a lethal gas chamber of waste for its offspring? What is our military protecting? The most heinous growth the world has ever hosted. What are our police protecting? The orderly functioning of a malignant growth. The primary goal of government seems to be enlarging the ponzi, both nationally and internationally, to enlarge markets to funnel wealth to those with insatiable appetites. The uncontrolled growth of the human population, their education and equipage with technology only feeds the ponzi. That they will lose all of their expansion and more, as suddenly as they have gained it, is beyond their foresight.
I wonder how Larry Ellison is enjoying living on his paradisaical island surrounded by soon-to-be dead radioactive soup. Where will the helicopters and jets fly when it’s time to get out of Dodge? Will it be chaotic like the fall of Saigon in 1975? Maybe they’ll end up on the Bush’s property in Paraguay. Trash the northern hemisphere, take the money and run to South America, New Zealand, Australia, or buy a remote island (hope it’s well above sea level.) Perhaps we should damn Nixon for opening relations with China and allowing the capitalist ponzi meisters access to a population of one billion eager for “development.” “Think of all the consumers, we’ll be RIIIIIIICH.” And what does China do but relax their one child policy to insure continued growth of their technological cancer. How many coal-fired and nuclear plants are they intending to build?
LikeLike
“The whole idea of a corporation whose goal is to exponentially grow being ‘sustainable’ is a joke. If a company supposedly cuts half their carbon, but plans on doubling their business, is that sustainable? When will people start to understand that it is the basic concept of perpetual growth that is the root cause of our future devastation as a species?” – jdyer2
LikeLike
Kevin Moore,
If you could send me the links for that paper you wrote, plus the corresponding phrases for the links, then I could convert it to a PDF file that will work for everyone.
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
It only exists as a word document at this stage.
Robert Atack has suggested updating the http://www.oilcrash.com website after giving up in 2011 (we did the 2012 update ahead of time), feeling disgust and exasperation with the apathy and ignorance of people in general and the malicious incompetence of government.
Oilcrash was one of the first in NZ (and one of the first in the world) to highlight Peak Oil and the need to prepare for its consequences, and I worked with Robert for many years from 2004, adding the urgency of dealing with Abrupt Climate Change to the discussion. And none of it made a scrap of difference to the insane trajectory of NZ society. Governments and councils carried on making practically everything worse, and the general populace continued to elect liars and idiots who voted for and orchestrated more destruction.
We have learned a lot since those early days..
I have sent Robert a suggested update for the homepage and the report to Andrew Judd (NPDC mayor), and am now waiting to see whether he can be bothered to do the update. I can understand why, if he doesn’t, having been abused for more than a decade for telling the truth, arrested for correcting lies on a political billboard etc. (I was arrested on trumped up charges by the corrupt Auckland police in 2005). So it goes on. .
I too gave up speaking to people, even though I knew I was absolutely right on practically everything, because people did not want to know. I’m known as the man who used to write letters to the editor.
That said, I carried on intermittently attacking the maniacs at the local council because the NPDC is the main driver of misinformation and absolutely awful policy around here. I have had some success insofar as the evil, mendacious, hypocrite, bully, coward and fascist Harry Duyhoven got deposed as mayor and Andrew Judd elected (as a businessman -optician- he was electable, whereas I wasn’t).
I was in the NPDC building again yesterday, to find out who is going to generate the Draft Plan for the district for 2014-15, which gets endorsed by councillors over June-July. People who have not probed the workings of local government (99.9% of the populace) have no idea how utterly incompetent senior council officers are and what an utter shambles the organisation is. The Manager of Strategy and Policy resigned 14 months ago in very strange circumstances, a few months after I had ‘barbequed’ her. She still has not been replaced. So last year’s ‘plan’ was particularly shambolic. It seem that they will get some copy-and-paste artist to generate this year’s plan.
That is why I mentioned previously that we will know by April. If the CEO and her team of incompetents and liars are allowed to generate and present the kind of garbage we have seen in previous years ‘the natural features of the district are appreciated and will be enhanced’, ‘the Perpetual Investment Fund will be restored to its original value [by making annual withdrawals from it] ‘, ‘sustainable development will create an attractive place to live and work’ etc. we will know there is absolutely no hope whatsoever and it is time to seriously think running for the hills. For councillors to vote in favour of such patent garbage is a clear indication of how incompetent or corrupt most councillor are. ;
If it were just me, I would not bother. I don’t have many years left. However, there are hundreds of millions of children around the world who are having their lives utterly wrecked by the maniacs in power and mindless bureaucrats, and NZ has its allocation. And most of the wonderful diversity of life on Earth is under existential threat by maniacs such as those at NPDC.
.
I am not at all hopeful. Every attempt to halt the juggernaut thus far has failed. However, when a large number of ordinary people discover the system is malevolent and is destroying their lives and that the people towards the top of the pyramid simply do not care, things will change.
I am hoping temperatures in Australia go a lot higher this summer, and that large numbers of houses and factories burn to the ground, followed by such severe flooding that most of the mines become inoperable. I am hoping that there is very little rain in California over the next year and that conditions become unliveable. Sadly, we need a lot of suffering now to reduce the even greater degree of suffering that will come if ‘the monster’ is able to keep functioning.
.
.
. . .
. .
LikeLike
As a young person inheriting the future, I appreciate the fact that you try hard. Thank you.
LikeLike
I’ve published that suffering was the answer too, many times. But I no longer believe that even this will create the impetus to change.
Already, we have ample evidence of widespread suffering and hardship in many regions of the globe. Entire regions are being devastated; people displaced, people are even dying. It is not changing anything.
Humanity has lost the ethic to truly “care” about what is happening. It’s been replaced for a lifestyle of convienence. And the requirement to sustain what is killing us all so that we can live day by day. The ultimate Catch-22.
There will be no “bottom up” change, nor any “top down” leadership. If either of these were true – it would have happened already. We would see real evidence, but we do not. Not anywhere. The impetus and need is there. But that is all that there is.
Need does not equate to “change”. Not anymore.
We’ve lost control (what little we ever had that is). We cannot control our civilization or even our companies. Everything is now being driven by profits. Daily existence is profit oriented. Doesn’t matter if you’re a poor fisherman in the Sudan or an oil tycoon in Texas. Anything that would threaten profits, even self-extinction, is simply not permitted to live long.
The only possible outcome now is a total collapse of the entire biosphere and of course, human civilization. This is in point of fact, the best thing that can now happen. It is the best we can hope for. Sooner the better. What will remain is unknown. But it won’t be this or anything like it, and civilization will never recover again. This is a good thing. It is as inevitable as the rising sun. It cannot be stopped, it can only be hastened.
Civilization has to collapse. This is now the only solution there is.
LikeLike
LikeLike
All people basically want the same things, like a future, air to breathe, and maybe the opportunity to raise a family in a peaceful and safe place. I don’t believe governments will give you any of these things. I wish people in america (and everyone) would get it through their thick heads that the government is NOT LISTENING to anyone incapable of donating 7 figures to it’s carefully selected group of special interest guardians. They don’t give a piss about your rights haha have you heard about the nsa?
“Well ya, but they have to follow the constitution!”
“No, they don’t. They have the patriot act, and secret courts, and secret interpretations of the law, which means that the words in any laws mean nothing, and they do as they please. They probably don’t even care if they violate your rights anyway, because THEY DO NOT ANSWER TO YOU.”
Their electorate is comprised of major corporations, bankers, and probably a few powerful people, though i doubt anyone on this side of the wall knows exactly who that electorate is. Greg Palast might have a few ideas.
None of these people in the government/major corporations/banks are in a cell, like your precious laws have stated that they should be. You must also believe you’ll change things by marching in the street with your buddies, waving signs, and screaming and singing for the fall of wall street and whatever other pipe dreams you pursue. All you’ve done is put your faces in a file, for later repression by the corporate state. Congratulations, your name is going to be put into the domestic terrorist file! 🙂
The companies of the world (at least the major ones) own everything, and buy governments to do their bidding. If they cannot buy a government, they will overthrow or destabilize it with a military or financial coup. (I’ve heard South Sudan has the some of the largest oil-rich areas in africa. There have been attempts to overthrow that government. Coincidence? Think Iraq. I know the jihadis in kenya and somalia won’t tolerate oil flowing to coastal tankers or refineries there, because they know who the oil enriches. What’s that? Civil war brewing in the west in neighboring C.A.R. too? You don’t say…) I don’t want to get involved with conspiracy theories here, but it makes sense to me that the oil companies would only go hard with native hydraulic fracking AFTER all the easy oil in the world has been consumed. But i’m just a simple-minded, semi-handicapped kid who cares for small things, and doesn’t entertain fantastic ideas of overthrowing the most powerfully anchored system of control in history.
The company IS your government. OUR government. Laws exist to enable them- no longer to regulate them. Focus your energies on something else besides attempting to change the status-quo. You just won’t win. I hate to be the dick to tell you, but the toothfairy and the easter bunny of freedom and democracy aren’t real. You might try starting your own country. Good luck, i’d love to help you with that.
I’m getting things ready for the big move. For real. FUCKIN forgot the password on my last email account. See ya guys 😉
LikeLike
My comment was not specifically directed at anyone. Just so you know. I wish everyone the best in their endeavors, whatever they may be. I just know what my monkey eyes see and my monkey ears hear. Good day.
LikeLike
LOL. Well, I’m dying to know what THE BIG MOVE is.
LikeLike
Kevin, I admire your tenacity. Trying to teach these “geniuses” anything is probably the most frustrating waste of time there is, since their paychecks depend on them “not getting it.”
i’m noticing the pace of societal implosion is picking up. This year should see more municipalities go bankrupt like Harrisburg and Detroit (not to mention the many CA places), more severe weather, a longer and more intense tornado season, massive flooding in some places and killer drought in others, while Fukushima gets ever worse.
It’s an easy call since everything is losing momentum, wobbling like a top that’s running out of energy – steadily more chaotic amid a general cyclic pattern, until it crashes suddenly. If the financial sector freezes up first, worldwide panic would ensue; if food prices skyrocket due to the failure to grow enough (already nutritionally depleted) vegetables, fruit, grains, nuts, berries and rice in too many places on Earth, widespread chaos will begin; the U.S. is in a constant state of war and every other country is on guard; diseases are mutating very quickly and are more virulent than earlier versions and novel ones are arising; decay steadily erodes bridges, roads, buildings and there’s no money for real maintenance or rebuilding; potable water is drying up and the oceans are dying from our pollution.
The environment will continue to degrade and it will become more noticeable than just the leaves lacking their storied brilliance in the fall (like 2013); the arctic ice is in a death spiral, Greenland continues to melt and the enormous Pine Island glacier just broke away from Antartica; volcanic activity is on the upswing, as are earthquakes (hell, we’re even causing our own by fracking); and more and more people will start checking out by cancer, suicide, violence, neglect, disease and abuse but the overall population will continue to climb. More people are waking up to these totally obvious conditions each year and it seems to be on a steep rise.
This might be the year that supply can’t meet demand and the economic engine sputters and chokes. It’ll all happen when the conditions are just right and then we’re off to the races as the rate of failure goes exponential. No government will be able to contain it.
LikeLike
From The Freeway Blogger:
LikeLike
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:29:00
From: Robert Costanza
To: solutions@mailman.anu.edu.au
Hi All
I thought you might be interested in a paper that I and several colleagues just published in Nature titled “Time to leave GDP behind.” The paper argues that we need new, more integrated measures of sustainable human well-being and that the stars are now aligned to allow this to finally happen.
You can view and download the paper here: http://www.nature.com/news/development-time-to-leave-gdp-behind-1.14499
(Please let me know if you have trouble accessing it.)
All the best
Bob
LikeLike
LikeLike
JR said:
:Already, we have ample evidence of widespread suffering and hardship in many regions of the globe. Entire regions are being devastated; people displaced, people are even dying. It is not changing anything.”
Most of the people who have been suffering thus far have been black or brown, living in ‘far away’ countries that a lot of people would have difficulty finding on an unlabelled map (and many would have trouble finding on a labelled map), or they have been ‘invisible people; living in squalor in ghettoes in ‘developed’ nations.
What we need is mass suffering of the top 10%: houses being burned down, yachts smashed to pieces by storms etc., not a few dozen but tens of thousands, and no insurance cover, or insurance cover that takes years to arrive. The people of Christchurch (NZ) suffered such a calamity, and waited months for those in authority to respond (that in a country noted for earthquakes, and supposedly with civil defence system in place to deal with such things, by the way) . There’s nothing like the repeated catastrophic failure of government and an uncaring attitude to turn well-trained slaves into rebels. I met a group who were protesting in the street a couple of days ago, and was told: “I have never done anything like this before.”
I guess there must be increasing numbers of Americans who are disillusioned, what with Katrina, Sandy, Irene etc. but still nowhere enough people and nowhere enough suffering, I’m afraid. A few hundred here, a few hundred there. Power off for a few days or a week and then restored. I am talking about “The Day the Earth Caught Fire’ (1962) with no water supplied to homes, and trees in municipal parks on fire because nobody has the resources to do anything about it.
That’s where we are headed anyway, it seems, so a taste of it now could cause people to start thinking a little bit about mitigation.
Okay, I’m dreaming. I’ll go back to what I have been saying for the past 5 years: They’ll just keep doing it till they can’t. .
.
LikeLike
“They’ll just keep doing it till they can’t. .”
That’s right Kevin. I think most will.
Have you ever heard the Derrick Jensen quote?
“If your experience is that your water comes from the tap and that your food comes from the grocery store, then you are going to defend to the death the system that brings those to you because your life depends on them…”
I agree with him, but I like to substitute cling instead of defend.
I do not believe we will see any significant or serious protests until food is scarce.
Xraymike79. Thank you for your quality and effort.
LikeLike
Yes, I know the Derrick Jensen quote. I learned a lot from reading and watching his stuff 5 or 6 years ago.
Cemeteries are full of dead people who defended the system that had enslaved them. I agree. Cling is a good word to describe modern consumers. Clinging to the handrails of the Titanic as it sinks, not even knowing it is sinking. .
.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Update on the Abby thing:
LikeLike
South Africa Tourism: A Catch 22
Posted on December 29, 2013 by Rhino Girl
[…]
Poaching
With South Africa being home to 83% of the world’s remaining rhinos, the country is holding all the cards when it comes to saving the rhino from extinction. There has been an escalation in poaching over recent years to the toll of 2-3 rhino being killed per day.
In 2013, although there have been 310 arrests, how many are actually convicted? The justice system seems inadequate in handing down speedy or consistent sentences. Those who are sentenced, are often released with a minimal fine, only to go out and poach again.
Granted, poaching is a multi-faceted issue which needs to be combated through combined routes of education, economy, and the justice system. But time is not on the rhinos side.
With the lack of action, and decrease of wildlife, some in the tourism industry are fearful of negative repercussions.
While that is true, it is a catch 22. No one will pay for wildlife safaris to see grass and trees. Tourism is the jewel of South Africa’s economy. If the tourism industry is to survive, then so must the rhinos, elephants, and lions.
LikeLike
14 minutes into this video (if you can stand it). One man with a gun: 38 rhino, 27 leopards, 15 bears and 120 tigers.
Regarding international tourism: one of the most destructive per capita activities known to man, arguably only surpassed by warfare. How come ‘nobody’ wants war and ‘everybody’ wants tourism?
LikeLike
You’re hoping that people would finally smarten up and realize that their demands are driving everything (the wrong way). Not going to happen. It wouldn’t change anything if 100,000,000 million “woke up” and stopped doing everything. Stopped driving. Stopped shopping. Stopped buying food at the grocery store. Such a “slowdown” would barely be noticed and would be insignificant.
Even if the top 40% of the world’s top earners started to “really suffer”, nothing would change. It’s too late. Far, far too late. Humans can’t replace what is already extinct, or burned up, or consumed or replace all the ice, restore the normal hydrological cycle or actually, solve anything. We can’t even control our populations or our consumption.
With virtually ALL the low-hanging resource fruit now long gone – and never to return – it’s clear that we cannot fix any of what we’ve done. We’ve devoured the world – there is simply no other way to explain what has happened.
The world of yesteryear will simply never, ever come back in all of what remains of human history (a time period of extremely short duration, perhaps 100 years now before we too go extinct).
All that remains now is all that there ever will be, and it is being consumed faster then ever. Even if a billion people stopped – it would not change anything.
The only solution is the total and complete catabolic collapse and massive die off (of 99% of all humans) on an unprecedented scale. All of ‘civilization’ has to end. Sooner the better.
So yeah, we’re both dreaming… I know it, you know it, anybody that is truly honest about the situation knows it.
The only thing I can think of to do is to enjoy what’s left, while everyone still can. There won’t be any survivors to “care” about “what we did”.
All that matters from a moral standpoint is what we do right now (even if we fail). And what needs to be done isn’t even legal to talk about. So in point of fact, everybody is really just spinning their wheels, trying to adjust to what it means to self-extinguish because we don’t have the courage to do the right thing.
This final generation is cowardly. It’s too bad, because what we really need right now is courage, but it is simply not there.
LikeLike
Yeah, but we get TECHNO UTOPIA, why are you such a wimp, complaining when science and technology bring you such a wonderful life ?
http://arstechnica.com/security/2013/08/holy-sht-smart-toilet-hack-attack/
LikeLike
LikeLike
J.R. sez: With virtually ALL the low-hanging resource fruit now long gone – and never to return – it’s clear that we cannot fix any of what we’ve done. We’ve devoured the world – there is simply no other way to explain what has happened.
The world of yesteryear will simply never, ever come back in all of what remains of human history (a time period of extremely short duration, perhaps 100 years now before we too go extinct).
All that remains now is all that there ever will be, and it is being consumed faster then ever. Even if a billion people stopped – it would not change anything.
I dunno about NEVER, EVER … but certainly within any meaningful human timeframe (as you say). As if human extinction (as part of the 6th major planetary extinction) isn’t bad enough, I just heard Guy McPherson say in one of his presentations (via YouTube) that a possibility exists that methane release could potentially transform the Earth’s atmosphere into one substantially like that of Venus, meaning that even in 50 millions years, there would be no ecological bounce back. That time span is far too great for me to contemplate meaningfully, but it’s another horrible possibility that would undoubtedly manifest long after we’re gone.
When I first read your comment, I thought yours was about the blackest truth-telling I’ve read, blacker even than my own or Ulvfugl’s. I do appreciate that you’ve got one thing right: we humans have devoured virtually everything. One of the frequent commentators here keeps saying we’re a cancer, but I’ve always thought we’re more like locusts. Both metaphors work, but one speaks more plainly to me than the other.
LikeLike
I was going to talk to a dog trainer but realized that NTHE would not need any instruction on how to bite Homo sapiens in the Ass.
Got to go. My mortality is being stretched on the Rack & I need to tighten the ropes.
LikeLike
Don’t underestimate the rising community of sufferers.
China’s smog now 20 times worse than safe levels
LikeLike
Damn, someone always puts all the blame on China for burning the coal, when much of that coal is burned to make consumer products that americans are dying to go out and buy.
LikeLike
I mean the person in the video, not you Tom
LikeLike
For anyone wanting interesting, valuable stories delivered to your email, I suggest subscribing(free) to this daily report:
LikeLike
Interesting comment to a great post on Scribbler’s site:
LikeLike
Nice xraymike, I visit that site often to see if there’s anything I’ve missed and I was going to post the global billion dollar storms chart. There’s so much degradation (in variety and severity) going on all over the place that it’s often hard to keep up. Fukushima, like the BP Gulf of Mexico disaster, hasn’t been “fixed” (because it’s impossible) and occurrences like them are becoming almost commonplace while the natural ones like volcanoes and earthquakes are on the rise too.
Here’s one that’s really strange and isn’t even on Earth:
http://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2014/01/17/has-the-sun-gone-to-sleep-strange-solar-behavior-baffles-astrophysicists/
Has the Sun gone to sleep? Strange solar behavior baffles astrophysicists
Posted on January 17, 2014
January 17, 2014 – UNIVERSE – Scientists are saying that the Sun is in a phase of “solar lull” – meaning that it has fallen asleep – and it is baffling them. History suggests that periods of unusual “solar lull” coincide with bitterly cold winters. Rebecca Morelle reports for BBC Newsnight on the effect this inactivity could have on our current climate, and what the implications might be for global warming.
[includes 6.5 min. BBC produced video]
LikeLike
Suffering in many counties in the U.S. as poverty grinds away:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/367903/white-ghetto-kevin-d-williamson
January 9, 2014 4:00 AM
The White Ghetto
In Appalachia the country is beautiful and the society is broken.
(quote from the well-written article)
“Well, you try paying that much for a case of pop,” says the irritated proprietor of a nearby café, who is curt with whoever is on the other end of the telephone but greets customers with the perfect manners that small-town restaurateurs reliably develop. I don’t think much of that overheard remark at the time, but it turns out that the local economy runs on black-market soda the way Baghdad ran on contraband crude during the days of sanctions.
It works like this: Once a month, the debit-card accounts of those receiving what we still call food stamps are credited with a few hundred dollars — about $500 for a family of four, on average — which are immediately converted into a unit of exchange, in this case cases of soda. On the day when accounts are credited, local establishments accepting EBT cards — and all across the Big White Ghetto, “We Accept Food Stamps” is the new E pluribus unum – are swamped with locals using their public benefits to buy cases and cases — reports put the number at 30 to 40 cases for some buyers — of soda. Those cases of soda then either go on to another retailer, who buys them at 50 cents on the dollar, in effect laundering those $500 in monthly benefits into $250 in cash — a considerably worse rate than your typical organized-crime money launderer offers — or else they go into the local black-market economy, where they can be used as currency in such ventures as the dealing of unauthorized prescription painkillers — by “pillbillies,” as they are known at the sympathetic establishments in Florida that do so much business with Kentucky and West Virginia that the relevant interstate bus service is nicknamed the “OxyContin Express.” A woman who is intimately familiar with the local drug economy suggests that the exchange rate between sexual favors and cases of pop — some dealers will accept either — is about 1:1, meaning that the value of a woman in the local prescription-drug economy is about $12.99 at Walmart prices.
(lots more)
LikeLike
(lots more) and all of it is bullshit written by a complete asshole.
LikeLike
I guess I need to take a closer look at his essays.
LikeLike
I have not read any of his other essays. I got pissed off at the way he judges and uses these people to make a political point. People abuse social programs, therefore social programs are bad. I have spent plenty of time trying to help addicted and homeless people and it can be very frustrating at times. I see very few overcome. I do not claim know how to solve all social ills, but over the years I have come to the conclusion that most people born into poverty will remain there.
Seems like there is more and more research that shows the same thing.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201209/the-myth-social-mobility-and-the-self-made-man-in-america
LikeLike
I’ll repeat something I’ve posted before: focusing on those who game social programs while ignoring financial crime and government corruption is like complaining that someone is pulling your hair while ignoring someone else sawing off your legs with a chainsaw. The righteous indignation we feel when someone at the bottom gets something for nothing is all out of proportion to how we should feel when someone at the top gets everything.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Pingback: Černá cesta technologií | Puntíčkovaní chrobáci
A huge intellectual battle is in its closing stages. The Internationalists believe that the world will be safe once regional differences are removed and mankind can act as a single, benevolent entity. The ecologists and fellow travellers believe that humans are natural phenomena who can only be safe if there are sufficient differences and diversity in the world to provide stability.
The Internationalists are winning. They are romping home. They have played some trump cards. For instance on the economic front they claim that the world is so large and diverse that there is no threat to mankind from industrial activity because nature will always compensate. On the social front they claim that the world is so large and diverse that there will always be ethnic, cultural and political diversity so people and goods should be free to move anywhere. Natural diversity, including social, politcial and economic diversity will simply happen, it does not need protecting.
These arguments are palpable nonsense because much of the world is already agri-desert and wherever you go in the world you tend to see the same concrete buildings and three lane highways. Nature is already largely destroyed and mankind is rapidly becoming uniform. So how did the internationalists win the argument?
They used paradoxical debate. They accused the ecological movement of internationalism and the libertarians of racism when it was the Internationalists who wanted globalization and an end to human diversity (races). And they rammed these arguments home. They were helped by the fact that globalizing capitalists and post-modern/post-Marxist journalists have the same agenda: Internationalism. An idiot agenda because its terminal point would be global government and tyranny for a millennium.
LikeLike
Sounds spooky. How would that work exactly? America is the richest and most powerful nation in the world, yet their government barely functions. And that’s a mere 5% of the global population. I think the opposite will happen. The stock market will crash, banks will fail and countries will start to split up into smaller entities. Walls will go up. Think of the New Dawn party in Greece.
LikeLike