Tags
"Renewable" Energies, 6th Mass Extinction, Abrupt Climate Change, Alternative Energy, Antarctic Ice Melt, Climate Change Denial, Climate Tipping Points, David Buckel, Donald Trump, Douglas Theobald, Ecocide, Food Shocks, Fossil Fuel Industry, Greenland Ice Sheet Melt, Lee Kump, Loss of Biodiversity, Micro-Plastic Pollution, Nate Hagens, Omnicide, Overpopulation, Permian-Triassic Mass Extinction, Runaway Climate Change, The Anthropocene Age, The Great Dying
“My early death by fossil fuel reflects what we are doing to ourselves.”
~ David Buckel
Today’s global consumption of fossil fuels now stands at roughly five times what it was in the 1950s, and one-and-half times that of the 1980s when the science of global warming had already been confirmed and accepted by governments with the implication that there was an urgent need to act. Tomes of scientific studies have been logged in the last several decades documenting the deteriorating biospheric health, yet nothing substantive has been done to curtail it. More CO2 has been emitted since the inception of the UN Climate Change Convention in 1992 than in all previous human history. CO2 emissions are 55% higher today than in 1990. Despite 20 international conferences on fossil fuel use reduction and an international treaty that entered into force in 1994, manmade greenhouse gases have risen inexorably. If it has not dawned on you by now, our economic and political systems are ill-equipped to deal with this existential threat. Existing international agreements are toothless because they have no verification or enforcement and do not require anything remotely close to what is needed to avoid catastrophe. The 20 warmest years on record have been in the past 22 years, with the top four in the past four years, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Ice loss from Antarctica has sextupled since the 1970s and Greenland’s pace of ice loss has increased fourfold since 2003. The Arctic ocean has lost 95% of its old ice and total volume of ice in September, the lowest ice month of the year, has declined by 78% between 1979 and 2012. With grim implications for the future, Earth’s air conditioner —the cryosphere— is melting away.
An article from a few months ago lays bare the reality that throughout the past two hundred years and with recent “alternative” or “renewable” energy sources, humans have only added to the total energy they consume without ever having displaced the old, polluting ones. An alternative energy outlook report by Wood Mackenzie foresees that even in a carbon-constrained future, fossil fuels would still make up 77% of global energy consumption in 2040. The world economy remains hopelessly tethered to fossil fuels. We are kidding ourselves if we think there will be any sort of orderly transition to sustainability with which modern civilization appears to be wholly incompatible. We are, as Nate Hagens says, energy blind.
Modern civilization has become so intertwined with petroleum-based products that their remnants are now found in our excrement. It seems no living thing can escape microplastics, not even the eggs of remote Arctic birds. This should come as no surprise if you look at the scale of the problem. Plastic production has grown from 2 million metric tons in 1950 to roughly 400 million metric tons today(more than 99% of plastics made today are with fossil fuels and only a tiny fraction of it recycled). There are five massive oceanic gyres filled with pelagic plastics, chemical sludge and other human detritus; one of the these gyres, named the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, is three times the size of France and growing exponentially. The health and environmental effects are grim; organized society may not even be around to examine the long-term effects of these persistent synthetic materials:
“Health problems associated with plastics throughout the lifecycle includes numerous forms of cancers, diabetes, several organ malfunctions, impact on eyes, skin and other sensory organs, birth defects” and many other impacts, said David Azoulay, a report author and managing attorney at the Center for International Environmental Law…”And those are only the human health costs, they do not mention impacts on climate, impacts on fisheries or farmland productivity.”
Making things more efficient and convenient has its limits, but humans keep trying to beat the consequences of Earth’s dwindling natural resources while ignoring the environmental costs. Jevons paradox be damned! To make matters worse, the fossil fuel industry has employed a well-financed and highly effective global disinformation campaign to confuse and sow doubt in the public mind about the reality of climate change. And to top it all off, we have a leader who reinforces the ignorance of climate change deniers:
It’s a cruel irony that this President’s emergency declaration for building a border wall comes at a time when migration from Latin America is near a 40-year low and the majority of those now seeking asylum are families fleeing climate change-related disasters. This President and the craven politicians who line up behind him are an abomination! At a time when compassion, cooperation, and scientific reasoning are needed to deal with the multiple crises we face, politicians are instead conjuring up xenophobia, racism, and conspiracy theories. As inequality grows and the once-stable climate continues to unravel, expect the super-rich to barricade themselves behind heavily fortified mansions while treating climate refugees and the most vulnerable among us with extreme prejudice. A new study shows increasingly severe weather events are fueling the number of ‘food shocks’ around the world and jeopardizing global security:
These “food shocks” —or, sudden losses to food production— are hitting local communities hard, in addition to impacting the global economy, with long-term implications. “Critically, shock frequency has increased through time on land and sea at a global scale,” the study notes. “Geopolitical and extreme-weather events were the main shock drivers identified, but with considerable differences across sectors.”
Douglas Theobald, in his study at Brandeis University, calculated that there is less than a 1 in 102,860 chance that all life did not arise from a common ancestor. In other words, humans are related to all life on Earth and share much of their DNA with other organisms. Despite earning the title of ‘superpredator‘, humans are dependent on intact and functioning ecosystems. Our chances for long-term survival are ultimately tied to the health of the planet, yet we are carrying out ecocide on a planetary scale. Being a mere 0.01% of all life on Earth, humans have managed to destroy 50% of wild animals in just the last fifty years and 83% since the dawn of civilization around 3,000 B.C.. Who knows how many plant species have gone extinct:
Hawaii is losing plant species at the rate of one per year, when it should be roughly one every 10,000 years. “We have a term called ‘plant-blindness’… People simply don’t see them; they view greenery as an indistinguishable mass, rather than as thousands of genetically separate and fragile individuals…”
The bedrock of our food, clean water and energy is biodiversity, but its loss now rivals the impacts of climate change. Without biodiversity, our food sources, both plants and animals, will succumb to diseases. Microbes and hundreds of different life forms interact to make soils fertile. Without them, soils will be barren and unable to support life. Monocultures can only be held together through artificial means(fossil fuels, inorganic fertilizer and toxic pesticides) and are highly vulnerable to diseases, yet industrial monoculture farming continues to dominate the globe. Most Worrisome are the recent studies indicating that biodiversity loss raises the risk of ‘extinction cascades’. Insect numbers, the base of the terrestrial food chain, are in steep decline and starfish, a common keystone species in coastal ecosystems, are facing extinction due to some sort of wasting disease likely caused by climate change:
“Many of these outbreaks are heat sensitive. In the lab, sea stars got sick sooner and died faster in warmer water… A warming ocean could increase the impact of infectious diseases like this one…We could be watching the extinction of what was a common species just 5 years ago.”
And here is Professor Stephen Williams discussing the recent mass death of Australia’s flying fox bats in which 30,000 —a third of their remaining population— died in a single extreme heat wave:
“A lot of tropical species are much closer to the edge of the tolerances, so they very much are the ‘canary in the coalmine’ for the world in what’s going to start happening with climate change…The fact that we’re now seeing things endangered occur in places that you would’ve thought to be pretty secure, that’s the scary bit…I suspect the next wave of extinctions is going to be mostly due to extreme events — extreme climate events like heatwaves.”
These disturbing headlines indicate to me that the Sixth Mass Extinction is gathering pace and the real stock market underlying our very existence and survival is crashing before our eyes!!! Four of the last five mass extinction events were preceded by a disruption of the carbon cycle. When renowned paleoclimatologist Lee Kump was asked whether comparisons to today’s global warming and that of past mass extinctions are really appropriate, he ominously said, “Well, the rate at which we’re injecting CO2 into the atmosphere today, according to our best estimates, is ten times faster than it was during the End-Permian. And rates matter. So today we’re creating a very difficult environment for life to adapt, and we’re imposing that change maybe ten times faster than the worst events in Earth’s history.” Humans are recreating the past extinction known as The Great Dying at a much faster pace and at many more human-forced levels that leave no ecosystem on Earth intact.
By orders of magnitude, the human endeavor has grown much too large for the Earth to support; climate change, plastic pollution, and biodiversity loss are just a few of the symptoms of this global ecological overshoot. The people who have studied this problem for years and from every angle have come to the same conclusion —technology simply won’t save us, but that won’t stop humans from experimenting. By far the most effective way to reduce future emissions and resource consumption is to reduce human birth rates, yet the global population is still increasing at about 90 million people per year despite the geographic shift in fertility rates.
Humans recognized decades ago the threats they are now facing, yet nothing was done due to political inaction and industry malfeasance which continues to this very day. The scientists who wrote The Limits to Growth decades ago were expecting our political institutions to take action back in the 1970s, but they were met with ridicule and now we stand at the doorstep of modern civilization’s collapse. Political inaction and regulatory capture by the fossil fuel industry appear to be intractable barriers that have condemned the human race to a hellish future. Anyone waiting for some sort of seminal climate change event that is going to galvanize the world’s leaders into action will be tragically disappointed. If seeing the world’s coral reefs dying, its glaciers disappearing, permafrost melting, and the steady uptick in extreme weather and wildfire events does not spur them to action, it is much too late to hope that any single event will ever do so. The time to act would have been before we were seeing all these environmental degradations and tipping points, not afterward. There is no way to put the CO2 genie back in the bottle. The Earth cannot even begin to reach a new climate state until humans stop emitting the roughly 40 to 50 gigatonnes of CO2 per annum and stop altering and destroying global ecosystems. This fact is our daily nightmare.
A myth that many uninformed people hold is that biospheric health will quickly bounce back after we humans get our act together. Nothing could be further from the truth. Much of the damage we are already seeing is irreversible on human time scales. Positive feedbacks were already occurring at less than 1°C of warming. Many carbon sinks are on the verge of becoming or have already become carbon sources. As we race toward a nightmarish future with no realistic way to stop, we leave behind a “forever legacy” that will haunt mankind for the rest of eternity.
I thought that everyone knew that once any waste from fossil fuel burning leaves an exhaust,it disappears with no after effects,just like one’s garbage does,once it ‘s placed in a waste container.
Any chemicals that are used in agriculture are naturally eliminated before the next
heavy rain & never enter the food harvest or the environment.
It’s so hard to edumacate the igerrant.;-)
LikeLike
And food comes from grocery stores.
LikeLike
but do not forget to praise the yeast superiority 🙂
LikeLike
Join the Rebellion… https://xrebellion.org/xr-us/get-involved
LikeLike
Pingback: The Inconvenient Truth of Modern Civilization’s Inevitable Collapse | Collapse of Industrial Civiliz ation – Enjeux énergies et environnement
As excellent as your summary of the current situation is, you could add many paragraphs to it. The fossil fuel powered human colossus is changing all aspects of the earth system. It is awesome and terrifying to contemplate.
LikeLike
Excellent, pithy summary – really well-stated and on target.
One man’s cause-suicide, and a nice polite “rebellion” action do nothing, however, against the overmassive, ever-growing process of the destruction of human and animal life.
The corruption and willing criminal predation of our fossil fuel industrialization reaches every institutional corner – judges, faithiests, academic solons, writers, Big Green, tech companies, every last inch of our known world.
Surely someone here will try to rally around some form of hopium…
LikeLike
Excellent post, excellent blog.
I’d just like to underline some critical terms that don’t get enough coverage:
(1) runaway feedback loops:
To call them “tipping points,” as so many do, is a pathetic misuse of language. We need stronger terms. “Tipping” sounds like fairies en pointe wearing tutus. “Runaway” at least has the robust virtue of making it clear that these reciprocal processes have become irreversible. We have lost control. It’s out of our hands. And as Mike points out, next to nothing is being done to prepare for the Age of Consequences.
(2) exponential increase:
If something is increasing exponentially, it tells us that we’re in “runaway” territory. The trends are self-amplifying. All those “hockey stick” charts? Take a good look. They mean something, and it’s not pretty.
(3) double-bind:
As Mike says, the consequences of our actions are “baked in.” Even if we quit all fossil fuel use today, the civilization will still collapse and the Great Extinction will proceed apace. But if we do not quit fossil-fuel use, and continue with “business as usual,” the civilization will still collapse anyway and the Great Extinction will proceed apace.
What we need is a clear-eyed courage to meet the storms ahead. We do not need hope-filled fantasies that blind us to the bitter realities and truths. Still less do we need “giving up in despair,” which seems to be all some people can imagine when they begin to comprehend how serious things are.
These are some reasons why I value this blog.
Thanks, x-raymike79!
LikeLike
Absolutely second what you write – “tipping points” is Gladwellian euphemism.
“Point of no return” seems too scary for most folks who do not want to be accused of being nihilists.
LikeLike
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your excellent post. I have been following your blog for years now and I am always amazed how accurately you describe the current state of affairs. Congratulations, It is a pleasure to know that there are people out there who understand and try to warn us about the future.
However, things are much, much worse than just the climate change. We a facing a plethora of crises. In my humble opinion the human race is about to go extinct and there are more reasons than the climate change.
a) Human genome degradation. We managed to escape high child death numbers, which were essential to keeping our species healthy, now this is going to play a very bad trick on us, our genome is rapidly accumulating nefastus mutations, it is just a matter of 2-3 generations before our children won’t be even able to survive without medical treatment right from the moment when they are born. For a large number it is happening already right now.
b) Physical degradation. The use of abundant fossil fuels and electricity resulted in mass obesity and physical degradation. We are much weaker physically than the generations before us.
c) Mental degradation. We just do not realise how fast computer technologies are killing our ability to think. There are multiple research showing that we are losing our cognitive abilities at an alarming rate.
d) Wealth disparity and societal degradation. This is completely unsustainable to have billionaires. In social aspect of our existence we witness involution and degradation of our social institutes.
e) Technological stagnation. Since the invention of nuclear power there have been no major technological breakthroughs in the energy sector. We could not even invent a compact and efficient energy storage device, until today petroleum remains the highest density energy storage available on mass scale.
I can go on and on, uncovering a plethora of crisis in nearly every aspect of human existence, like food quality degradation, a sharp rise of degenerative diseases, biosphere degradation and so on and so forth. Climate is just one aspect of the whole picture.
Conclusions: human race is involuting, we just having hard time admitting it. The imminent demise of our industrial civilisation and human extinction is a logical conclusion to our species’ characteristics: greed, egoism, aggression, etc. A species with such qualities cannot survive at the long run, especially if it learns a pretty damn simple way to produce energy from a primitive chemical reaction. We are a monkey with a hand grenade (our primitive technology). Besides we are only marginally intelligent, 90% of humans just copy each other and practically do not use their brains in their everyday lives. Hence there is absolutely nothing wrong in our species going extinct, as this is the law of evolution, which weeds out the unfit. I am sure that a couple of millions years after we go extinct the Evolution will produce a better, more intelligent species. The planet will recover from us and produce new lifeforms. Hence there is no need in worrying that we are going to go extinct, we deserve it. Life on this planet will continue after we are gone, it is exactly as the case of dinosaurs, they weren’t fir for the environment and got wiped out. Now it is now turn and we should understand and take it with dignity. There is absolutely no point in saving our species, not from the Evolution’s point of view. It knows better.
LikeLike
I revised my essay slightly. We’re replicating The Great Dying.
LikeLike
I see, Mike. Yes, our species is dying and taking the entire planet with it. I think we are not just replicating the Great Dying, we will take it to a new level.
LikeLike
Hi Mike, I took the liberty of translating the article into Russian. Here’s the Russian pingback: https://www.aum.news/nauka/6203-neudobnaya-pravda-o-gryaduschem-kollapse-sovremennoy-civilizacii link to your blog provided at the end of the article.
LikeLike
Thanks!. Looks good.
LikeLike
*$$$ Our Stolen History $$$
In geological time, Gaia is entering menopause. It spins slower, It’s getting wider around the middle, tilting and wobbling a bit, rebounding up at the poles, low on magnetic charm, drying up in the mainlands, being gouged on the coasts, and popping out in volcanoes while having severe hot flashes. Imagine a falling droplet of water pulsating and you’ll get the picture. Having slept with a menopausal woman, I can tell you our rest is in trouble.
I remember when laptops didn’t bend. We have a fridge made in 1946, it still works. Maybe always has.
The billionaires stole the missing pentagon trillions for several post-collapse billionaire bunkers underground worldwide.
You will never see the 1%’s bunkers on a video screen, but not even the pentagon can spend that much on child porn.
Banks stole public credit 100 years ago to fight a war on the unwhite.
After the civil war, the railroad barons got rich shipping oil.
The banks got super rich off railroads and oil.
The banks formed a cartel in 1913 and privatized public credit.
The banks funded WW1 and got rich investing in transport and arms.
The banks crashed 1929.
The banks funded WW2 to beat communism and depression.
Propaganda is 100 years old. So is feminism and socialism.
It takes 50 years to complete new energy and social systems worldwide without $ incentive.
Everybody is unequal due to race sex nature and nurture, that is why we must tax the rich to help the poor.
The top 20% produce 70% of emissions.
We have 10 years to reduce emissions 50% or earth dies.
100 year old fantasies will not do this.
Banks are real, 100 year old fantasies are not.
Video phones won’t be around forever. We have to prepare.
Unhiding money is a social multiplier of goals. Make money private and public with nowhere to hide.
The only way to survive is to tax the rich and start a universal 100% private basic carbon income with 0% for corporations, NGOs and governments phased in over 10 years worldwide.
Emissions have gone up 60% since corporations, NGOs and governments started fixing the climate.
We can rule ourselves with private money and public regulation. It values policy over greed.
The current public/private banking partnership is inimical to life on earth,
This partnership is based on killing the unwhite for oil.
Oddly enough, I only have to take on corporations, NGOs and governments to do it.
It’s easier than you think. We don’t need them to do it.
The rest is history.
☆☆☆
LikeLike
*Social Media = Mass Extinction*
Indoor CO2 is 1,000 ppm in schools and reduces cognition 15%.
Video screen time causes myopia.
Wifi and cell radiation cause diabetes and mental illness as testified in Congress.
Social media causes chronic, acute addiction to extreme ideology.
Social unrest will peak 2025.
Mountain View California group-think is driving technical talent away.
The PFAS in drinking water will make most males sterile by 2060.
The food we eat is destroying the neural and biome networks in our stomachs.
Species feminization by endocrine disruptors affects all vertebrates.
China is now buying up chip manufacturers and biotechs.
China has 80% of the hi-tech mineral mines on earth.
The massive US military has internal security corruption issues.
All of the above are pre-collapse items.
Collapse is a tipping point.
All tipping points cannot be stopped or reversed once they start.
This is true for social, financial, ecological, planetary collapse.
Financial collapse will trigger social collapse, and vice-versa.
5 of 13 major climate tipping points start between 1.5-2.0 C.
Social collapse will trigger climate collapse by preventing mitigation.
Social collapse will trigger runaway mass extinction collapse by preventing mitigation.
Runaway climate change and runaway extinction cannot be stopped or reversed once started.
Tweet storm doxxing and deplatforming will not save anything.
*Unfinished Business* https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/2018/12/29/unfinished-business/
*The Vomitorium* https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMBRo_pT8k6JXI0kWPgGEdg/discussion
*The Dumpster* https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/
☆☆☆
LikeLike
*Shooting Dickless Blanks* PSA
PFAS = male infertility + smaller penis size
http://www.michiganradio.org/post/pfas-chemicals-can-potentially-cause-male-infertility-and-smaller-penis-size
PFAS = Most western men will be infertile by 2060
https://www.indy100.com/article/men-infertile-2060-science-us-europe-australia-new-zealand-8025861
PFAS = Forever Chemicals in Drinking Water
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/02/epa-blasted-failing-set-drinking-water-limits-forever-chemicals
The IEA says oil demand will rise 7 million barrels/day in 7 years.
We have to reduce emissions 50% in 10 years for 1.5 C.
We have to reduce emissions 100% in 20 years for 2.0 C.
Fracking methane emissions are under-reported by a factor of 4.
Runaway hothouse earth starts between 1.5 – 2.0 C.
Runaway mass extinction is imminent.
Both runaway hothouse and runaway mass extinction cannot be stopped or reversed once started.
Earth’s Oceans Lost In Space – Nature Communications 2016
https://www.natureasia.com/en/research/highlight/10512
Greenhouse Gases Boil Oceans Away – Motherboard 2016
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/53dgmx/greenhouse-gases-could-eventually-heat-the-planet-enough-to-boil-the-oceans-away
Planets with too much carbon dioxide could lose oceans to space – New Scientist 2016
https://www.natureasia.com/en/research/highlight/10512
Stephen Hawking, All of Earth’s oceans boil away into nothing – Inverse 2017
https://www.inverse.com/article/33729-stephen-hawking-trump-climate-change-venus-syndromemaller penis size
http://www.michiganradio.org/post/
*Unfinished Business* https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/2018/12/29/unfinished-business/
*The Vomitorium* https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMBRo_pT8k6JXI0kWPgGEdg/discussion
*The Dumpster* https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/
*The Anti-dote*
Charlie Parr, Scrapyard Bus Stop https://youtu.be/Kuc1R_TVCSI
Charlie Parr, Hobo https://youtu.be/LpCWj4VbqE8
LikeLike
These lists of calamities leave out the growing desecration of landscapes and oceans by “clean energy” projects that can never achieve the scale to replace fossil fuels (even if they could replicate without them). Nor will people tolerate such blight for much longer.
In other words, the biggest efforts to “save the planet” (rather, save civilization) are just adding new layers to ecocide, and the perpetrators can only cry “NIMBY!”.
https://www.google.com/search?q=blight+for+naught
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great work. Notice how overwhelming it is to big picture the collapse. It’s like, Where do I begin?
LikeLike
Thanks mike. Expertly done as per usual.
What’s left to say?
LikeLike
♪♫♬ “There’s the stillness of death on a deathly unliving sea,
and the motor car magical world long since ceased to be,…” ♪♫♬
Never knew Jethro Tull was a realist. 🙂
LikeLike
Thanks for posting Earth/Tree battery story Ape. All the best anyway.
Male Infertility + Male Feminization = 5G + Petrochemicals
Socialist vs. capitalist is 100 years. The rich 80 yo liberals and conservatives are stuck in a time warp. Now we have the extinction rebellion vs. yellow vests proving you can’t pay carbon taxes on the backs of the poor. Rich liberals say everybody is equal because they don’t want to pay taxes. If we tax the rich, it won’t matter if you’re liberal or conservative. The rich put out 80% of carbon dioxide emissions. The only way to unite America is to make sure those taxes are 100% private worldwide. America should cut its military for health and education, but the world needs a universal basic carbon income to destroy energy demand, or earth dies. Energy demand and all things evil come from the rich. Three and half billion people fly each year, that’s half of earth’s population.
Euro/American males will be infertile by 2060. Africa/Asia are like 5 billion people. China is building 700 coal plants in Africa/Asia. Our clothes and products are covered with non-stick, stain-free, water- and fire-proof chemicals. These chemicals, along with pharma waste, are feminizing all the vertebrate animals on earth. This includes frogs birds fish and mammals. Euro/American males are becoming feminized and infertile, and the world’s young African/Asian males want to be like us. The only way to show the world we mean business is to make carbon taxes 100% private. Both rich liberals and conservatives hate 100% private carbon taxes.
Rich liberals and conservatives work within corporations, NGOs and governments. Corporations, NGOs and governments have been ‘solving’ climate change for 30 years in which time emissions went up 60%. After 30 years of trying, solar/wind is 3% of total world energy demand. We can’t build enough batteries to sustain our lifestyle. Rich conservatives want our money for war, and rich liberals want to get rich off climate change. That’s what all this bullshit is about, money, and nothing else.
There are over 100 peer reviewed studies since 1979 saying wifi = male infertility.
Petrochemicals off our plastic products and drinking water are feminizing and infertilizing the world.
All the world’s energy and population growth is in Asia/Africa.
If America got all its electric power from renewables by 2050, it wouldn’t matter because electricity is only 33% of its total energy demand. Humanity must reduce emissions 100% in 20 years or face mass extinction. Our whole hi-tech fantasy world is based on 3% energy demand growth, which has to go up 10% in 10 years, or there will be another financial crisis.
Euro/Americans are only 1 billion people, Asia/Africans are like 5 billion.
Nobody in Asia/Africa cares about windmills in rinky dink Denmark.
Europe gets 50% of its renewable electricity from burning trees.
Eight percent of Europe’s diesel fuel includes palm oil.
China is building massive infrastructure to Asia/Africa/Europe and 400 nuclear plants at home.
China pours more cement in 10 years than America ever poured in its own history.
China has built 30 billion miles of high-speed train track in the last 10 years.
China cut solar panel production in half.
China needs oil to make 5G AI IOT WIFI work.
All these devices are made of plastic and metal.
America has one last chance to show the world it’s great.
If you want to know why 5G = Death:
*Cross Species Male Feminization And Infertility*
135 peer-reviewed scientific studies & reports showing effects of EMF exposures on male fertility (1972-2012)
http://www.emfresearch.com/emfs-male-fertility/
PFAS = male infertility + smaller penises
http://www.michiganradio.org/post/pfas-chemicals-can-potentially-cause-male-infertility-and-smaller-penis-size
PFAS = Most western men will be infertile by 2060
https://www.indy100.com/article/men-infertile-2060-science-us-europe-australia-new-zealand-8025861
PFAS = Forever Chemicals in Drinking Water
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/02/epa-blasted-failing-set-drinking-water-limits-forever-chemicals
Dental flossing and other behaviors linked with higher levels of PFAS in the body
https://silentspring.org/research-update/dental-flossing-and-other-behaviors-linked-higher-levels-pfas-body
PFAS in Drinking Water: Hazardous at Ever-Lower Levels
https://www.ewg.org/news-and-analysis/2019/02/pfas-drinking-water-hazardous-ever-lower-levels
PFAS: Insights from Past Actions to Inform Today’s Decisions
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41370-018-0113-2
China will become the dominant user of petrochemicals.
I don’t believe PFAS, pesticide, herbicide and pharmacide regulation is high on China’s list of priorities. Only by taxing the rich we can prevent psychotic behavior.
Do you know that 3.5 billion people fly each year? That’s half the people on earth. Corporations NGOs and governments have been fighting climate change for 30 years, and emissions went up 60% in 30 years. Socialism and capitalism have been at odds for 100 years. It will take 50 years for socialism to spread worldwide if we don’t shut down tax havens for the rich. You can’t put the cart before the horse.
**Male Feminization Affects All Vertebrates:**
This next link is important because species feminization has been found in even remote wilderness areas. There’s also a link about how pesticides can make humans depressed and males infertile.
This all happened because academia sold out to big business 100 years ago. Be sure to check out the Academic Fraud section. You heard of fake news, will wait til you hear about fake science.
https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/2018/12/29/unfinished-business/
**The Revengey Part**
Our recycling program is revealed for the fraud it is. All our plastic is spreading throughout the food chain. I’ve even heard said there’s micro-plastics lodged in our brains.
Most Euro/American men will be sterile by 2050. Euro/Americans are more feminized than Africa and Asia. We are dulled depressed and sickened by our own air water and food.
There are maybe a billion Euro/Americans, so maybe 5 billion African/Asians. They are more young virile and male due to limited multiple exposures so far. China is building massive infrastructure to serve these markets, and those young billions will not be socialist during the boom phase.
We can’t flood the world with sex robots and drones. We are not going to live on Mars and big fast EVs won’t change anything. After 30 years of trying, solar and wind are only 3% of the world’s total energy use.
We have to destroy 50% of energy demand within 10 years. When people say we got 10 years to fix the climate, it doesn’t mean we got until the last day of the 9th year. We have to destroy 100% of fossil energy demand in 20 years or WW2 will be a footnote in history.
It is not only PFAS feminizing species, it’s the combination of petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and wifi in the air water food.
Every toy drone is made of plastic and trace metals. Every fitbit is killing the earth. Urban classrooms can be 1,000 ppm CO2 and filled with off gassing PFAS that are also found in drinking water. Herbicides rot your gut and pesticides make males infertile and mentally ill. Dow Chemical gave us this with their non-stick, stain-free, fire-proof, waterproof clothes and furniture because cigarettes kept burning down houses back in the day when everyone smoked.
Video time turns kids myopic, rewires their brain and causes them to become addicted to ideological fantasies. The pollution in urban air is like smoking a pack of cigarettes a day, and makes us stupider. Urban classroom air at 1,000 ppm CO2 makes kids 15% stupider. Kids drink juice and water are filled with toxic metals, which make them stupider. Imagine how smart our kids would be without all this. Of course if affects poor blacks more than rich whites, but that’s not what matters anymore, because its spreading to the rest of the world, and they’re all the same race.
Wifi is a brand new experiment the human race can’t give up. The 5G rollout will be like sticking our testicles and heads in a microwave.
5G IOT AI WIFI is why China is buying up oil, so instead of burning oil in cars, we can now turn oil into ipads and phones. Petrochemical demand is growing 7X faster than population growth.
By assigning fake safe limits to everything we’ve ignored how much of everything there is everywhere, and their cumulative power over our evolutionary destiny. We can’t escape our race sex class or even geography, but we can tax the rich without the government. Here’s how…
I am a delusional optimist because I believe 100% private carbon taxes on the rich can fix avarice. By taxing the rich we can sublimate deep state surveillance/targeting AI into a universal basic income worldwide. Taxing the rich with 100% private carbon taxes means 100% of it goes back to the poor, no middle man.
We have the computing power to keep track of every dollar on earth. This means we can eliminate tax havens, if we transition from oil security dollars to a world basic income. World socialism will take decades, we can tax greed in just a few years.
I am not educated, so if you are, then spread this topic, and don’t expect any success, but lots of blowback. I know because denial is something I’m good at.
*Ecological Policy Failure = Humanity’s Greatest Mistake*
https://lokisrevengeblog.wordpress.com/2019/03/04/ecological-policy-failure-humanitys-greatest-mistake/
I saved the scariest for last
Thiamine deficiency is affecting life at the top of the seafood chain including seabirds etc., and scientists don’t know which pollutants are the cause, which also means there are other likely causes.
Researchers also flagged increasing evidence of thiamine deficiencies in a range of taxonomic groups and in ocean waters as a possible driver of wildlife declines. This is especially worrisome how it affects plankton. We can’t figure out if its pollutants or climate change or both.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6196476/
LikeLike
“In today’s Chronicle of the Collapse, I read an article by Xraymike79 titled “The Inconvenient Truth of Modern Civilization’s Inevitable Collapse.”
LikeLike
Should I call him up? I used to live in Austin back in my military days. Loved the city back then, but I’ve heard it has grown by leaps and bounds and likely has lost its charm.
LikeLike
Hey Mike, Sam ‘Hambone’ Mitchell emailed me hoping I had a way to contact you directly. The best I could do was suggest he PM you on Reddit.
Here is Hambone’s email.
collapsechronicles@gmail.com
…………………..
Ian Anderson, the musical genius behind Jethro Tull, wrote many collapse themed songs back in the 1970’s, most of which saw no main stream radio play.
Here’s one about runaway overpopulation that did get significant radio play.
LikeLike
““My generation and my parents’ generation are those responsible for most of what great-grandchildren will be inheriting, and a lot of it is going to be pretty ugly,” [Ian] Anderson tells Newsweek. “Those who are climate change deniers, like your president [Trump], are unfortunately in a position to continue to do a lot of bad.”
LikeLike
” The world economy remains hopelessly tethered to fossil fuels. We are kidding ourselves if we think there will be any sort of orderly transition to sustainability with which modern civilization appears to be wholly incompatible.”
“ The level of fossil fuel consumption globally is now roughly five times higher than in the 1950s, and one-and-half times higher than in the 1980s, when the science of global warming was confirmed and governments accepted the need to act on it. This is a central feature of the “great acceleration” of human impacts on the natural world. . . .
CO2 emissions are 55% higher today than in 1990. Despite 20 international conferences on fossil fuel use reduction and an international treaty that entered into force in 1994, man made greenhouse gases have risen inexorably.”
Click to access pirani-helsinki-wern2018-paper.pdf
LikeLike
Well done once again XrayMike.
LikeLike
With a gold chain…

LikeLike
David Buckel was not mentally ill.

LikeLike
Pingback: The Week in Doom February 26, 2019 | Doomstead Diner
Informative post here on the not-so-green “New Green Deal”:
https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/01/17/that-green-growth-at-the-heart-of-the-green-new-deal-its-malignant/
…Under the Green New Deal vision, investment in renewable energy and infrastructure production would be the mechanism for revving up the economy. But whatever shape it takes, this new New Deal would be born into a very different world from that of its predecessor—a world that can’t handle a big economic stimulus. If we are to avoid climate catastrophe, we have to simultaneously bring an end to fossil-fuel burning and develop vast renewable energy capacity, both starting right now and both on a crash schedule. That means the everyday economy must find a way to run on much less available energy.
Analyses purporting to demonstrate otherwise—claiming that current and growing energy demand can be met by 100% renewable generation—rely on overly optimistic technical and environmental assumptions, and on the assumption that today’s huge disparities in energy consumption among and within countries will remain in place.
Research based on more realistic assumptions shows that neither the United States nor the world can satisfy 100% of current, let alone projected, energy consumption only with renewable sources. And there’s no way that even a more modest but still adequate introduction of renewable energy could be achieved within a decade or even two.
Quickly phasing out fossil fuels at a time when renewable sources have not yet been phased in, affluent nations and communities in particular will have to shrink their total energy consumption dramatically while shelling out billions to help fund renewable energy in poor nations.
The Green New Dealers nevertheless are holding out the promise of prosperity and sustainability through growth. Without asking where the energy to fuel that growth will come from, they predict that with heavy investment in renewable infrastructure, the U.S. economy will expand rapidly so that lower-income households can look forward to more, better jobs and rising incomes.
Unlike the World War II stimulus, this new green stimulus will not be accompanied by any planned allocation of resources or limits on production and consumption in the private sector. But that is what’s needed. Given the necessity for an immediate, steep decline in greenhouse emissions and material throughput, such planning and limits are needed even more now than they were during World War II.
In the 1930s, the U.S. and world economies were vastly smaller than they are today, and greenhouse emissions were far lower. Earthlings, all but a tiny handful, were blissfully unaware that continued fossil-fueled growth would one day become a mortal threat to civilization….As far as I know, no one complained at the time about the 65 percent increase in fossil energy consumption that occurred between 1935 and 1945 thanks to the growing economy. Even if there had been prophetic scientists within the growing federal bureaucracy of the 1930s sounding the alarm on future global warming, that carbon would have had to be spent anyway in order to stop the march of fascism…
LikeLike
‘we have to simultaneous bring an end to fossil fuel burning and develop vast
renewable energy capacity…..’
This link has been posted before. Note that to replace all fossil fuel, the numbers
of the construction required need to be multiplied by 2.4.
How exactly is all that construction done,( note also that the energy and material
requirements for all the energy storage and dissipation equipment have to be
added to the link above as well) ,and keep this civilisation functioning in the many
decades required,without using fossil fuels ? Supply constraints for the mineral
requirements alone,even without considering energy, mean that this is just another
techno-optimist delusion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_mile_of_oil
And all of that infrastructure has to be replaced about every 30 to 50 years.
Good essay again. Mike.
LikeLike
You already know this, but some great quotes from Immoderate Greatness: Why Civilizations Fail, by William Ophuls:
“Civilization is trapped in a thermodynamic vicious circle from which escape is well nigh impossible. The greater a civilization becomes, the more the citizens produce and consume—but the more they produce and consume, the larger the increase in entropy. The longer economic development continues, the more depletion, decay, degradation, and disorder accumulate in the system as a whole, even if it brings a host of short-term benefits. Depending on a variety of factors—the quantity and quality of available resources, the degree of technological and managerial skill, and so forth—the process can continue for some time but not indefinitely. At some point, just as in the ecological realm, a civilization exhausts its thermodynamic “credit” and begins to implode.”
—————————————————————————
“When coal is burned to produce electricity, only about 35 percent of the energy in the coal is converted into electrical energy. The rest becomes waste heat, various gases (such as carbon dioxide), various chemicals (such as sulfuric acid), particulates, and ash. And even the electricity dissipates into the environment as waste heat once it had done its work. From the physicist’s point of view, the books are balanced—there is just as much matter and energy in the overall system as before—but what remains is significantly lower in quality. The upshot is that for every unit of good that man creates using this particular technology, he manufactures two units of bad and even the good is ephemeral.”
———————————————————————————-
“…technological improvements actually increase thermodynamic costs. Take the substitution of the automobile for the horse. To make a horse requires a modest investment in pasture, water, and fodder for he two to three years it takes from conception until the horse can work. But to make a car requires not only many direct inputs—steel, copper fuel, water, chemicals, and so forth—but also many indirect ones such as a factory and labor force as well as the matter and energy needed to sustain them. To use a technical term, the “embodied energy” in the car is many times that in the horse. In addition, the thermodynamic cost of operating the car is greater. A horse needs only a modicum of hay, water and oats procured locally without to much difficulty. But the auto requires oil wells, refineries, tankers, gasoline stations, mechanics shops, and so on—that is, a myriad of direct inputs that are difficult and expensive to procure, as well as a host of indirect costs. So the substitution of auto for horse may have brought many advantages, but at a heavy thermodynamic price.”
Nothing lasts forever, but humankind would do well to find a way to extend the ride. To do so would require a herculean exercise in self-control and sacrifice for long-term gain and good —not a natural proclivity of humans. Barring some technological miracle, there is little reason for optimism.
LikeLike
Thanks for the Ophuls quotes,Mike. They should be read and reread by those who fail to see the difference between the renewable energy systems of the Human
societies which have endured for >50.000 years ,and the ‘Renewable ‘ energy systems being promoted as the saviour for this civilisation. The societies which have endured have relied on solar energy capturers which are self-replicating and do not require mining and manufacturing by humans for their existence.
I doubt if your last sentence is correct. Even if we had a ‘technological miracle’
(by that I assume you mean fusion energy on Earth becoming the energy source)
the other systemic flaws of this civilisation would still mean that it would not last
beyond the end of this century at the latest,and then with a greatly reduced population. You no doubt understand why I say that,so I won’t elaborate further.
LikeLike
Yes, it was intended to be a facetious statement. We might as well wish for intervention from benevolent extraterrestrials.
LikeLike
Estimates of mineral quantities required for energy storage:
http://energyskeptic.com/2019/utility-scale-energy-storage-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-make-renewables-possible/
LikeLike
“…Under the Green New Deal vision, investment in renewable energy and infrastructure production would be the mechanism for revving up the economy….”
Even if it was mathematically possible to replace fossil fuels with machines built BY fossil fuels, the Green New Deal would be a raw deal for what’s left of open space, birds, bats and rural nights unfettered by noise and red lights.
Good writeups: https://www.google.com/search?q=robert+bryce+green+new+deal
The GND looks like a futile attempt to train inner city toughs to climb wind turbines and spread mechanical graffiti across the countryside, just as they’ve done on city bridges with spray-paint. I see it as grimly ironic. Being green is also the furthest thing from a potentially reformed drug dealer’s mind, except for dollar-green (like Big Wind chasing subsidies).
Who in their right mind thinks we can “save the planet” by industrializing its last scenic places? That includes offshore wind, as well. The minimum setback in that case is about 30 miles (26 nautical miles) at today’s turbine heights, and it may never be pragmatic. Look into Ocean City MD’s efforts to save their coastal views.
https://www.google.com/search?q=windschmerz
LikeLike
You left out the gorilla in the room, phytoplankton, half gone in my lifetime because of PCB laced Marine microplastic. It is the beginning of the food chain, sequesters CO2 and converts it to most of our oxygen. One billion people rely on our dying oceans. I believe hunger is the greatest motivator of mankind and the starving, migrating, seems will finish us.
LikeLike
Yes, I’m aware of the dramatic drop in Diatoms or Phytoplankton, the base of the aquatic food chain and ultimately all life on Earth. Their shrinking numbers are attributed also to warming and acidifying oceans. There were a couple studies from last year that shed more light on this:
Ocean acidification could hit the base of the marine food chain
…In a study published Wednesday in the journal Nature, scientists collected a species of diatom from the ocean and exposed it to increased seawater acidity — akin to the projected ocean acidity levels by the end of the century. They found that more acidic waters hindered diatoms from getting the nutrition they need, specifically iron, for their numbers to grow.
And if diatom populations were to plummet, there would be global implications beyond the sea.
Diatoms float near the ocean’s sunlit surface, and they suck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and then use this carbon as a key nutrient. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the ocean absorbs 30 percent of the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and much of this is consumed by hungry, surface-dwelling diatoms.
The diatoms take in the carbon, but release oxygen — so much so that “Diatoms supply the oxygen in every fourth breath you take,” according to NOAA. Eventually these heavy diatoms sink to the ocean floor, where they naturally “sequester” this carbon far from the atmosphere.
If diatom numbers fall, so might the ocean’s natural ability to gulp carbon dioxide, a potent and long-lived greenhouse gas, out of the air. This could speed up global warming…
…According to the researchers, due to ocean acidification, the carbonate near the ocean’s surface — where most of the acidification is taking place — will decline by nearly 50 percent during this century.
So, although much more research is needed to build upon this initial study, this could spell doom for diatoms in vast swathes of the ocean, particularly seas in the Southern Ocean around Antarctica that are already iron-deficient.
Falling diatom populations can stoke a vicious “feedback loop,” wherein there’s fewer diatoms to suck carbon out of the air and eventually sequester it near the ocean floor. Accordingly, there will be more carbon dioxide left in the atmosphere, further acidifying the oceans and making it more difficult for diatom populations to grow…
Also…
Building blocks of ocean food web in rapid decline as plankton productivity plunges
…Pepin says over the past three to four years, scientists have seen a persistent drop in phytoplankton and zooplankton in waters off Newfoundland and Labrador.
“Based on the measurements that we’ve been taking in this region, we’ve seen pretty close to 50 per cent decline in the overall biomass of zooplankton,” said Pepin. “So that’s pretty dramatic.”
Scientists say local testing reveals half the amount of plankton in a square metre of water today. It’s not just a problem here, declining plankton numbers are a global phenomenon.
It’s a difficult idea to convey to the average person who might not understand the ocean ecosystem, but Pepin likens it to walking into a grocery store and instead of seeing the shelves full, they’re only half-full…
…”When it persists — for in our case now for three or four years — in the back of my mind, at the very least, little alarm bells start going off because it means that something fundamental may have changed in the food web.”…
Newfoundland and Labrador is already 1.5°C warmer than the historical average.
LikeLike
Good article here. Some technological hopium of his own,near the end.
One quibble : He refers to fossil fuels as being ‘produced’. A more accurate term is ‘
‘extracted’.
http://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2019/03/06/the-green-deal-is-hopium/
LikeLike
To express our predicament as simply as I can, it is this:
…Between the proverbial rock and a hard place.
LikeLike
I had previously commented that I thought that the process of human extinction would take decades. (Starting from the first mega famine.) At that time I was unaware of the role played by sulfates in the environment that are released by burning coal. Now my expectations are that humans will become extinct much faster than I previously thought. That is actually good news.
There will be less time to suffer.
LikeLike
Two good things happened this week.
Earlier in the week I thought to tap in “survival acres” after what could be years or year,and lo it was there, Jonathan as angry as ever.
And then today “x-raymike79” appeared, at un-denial, under the article hambone had been reading. And so I tapped… collapse of…
And now this moment of grateful.
May there be lots more of that.
LikeLike
According to the UN, we only had 10 years to fix climate change in 1989. After 1999 it was out of human control.
https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
LikeLike
I’ve been hoping to help speed the Clever Ape to his end, just so I can ask: How’s one’s political, cultural, religious, societal, economic theologies working out?
Now of course everyone’s right/wrong value system makes them immune to all consequences of theirs & others’ actions & in-actions.
The simple answer to: What can we do? DIE!
“The roof! The roof! The roof is on fire!”
…….
Good to see recent comments.
LikeLike
The herd mentality is taking us over the cliff as we speak. TR, tell us more about you. Where are you located? What’s your occupation?
LikeLike
70 years old.Married. I wear the pants in my family. She tells me which pair to wear.
Tried on three pair this morning before she was happy!
Lived in Georgia all my life. Worked in other Southern states. Grew up with outhouses, carrying water from a well, single light bulb hanging in the center of the ceiling with pull chain, hog killings in the front yard, damn fine natural gardens. Moved to Oregon 10 years ago, had enough of Southern Redneck White Trash. One should not talk about their extended family.
Worked for myself in construction, contracting for others.
My sweet spot was building my personal residences, waiting to sell & rebuild to avoid
capital gains & other taxes involved with income. Building for one’s self is a pleasure that not many can & won’t experience.
Pretty much been an independent cuss since I was 21. Been called a SOB, that’s Sweet Old Boy until one gets to know me. 😉
Read too much mythology & philosophy before I realized I could have wasted my time
just wasting time.
One thing that I have is the ability to tell my ego to sit down & STFU, it minds very well.
There are so many brilliant sayings.
Eagles -“Already Gone” lyric:
“So often times it happens that we live our lives in chains & we never even know we have the key.”
LikeLike
If anyone has any questions,I’ll be glad to ask the voices in my head. They keep telling me they know it all. 😉
LikeLike
This might be of interest. I am almost certain that this is written by Paul Ehrlich,as
he started,and continues his work ,on the MAHB site.
https://mahb.stanford.edu/library-item/35755/
LikeLike
Sorry. The MAHB article was written by Ester Phillips. The Guardian ant article was
written by Ian Sample.
LikeLike
Again,for those that are unlearnable.;-)
With much age comes much wisdom.
Just realized everyone is as dumb as I am.
On the IQ scale,the highest number for the Clever Ape is -4.
Being able to edit comments would be nice for those of us that can’t proofread our prior comments.
LikeLike
“And one day when the oil barons have all dripped dry
And the nights are seen to draw colder”
LikeLike
Tad Patzek :
http://patzek-lifeitself.blogspot.com/2018/12/a-requiem-for-beautiful-earth.html
LikeLike
>1°C global warming was too much:
The first temperature increase limit proposed by scientists was by the 1989 UNEP Advisory Group.
• Greater than 1.0°C above pre-industrial levels “may elicit rapid, unpredictable and non-linear responses that could lead to extensive ecosystem damage”.
• 2ºC increase was determined to be “an upper limit beyond which the risks of grave damage to ecosystems, and of non-linear responses, are expected to increase rapidly”.
This was published in 1990 as an international assessment Targets and Indicators published by the Stockholm Environmental Institute, edited by F. Rijsberman and R. Stewart.
The targets were chosen to protect vulnerable ecosystems. Two temperature increase limits were given. 1C was (and is) the limit to avoid loss of global ecosystems like coral reefs and the planets last remaining great forests. It is clear today 1C is very high risk. 2C was cited as an extreme limit with the risks of grave damage to ecosystems and all non linear responses expected to increase rapidly.
They knew: https://www.climateliabilitynews.org/2019/03/18/national-petroleum-council-climate-change/
LikeLike
Pingback: The Inconvenient Truth of Modern Civilization’s Inevitable Collapse | syndax vuzz
Excellent summary, thanks for writing this up.
Small nitpick in the first paragraph: “More CO2 has been emitted since the inception of the UN Climate Change Convention in 1992 than in all of human history.” should be something like “than in all previous human history”
I agree that it’s too late to stave off collapse, but I do think action is still worthwhile, since it can ameliorate the extent of ecological damage left behind by industrialism, how much biodiversity is left, and thus how quickly life recovers. I’m part of Stop Fossil Fuels, researching and disseminating information on effective strategies and tactics for shutting down the flows—which would go a long ways towards limiting the destruction.
LikeLike
I agree with your edit and have made the correction. Some people found this fact about or CO2 emissions hard to believe, so I listed my proof here:
Also, I agree with the second half of your comment. It will never be “too late” to mitigate future damage.
LikeLike
From your homepage:
‘the sooner we put on the brakes, the gentler the transition’
If we stop using fossil fuels now, over five billion people would be dead within months.
There would be no ‘gentle transition’. If you are interested in reality, put that fact on your home page. Whichever way we go, stopping fossil fuels now, or continuing their use, there will be a die-off.
LikeLike
Hi David,
A couple things you’re misreading / assuming differently than I:
1) The site says “gentler“, which unfortunately doesn’t necessarily mean “gentle.” We’ve collectively screwed ourselves pretty badly, so from here forward it’s a matter of limiting the pain for ourselves, for non-industrial humans, and for other species. We can still influence just how bad it gets.
2) Stopping fossil fuels is not an all-or-nothing choice. There’s no reason to (and little value in) jumping to the extreme of “stop using fossil fuels now” and consequent die-off of billions within months.
Did you disagree with any of the text within that section:?
Human population is already in overshoot, and growing. Meanwhile, our impact on global ecology decreases world carrying capacity every day. A crash is inevitable. The sooner we put on the brakes, the gentler the transition.
We’re carrying out an experiment in madness. It would be great if everyone in the world came to our senses: aggressive, proactive, unanimous reduction of consumption and population—a managed crash—might just stave off disaster for ecological and human communities. But that’s not the path we’re choosing. Far from competing to most quickly reduce their annual income to a globally sustainable level, the vast majority of humans, understandably, compete for larger slices of the pie which they hope will keep growing. Far from each family contemplating a sustainable global carrying capacity and charting a path to match it, humans are behaving, naturally, like every other species, reproducing to match their current food supply.
Every day, a net 227,000 new humans join the global population. At the same time, fossl fuels undermine the planet’s ability to support even those already here. Industrial development, manufacturing, transportation, farming, fishing, and logging erode topsoil, destabilize the climate, toxify the environment, and collapse populations of fish and wildlife. The sooner we stop fossil fuels, the less we’ll overshoot, thus the less wrenching will be our adjustment.
LikeLike
I found this on the ‘damn the matrix’ site.
‘As one can clearly see,if humans want to continue living,they have no choice but to reduce fossil and all other energy use and bring it down to zero very quickly’
One minor problem. If we reduce fossil and all other energy use to zero very quickly,
we will reduce the population of humans to zero very quickly.
LikeLike
“I think there’s something morally naive about living in a reference frame where one species takes itself as absolute and devalues everything else as secondary,” he said.”
The voices in my head tell me I’m exceptional! 😉
https://www.greeleytribune.com/news/local/professor-on-earth-day-its-a-mistake-to-downplay-effects-of-population/
LikeLike
All anyone needs to know in about 35 seconds.
LikeLike
Pingback: Is Modern Civilization Immoral? – The New Empire
Pingback: The Year in Doom 2019 | Doomstead Diner
Pingback: Una verdad incómoda sobre el colapso industrial – Sylvia García