Tags
Addiction to Fossil Fuels, Albert Einstein, Anthropogenic Climate Disruption (ACD), Capitalism, Climate Change, Consumerism, Corporate State, E.M. Forster: “THE MACHINE STOPS”, Environmental Collapse, Extinction of Man, Ferengi of Star Trek, Inverted Totalitarianism, Joseph Tainter, Kevin Lister's The Vortex of Violence and why we are losing the battle against climate change, Military Industrial Complex, Nuclear Proliferation, Peak Oil, Resource Wars, Rudolph Herzog, Social Unrest, Thermonuclear War, War for Profit, War Profiteers
“Cannot you see, cannot all you lecturers see, that it is we that are dying, and that down here the only thing that really lives is the Machine? We created the Machine, to do our will, but we cannot make it do our will now. It has robbed us of the sense of space and of the sense of touch, it has blurred every human relation and narrowed down love to a carnal act, it has paralyzed our bodies and our wills, and now it compels us to worship it. The Machine develops – but not on our lives. The Machine proceeds – but not to our goal. We only exist as the blood corpuscles that course through its arteries, and if it could work without us, it would let us die.”
~ E.M. Forster, “THE MACHINE STOPS”
Insects, birds, mammals, and fish have all been migrating to cooler zones for the past four decades in response to the cataclysmic climate disruption ignited by industrial civilization, but humans are the only organisms inhabiting this blue orb we call Earth who are not altering their behavior. They live within an energy cocoon that keeps them cool in the summer, warm in the winter, stuffed with massed produced food from mechanized factory farms, and entertained by a virtual world of digital imagery. As cracks and holes in the Earth’s biosphere grow ever larger, the natural response of capitalist carbon man ensconced within his protective energy shell is to try to put a price tag on what is being burned, i.e. fossil fuels, rather than deal with the deeper root cause of an unsustainable economic system and way of life which demands such exorbitant consumption of resources.
Our energy slaves feed us and control the climate for us while at the same time destroying the natural world that had enabled humans to create such an artificial environment. Detached from nature and enslaved by our own technological creations, we sleepwalk over the cliff of extinction. Our so-called progress will, in the end, disappear like a mirage in the scorching desert sun as nature is sacrificed to the machine of industrial civilization.
Throwing money into the maw of the ‘free market’ is the predictable modus operandi of technocapitalism’s indoctrinated disciples who believe such offerings will create a technofix, miraculously healing the planet. In the Star Trek TV series, the Ferengi were an extraterrestrial race whose culture was characterized by “a mercantile obsession with profit and trade, and their constant efforts to swindle unwary customers into unfair deals.” Just like the Ferengi species where profit is the first, last and only important factor, the high temples of private enterprise are commodifying and monetizing the atmosphere just as they have everything else in nature. The colonization of the public mind by capitalism is complete and overriding. We ignore unfolding geologic forces and instead put our faith in manmade market forces to our detriment.
In the final days of capitalist industrial civilization, the relentless and compulsive pursuit of profit and growth has subsumed any intelligent and realistic plans for survival. In fact, with the race amongst nations for nuclear technology and sophisticated weaponry, the requisite competitive economy to support such hi-tech militaries nullifies any attempts at reducing greenhouse emissions and pushes the world towards nuclear annihilation. As Kevin Lister, author of the forthcoming book The Vortex of Violence and why we are losing the battle against climate change, points out:
…The fundamental dilemma all nuclear weapons states face is that to maintain a credible nuclear force, be it a force of one or one thousand nuclear warheads on deployment, a massive military industrial complex must be maintained. As well as building the actual nuclear weapon systems, it must also provide the conventional defence screen consisting of fighter jets, patrols planes, anti-submarine warfare technology etc. In an ultimate irony, the purpose of these becomes to defend the nuclear forces to ensure a second strike can be launched rather than to defend people, because there is no defence against a determined nuclear attack. The military industrial complex that delivers this equipment must be continually fed with new streams of contracts at increasing values otherwise the industrial complex collapses. Thus a key objective in the initial gate document which justified to parliament the early procurement of material for Trident was that, “We must retain the capability to design, build and support nuclear submarines and meet the commitment for a successor to the Vanguard Class submarines.” In other words, we build Tridents to continue building Tridents.
The enormous cost of this needs to be covered by taxes, and for this some £500 billion of additional excess economic activity is needed which requires energy from fossil fuels and is the antithesis of making the urgent cut backs we need to tackle the soaring greenhouse gas overburden. Thus once the decision is made to proceed with Trident, it becomes impossible to make the climate change agreements to save the planet. In this context Trident is more dangerous than we ever first thought and it is the ultimate Faustian bargain.
Your commissioners have also failed to acknowledge in their report that the public spending that will be needed on Trident must be made at the same times as scarce public funds must be diverted to building a low carbon economy and mitigating the effects of climate change such as flooding and storm damage. This conflict will arise as tax receipts simultaneously drop through energy price rises.
The impossibility of meeting these conflicting challenges is the reason that much of the negotiations at climate change conferences takes place around the positions of the nuclear weapons states and their need to maintain large military industrial complexes and competitive and expanding economies to fund these…
…to build at huge expense a nuclear force whilst the nation is effectively bankrupt that will never provide secure protection from nuclear attack and merely encourage our competitors to reciprocate. It drives a race to the bottom where rational decisions on climate change can never be taken.
This nexus between global capitalism, the lucrative military-industrial complex, and the strategy of nuclear deterrence has locked the nations of the world into a trajectory of escalating anthropogenic climate disruption, environmental degradation and an ongoing arms race since World War II. Illustrative of this are the energy consumption levels of the U.S. DoD and war profiteering motives of defense contractors:
…The US military is the largest single consumer of energy in the world. If it were a country, the Department of Defense (DoD) would rank 34th in the world in average daily oil use, coming in just behind Iraq and just ahead of Sweden…
…Electricity usage by the military, which accounts for even more greenhouse gas emissions, is also gargantuan. In FY 2006, the DoD used almost 30,000 gigawatt hours of electricity at a cost of almost $2.2 billion. The DoD’s electricity use would supply enough electricity to power more than 2.6 million average American homes.
In fiscal year 2012, the DoD consumed about a billion gigawatt hours of site delivered energy at a cost of 20.4 billion dollars. While consuming that amount of energy, DoD emitted 70 million metric tons of CO2. And yet, total DoD energy use and costs are even higher simply because the energy use and costs arising from the contractors to support military operations both domestically and abroad are not included in DoD’s data…
…The increased propensity for war and conflict brought about by global warming is being exploited by the military-industrial complex which is planning on how to profit from it. Defense contractors are looking at climate change as a growth and profit opportunity due to the potential conflicts produced by food and water shortages. They are salivating over the potential profits to be made leading to increased stock market performance and, therefore, higher CEO compensation.
Defense contractors are setting their sights on a narrow-minded militarist approach. Indeed, the very companies most responsible for climate change are set to make a killing from its intensification. – link
Only one civilization in history has voluntarily uncomplicated/decomplexitized its society in the face of resource scarcity. According to Joseph Tainter, that civilization was the Byzantine Empire:
“After the Byzantine empire lost most of its territory to the Arabs, they simplified their entire society. Cities mostly disappeared, literacy and numeracy declined, their economy became less monetised, and they switched from professional army to peasant militia.”
As commenter James wryly puts it:
…Because the human ape is such a competitive and vicious sort, there must be a constant “progress” in technology and development to prevent being eaten by or dominated by another nation. Evolution writ large. Without a doubt it will end soon and nothing shall remain but the Ozymandian technological skeletons of times gone by…
Yes, where is the evolution? Teeming within the capitalist industrial civilization that is M.A.D. are 7+ billion naked apes, the most dangerous creature to ever walk the face of the Earth capable of wiping itself out within mere minutes from thermonuclear war, if anthropogenic climate disruption, ocean acidification, and global nuclear reactor meltdowns don’t do the trick.
As a warming planet cooks our brains and scrambles our environment, the trigger finger of some mentally ill and agitated soul may just belong to someone sitting at the launch button of a nuke. As Albert Einstein said, ‘I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.’
Full video here: http://www.c-span.org/video/?312985-1/book-discussion-short-history-nuclear-folly
You might enjoy this one (or may have already seen it)
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/11/13-0
LikeLike
Ahh yes, and the first comment to that article sums it up:
“I think the proof of our declining intelligence can be marked by the recent mass production of nuclear and biological weapons, genetically-engineered foods and persistent organic pollutants that ignore the realities of human error and all work their relentless way through the food chain back to our brains.”
LikeLike
Crabtree, the author of the study says, “our society is robust almost entirely by virtue of education, which allow strengths to be rapidly distributed to all members.”
I think it would be more accurate to say
“our society is robust almost entirely by virtue of FOSSIL CARBON, which allow strengths to be rapidly distributed to all members.”
You could even go further and say it’s agriculture to some degree. As long as a person could preform one useful role to their society, (baker, farmer, priest, etc) their overall intelligence or lack of it was a non factor to their basic survival.
Take away or even greatly reduce our use of fossil carbon and you will see many die. Just a one or two week disruption in the production and supply of insulin would result in massive death and suffering. How many other medications fall into that same category? How many life saving and life extending medical devices need uninterrupted electricity?
LikeLike
Without energy dense fuel sources, societal complexity falls apart and only the jack-of-all-trades people survive.
LikeLike
Lake Mead, Nations Largest Reservoir, To Reach Record Low This Week.
That could mean the loss of a major energy source, yet one of the main concerns seems to be,
“…extending boat ramps to reach the lower levels.”
Priorities priorities…ya gotta laugh just to stay sane.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/07/07/3457127/lake-mead-lowest-point-ever/
LikeLike
@Apneaman
Via America2.0:
LikeLike
That’s demented……….I love it!
LikeLike
LikeLike
It seems very anthropocentric to equate evolution with “advancement”, whatever that means. The pathology of progress can even slip into the language of its detractors from time to time.
LikeLike
I’ll make an anthropocentric judgment here and say I’d like to change the trajectory of our ‘Evolution‘.
LikeLike
An excerpt from another blog post by Kevin Lister whom I quoted in this essay of mine:
…most of us have not risen to the great pinnacles of society and are simply struggling to survive. In the face of runaway climate change, we are forced to prostitute ourselves to industries we know are destroying our planet. Anyone working in the arms, oil, car or travel industries along with many others do so in the knowledge that their actions contribute to ecological collapse. To enhance their short term prospects of survival they must be silent on this and vote for governments that will maintain the status quo of destructive industrialisation.
The struggle for survival in an industrial world corrupts us all. In so doing, we parallel the Kapos in the German concentration camps. They were the jews that did the dirty work the SS would not do. They pushed their brethren into the gas chambers and took their dead bodies out. They did it knowing it was wrong, but it was the only way they could survive and they had no choice in the matter. They also had to hope for train loads of new victims to keep coming, because without these they too would be destroyed…
LikeLike
Another great piece.
LikeLike
Gotta be number one at something, right?

LikeLike
Where is the evolution? Mostly in the technology enabling parts of the brain because these areas had the greatest impact on acquiring net energy and enhancing survival. We’re still the same tribal, violent and deceptive ape, we’re just better equipped to eat the ecosystem to accommodate our ever increasing numbers. If that fails, we’re well equipped to kill each other. Jay Hanson takes up some of these issues in a post at theautomaticearth.com.
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/debt-rattle-jul-7-2014-overshoot-loop/
The consumption of fossil fuels has temporarily allowed population growth and density concentration, equivalent to several new earths of natural human territory. In other words, as long as the fossil fuel energy and food keep flowing, the inter-tribal warfare can be controlled because dense energy delivery to high density areas substitutes for the much larger area of land that would be needed to support those individuals. To live a hunter-gatherer existence without the advantage of tools would require many more earths to accommodate the current population. As the energy runs out we should see a great uptick in inter-tribal warfare and lethality until population levels fall to a much, much lower levels, even lower than preindustrial times. Agreements to limit consumption and/or reproduction are useless as humans have already evolved the tendency to cheat and attempt to gain advantage surreptitiously and judging by the tendency towards corruption, this behavioral trait is widely distributed.
A successful appeal to humanity to “just do the right thing”, limit population, live humble and unassuming lives, and be ecosystem friendly is about as likely as………………..well, I can’t imagine anything less likely. More likely is that some group like ISIS will pop-up in a starving megalopolis somewhere near you. Imagine Beirut multiplied by several hundred, ruled by gangs that want to extract a lion’s share of the remaining wealth coming into cities, and they’ll fight for it while relatively peaceful residents stream out to the countryside to intercept the food and energy that would have made its way into the city. The Nazi’s had no problem building a tribe with certain characteristics, branding it with a swastika, circumscribing the Jews, taking their wealth and feeding them into ovens. If you are not a part of the dominant political group of your particular Muttlandia, it might be a good idea to move.
Tribalism is widespread. The upper crust, being tribally distinct from the common mutts they’ve enslaved, fears the potential of their organization and reprisal. Tribal passions are exhausted in the faux competition between Democrats and Republicans or inside the local sports coliseum. To prevent the slaves from attacking the big house, leaders agitate foreign tribes to redirect antipathy and violence towards some other target. Even tribes based upon “religious” precepts will be on the warpath to exterminate competing groups with violence and/or destroy them by simply outnumbering them with aggressive procreation. As energy and resources are depleted it can be expected that untoward behaviors will become much more common, as corruption in the United States has become much more open and widespread IMO. In Africa people lay down and die as military warlords battle and capitalist warlords expropriate wealth. In the dry and inhospitable Middle East things are heating up. Just consider the destruction in Beirut, Damascus, Baghdad and, in time, Riyadh, Tehran and Tel Aviv will join them, accelerating an unimaginably chaotic collapse.
LikeLike
Nice comment.
And IMHO the most lethal and dangerous tribe currently residing on the planet is that of the American military-industrial complex which has its tentacle and members in every state of the union, from the assembly line worker of army gear to the politician invested in Lockheed Martin.
The MIC is adept at creating and exploiting tribal rivalries in order to destabilize governments and install puppet regimes compliant to Western corporate interests. The current Chomsky article is informative on this point:
In a recent interview with Moyers & Company, Iraq specialist Raed Jarrar outlines what we in the West should know. Like many Iraqis, he is half-Shiite, half-Sunni, and in preinvasion Iraq he barely knew the religious identities of his relatives because “sect wasn’t really a part of the national consciousness.”
Jarrar reminds us that “this sectarian strife that is destroying the country … clearly began with the U.S. invasion and occupation.”
The aggressors destroyed “Iraqi national identity and replaced it with sectarian and ethnic identities,” beginning immediately when the U.S. imposed a Governing Council based on sectarian identity, a novelty for Iraq.
And there are numerous other examples.
One could say these are simply the dirty tricks of Homo Colossus who is at the apex of the resource consumption pyramid. What happens when Homo Colossus starts to have trouble satiating his exorbitant appetite for energy? He creates mayhem and chaos across the globe in order to get what he wants.
LikeLike
The World’s Most Destabilizing Force in the World
https://collapseofindustrialcivilization.com/2012/10/13/the-worlds-most-destabilizing-force/
LikeLike
The service, wait and IT staff at the Department of the Interior work in perpetual fear of losing their jobs. As a going rule, the nastier the contractor space is at the Federal Agency the more alledgedly corrupt it is. What passes for corruption is called business as usual. Talk with the people who work at the agencies, you’ll find this bizarre allegiance to BP and big coal. They’ll call “lax oversight” nonsense propagated by radicals. A lot of these guys, and this isn’t necessarily an indictment, are doing what they believe in to survive and become finacially successful. If you play the game you can enjoy success as popularly defined.
It’s not a coincidence that the secretary is a banker, and where there is coal you have JP Morgan and others. No conspiracy implied or some heavy semantic laced tale of global malaise, it’s facing business as usual.
LikeLike
Thanks to science and free-market ingenuity, Po folk like me can fly forever.
A Study on Potential Standing Cabin Effects in Improving the Competitiveness of Low-Cost Airlines
http://www.academia.edu/5820490/A_Study_on_Potential_Standing_Cabin_Effects_in_Improving_the_Competitiveness_of_Low-Cost_Airlines
LikeLike
Bring back the Glass-Steagall Act? LOL, not a chance…
This is the son of right-wing Supreme Court judge Antonin Scalia:
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Myopic views…


LikeLike
Thanks for the laugh,the essay,and the many useful comments and links,Mike.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Every living thing changes the environment by simply existing. However, the changes caused by non-human beings develop and conspire in a way that maintains the balance between what is taken and what is returned.
Human civilisation doesn’t just change the environment, but destroys it utterly, sterilizes it. It takes everything and returns nothing.
In my humble opinion the Neolithic Revolution was a wrong turn on a one way street to extinction. Prior to that colossal evolutionary blunder humans were foragers who practiced gathering and hunting in small groups.
The Paleolithic ended around 15,000 years ago and sometime shortly thereafter, in the early stages of the Neolithic Period, something happened that took the human species off the path of natural evolution.
Somewhere around 10,000 to as long as 13,000 years ago our ancestors started behaving oddly. They abandoned the way of Life that had allowed the primate family Hominidae, the hominids, which includes H. sapiens, to survive for some five million years.
Archaeological evidence from locations such as Gobekli Tepe, in southeastern Turkey, indicates that, at least eleven thousand years ago, Neolithic humans started building large structures, temples, places for ritualistic gatherings. At the same time, most significantly and most damning, we began to think of ourselves as separate from and superior to all other Life of Earth.
“Anthropologists have assumed that organized religion began as a way of salving the tensions that inevitably arose when hunter-gatherers settled down, became farmers, and developed large societies. Göbekli Tepe, to Schmidt’s way of thinking, suggests a reversal of that scenario: The construction of a massive temple by a group of foragers is evidence that organized religion could have come before the rise of agriculture and other aspects of civilization. It suggests that the human impulse to gather for sacred rituals arose as humans shifted from seeing themselves as part of the natural world to seeking mastery over it” (emphasis added). (source)
We were thus set upon the path of ecocide.
We allowed ourselves to be overwhelmed by pathological anthropocentricity. We built permanent settlements and began the drastic and destructive modification of the ecosystem. As a consequence there came the hierarchies needed to administer, govern and control rapidly growing populations. We became “civilised”.
We created exploitative consumer societies that exhausted the carrying capacities of their landbases. Settlements became villages, towns, cities, nations and empires, all of which inevitably consumed more than the land could provide.
When any given society or culture can no longer be sustained by its landbase, it must seek more resources elsewhere. This means taking them from the area outside its borders and that area is often already occupied by someone else. So we invented invasion, colonisation, occupation, wars of conquest and genocide.
We came to “believe” we had the unquestionable right to exploit everything and everyone in order to continue upon this new path. We developed a sense of entitlement and invented religions and then technologies to support it and today the cancer of civilisation has spread around the world.
The human race is in trouble. So is all Life on Earth. And we all spend our time arguing over how to treat the symptoms of the disease that is murdering the planet rather than trying to eliminate the disease itself.
A disease is not cured by putting band-aids on the symptoms. To be rid of the disease, the source must be eradicated. The source of the disease that’s killing our Mother is industrial civilisation. The end of civilisation as we know it is prerequisite to the continuation of human Life on Earth.
This is not to say that the human race must be destroyed. But, after many years in denial, during which time I clung desperately to a utopian illusion of a sustainable, enlightened, techno-industrial society, I have finally reached the conclusion that industrial civilisation must be brought to an end or the human species will effectively destroy itself and possibly all Life on Earth.
Acculturation to the compartmentalised nature of industrial civilisation makes it extremely difficult for its individual members to reach an understanding of its mortiferous nature. The forest cannot be seen for the trees as it were. People just don’t see the “big picture”. They are consumed with their own pet issues, their specialised functions and their own self-interest. They are incapable of taking a holistic viewpoint.
However, it should, by now, be getting a lot easier for people to see that this system cannot be “fixed”, that we can’t get things back to “normal”, that our “civilised” normal is the problem, not the solution.
That the extraction and consumption of non-renewable resources without restraint cannot go on forever should be self-evident to anyone. Yet this culture not only consumes non-renewables with reckless abandon but devours or destroys renewables, like land, trees, food, air and water, at a rate far surpassing that of their recovery. Any culture or species that depends for its very existence upon such a system cannot endure.
What is the big picture?
Industrial civilisation is unsustainable and irredeemable. Its members, both rulers and ruled, will not voluntarily enact the changes needed to transform it to a culture that is rational, sustainable and natural. Therefore, it will collapse.
Civilisation will collapse in due course without any extra “help” or it could be dismantled voluntarily, logically and rationally with the aim of making the transition as painless as possible.
The human species, if it is to survive, must return to the natural world, find its proper place there and accept it with humility.
Just my opinion
LikeLike
“Where is the evolution.”
Good question.
Biological evolutionists have forever been goaded out of science and into social politics from the right and from the left.
They failed to win that struggle IMO because they did not back up into the cosmic past, “the beginning”, the point of origin, which is where most “evolution” had to first take place, to begin.
Thus, they became so incoherent that it took a seven or so year struggle to rescue them from glossalalia (see Wikipedia, “Modern evolutionary synthesis”).
That resulted in substantial part from their having selected the tiniest slice of time to try to hide in wearing transparent camouflage (The Uncertain Gene – 9, On the Origin of the Genes of Viruses – 8).
Thus, Keith Richards became their spokesman who eventually expressed their doctrine and dogma most succinctly (“Shit happens”).
Plus, he can play.
LikeLike
Top shelf essay Mike.
i’d like to try, as a thought experiment, to see if it would even be possible for humanity to have evolved “differently.” According to Kubrick, von Daniken and others, we’ve been visited by “the Gods” who influenced our genetics, traits, wiring, development, etc. Whether or not God is just a straw-man to blame for our own inadequacies, what did the Gods do wrong? Where did humanity go off the rails? Which part of our programming were we supposed to overcome and still survive?
Better yet, what should our evolution have been, had we been “optimized” to co-exist with our surroundings and each other?
Were we supposed to somehow develop the sentience that Mobus touts as our finest trait? Was it to overcome our sinning ways that the religions list (when they themselves can’t seem to)?
Were we doomed by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, as others have said?
What do you all think?
LikeLike
Tom,
Not trying to start an argument,but I think Von Daniken was exposed as a charlatan years ago.Just made most stuff up to sell books.
Your second last question is a whopper.Have you read ‘A short history of Progress’
by Ronald Wright? Only a short book,but if you haven’t read it,I think you will find it worth your time.He discusses how we have had many ‘progress traps’ as our populations have increased and societies developed,and so far technological solutions have enabled us to escape the trap,but as a species we have not realized
that we cannot rely on technology to allow us to continue on the same path,and the ultimate ‘progress trap’ is upon us.
The book is similar in it’s main thesis to ‘Too smart for our own good’,but more concise.
LikeLike
Excellent points.
LikeLike
Thanks David! There are points along the way – like agriculture as opposed to hunting and gathering – cited as places where we, as a species, “went wrong” because although it solved one problem, it created another (population overshoot). There are many of these “critical points,” so what i’m asking is: were we “wired” to do this all along? Is our adventure as “humans” one in which we learn this horrible lesson regarding limits (and others) the hard way? Were we supposed to only live a short while in a virtual “paradise” (full of threats to avoid)?
i’ll check out the book you recommended.
LikeLike
Someone got really pissed offed at the whole ancient aliens scam/religion deal, so he did something about it.
Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the “ancient astronaut theory” which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others.
http://ancientaliensdebunked.com/
LikeLike
It took some time for the ecosystem to create something like humans, there was/is a constant rearrangement of cells to create novel organisms to take advantage of extant resources. A frog evolved a long sticky tongue to catch flies. It took much longer to create something that could effectively wield tools and then create them, numerous evolved traits in different areas of the human body. But once we started, the net energy started flowing and differential survival favored those with the most net energy and inventiveness. No Gods involved. We found fossil fuels and turned them into ape dopamine and a technological organ system suitable to the task of distribution, removal of waste, immunity an so on. No God involved. In reality we are a cancer, something that got out of natural control and grew exponentially. To put it another way, we’re sort of like a chimp that’s been given a stick of dynamite and a lit match. BOOM. For humans, the boom is happening right now, on a geologic time scale. In the milliseconds from the beginning of the explosion we have channeled the energy into creating complexity, but in the end the result will be the same, after the oooh and aaaah are over there will be bits and pieces of chimp all over the landscape with little of civilization or humans surviving the explosion. FLASH. BOOM. IT’S OVER.
LikeLike
James – i’ve been admiring your comments for some time now and appreciate your weighing in here. That’s a great explanation and it seems that indeed we are simply following the 2nd Laws dictates TO EXTINCTION! Amazing, isn’t it? We couldn’t have avoided it no matter what we did – or what examples of humanity we choose to examine, be they modern man or the uncontacted tribe the loggers just discovered in the Brazilian rain forest (what’s left of it). We all hit the wall eventually.
thanks
LikeLike
Mmmmm ape dopamine
LikeLike
LikeLike
Zyklon B & Sarin = BAD
White Phosphorus & Depleted Uranium = NO PROBLEM
LikeLike
“…the innate hypocrisy of empire is that imperial powers usually claim to represent a superior morality to “the other,” the so-called barbarians beyond the frontier who become a perverse justification for imperial power when they react ungratefully to attempts to dominate them.”
~ Ian Williams, STORIES OF IMPERIAL DECLINE
LikeLike
…It’s not hard to see why some missileers find it hard to adjust to life under the prairie. An 8-ton blast door seals their launch control center from a potential incoming nuclear detonation. Twice last year launch officers were disciplined after admitting they left the blast door open while a crewmate was asleep — a security violation. That and other lapses in discipline, training and leadership were documented by The Associated Press over the past year, prompting Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to declare that “something is wrong.”…
…Nuclear weapons duty is a deadly serious business, but it’s not without room for a pinch of missileer humor. A patch on the green leather seat from which Parthum monitors a computer console linked electronically to each of his 10 Minuteman 3 missiles offers these pithy phrases: “This Round’s On The House,” and “Party Til You Nuke.”…
LikeLike
Ah yes, the Military-Industrial Complex operating like a well oiled machine…
…One thing the grounding won’t do, however, is derail the F-35, a juggernaut of a program that apparently has enough political top cover to withstand any storm.
Part of that protection comes from the jaw-dropping amounts of money at stake. The Pentagon intends to spend roughly $399 billion to develop and buy 2,443 of the planes. However, over the course of the aircrafts’ lifetimes, operating costs are expected to exceed $1 trillion. Lockheed has carefully hired suppliers and subcontractors in almost every state to ensure that virtually all senators and members of Congress have a stake in keeping the program — and the jobs it has created — in place.
“An upfront question with any program now is: How many congressional districts is it in?” said Thomas Christie, a former senior Pentagon acquisitions official.
In the case of the F-35, the short answer is: a lot. Counting all of its suppliers and subcontractors, parts of the program are spread out across at least 45 states. That’s why there’s no doubt lawmakers will continue to fund the program even though this is the third time in 17 months that the entire fleet has been grounded due to engine problems. In fact, in the version of the defense appropriations bill passed by the House, lawmakers agreed to purchase 38 planes in 2015, four more than the Pentagon requested…
LikeLike
They have been cat fighting about buying 65, F-35’s for years up here. It would make my day to see them back out on Lockheed and buy the Rafale fighter from the French. Be fun to listen to Merican right wing radio on that day. From this day forth Canadian bacon will be referred to as “Freedom Bacon”
F-35’s French rival pitches ‘Canadianized’ fighter jet
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/f-35-s-french-rival-pitches-canadianized-fighter-jet-1.2577234
LikeLike
Increasing levels of certain toxins in Louisiana marshes – including some south of Cocodrie – are among the findings of LSU researchers examining effects of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
The toxins, entomologist Linda Hooper-Bui says, are believed responsible for the disappearance of some insect species from marshlands near Terrebonne Bay, Barataria Bay and other water bodies crucial to coastal habitat.
Those insects are among life forms essential to land and marine food chains, Hooper-Bui says, causing she and other scientists to conclude that effects of the 2010 Macondo well blowout are neither finished nor fully comprehended.
BP disputes the findings, which Hooper-Bui says have been peer reviewed and will soon be published.
But charter captains and commercial fishermen maintain the scenario Hooper-Bui’s research paints with what they have said all along, that oil was forced beneath the Gulf of Mexico’s surface during frantic cleanup efforts and can – in some form – later bloom with toxic effects.
“I am not a scientist,” said veteran charter captain Stu Scheer. “But we know something is wrong out there. Speckled trout are down. The fishing has gotten steadily worse since 2010.”
Scheer says the way he and other fishermen see it, the loss of a big slice of population from a generation of game fish, coupled with hard fishing in the years since, is making for a tougher comeback.
Scheer was not surprised by Hooper-Bui’s claims, which he said are cause for even greater concern.
While counting and cataloguing insects on the coast Hooper-Bui and her team placed crickets native to the marsh in floating houses, releasing them in previously oiled areas as well as in those not affected by oil, as a control.
Insects released in places previously affected by oil but considered cleaned – including Terrebonne Bay marshes – did not survive.
Research built on those findings, Hooper-Bui said, indicates that even as visible oil has lessened, toxic aromatic compounds have increased. Those are the products, she suspects, of oil remnants that sank sub-surface being stirred up by storms and other activity, as well as continued erosion of the marsh.
“What we think we know is that when we put the crickets out in the cages in the oiled areas and equivalent cages in unoiled areas, when the tide was blown and the water blown off the marsh and the air temperature was above 85 degrees, volatiles expelled from the sediment were high enough to kill the crickets,” Hooper-Bui said. “There is a problem in the marsh, there are volatile compounds. There are five, there may be more. What we found is that some of those volatile compounds have increased since the oil spill. They have not decreased, they are not going down and some of them seem to be accumulating. The marsh is not healthy.”
Various unknown factors could be contributing to the ultimate findings, Hooper-Bui and other scientists have acknowledged, although work is being done to more accurately determine causal factors, including more sensitive air sampling.
That researchers themselves acknowledge uncertainty is one reason BP spokesman Jason Ryan says there is reason for skepticism.
“The researchers acknowledged many unknowns related to their preliminary findings, including what process would cause levels of naphthalene and methyl-naphthalene to increase over time,” Ryan said Sunday, in an e-mailed response to questions about the research.
Extensive sampling and testing conducted in 2010 “indicates that weathering processes removed virtually all of these compounds from the Macondo oil before it made landfall,” he said. “The trace levels of naphthalene and methyl-naphthalene that remain in weathered Macondo oil are no different than background levels from other sources, and there is no known process that causes these compounds to spontaneously form from other oil constituents that are degrading.”
The LSU scientists say that while Ryan has indeed done his homework, the unanswered come from an abundance of caution being used. Additionally, the Macondo incident is taking scientists places where they have not gone before.
“Just because it is new science does not mean it is wrong,” Hooper-Bui said. “This is the most well-studied oil disaster so naturally, new unexplained phenomena will be discovered. We have carefully conducted experiments in the field and in the laboratory examining the issues from different perspectives and cannot present all of our methods and results in a short time a scientific conference allows. We report the independent science outcomes even if we cannot explain the cause at the moment. We continue to conduct independent research to seek answers to perplexing questions and will report the results regardless of the outcome.”
Insects LSU researchers have catalogued as disappearing from marshes include acrobat ants, several species of spiders and crickets. The scientists have samples of insects – benchmark data – from before the spill that help them know what change has occurred.
“If the marshes aren’t healthy, the insects are really a good indicator,” Hooper-Bui said, adding that the ill effects were charted as similar from shoreline into the marsh areas, as deep as 300 feet, using air quality measuring equipment.
“You can’t see it because it is blended into the sediment,” she said. “You cannot smell some of these toxic aromatics.”
Asphaltene and various paraffins, Hooper-Bui said, are not usually toxic and can be measured, and they are degrading.
But the more toxic elements, she said, are those that remain.
One factor being considered in the findings is that the degradation or erosion of marsh overall – especially in the Terrebonne Barataria areas – makes for a moving scientific target. As land is lost, the effects suspected of being from oil show up in areas previously not included in the surveys. And oiling of some marsh, Hooper-Bui suspects, is related to its disappearance.
“The marsh in Terrebonne Bay and Barataria Bay is very degraded,” she said. “The oiled areas we are losing have us very concerned about the Terrebonne Bay and Barataria Bay marsh.”
A paper to be published in the Marine Pollution Bulletin, an international journal of scientific studies, will focus primarily on the increase in harmful substances even as less harmful substances degrade or disappear.
“The aromatics, the very toxic compounds, are very stable,” Hooper-Bui said.
Told that her theories reflect those posited by fishermen shortly after the spill, Hooper-Bui said she is not surprised.
Considering herself a mere visitor to the marsh environment, Hooper-Bui notes that fishermen and others routinely in the outdoors of the marsh have knowledge born of experience to which attention should be paid.
“When a fisherman tells me something it gets my attention,” she said. “When other fishermen to whom that fisherman has not spoken tell me the same thing, I am gaining a knowledge base.”
LikeLike
…Weise was in the pump room with several other men and “never knew what hit them,” his mother, Arleen Weise, 60, said.
“I knew within 24 hours of them calling me that if they hadn’t found them, he was dead,” Weise said. “My mom just thinks by some miracle, he’ll come walking in, but he won’t.”
While she doesn’t know the men who are being sought on manslaughter charges individually, she thinks BP should be taken to task for its lack of safety.
“When Adam was off work, he was off work, and he left work behind. … The only thing he said was that it was the rig from hell,” Weise said, adding that tells her something was awry there.
Winslette, 80, agreed and heard that BP officials were on the rig the night before the explosion and noticed rubber coming up from the well.
“Why didn’t they shut it down? Maybe they had a deadline to meet or that they wanted to meet. I think it all comes down to the almighty dollar,” Winslette said….
LikeLike
LikeLike
An important story tweeted by both Nader and Moyers is the recent corporate rewriting of the law in regards to lawsuits and class actions. The little guy has no recourse anymore.
…“The lawsuits against Target would almost certainly not be possible against Amazon,” says Paul Bland, executive director of Public Justice. “It’s got its ‘vaccination against legal accountability’ here.”
Following the 2011 and 2013 Supreme Court rulings, dozens of other giant corporations — from Comcast and Wells Fargo to Ticketmaster and Dropbox — have secured the same legal immunity. So have companies ranging from airlines, gyms, payday lenders and nursing homes, which have quietly rewritten the fine print of their contracts with consumers to include a shield from lawsuits and class actions. Meanwhile, businesses including Goldman Sachs, Northrop Grumman, P. F. Chang’s and Uber have tucked similar clauses into their contracts with workers…
…The result is a world where corporations can evade accountability and effectively skirt swaths of law, pushing their growing power over their consumers and employees past a tipping point…”
LikeLike
I guess it’s time for me to write a post about Israel.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Bankers and other masters of investment have encouraged the populace to use their imaginations, their inventiveness, in creating the tools and factories necessary to metabolize the surface of the planet. One good loan deserved another and progress continues. Those at the top of the lending pyramid obtain an annual infusion of some percentage of the productivity of the malignancy they support. Developers get loans from banks, build some cancer (roads, houses, shops) and sell them to someone taking on a mortgage loan. The population expands, everyone vies for a job that will enable the to buy into the cancer and the pleasures and security it provides. The population of potential workers continues to grow and business cheers the expansion of potential new customers. The creeping crud of industrial civilization penetrates the soils and natural areas in all directions while giddy apes dance before the flickering lights of their artificial walled enclosures. They’re safe now, from the outside, the elements, the bacteria and viruses, a grocery is a few metastatic arterioles away. Fresh clean water flows from pipes and waste is whisked away by depressing a small lever or is carted off to the local landfill. Ahhh, every hirsute denizen of the jungle would trade a thousand miserable futures for just one lifetime of drinking heartily of the sweet dopamine ambrosia. And so the trade is made and the future is speechless. Not having evolved any resistance to consuming the dearth of life-giving stimuli found within the natural environment, we obey the consequent commandments inscribed within the archaic structures of our insatiable brains and existence become more tenuous with each passing day.
LikeLike
Mmmm dopamine ambrosia
Miami, the great world city, is drowning while the powers that be look away
Low-lying south Florida, at the front line of climate change in the US, will be swallowed as sea levels rise. Astonishingly, the population is growing, house prices are rising and building goes on. The problem is the city is run by climate change deniers
Land and property values will plummet and people will start to leave. Places like South Miami will no longer be able to raise enough taxes to run our neighbourhoods. Where will we find the money to fund police to protect us or fire services to tackle house fires? Will there even be enough water pressure for their fire hoses? It takes us into all sorts of post-apocalyptic scenarios. And that is only with a one-foot sea-level rise. It makes one thing clear though: mayhem is coming.”
“And then there is the issue of Turkey Point nuclear plant, which lies 24 miles south of Miami.”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/11/miami-drowning-climate-change-deniers-sea-levels-rising
LikeLike
“If you are contemplating suicide, please re-consider. And then click here for awareness, prevention, and support on the topic of suicide.
I’m not advocating for or against suicide. I’m non-judgmental about the issue. It can be a thoughtful decision, as illustrated by Martin Manley.”
This is quoted from NBL … I wish that they would address “IF YOU ARE CONTEMPLATING SUICIDE” to “Society” …. in honor of Toynbee:
“In other words, a society does not ever die ‘from natural causes’, but always dies from suicide or murder — and nearly always from the former, as this chapter has shown.” – A Study of History, by Arnold J. Toynbee
Which brings up an interesting question: “what is ‘contemplating’ in this context?”
Is it like ‘intent’ which, in the law, “follows the bullet.”
In other words, if we shoot at someone intending to kill them, if we miss and the bullet ricochets and kills someone else, we “intended” to kill the person who died, and we are guilty.
How does a society do that?
Ignoring warnings for a century perhaps?
LikeLike
Indeed, ignoring warnings for decades and centuries despite incontrovertible evidence and warnings. The invisible gremlins of industrial civilization are no less real than the weekly mass shootings in America. Both are a result of our sociopathic culture.
LikeLike
Your title, mike, reminded me of the five lectures Ouspensky did many years ago titled The Possibility of Man’s Future Evolution. The main point was that our human biological evolution is pretty much done; if there is a chance for our further evolution it will be in consciousness – or not. The choice of whether to devote ourselves to that project is up to us, Nature is not going to do that one for us. With the degree of conscious development we have achieved so far we are faced with the necessity to grow further or perish.
Ways to accomplish that further growth exist, and are usually referred to as “spiritual paths”. This is in some ways unfortunate, given the poor repute that anything labeled as spiritual has at this time. To evaluate the methods objectively it might be best to strike the word spiritual or religious from their description. Doing so, it might be realized that there is much in some of them that serves the purpose of returning us to some sort of humanity and sanity that might yield us a chance to design and live in a better world.
LikeLike
US Geological Survey data analysed by the report shows that chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, nickel, platinum-palladium, copper, zinc, cadmium, titanium, and tin will face peak production followed by declines within this century. This is because declared reserves are often “more hypothetical than measured”, meaning the “assumption of mineral bonanzas… are far removed from reality.” says Nafeez Ahmed
Tungsten: The perfect metal for bullets and missiles
…But it was tungsten’s density that earned it its name – it comes from the Swedish tung sten, heavy stone.
It is almost three times as dense as iron, almost twice that of lead and virtually the same as gold…
…And tungsten’s extraordinary properties have led to the development of a class of missiles that work without explosives.
“Kinetic bombardment” weapons involve firing what are, in effect, spears of tungsten at incredible speed towards your target. They can penetrate thick steel armour and cause terrific, but very localised, devastation.
Tungsten’s only rival for this kind of application is the radioactive element uranium. Depleted uranium is (almost) as dense as tungsten and has an added advantage – from a military perspective – that it burns at the extreme temperatures generated as you punch your way through steel tank armour.
That will often blow up any explosives in the tank.
“Put it this way, if you are the guy inside the tank, you will not remember what happened,” says Kelley bluntly.
So why does the military still use tungsten if uranium has this macabre, but useful additional property?
Because, as the people of Kuwait discovered after first Gulf War, depleted uranium leaves a potentially deadly dust behind after it burns. It sounds bizarre but, in the world of warfare, tungsten is the eco-friendly alternative.
All these evolving military and industrial uses explain why tungsten is classified as a critical strategic element by many nations.
Yet more than 80% of world supply is controlled by China, and in recent years China has imposed restrictions on the export of tungsten – along with many other raw commodities. It wants to encourage the development of the hi-tech industries that use tungsten within China itself.
That’s also helped to push prices up, making previously uneconomic non-Chinese deposits worthwhile to mine.
Hemerdon, on the edge of Dartmoor, is the first new metal mine to be opened in Britain for 40 years, and will exploit the world’s third largest tungsten deposit…
LikeLike
North Sea oil ‘worth billions less than expected’
http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/north-sea-oil-worth-billions-less-than-expected-1-3473371
LikeLike
Is (temporary) help on the way for our overpopulation problem?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_ebola_outbreak
LikeLike
False alarm. Further search tells me ebola is not good material for a pandemic. I don’t know if mike has done a piece on the possibilities of a pandemic as a factor in our shortening future.
http://www.ibtimes.com/fears-ebola-outbreak-spreading-guinea-unfounded-health-officials-say-1566750
LikeLike
I hope it’s true about the ebola, but I would not trust the International Business Times without confirming. More of a PR firm/Think Tank/cheerleader for neo liberal economics. Imo.
LikeLike
Ah yes. There are so many factors contributing to our collective demise, but one of them should be examined in a post someday. You could have a field day with this one: Human stupidity!
Are you kiddin’ me? There are MILLIONS of examples every day!
Look mayt, we’re all dow’-royt barmey, know-wot-a-mean – off the deep end, gone round the bend, loopy, nuts, bonkers, out of it, wacko! We shouldn’t even ‘AVE nu-cular weapons – or weapons of any kind, we’re so oil-fah-kin’ responsible an’ all, eh?
Crikey, we poison the bees an’ the weeds and next thing ya know we’re eatin’ poison ah-selves! ‘ow syne is ‘at?!
Here’s an example of human stupidity in the vaunted “military thinking” (is that an oxymoron?)
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Serratia-has-dark-history-in-region-Army-test-2677623.php
Serratia has dark history in region / Army test in 1950 may have changed microbial ecology
LikeLike
To my readers,
I’ve been taking some time off to enjoy the weather where I live, but I’ll be back. My next post will be on the immigration problem you’ve been hearing about lately in the news. Then at some point I want to tackle the never-ending Israeli/Palestinian crisis.
LikeLike
And in the face of the above information, we have all the evidence in the world below that denial and delusion reign supreme…
LikeLike
Of the course the article is spot on. However it’s based on one assumption. That assumption being that the handful of extremely rich and their Govt cohorts are not aware of the obvious. One can assume that they didn’t become rich and powerful by being unaware of their surroundings. What if they are aware? If they are then the problem and solution would be equally obvious to them. Problem: There is NO solution with 7 Billion + people. Solution: Kill off 6 Billion people probably using a virus.
Sound far fetched. I’ve analysed the problem for years and keep coming back to this one answer. There are simply too many of us and not enough time and the alternative is far worse.
LikeLike
I wrote a few posts concerning these ideas, two of which are here:
https://collapseofindustrialcivilization.com/2014/03/20/weve-got-it-all-under-control/
https://collapseofindustrialcivilization.com/2013/10/03/the-first-great-culling/
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike