Tags
Benjamin Franklin, Capitalism, Climate Change, Collapse of Industrial Civilization, Consumerism, Corporate State, Corporatocracy, Eco-Apocalypse, Ecological Overshoot, Economic Growth, Empire, Environmental Collapse, Extinction of Man, Greenwashing, Inverted Totalitarianism, Mass Die Off, Military Industrial Complex, Peak Oil, Security and Surveillance State, Thomas Malthus, War for Profit
“When the well’s dry,
we know the worth of water.”
~ Benjamin Franklin
From Luke’s Journal:
Date: January 2064
I’ve just returned from a salvaging expedition into the heart of what was known as Los Angeles, a vast megalopolis once teeming with millions of people and home to Hollywood movies and TV, hallucinogens for the masses. It is now known as celluloid cemetery. The air was still this evening and off in the distance I could hear the desperate screams of those who had been exiled from our underground colonies.
I’ve got all the public libraries mapped out on my tracking device so that I can hit them up for rare books not archived on our historical databases. Paper books never died because a lot of data has been lost over the years due to grid failure, floods, fires, and arson. A very well-preserved collection of writings by Benjamin Franklin, a true renaissance man of his time, caught my eye as I rummaged through piles of books strewn knee-deep across the floor. Inside the dusty tome I saw the brief essay ‘Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind‘ and read it on the spot. Franklin says, “But not withstanding this (population) increase, so vast is the Territory of North America, that it will require many ages to settle it fully…” A mere 215 years after those words were published, America officially went into overshoot. Thomas Malthus is said to have credited Franklin for discovering the ‘rule of population growth’ which states that when agriculture increases in arithmetic progression(2, 3, 4, …), the population grows in geometric progression(2, 4, 6, …), eventually outpacing the means to feed everyone. Neither Malthus nor Franklin foresaw the discovery of fossil fuels, which fueled the population explosion, or its horrific side-effect of climate change which would act as a catalyst for the spread of virulent diseases and pathogens such as the African Flu Pandemic of 2029, otherwise known as The First Great Culling. Two-thirds of the global population were wiped out. Subsequent pandemics of varying origins and lethality picked away at the remaining 2.5 billion, leaving a few hundred million survivors scattered across the globe. The construction of vast subterranean cities began several decades ago once the world knew that industrial civilization would never be able to survive runaway climate change above ground. Today no one is allowed to have more than two children. Population is strictly monitored by the technocracy which severely punishes those who break this law; no one wants to be banished to the outside where life is short and brutal.
Franklin must truly have been rolling in his grave at the end result of his expansionist dreams for America: a pockmarked landscape of fracking wells, oil spills, and toxic waste dumps; a corrupt government of corporate sock-puppets; a military that had become a malevolent industrial complex seeking war for profit and destroying fledgling democracies wherever they appeared; an agricultural system of factory farms and frankenfood; a self-proclaimed “free press” of corporate mouthpieces and shills; and a population of citizens that had been reduced to mindless consumers incapable of critical thought. And I think he would be utterly distraught to find that his name had been reduced to a popular idiom by the dumbed-down masses — “it’s all about the Benjamins.“ Knowing what a grotesque monstrosity this country would become, he surely would not have declared America’s cause to be ‘the cause of all mankind’ — wasteful consumerism, monopoly capitalism, and the tyranny of the corporate state. When he was studying dinosaur bones in northern Kentucky back in the mid 1700’s, I’m sure it never crossed his mind that the human species would soon suffer the same fate, becoming the next hapless victim to sink into a tar pit of its own making. Franklin would have said, “It’s inconceivable such a technologically advanced society as this would not look at the scientific evidence and take action at once to preserve life and liberty.” But after witnessing what an irredeemable abomination his Republic had become, he would most likely say, “My God, the only recourse remaining is to clear the entire system with near-term-extinction.”
Walking with the tortured spirit of Benjamin Franklin along the Beach of Doom where anoxic ocean waves wash plastic debris and dead jellyfish ashore, I explain to him that the seeds of our destruction were planted long ago with the expansionist mindset of the first European settlers. The Indians and buffalo were systematically wiped out, all the virgin forests were chopped down and converted to lumber, and the rest of America was laid wide open for exploitation by the construction of a transcontinental railroad. Technology and the power of fossil fuels only intensified the process; this country never looked back, expanding to foreign shores for control of evermore resources and spreading the same logic and belief system of capitalism throughout every inch of the Earth until there was no place further to go. The system started to cannibalize itself after hitting peak oil, turning inward to burn dirtier, more marginal energy resources and starving the masses whose share of the economic pie kept shrinking while a tiny few gorged themselves on ill-gotten wealth and delusions of grandeur. In its final days, this con game measured everything only with a monetary scale. If there was no profit to be earned, then real solutions to the grave threat of anthropogenic climate change, like “powering down”, were summarily discounted. America and the world had ideologically boxed itself into a death trap called capitalism. No one realized or refused to realize that all the perceived gains in infrastructure, technology, social institutions, and other complexities of industrial civilization would soon fade into oblivion at the hands of an uncaring climate radically and thoughtlessly altered by mankind’s activities. In the end, it was all phantom wealth stolen from nature and built off her back by burning trillions of tons of carbon into the atmosphere. The system’s only available avenue was to rush headlong into the dark void of misery, death, and extinction while spinning quixotic tales of “sustainable growth”, “renewable energy”, and geoengineering fixes. Cooperation on a planetary scale to lower greenhouse gases could never be accomplished under a capitalist system, nor would the arms race amongst nations which requires a constant investment of highly dense energy to develop technologically superior weaponry. After knowing for decades that it was far too late to escape the carnage of climate chaos, those in positions of power felt compelled to ignore the facts and keep the gas pedal pressed to the floor, leading all of humanity over the cliff.
“He cannot complain of a hard sentence, who is made master of his own fate.”
~ Johann Friedrich von Schiller
Thanks for taking us into an imaginary world of a possible future dystopia.
‘Today no one is allowed to have more than two children. Population is strictly monitored by the technocracy which severely punishes those who break this law; no one wants to be banished to the outside where life is short and brutal.’
It’s an interesting concept but I don’t think there will be any government in 2064, and I cannot see how any technology will be maintained that far into the future.
I believe that if anyone survives into the 2060s they will be living in small bands of hunter-gatherers and using stone and wood technology If there are no trees in the future there will be no people.
.
LikeLike
Death sounds like a preferable alternative to either scenario.
LikeLike
When I think about the possible scenarios, I think that we have been given a great gift….death…..when living simply is torture.
I’m lucky to be at an age to see, out of interest I guess, the great unravelling, but will probably die of natural causes well before the worst of it, what Luke has had to go through.
LikeLike
rise up out of your chosen graves and kick their asses.
LikeLike
Underground? great for getting a dose of rickets, &, having no UV on skin, other ills. I prefer the woodlands setting.
LikeLike
Posted: 01/30/14 EST | Updated: 01/31/14 EST
California May Have Hit Its Driest Point In 500 Years, And The Effects Are Frightening
LikeLike
It doesn’t look like anyone is reading any of the links in the above post, so let me quote from one of them to spell out the situation to you all:
Existing Strategies Have Been Powerless
The task then becomes to extract as much out of it[fossil fuels] as possible, while we still can. In this sense, the alarmism of environmental activists and climate researchers actually adds fuel to the fire, because it calls attention to the fact that the party may soon be over. Perhaps this solves the puzzle of why “Earth Summits” and climate conferences to save the planet take place incessantly, even though none of these have ever lead to real change, let alone to a reversal of the trend.
It demonstrates the utter powerlessness of the intervention strategies which have been employed so far. It couldn’t be otherwise, in fact, in a system organized around the division of labor. Any form of protest that doesn’t interfere with the existing business models, and which is able to perform well in the economy of attention, quickly establishes its own economic segment. To put it cynically, such protest creates its own “concern industry,” with its own experts and industry professionalization, its own career paths and PR divisions.
A science that produces troubling findings, as climate research does, differentiates itself as its own discipline, experiences booms in the creation of institutes, commissions and councils, yet in practical terms hardly disrupts the economic metabolism that is responsible for the troubling findings in the first place. We could even say that neither climate research nor climate conferences reduce CO2 emissions, but rather blithely contribute to their annual increase, because they are part of the larger system.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/warsaw-climate-conference-shows-capitalism-root-of-climate-failure-a-937453.html
LikeLike
Even if these conferences and all the research could change our economic habits and somehow stop our use of fossil fuels quickly, we are already on a trajectory that will lead us to extinction no matter what.
Still, I like it that the research is being done. Seems to be money well spent, simply because I like hearing what they find out. Might as well go out understanding just why all is going to hell.
LikeLike
Paying for the research and then not acting on those findings is worse than not knowing because it’s willful negligence.
LikeLike
Except at this point acting will not change much. Haven’t I been hearing several here say that acting, and figuring that acting could change our future, is useless hopium? Which is it….do you want to see action, or is that all silly?
I like to see action. I’ll support those who are pushing for action. I do not believe it will change much, or anything in the long run, but I like the fight.
LikeLike
It’s all about mitigating the damage that is already in the pipeline. An emergency powerdown of society is needed and it’s never too late to change unless, of course, we go extinct quite abruptly.
LikeLike
I agree with that. We have a lot of information, and we do almost nothing to mitigate the worst effects of our industrial economy. And one reason we do nothing is because the fossil fuel and related industries have been so successful in making sure our population is thoroughly misinformed and ignorant of the very basic facts about climate change..
While morality is relative, I feel I have a moral responsibility to fight the bastards doing the worst. I feel the worst of them are those who knowingly work to confuse and mislead the public. Organizations like the Heartland Institute, and the Heritage Foundation, and the supporters of these agencies like the Koch Brothers. Right now my target is John Droz, a real asshole connected with these organizations, who is working tirelessly to defeat any chance of any wind power projects here in my county or anywhere in NC. Despicable people who will lie and exaggerate and get the local people here so completely misinformed about climate change and all of the issues related to fossil fuel use and extraction. Real evil bastards. So, regardless of just how helpful wind energy could be for us, I want to fight them.
LikeLike
Oh, for fuck’s sake, will you please try and straighten your head out, Paul
I feel the worst of them are those who knowingly work to confuse and mislead the public.
Like McKibben, for example, who KNOWINGLY confuses and misleads the public by telling people that the level of CO2 can be reduced and that will get them their climate back, blahblahblah etc, etc.
LikeLike
Industrial wind power a catastrophe on every level
But it pulls in funding for Bill McKibben so it MUST be good, eh, Paul
http://www.onlinesentinel.com/opinion/MAINE_COMPASS__Industrial_wind_power_a_catastrophe_on_every_level_.html
LikeLike
Ulvfugl, please take a chill pill or meditate or something, and save your anger for the people who really deserve your anger, not me or Bill McKibben.
LikeLike
And you post this comment right after posting one that says ‘Misinformation is winning’ re climate change and public opinion, and you are still unable to see how you hero McKibben is contributing to that ?
Because you are not smart enough to understand that being dishonest and telling lies is BEING DISHONEST AND TELLING LIES. You think it’s okay, because he’s selling fucking windpower instead of coal or oil or gas, so you go for the lesser evil because you like the guy and he writes an article crticising Exxon.
And I’m saying that’s total bullshit, and just propping up the system with greenwash, and you’re going along with it because you HAVE no fundamental principles or thought out position, you just want people to think you are one of the good guys and like you because you make the right sort of noises and post the right sort shit here.
Don’t tell me to fucking chill out, because as far as I’m concerned people like you are as much a part of the problem as the people who drive the fucking SUVs. You’re so gullible and naive you fall for every trick that’s thrown at you.
BUY OUR NEW ‘SAVE THE PLANET RANGE’ AS ADVERTISED ON TV BY BILL MCKIBBEN ! SEE THEM AT YOUR LOCAL SHOWROOM NOW !
You’re being played. You’re saying you’ll vote Obama even though he’s not perfect, because Romney is worse, because you’re so clueless that you can only think in black and white. So you think that because Koch and Heartland are evil, that means McKibben is the guy in the white hat who will fix things. What you don’t understand is, he’s been PUT THERE so that THE GAME CAN CARRY ON ! Fucking Rockefellers put him there. You’re too dumb to see it !
The whole thing is staged theatre and every week there are blog posts and comments here and on NBL explaining this stuff and here YOU are as clueless as ever, completely missing the point.
LikeLike
In addition to meditation, medication may also be warranted. It must be tough, being the only true Scotsman.
LikeLike
And what do you know about anything DC ?
LikeLike
An alternative is to not read any material that relates to the real world, even when directly presented with it, which I describe as Constructed Ignorance.
That is the strategy adopted by most councillors and council officials in this district.
I will make further comment later but will say at this stage that the word now used to describe our newly elected mayor ( who campaigned using the slogan of ‘bringing back honesty to local government’) is BETRAYAL.
The interesting thing about Andrew Judd is that I had around 20 hours of discussion with him about everything we talk about here before he decided to stand for election, and he agreed with me that the state of affairs at NPDC was corrupt, incompetent, immoral, inter-generationally appalling, and ultimately suicidal. In fact about a year ago he told me the NPDC administration was utterly corrupt to the point he was going to quit as a councillor because he could not stand the corruption and lies.
We persuaded him to not quit, and when he said he would stand for election we supported him because, unlike me, he was electable.
His betrayal is not just of the people who supported him, of course, but is a betrayal that relates directly to his own children’s fairly immediate future.
This was circulated yesterday, following the ‘final straw’ in a series of failures and U-turns:
‘I must say, Andrew Judd sure had a lot of us fooled.
We saw the slogans, we heard or read the comments and speeches. Some of us spent many hours with him, going over it all, what was happening and what needed to be urgently done. However, it seems that all his talk about ‘bringing honesty and accountability back into local government’, all his talk about tackling the ‘corruption and lies’ of NPDC (his words, not mine) and dealing with the important, urgent issues was just empty rhetoric.
I say, start as you mean to go on. And, assuming Andrew Judd has done that, I’m not al all impressed. Backsliding, retracting on declared policy, failing to do what he said he would do both personally and in his position as mayor, and saying, as he has said twice to me since being elected: “I’m going to let you down,” are clear indications of what to expect over the coming months: more failure, as large sectors of the community get driven ‘off the cliff’ and the environment gets further assaulted by totally unsustainable and highly destructive ‘corporate development’ which provides short-term profits for a few greedy individuals at the expense of everyone else.
We can easily be forgiven for assuming that now that Andrew Judd has got his snout in the public money trough, he has shown his true colours and is just another charlatan, just another player of the self-serving game, just another politician (=liar).
How he reconciles his supposed ‘deep Christian convictions’ with not being a man of his word and becoming a key component of the system of corruption and deceit is quite a mystery. Perhaps we should assume that the ‘deep Christian convictions’ are just a sham too.
Should we be surprised that it has all turned out so dismally? I suppose not.’
. .
LikeLike
So long as you’re happy, Paul. You and yours.
I thought we already understood why it’s all going to hell. Maybe you havn’t been reading NBL.
LikeLike
You have said you do a lot of reading keeping up with the latest information. Do you feel we know it all now? I’m interested in even more research, if only because it is interesting. You done with looking for more information?
LikeLike
Before I comment on this wonderful post (great idea!) I wanted to post this link to the topic of the TPP that I talked about a post or two back:
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/01/democratic-leadership-today-effectively-kills-obamas-international-trade-deals.html
The Democratic Leadership Yesterday Effectively Killed Obama’s International Trade Deals
Posted on January 30, 2014 by WashingtonsBlog
Preface by Washington’s Blog: The Trans Pacific Partnership is a corporate power grab. The fact that Democratic leader Harry Reid is standing up to Obama on this is a very good thing.
One of President Barack Obama’s top priorities ever since he entered the White House has been to achieve two international trade deals, one with Europe, and the other with Asia, that will enable international corporations to override the laws in participating nations and thus to provide ultimate corporate control over regulations concerning pesticide-use, food-safety, global-warming abatement, collective bargaining, and other such matters.
Yesterday, Wednesday 29 January 2014, the leader of congressional Democrats, Harry Reid — the U.S. Senate Majority Leader — came out publicly saying, “I’m against fast track.” This means that unlike the international-trade treaties that were rammed through Congress under George W. Bush, Obama’s trade deals won’t be — and that they are thus now practically dead.
Fast track trade promotion authority (TPA) enables an international-trade deal to be presented to Congress for an up-or-down vote without any amendments and without any possibility of being filibustered. TPA was first introduced in 2002; and, in order for it to be able to be imposed under the law, the Majority Leaders in both the House and the Senate must introduce the implementing bill to their respective bodies. This means that, if Harry Reid in the Senate declines to introduce TPA to the Senate, then Obama’s extremely controversial TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement) and TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership) are both virtually dead.
Harry Reid, in announcing his decision, said, ”I think everyone would be well advised just to not push this right now,” which, translated, means: Unless and until President Obama rewrites major provisions of each of these two deals, both of them are, indeed, dead.
[there’s more, and like I said before, the ‘corporatocracy’ isn’t likely to just give up and go away]
LikeLike
A nice piece of fictional dystopia to go along with the dysAtlantopia on the news. Underground may be good option for surviving the heat. People can come out at night to catch two-headed sand lizards to feed their two-headed children. If California runs out of water, they’ll have to turn off the electric too. Hot and dry. Bring on the sand lizards.
On a different but related note, there is no purpose to all of the structures that arise as energy is passed through the thermodynamic mill. They don’t even have the sole purpose of dissipating heat, which could be done by other means. Technological structures are no more “advanced” than their biological counterparts. The processes continue but they lead nowhere in particular. Humans maintain narratives of growth, progress and everlasting life while they undermine their own existence. Their existence, humble as it may have been, was only possible when balanced against all other species and the natural environment. The human malignancy arose suddenly in geological time in a similar way to cancers that arise in human cellular systems, not by point mutation, frame-shift or chromosomal mismatch, but by the emergence of an adaptive information-based system beyond DNA that allowed enhanced growth and survival at the cost of all else.
Humans should really be able to take what they dish out. If we have a war on cellular cancer should we not also have a war on industrial cancer? Should humans whine about their cellular cancer as they proceed in killing the ecosystem? Should we bring the larger body of species to death and let the technological cancer live for one more generation of growth? Have no doubt that the details of these phenomena have been explored and can be cogently expressed within the framework of systems science.
Those trading on the bourses and exchanges of the world are trading in certificates of death. Pieces of paper that require another iteration of growth. The blood of their children drips from their fingers in this orgy of death and their temporary gains shall be interred with the last generation.
LikeLike
Casually talking to people (presently at Rotterdam film festival – located in a burgeoning urban world already many feet under sea-level) bringing up less drastic though severe scenarios of sea-level rises, loss of coastal areas, threats to food supply from mix of lack of water, rising costs of energy supplies, mass survival migrations, etc. – it is amazing how the response is a polite don’t-bother-me, it-won’t-happen-in-my life-time. I think we are like the road-runner, already far off the cliff, feet racing, and awaiting the sudden fall.
http://www.jonjost.wordpress.com
http://www.cinemaelectronica.wordpress.com
LikeLike
I grew up in Philadelphia, in the shadow of Franklin. We got to know him well in the area schools. I think your ideas of how he would now think of his country are perfect. I skimmed your essay first…..when I went back and read carefully I saw it is quite a masterpiece.
LikeLike
Thanks Paul. That’s very nice of you to say. I did put some thought into it.
LikeLike
Chaps, I would welcome some advice. I need to persuade someone close to me that the current set-up is unsustainable and that the economy is about to collapse under the weight of dimishing returns. I’m not even going to touch climate change. This person is in his seventies, very invested in BAU and likely to be highly resistant to a paradigm shift. How would you tackle such a challenge?
Is there a particular article or youtube clip any of you have come across that explains the major flaws in BAU with such breathtaking simplicity and undeniable logic that resistance becomes futile? Denial is such a powerful thing and he’s a stubborn old mule.
LikeLike
LikeLike
You beat me to it.
Yep.
That’s the one Councillor Andrew Judd viewed (with me and a few others), and after watching it said he agreed (having previously been to a Guy McPherson talk in New Plymouth).
And now he’s in a position to do something to mitigate the suffering he does nothing.
LikeLike
Brilliant – thank you so much, Mike and Kevin. I need to persuade this person to free up some liquid assests for me before a minsky moment sends them all up in smoke. That money will go into prepping (in so far as anyone can) and could mean an extra few years of life for my family, so it is important to get this right. Please God he’s somewhat open to a dose of reality.
LikeLike
Neat film. Odd that global warming isn’t mentioned, but fits the bill for what Harry needed.
LikeLike
Albert Bartlett’s brilliant lecture ‘Arithmetic, Population and Energy’ is available on line,
Chris Martenson’s ‘Crash Course’..
Post Carbon Institute’s ‘There’s No Tomorrow’.
Declining EROEI was depicted very well in the version of Crash Course I watched several years ago.
‘Money As Debt’ demonstrates that the global financial system is a Ponzi scheme with nothing supporting it.
I worked out a few years ago that most people are:
Ignorant
Stupid
Stubborn
LikeLike
I’m afraid that arguably this person is all three. Well, perhaps more unimaginative than stupid. I can’t be too hard on such people however as I msyelf didn’t cotton on to the gravity of our predicament until a year or so ago. I feel like such a sucker for buying into BAU for so long.
LikeLike
Changing his mind will not change reality.
Allow him to die Dumb.
LikeLike
I want to register a complaint: What is it with these cavalier postings of a you-tube link at the end of the posting? After listening to the wonderful guitar piece, I saw a performance by Sarah Chang of a violin concerto. After that I noticed Dvorzac’s ninth symphony “From the New World”. I felt obligated to listen to it in its entirety. Now I’m an hour and a half into this and I forgot what the article was about. Oh yes, dystopia and the near term prospect of human (and possibly all life) extinction. Never mind.
LikeLike
Well it worked then. It’s a stress reliever to prevent people from slitting their wrists.
LikeLike
It’s a way to more quickly break down the energy gradients.
LikeLike
What happened to my 2nd comment? Did I hallucinate it? Sheesh.
LikeLike
I never received it.
LikeLike
I fumbled it, answering a Skype call – I think I deleted it (instead of minimizing the window).
What it said in essence was that this is a wonderfully clever post, especially weaving in Franklin and closing with that Paco-led symphonic piece. Bravo Mike!
LikeLike
LikeLike
Your coverage is encyclopedic. Keep up the good work.
Please note that dinosaur fossils have not been found in Kentucky, according to Wikipedia, “Fossil-Bearing Rocks,” Greb (1999). Maybe there is some recent discoveries, but I missed them. See: http://www.uky.edu/KGS/fossils/vertes.htm
You might consider a concentrated and thorough critique of the Citizens Climate Lobby and their proposals (carbon fee & dividend)
Donald Campbell, Ph.D. Geologist
LikeLike
Ah ok. Some very old bones of mammals nonetheless:
“There is a common misconception that the bones from Big Bone Lick are the bones of dinosaurs. This is not true. The bones from the lick are fossils of mammals that lived during the Pleistocene Epoch, often called the Ice Ages, and are much younger than the dinosaurs. In all, 22 distinct species of Pleistocene mammals were reported in the early digs at Big Bone Lick (Jillson, 1968). However, subsequent expeditions by the University of Nebraska in cooperation with the Kentucky Department of Parks during the mid-1960’s could only confirm 10 of these species. Most of the bones collected during the 1960’s remain in a Nebraska paleontological warehouse, but some are housed in the small museum at the Big Bone Lick State Park , in Boone County, in northern Kentucky, and similar bones can be seen at the Cincinnati Museum of Natural History an hour to the north. The most famous bones belong to two types of Ice Age elephants, mastodons and mammoths. Life-size statues of the ice-age mammals can be seen at the Park.”
LikeLike
I think they have a few dinosaurs at the Creation Museum in Northern Kentucky, featuring Jesus saddled upon a T. rex. Following collapse the site should be fertile ground for psycho-pathologists and techno-paleontologists should they survive the coming rapture. As you’ve mentioned, we do have some Mammoth bones.
LikeLike
@ James
I did not know that was such a popular meme.
LikeLike
My God, I had never seen it with my own eyes, but now I can believe. It is magnificent!
LikeLike
LOL.
LikeLike
A humorous and accurate retelling of the bullshit story of America.
2006/07
LikeLike
That’s a great vid. Thanks for posting.
LikeLike
“What is especially worrisome is that climate change has only just started to have an impact on Western droughts. We’ve only warmed 1.5°F in the past century. Absent strong climate action, we are on track to warm 10°F over the next century!”
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/01/31/3223791/climate-change-california-drought/
LikeLike
I know that we have evidence and analyses that tell us 10 deg F cold come a lot sooner, but we would not have seen this amount of warming predicted in this century in the press several years ago. While most of the ms press ignores such dire predictions, there is definitely a swelling of these kinds of reports lately. It will be interesting to watch how more open minded people in the press react when they finally “get it”, and that day may come soon.
LikeLike
How about a 7-9oC rise now Paul?
Okay, the item below refers to only one month’s data, and February COULD be 7-9oC colder than normal, and a series of months so much warmer than normal is impossible. Nevertheless, it’s food for thought, especially when so many regions of the world are experiencing extraordinary deviations from the norm:
‘Of particular note were the amazingly warm January temperatures in the Balkans. According to weather record researcher Maximiliano Herrera, “over 90% of all stations in the Balkans from Slovenia to Croatia to Bosnia to Serbia To Montenegro to Macedonia to Kosovo etc, have DESTROYED their previous record of warmest January ever (many locations have 100 – 200 years of data.) In many cases the monthly temperatures were 7 – 9°C (13 – 16°F) above average, and the new records were 3 – 4°C above the previous record.’
http://robinwestenra.blogspot.co.nz/2014/02/climate-records.html
Whether anyone in MS gets it or not, under the present regime media are more or less obliged to run adverts for planet-fucking via vehicle sales, air travel, holiday cruises, real estate development, shopping etc.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Continue here.
LikeLike
Read this:
Americans’ Mental Health is Latest Victim of Changing Climate (Op-Ed)
….
…What Isman is experiencing is one of the little-recognized consequences of climate change, the mental anguish experienced by survivors in the aftermath of extreme and sometimes violent weather and other natural disasters. The emotional toll of global warming is expected to become a national — and potentially global — crisis that many mental health experts warn could prove far more serious than its physical and environmental effects.
“When you have an environmental insult, the burden of mental health disease is far greater than the physical,” said Steven Shapiro, a Baltimore psychologist who directs the program on climate change, sustainability and psychology for the nonprofit Psychologists for Social Responsibility (PsySR). “It has a much larger effect on the psyche. Survivors can have all sorts of issues: post traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, relationship issues, and academic issues among kids.”
A report released in 2012 by the National Wildlife Federation’s Climate Education Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation predicted a steep rise in mental and social disorders resulting from climate change-related events in the coming years, including depression and anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, substance abuse, suicide and widespread outbreaks of violence. Moreover, it estimated that about 200 million Americans will be exposed to serious psychological distress from climate-related events in the coming years, and that the nation’s counselors, trauma specialists and first responders currently are ill-equipped to cope.
“The physical toll has been studied, but the psychological impacts of climate change have not been addressed,” said Lise Van Susteren, a forensic psychiatrist and one of the report’s authors. “We must not forget that people who are physically affected by climate change will also be suffering from the emotional fallout of what has happened to them. Others suffer emotionally from a distance, especially those who are most keenly aware of the perils we face, or as in the case of children, those who feel especially vulnerable. And the psychological damage is not only over what is happening now, but what is likely going to happen in the future.
“This kind of anticipatory anxiety is especially crippling and is increasingly being seen among climate activists — in some cases rising to the level of a kind of ‘pre-traumatic’ stress disorder,” she added.
Moreover, society can expect to experience a collective sense of sadness, anger and defeat as it confronts the inevitable, and possibly irreversible, long-term environmental effects of global warming, and the failure to prevent them, according to Van Susteren.
“We are undoing millions of years of evolution, and the situation is a catastrophe,” she said. “Climate activists on the front lines are desperate to convey this to the public, but are told to be wary of paralyzing people with fear. Compounding the issue is that people often generally are not ‘good’ at knowing they are anxious, or, if they do, often don’t know why.
“Because of the magnitude of the problem, and the fact that our leaders are not responding commensurate with the threat, feelings of vulnerability are repressed and cause unseen psychological damage,” she added.
The report emphasized that certain populations would be more at risk than others, including the elderly, the poor, members of the military, people with pre-existing mental-health disorders, and especially America’s 70 million children.
The report compared what children may be feeling today to the distress suffered by American and Russian children over the threat of the nuclear bomb in the 1950s during the Cold War era, saying that climate change could have the same destructive impact. “Some children are already anxious about global warming and begin to obsess, understandably, about the future, unmoved by the small reassurances adults may attempt to put forth,” the report said.
The report recommended that the federal government draft a plan to enact a large-scale response to the mental-health effects of global warming, including public-education campaigns, increased training for mental-health professionals, and developing mental-health incident response teams.
Despite the nation’s experiences with previous natural disasters, “the scientific data show that what lies ahead will be bigger, more frequent, and more extreme than we have ever known,” prompting potentially dire mental-health impacts, the report warned.
“Many people will experience an inordinate risk and their minds will be changed because of it,” Shapiro said. . “Although some people may come out of it stronger, experiencing a trauma can totally change the way you function.”…
…
Members of Psychologists for Social Responsibility worry that continued inaction on climate change will only bring more of the same. The group recently wrote to Congress, urging lawmakers to address climate change to avoid a mental health catastrophe.
“Without such action, the impact of heat waves, extreme storms and floods, droughts and water shortages, food production problems, lessened air quality, sea level rise, and displacement from homes and communities is likely to pose significant mental-health challenges to millions of Americans and billions of others worldwide,” the psychologists wrote in their letter.
The resulting stress and rise in mental illness likely will “harm interpersonal relationships, make people less able to work constructively or do well in school, and ultimately injure the day-to-day functioning of our society and our economy,” the group told Congress. “Hurricane Katrina demonstrated all of these outcomes in microcosm to the American people, and an ample body of research strongly predicts such severe psychological and social consequences.”
To be sure, while it is possible for survivors to recover emotionally, “there is significant sudden loss that needs to be processed,” Nadel said. “There is physical loss, there is emotional loss, and there is social loss.”
Meanwhile, if the world’s nations do not contend aggressively with the dangers posed by a warming planet, “we will have to deal with the reality that we are living in unpredictable, unstable and volatile times when it comes to climate change,” Nadel said. “When I talk to people in other countries who’ve been living with natural disasters their whole lives, they don’t expect the phones to always work, and they understand that people may not show up on time because a tree might have fallen on the road. They accept that emergencies are part of life and out of their control.
“Their social rhythms have adapted, and that’s what we’re going to have to do,” she added. “We will have to shift our mindset to accepting uncertainty and unpredictability, and develop a different belief system about what we’ll have to contend with when the order of things changes.”
LikeLike
Disaster capitalism should be able come up with plenty of pills and treatments to sell to people who are anxious, depressed, suffering from post-traumatic stress disorders or pre-traumatic stress disorders.
Anything but address the real problem, of course.
I’m no fan of Winston Churchill but was probably right when he said the Americans will do the right thing after they have tried everything else (having made a succession of monumental fuck-ups himself)..
LikeLike
I would have to disagree with that. America(the corporate state) seldom does the right thing unless it coincidentally aligns with the agenda of global domination and wealth extraction. The examples are extensive, enough to fill a book.
LikeLike
“make people less able to work constructively or do well in school” Because God forbid mental issues might interfere with BAU!
LikeLike
LikeLike
“We’ve had about a 25 percent decrease in the number of air samples measured from the global cooperative network,” Dlugokencky told Live Science. “If we want to understand what is happening [with methane], we’re going in the wrong direction to do that.”…
LikeLike
12 Graphics that Contain Everything You Need to Know about Climate Change
By David Biello | January 31, 2014
…Cement, natural gas, oil and coal—these are the fundamental inputs of the modern world. They are also the four main reasons for rising greenhouse gas emissions, as the world burns ever more fossil fuel and builds more and more cities (for every ton of cement made, roughly a ton of CO2 enters the atmosphere). The most polluting is coal, so cutting back on coal burning (or capturing the CO2 and other air pollution it creates) is the number one priority for combating climate change….
LikeLike
Too good to miss..
from the remember-that-one-time,-at-idiot-camp? dept
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140131/10240226060/guardian-releases-video-that-time-its-editors-were-forced-to-destroy-laptop-that-had-snowden-documents.shtml
and
from the did-he-really-just-say-that? dept
You may recall the stories from the past couple years about the so-called “snooper’s charter” in the UK — a system to further legalize the government’s ability to spy on pretty much all communications. It was setting up basically a total surveillance system, even beyond what we’ve since learned is already being done today. Thankfully, that plan was killed off by Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg.
However, Prime Minister David Cameron is back to pushing for the snooper’s charter — and his reasoning is as stupid as it is unbelievable. Apparently, he thinks it’s necessary because the fictional crime dramas he watches on TV show why it’s necessary. I am not joking, even though I wish I was:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140131/09523326059/david-cameron-says-snoopers-charter-is-necessary-because-fictional-crime-dramas-he-watches-prove-it.shtml
LikeLike
Thanks. So much going on it’s easy to miss things, especially when one has given up reading stuff relating to politics and the games politicians play.
One might think it’s all play-acting. However, all the evidence indicates political leaders have rather low intelligence and more-or-less no ethics.
All long as the lies they continually tell sound plausible to the uninformed masses they can get away with anything. That’s the scary part. . .
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Unfortunately Stephen Harper’s vile government was not ‘defeated’ at New Brunswick.
The evil, mendacious, fascist cretin Harper will be back with more vicious tactics to crush opposition: His mission -to totally wreck the health, wealth and welfare of the Canadian people and destroy the environment, both locally and globally- is only half accomplished.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Flooding has been identified as the most dangerous impact of climate change for the UK and is hitting harder and faster than expected
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/01/january-uk-wettest-winter-month-250-years
The deluge that has engulfed southern and central England in recent weeks is the worst winter downpour in almost 250 years, according to figures from the world’s longest-running weather station.
The rainfall measured at the historic Radcliffe Meteorological Station at Oxford University in January was greater than for any winter month since daily recording began there in 1767, and three times the average amount.
The latest Met Office data shows that the region from Devon to Kent and up into the Midlands suffered its wettest January since its records began in 1910.
But Ian Ashpole, the Radcliffe Meteorological Observer, said: “The Radcliffe measurements more than double the length of the Met Office record and give us a better grip on how things are changing.”
Flooding has been identified as the most dangerous impact of climate change for the UK and is hitting harder and faster than expected, according to scientists. Thousands of homes have been flooded since December, and much of the low-lying Somerset Levels remains under water.
Ashpole said: “The figures here are pretty representative of the broader area as all the weather stations in the region have been recording very high rainfall and the rain fronts have been coming in over broad areas.”
Oxford’s Radcliffe Observatory was founded to assist astronomers, but while the telescopes have now gone, the weather station has continued its work and now has one of the longest-running series of daily measurements in the world.
A total of 146.9mm of rain fell in January, smashing the previous record of 138.7mm in 1852. The new record is three times the average recorded for the month over the last two and a half centuries. It was also the wettest winter month – December, January or February – ever recorded, beating December 1914, when 143.3mm fell.
In addition, the 45-day period from 18 December saw more rain at Radcliffe than for any such period in the observatory record. The total of 231.28mm demolished the previous high of 209.4mm, which fell from 1 December 1914.
But Met Office forecaster Callum MacColl said the relentless series of brutal storms showed no sign of letting up: “There will be more wet and windy weather from the Atlantic this week. And the 15-day outlook sees the unsettled theme very much continuing.”
Andrew Barrett, a storm expert at the University of Reading, said: “The conditions are exactly right to bring wet weather across Britain. There’s effectively a storm factory over the Atlantic, caused by cold polar air pressing up against warm, tropical air, causing weather systems to form. These have then been steered across Britain by a strong jet stream.” Scientists are examining whether the melting of the Arctic ice cap, due to global warming, has led the jet stream to track further south, meaning more storms are channeled across the UK.
On Saturday, the Environment Agency had five severe flood warnings in place, indicating a danger to life, in parts of the south-west and the Midlands. There were also 156 standard flood warnings, meaning flooding was expected and that immediate action was required, with only the north-east region unaffected. The Met Office was also warning of severe weather along the entire west coast of England and Wales, where very strong winds were expected on Sunday, with the additional risk of large waves over-topping sea walls.
LikeLike
…A New York man sitting in a car that had a loaded rifle, machete and a container of gasoline was charged on Friday with threatening to kill George W. Bush after professing a romantic interest in the former president’s oldest daughter, prosecutors said.
Benjamin Smith, 44, of Pittsford in upstate New York was arrested in Manhattan by the U.S. Secret Service, according to a criminal complaint filed in federal court.
“Bush will get his,” Smith screamed as he was taken into custody, according to the complaint. Later, when asked about his marital status, he told agents he was divorced and “working on a relationship with Barbara Bush.”
At a preliminary hearing, Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrea Griswold told U.S. Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman the government believes Smith was referring to the former president’s daughter and not Bush’s mother, who shares the same name…
LikeLike
1-18-2014
LikeLike
1-23-2014
LikeLike
LikeLike
Keystone XL
Looks like they’re going to say
It won’t make a difference, but hey,
The government’s view
Is actually true—
We’re totally fucked anyway.
LikeLike
Have to work one of these into a future post. 😉
LikeLike
The stark reality of falling EROEI:
LikeLike
The State of Phony Populism
2-1-2014
By Norman Solomon
…Now, entering his sixth presidential year — after doing much for Wall Street and little for the nonwealthy — Obama has used the State of the Union to burnish himself as a champion of working people. But top economic officials in his Cabinet belie the pose.
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew is a former top executive at Citigroup, where he ran a unit that profited from the housing collapse. The same collapse was also very good to Obama’s current commerce secretary, Penny Pritzker, a Chicago billionaire who profited handsomely from banking operations that methodically targeted low-income people for subprime mortgages. (By the way, Pritzker was the national finance chair for Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign and a co-chair of his 2012 campaign.)
The president’s 2014 State of the Union, of course, hit all the right populist notes. He lauded “middle class” Americans who “work hard and take responsibility.”
Earlier in the day, the Democratic National Committee distributed talking points to its members, featuring this headline: “The President & Democrats Acting to Build a Stronger Middle Class.”
Limited-opportunity agenda
In his speech, Obama used the term “middle class” five times. But he had nothing of substance to say about America’s poor, despite the fact that nearly 50 million people — almost 1 in 6 — are living below the official U.S. poverty line.
“The Obama administration seems to have very little concern about poor people and their social misery,” African-American scholar and activist Cornel West said in November 2010. More than three years later, Obama’s record does little to refute such assessments.
Like West, I was a hopeful supporter of Barack Obama during his first campaign for president. In fact, I was an Obama delegate to the 2008 Democratic National Convention. But his corporate affinities and lack of interest in genuine structural change to the U.S. economy have long since become painfully clear.
On Wednesday, The New York Times headlined a bold-sounding statement from his State of the Union address: “Whenever I can take steps without legislation to expand opportunity for more American families, that’s what I’m going to do.” But such noble barking from President Obama has rarely had much bite.
Opportunity for American families is badly circumscribed by many policies that Obama has shown no interest in changing — such as huge military budgets that drain vast amounts of badly needed resources away from domestic needs. And he could expand opportunity for American families by removing Treasury’s Lew and Commerce’s Pritzker from his Cabinet, which remains well stocked with officials who have long functioned in sync with the predatory elites of Wall Street.
Obama’s continuing allegiance to those elites is one of the great tragedies of our era. He knows how to give speeches that impress many pundits and power brokers. But no amount of lofty oratory can make up for a presidency that continues to boost extreme disparities between the rich and the rest of us…
LikeLike
LikeLike
All the usual bullshit about transforming the economy, providing jobs and increasing GDP that we have been hearing for the past 40 years, with fuckwits leading the charge off the cliff:
http://robinwestenra.blogspot.co.nz/2014/02/fracking-in-new-zealand.html
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Vice: I think most people’s natural inclination after watching your video would be awe, followed by fear.
Vincent: I am in agreement. That was part of the intent of the video, for those that know, play, and love the game.
Not to presume you didn’t have fun building and developing Magnasanti, but your approach to Sim City doesn’t seem like you really treat it as a game anymore.
For me, SimCity 3000 is more than just a game. It has evolved to become a tool or medium for artistic self-expression. While most games today are focused on destroying things and killing other players, Sim City instead allows one to exercise the imagination to create, and express. Many people say, “Oh, it’s just a game!” But they are mistaken.
Godfrey Reggio’s Koyaanisqatsi seems to have been a big inspiration.
It very much was–I first watched it in 2006. The film presented the world in a way I never really looked at before and that captivated me. Moments like these compel me to physically express progressions in my thought, I have just happened to do that through the form of creating these cities in SimCity 3000. I could probably have done something similar–depicting the awesome regimentation and brutality of our society–with a series of paintings on a canvas, or through hideous architectural models. But it wouldn’t be the same as doing it in the game, because I wanted to magnify the unbelievably sick ambitions of egotistical political dictators, ruling elites and downright insane architects, urban planners, and social engineers.
I’ve a quote from one of your Facebook status updates here: “The economic slave never realizes he is kept in a cage going round and round basically nowhere with millions of others.” Do you feel that sums up the lives of the citizens of Magnasanti? (And you might want to set your Facebook to private by the way.)
Precisely that. Technically, no one is leaving or coming into the city. Population growth is stagnant. Sims don’t need to travel long distances, because their workplace is just within walking distance. In fact they do not even need to leave their own block. Wherever they go it’s like going to the same place.
http://www.vice.com/read/the-totalitarian-buddhist-who-beat-sim-city
LikeLike
From Desmogblog. If there were any chance of mitigating the worst of global warming, this is what is killing the chance of doing so:
Misinformation Is Winning – Doubt In Climate Change Climbing
Climate change-related disasters have been rising for decades; yearly temperatures are rising in a nearly consistent pattern; extreme weather events are costing economies across the globe hundreds of billions of dollars. Despite the mounting evidence that climate change is both real and a major threat to our security, more people are buying into the idea that climate change is a myth.
A new poll from Yale University and George Mason shows that the percentage of Americans who don’t believe in climate change rose 7% in 2013 to 23% of the entire population. While 63% of the general public believes that climate change is occurring, only 47% believe that human activities are to blame. The poll also revealed that less than 50% of Americans believe that climate change will affect their lives, but 65% say that it could harm future generations.
This shift in public opinion in 2013 happened during another record-breaking temperature year, with 2013 being the seventh warmest year on record.
All of the evidence points to the fact that climate change is real and that human beings are making it worse. Scientists agree that it is happening, and the physical evidence is all around us, so the big question is: why is the number of climate change deniers increasing?
The answer is that the misinformation machine has kicked into high gear, and 2013 saw a massive increase in the amount of climate change denial being given a microphone throughout various forms of media.
In the blog world, noted climate change denier and industry-funded lawyer Marc Morano made the claim that 2013 saw a decrease in the number of extreme weather events such as tornadoes, hurricanes, and droughts, as evidence that climate change isn’t happening. However, while 2013 did see a drop in these events, their overall occurrence has increased dramatically over the last 4 decades, making Morano’s “small picture” view of the problem grossly inaccurate.
But Morano is small potatoes compared to the larger misinformation campaign taking place.
Media Matters compiled a report earlier this month detailing the lackluster coverage of climate change in 2013, even after a major U.N. report and a presidential speech on the need to address the growing threat.
According to their report, mentions of climate change increased slightly in 2013 (but still remained below the highest point of coverage achieved during 2009), but the majority of the coverage was skewed to the denial side.
Rather than bringing on scientists to discuss the issue, networks like Fox, ABC and CBS relied instead on Republican politicians and pundits to tell the story, which was often no different than the dirty energy industry’s talking points on the subject.
Altogether, the three major networks — ABC, CBS, and NBC — aired a total of one hour and 52 minutes worth of programming related to climate change during their evening news programs in 2013.
The Guardian compared the media’s coverage (or lack thereof) on climate change to the way the media handled the run-up to the Iraq War. In both instances, says The Guardian, the media failed to do their job and fact check the talking points from both industry and government, and led the public to believe that the problem was much worse (or less severe in the case of climate change) than reality would have us believe.
2014 isn’t off to a much better start, either. The polar vortex and ensuing massive winter storms have given the deniers plenty of “evidence” to say that climate change is a hoax, ignoring the fact that climate change helped pave the way for the vortex. There’s even a term for this trend, snow-trolling.
As extreme weather events increase and global temperatures continue to rise, so will the attacks on climate science.
The problem is not necessarily the denial industry, but a public that is so unwilling to accept the truth that they will buy into any piece of “good” news, even if all evidence points to the contrary.
http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/02/01/misinformation-winning-doubt-climate-change-climbing
LikeLike
below the surreal cloudy image that is part human skull and part devastated big city skyline, your description of what amerikkka has become is great, xray.
‘the seeds of our destruction were planted long ago with the expansionist mindset of the first European settlers’
i think a pretty good argument can be made (although probably not conclusively) that ‘free will’ doesn’t exist, and that everything present and future is determined by what’s happened in the past. beyond that, re. the present predicament of industrial civ., i think one must go back at least to the onset of civilization itself to find the roots of this madness. the ability to (temporarily) dominate and manipulate nature then began in earnest, but the ability/wisdom to perceive the inherent dangers/flaws in doing so never materialized, or has lagged far behind. the ‘death trap’ didn’t begin with capitalism, it began with civilization.
once again, thanks for providing a great blog. it’s a relief to commiserate with others. it’s a small island of sanity in a sea of insanity. like the rising oceans, the insanity will in due time rise up and take this away from us.
LikeLike
I don’t know if I can go so far as to say civilization in general, but certainly “industrial civilization” and most definitely “capitalist industrial civilization.” I get your point though. It is said that the accumulation of wealth and stratification of society began in earnest after mankind settled to practice agriculture.
LikeLike
“Both archeology and history suggest that once a society gives up its belief system supporting egalitarianism for one in which they are supported by social superiors, it is difficult to reclaim the freedom and equality they lost. It almost requires a new start with full agreement by the population on a cosmology that declares all to be equal.”
— The Separation of Heaven and Earth: The Advent of Social Hierarchy and Its Implications
LikeLike
LikeLike
On news of his death they said, that’s so sad, BUT whats going to happen to “The Hunger Games”?
R.I.P. Philip Seymour Hoffman
LikeLike
That’s what should concern us about a celebrity death? What’s going to happen to some cinematic YA drivel? Sheesh ….
LikeLike
Collapse: What’s Happening to Our Chances?
Paul R. Ehrlich and Anne H. Ehrlich
But what is crystal clear is that these changes are not remotely big or fast enough to make a real dent in the problem. Furthermore, there are no plans nor any tendency toward making the most crucial move required to lessen the odds of a collapse: a rapid but humane effort to reduce the scale of the entire human enterprise by ending population growth, starting the badly needed overall decline in numbers, and dramatically curtailing consumption by the rich. There is not even discussion about the obvious elements of the socio-economic system that support a structure embedding a need for perpetual growth – fractional-reserve banking being a classic target that requires investigation in this context. Virtually every politician and public economist still unquestioningly assumes there are benefits to further economic expansion, even among the rich. They think the disease is the cure.
A few years ago we had a disagreement with our friend Jim Brown, a leading ecologist. We told him we thought there was about a 10 percent chance of avoiding a collapse of civilization but, because of concern for our grandchildren and great grandchildren, we were willing to struggle to make it 11 percent. He said his estimate of the chance of avoiding collapse was only 1 percent, but he was working to make it 1.1 percent. Sadly, recent trends and events make us think Jim might have been optimistic. Perhaps now it’s time to talk about preparing for some form of collapse soon, hopefully to make a relatively soft “landing.” That could be the only thing that might preserve Earth’s capacity to support Homo sapiens in a post-apocalyptic future.
More: http://mahb.stanford.edu/blog/collapse-whats-happening-to-our-chances/
LikeLike
Seems reality is becoming harder for Ehrlich to hold at bay. Over six months ago when he was on a panel in Australia this past July 2013 he was extolling the need for us to use more nuclear power plants. He also mentioned that fission is on the horizon. He was backed up by fellow panelist Cory Bradshaw. How desperate was Ehrlich to keep IC going that he was supporting nuclear. It was as if he was channeling Stewart Brand.
At that time (6 months ago) he still was saying we had a 10% chance. His motivation: was that he had children and grandchildren (oddly enough that he set himself up to fail by breeding. Similar to Charles Eisenstein (is he up to four now and Orlov with he brand new bouncing baby). Bradshaw also chose to procreate (and what a very special offspring he had). These people must have very special DNA that drives them to avoid vasectomies and adoption like the plague.
Ehlrich was ahead of the curve for years, yet he’s not able to accept the reality he warned of almost half a century ago because he’s got offspring. He’s got to have hope. Disappointing to say the least.
LikeLike
Stock Markets will lead to the extinction of humans; the rich will escape to the moon
An Australian scientist who helped in eradicating smallpox has sounded a death warning. Frank Fenner, emeritus professor of microbiology at the Australian National University, has claimed that human race will be unable to survive population explosion and unbridled consumption. “Humans will become extinct, perhaps within 100 years, Fenner is quoted as saying. “A lot of other animals will, too.”
Fenner’s chilling prediction should not be taken as yet another sensational news. I think any sensible leader, and I am not talking of only political leadership, should be able to get the message straight and loud. If you remember, Mahatma Gandhi had said that the Earth has enough for man’s need, but not greed. Prince Charles had more recently warned of ‘monumental problems’ if the world’s population continues to rise at such a rapid pace. Probably what the Prince did not mention was the greed of the growing population through increased consumption will create the grave crisis.
Unbridled consumption is the foundations for the ‘growth economics’ that has become the Bible of the modern neoliberal economics. In reality, growth economics is nothing but violent economics. It unleashes violence against natural resources, against the climate, against the nature, and also against fellow human beings. It shifts natural, physical as well as financial resources from the hands of the poor into the pockets of the rich and elite. We have been often told that 20 per cent of the world’s population of haves controls and uses the resources of the 80 per cent of the have not. Globalisation further strengthens that monopoly control.
In fact, globalisation has simply brought together all the haves from each country. In simple terms, each country has a North and a South, the North depicting the percentage of the bold and beautiful population. Globalisation has brought the North together. They have joined hands to usurp the world’s resources, to snatch whatever lies in the hands of the South. Globalisation has actually brought the rich and the crooked together.
Blame it on the burgeoning population, but it is the 20 per cent elite that is destroying the world’s resources. In the quest for more wealth they have succeeded in very cleverly changing the rules of the game. They began by first co-opting the economists, and then spread their wings to include the media. The economists laid out the ground rules. They began by designing GDP as an indicator of growth. They crafted it so deftly that we accepted an indicator of personal wealth to be a pointer to national development. They made everything, including global climate, look like a commodity to be sold and exploited.
I am reminded of what the milkman of India, Dr Verghese Kurian, had once said. One species that should disappear from the face of the Earth, and the Earth will be a wonderful place to live in, are the economists.
I am in complete agreement.
After the world became convinced about the virtues of GDP, the mainline economists and the consultancy firms worked out the stock market. I think there is no other innovation (if you don’t like to use the word invention) in recent times that has not only influenced but hastened the process of unbridled consumption than the emergence of the Wall Street. In fact, the consultancy firms may refuse to accept it now, and for obvious reasons, but Stock Market will lead the world towards the extinction of human race that Fenner has warned us.
I am amazed at the way the Stock Markets work. These markets have commodified everything. Much of the world’s environmental ills are a direct fallout of the Stock Market. Stock Markets will squeeze every drop of water (or other natural resources) out of the planet. There is a price for everything, including the air you breathe. In the days to come you will see Wall Street beginning to trade in synthetic life. Craig Ventor is already pitching for it. I will not be surprised if the human genes too are traded sooner than I expect.
Stock market is certainly not sustainable. The economic meltdown (economist refused to call it economic collapse) that the world witnessed in 2008-09 was the outcome of a systemic failure in the Stock Markets. But the lure of money was so strong, that even the mightiest of the governments refused to let the faulty system go. In a globalised world, the economic bailout package became a necessary evil. As someone said, it amounted to privatising the profits, and socialising the costs. Everyone willingly participated. With the media being a beneficiary of this corrupt system, no dissenting voice could be heard.
If the tax-payers had refused to bailout the collapse of the markets, the world would have taken the first step towards making a correction for the better of the humanity. It didn’t happen.
Such an unbridled consumption will be the beginning of the end of the world. In fact, the process if already on. Only the economists refuse to see it, and since the economists have been paid to be quiet, the media too refuses to spot the evil. Stock Markets have already caught the fancy of the media, and they are projecting it as an indicator of economic growth. And as I said earlier, growth economics is nothing but violent economics. While the economic benefits would be reaped by the rich and the crooked, you and me will have to live with the violence it unleashes. I am not sure how many of us will survive this violence.
Fenner is therefore right when he says that humans will probably become extinct within 100 years. Humans will certainly disappear from the face of the Earth, I don’t doubt it. But by the time the Stock Markets succeed in plundering the Earth’s resources making it absolutely inhospitable for the man to survive, the rich and the elite would have escaped to the moon.
LikeLike
Website for above: http://devinder-sharma.blogspot.in/2010/06/stock-markets-will-lead-to-extinction.html
LikeLike
And there you have it in a nutshell. Not much more can be said.
LikeLike
This piece seemed pretty on target, except for the lack of resources and data supporting his conclusion.
Unfortunately he completely lost credibility with that last sentence. Yeah like there is going to be colonies of the elites in outer space. Shades of Gerald K. O’Neil and the High Frontier.
Delusional not to understand how much energy and resources would be needed to actually transport all the necessary materials and machinery off planet. Then what. Are they going to terra form the moon like in a Bradbury, Heinlein, Asimov novel? Those days are long gone; only what does the author say at the end. Oh, yes. Technology will save us.
LikeLike
I don’t think he was being serious, but rather sarcastic with the moon colonization hyperbole.
LikeLike
As a matter of fact, I know he was not serious about the moon colonization joke. He’s highly critical of technology in his writings. For example, from ‘Death Trap’:
‘Ninety-five percent of the new science in the world is created in the countries comprising only one-fifth of the world’s population. And much of that science neglects the problems that afflict most of the world’s people. – Kofi Annan in Science, Mar 7, 2003
It is a sad reflection on the way modern science has grown. Nothing can be more tragic for the five-sixth of the world’s population that has been forced to accept science and technology that had actually not been developed for them. Still worse, what Kofi Annan probably forgot to say was that the biggest tragedy of modern times is the way countries have allowed industries to control and manipulate science…
LikeLike
Thanks for clarifying.
This is the first piece I read by this guy. I totally didn’t get that he was being sarcastic. After watching people like Stewart Brand morph into the Dark Side and hearing the constant drum beat about technology, technology, technology I’m probably unable to tell when people are really on the bandwagon or not.
From that piece you linked to and those particular quotes this author gets what most do not. That technology and those who promote it have not taken into account those have been forced to accept this stuff that does not bring the benefits too many claim it does.
A recent poster on NBL posted to a piece by Paul and Anne Ehrlich which lead to a link of a rebuttal piece by one Michael Kelly of Engineering Dept at Cambridge. It’s entitled “Why a collapse of global civilization will be avoided: a comment on Ehrlich & Ehrlich” and can be found here http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/280/1767/20131193.full.html#ref-list-1.
If any of you on this site choose to read this piece I’m pretty confident that you’ll easily find the flaws and weak points in the conclusions Kelly makes. Top most is the clarion call that technology will save us.
LikeLike
The elite aren’t going anywhere but down and out with the rest of us. In fact, they have the most to lose (as far as possessions and so-called wealth). People keep thinking that enough money will “buy” ones’ way out, but that’s impossible in a total collapse of civilization because the habitat that supports life in all its glorious forms
will be gone.
While we’re collapsing there may be those who can stave off the violent zombie hordes, but they can’t do anything about the atmosphere becoming ever more toxic from all the pollution we’re dumping in to it (including mercury now, being pushed down from higher elevations to the troposphere, where it may enter the food chain), the increased radiation from Fukushima and all the other nuke plants on Earth going into meltdown due to increasingly disastrous natural conditions (superstorms, earthquakes and volcanic activity), deterioration of infrastructure (like pipelines and especially the electrical grid from the stresses of climate change), and the fact that we’re doing precisely NOTHING to mitigate against any of it (and haven’t for decades).
It’s the loss of habitat, which supports all life, that will guarantee our demise.
http://www.livescience.com/43045-arctic-warming-linked-stratified-air.html
Arctic’s ‘Layer Cake’ Atmosphere Blamed for Rapid Warming
The Arctic is leading a race with few winners, warming twice as fast as the rest of the Earth. Loss of snow and ice, which reflect the sun’s energy, is usually blamed for the Arctic temperature spike.
But a new study suggests the Arctic’s cap of cold, layered air plays a more important role in boosting polar warming than does its shrinking ice and snow cover. A layer of shallow, stagnant air acts like a lid, concentrating heat near the surface, researchers report today (Feb. 2) in the journal Nature Geoscience.
“In the Arctic, as the climate warms, most of the additional heat remains trapped in a shallow layer of the atmosphere close to the ground, not deeper than 1 or 2 kilometers [0.6 to 1.2 miles],” said Felix Pithan, a climate scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany and lead author of the new study.
“[This] makes the Arctic surface rather inefficient at getting rid of extra energy, and therefore it warms more than other regions when the entire planet is warming,” Pithan told Live Science.
The Arctic atmosphere looks like a layer cake compared with the tropics. In those regions, thunderstorms carry heat from the surface miles upward, where it then radiates out into space. But in the Arctic, air and heat at the surface rarely mix with air located high in the atmosphere, Pithan said.
“The Arctic atmosphere is much more inefficient than the tropics at getting rid of that extra energy,” he said.
This pattern also helps explain why the Arctic warming signal is stronger in winter, Pithan said. During that season, the Arctic air mixes less than in the summer, because of cold temperatures and inversion layers — places where air temperature increases with height, instead of the other way around.
Feedback loops
Pithan and co-author Thorsten Mauritsen tested air layering and many other Arctic climate feedback effects using sophisticated climate computer models. On a regional scale, climate feedback effects can amplify or dampen the global warming caused by greenhouse gases.
In the Arctic, one familiar feedback effect is sea ice albedo, which measures how well the Earth’s surface reflects sunlight. Snow-covered ice reflects up to 85 percent of sunlight. But the Arctic sea ice has hit near-record minimums of sea ice since 2002, meaning the ocean is absorbing more sunlight, and heat, than it used to, leading to more ice melt.
The ice-albedo effect was the second most important contributor to Arctic warming, according to the study.
LikeLike
I can’t think of any preparation that really makes sense in the long term. I used to like the idea of permaculture, and I have done a bit of it at my place. But the plants I’ve selected are those that grow well without chemicals NOW. In a decade or two all will change drastically, and it has probably been a waste of time, except that I enjoy doing it.
It will be sad to see my trees, bushes vines, and other plants, some of them so beautiful now, wither and die, knowing my family and friends and I will follow.
Still, I feel giving these plants and all the critters a chance to live for a while is the right thing for me.
LikeLike
Heed the warnings in extreme weather – or risk losing Earth
Make no mistake – climate change will hit us hard. We need to clean up the mess before it is too late
From The Guardian
• Anders Levermann is a professor at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, and an IPCC lead author
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2014/jan/31/climate-change-extreme-weather-earth
LikeLike
There goes that “before it’s too late” phrase.
LikeLike
Sure. We aren’t going to see articles for the general public, even in most of the alternative media, that do not say we can possibly do something to avoid extinction. But the big news is that the media really is now presenting us with articles that pose the POSSIBILITY of extinction, if we do not engage in a gigantic, implausible turnaround in our fossil fuel use. This is a big change for the media, until a year or two ago these kinds of articles were very rare. We were told global warming would be an enormous problem, but the idea of extinction did not come up. I probably have seen thirty articles in just the last couple of weeks that hint that we may be heading toward the end of all human life. That is a big change.
I like to follow this stream in the media. I think these writers are a bit courageous even bring up extinction as a possibility, as only some 47 % of people in the US are even convinced hat fossil fuels are the cause of climate change. Almost none realize the certainty or severity of runaway climate change. So these writers are pretty radical and taking chances with their reputations. But at some point, still a bit in the future, some of these will come over to our side and admit we are headed in a direction that cannot be changed. That will be too scary for most people.
LikeLike
And what happens when they come over to ‘our side’ (whatever that is ?) What do they find ? Paul Getty plugging Bill McKibben.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/02/tom-engelhardt-ending-world-human-way-climate-change-anti-news.html#comment-1853563
LikeLike
Well that was an interesting journey. I went to that link and found myself in the midst of another group of people (and I believe Foss’s website partner) defending both Gail T and Foss.
Was the particular comment you linked to from Paul. I’ve read the interchange here between you and Paul regarding old Bill, but didn’t see any mention of McKibben on that particular Naked post. Did I miss something?
That particular post referred to Guy being too optimistic, which was odd in itself. Was that commenter being sarcastic?
I did find it strange that no one (unless I missed it) referred to or showed an understanding of the time lag effect. Certainly neither Foss nor Tvberg seem to get this important piece of the puzzle. It’ how I understand that even if IC collapsed today the natural world will still be processing the damage from the last 40 years. And in addition with the collapse of IC whatever particulates we’ve put out keeping the temps from rising will go away immediately causing a rapid increase in temps.
The omission of these two points (unless they are proven to be incorrect) by others writing on climate chaos seem like the cherry picking that McPherson is accused of.
LikeLike
@ PMB
No, my point re Paul harks back to the previous thread and earlier, re his enthusiastic support for McK whom I consider a fraud and Paul’s point about mentions of extinction.
I provided that link as an example of where some people are at re the climate debate.
I don’t know who provided the McPherson link, I don’t think the comment was being sarcastic, Guy does mention food in passing, but it’s not much about resource wars.
People who accuse McPherson of cherry picking usually are not very specific, it’s just a smear to sow doubt.
I think he does cherry pick. He says here’s the very bad news that nobody is telling you about, this is what I think it means. He puts it all together in one place. Everyone is free to check it out for themselves.He seems to be the only person doing it, which is rather astonishing.
LikeLike
Well, everyone is on a journey, and most people do not even realize that global warming will be truly devastating. Hail to those who work tirelessly to educate the public, and lead them onto the first steps of understanding our situation.
And, frankly, I like that people will be led to support efforts to get off of fossil fuels, support sustainable farming, permaculture, renewable energy,, preservation of natural areas, fight polluting industries, oppose the climate denying fossil fuel industry and related think tanks, and on and on.
I no longer feel any of this will win the fight to save the world, but I am in support of the efforts. And I am sure that as these people, who hear the word from McKibben and others like him, will eventually go on to realize we have gone too far. Their efforts will be in vain, but as XRayMike says, it is well they do all of this as it may mitigate the worst that is coming and hold it off for awhile.
Meanwhile, I feel better being part of the fight. Wish I could do more. Seems like a good way to finish out the last years of my life. What is a better way to spend one’s energy?
LikeLike
Ten years out of date.
LikeLike
What good has it done? McKibben and all the others like him have changed nothing. I’ll give some of them some credit for their efforts, but once you take corporate money, let the enemy in your camp, you’ve lost. Most NGOs are allowed to exist as long as their is no real disruption to BAU. Corporations just think of them as part of the PR budget.
LikeLike
I think it’s much worse than that.
Jonathan Porritt, was a posh ans articulate green campaigner who went around making speeches urging people to change their lifestyles, and got a strong following, much like McK. This phenomenon has been going on for CENTURIES. TPTB know exactly how to handle it. JP was invited to speak at Bilderberg.
He was educated at Eton, he’s an upper class toff, you’d think he might know better, but the dumb twit actually believes that he will save the planet, and gives the Bilderbergers all his best rhetoric about how we’ll be doomed unless we stop using plastic shopping bags and plant more trees and ride bicycles instead of driving. And of course, they applaud and all agree with him.
But they didn’t invite him because they wanted to know how to be GREEN, ffs. They invited him to see how dangerous he might be to their interests. So, the Gvt gives him a nice cushy well paid job as a special advisor, with a few perks and a sectretary, and every year he’d write a report, which nobody would read, and that meant he was sidelined and neutralised, and he became a chubby, boring, useless bureaucrat with nothing of interest to say.
Exact same thing, re the protesters on climate. TPTB checked out who was dangerous and who could be corrupted and they saw McK, so they funnelled the funding to HIM, and made sure the real radicals didn’t get any, because they could see he was a nice tame sort of fellow who they could easily manipulate, he’d sell a few windmills, but where’s the harm in that ?
It doesn’t threaten any of the BIG Industrial interests at all, it’s a nice little earner for Buffet or someone, everybody can see that ‘AMERICA IS A DEMOCRACY, HEY, LOOK, WE’VE GOT FREE SPEECH’ even Bill McKibben can protest !
It’s all contrived and controlled bullshit. You’re allowed to ‘protest’, so long as it’s somewhere between Chomsky and Amy Goodman. Anything outside and it’s a bullet in the head. Same for ‘alternatives’.
There is absolutely NO possibility of reducing CO2 ppm down to 350. McK has always known that. He has been lying from the start by telling people that his campaign was about doing that.
Even if there was some way of doing it, that STILL does not get the climate back.
Once the climate system is destabilised, it does not return to it’s previous state just by changing the CO2 levels back to what they had been. The idea that it does is ridiculous. Like thinking you can un-crash a car. McKibben has always known that.
So he set up a campaign, raised money, got millions of supporters around the world, all on the basis of FUCKING LIES that he KNEW were lies.
Well, that’s what politicians do, we all know that. Or at least we are supposed to be smart enough to know that by now.
Which is what pisses me off. Because I’d like it if people were trying their best to tell other people the fucking truth for a change.
LikeLike
Your right it’s been “going on for CENTURIES.” Once we hit the 20th century and spawned guys like Bernays and invented the technical means to mass propagate it was game over for free thinking on any scale that matters. Why It never worked on me, I have never really figured out.
LikeLike
Look at the start of EF!, I think there were only about 6 and one was an FBI informer who tried to get them to plant bombs so they’d all be busted. This happens all the time. Any SERIOUS radical resistance gets crushed. Any less serious gets defused and diverted, or bought off or pushed into a stupid cul de sac where its ineffective.
I know about this stuff. I worked for a nature conservation organisation. The foot soldiers were volunteers and genuine. The bosses were traitors who were in it for themselves. They took Texaco money for everything they needed and when there was a big oil spill on their patch there wasn’t a peep out of them, you’d have thought it was the best thing that could have happened for the wild life.
There’s a beautiful story from ancient China, if you have a troublesome young radical who threatens the status quo, congratulate him on his good ideas, promote him, give him lots of responsibility to put his plans into action, give him more and more, tell him how exciting it is that his ideas will change the world, praise him, tell him he must expand his plans further and faster, it must all happen more quickly, raise him higher so that his rivals get jealous and envious and hate him and plot against him, give him more and more responsibility so he cannot possibly cope and his schemes begin to fail and fall to pieces and everyone can see has caused a disaster.
And then in front of everyone, with great regret, tell the assembled multitude that you have to take away his position, and replace him with someone else, because sadly he was not the man for the job after all, and he is disgraced and vanishes from public life .
LikeLike
Replying here so as not to get too far indented. I never paid much attention to McKibben, but there are some unclear forces behind him.
I just saw a climate-disaster film, as described here:
http://guymcpherson.com/forum/index.php?topic=563.msg41923#msg41923
and the Woodstock, VT/Rockefeller connection was odd, and strong.
The solution proposed was that we should sing to save the earth, btw.
LikeLike
From TomDispatch:
“What makes climate change so challenging is that the carbon dioxide (and methane) being generated by the extraction, production, and burning of fossil fuels supports the most profitable corporations in history, as well as energy states like Saudi Arabia and Russia that are, in essence, national versions of such corporations. The drive for profits has so far proven unstoppable. Those who run the big oil companies, like the tobacco companies before them, undoubtedly know what potential harm they are doing to us. They know what it will mean for humanity if resources (and profits) aren’t poured into alternative energy research and development. And like those cigarette companies, they go right on. They are indeed intent, for instance, on turning North America into “Saudi America,” and hunting down and extracting the last major reserves of fossil fuel in the most difficult spots on the planet. Their response to climate change has, in fact, been to put some of their vast profits into the funding of a campaign of climate-change denialism (and obfuscation) and into the coffers of chosen politicians and think tanks willing to lend a hand.
In fact, one of the grim wonders of climate change has been the ability of Big Energy and its lobbyists to politicize an issue that wouldn’t normally have a “left” or “right,” and to make bad science into an ongoing news story. In other words, an achievement that couldn’t be more criminal in nature has also been their great coup de théâtre.
In a world heading toward the brink, here’s the strange thing: most of the time that brink is nowhere in sight. And how can you get people together to solve a human-caused problem when it’s so seldom meaningfully in the news (and so regularly challenged by energy interests when it is)?
This is the road to hell and it has not been paved with good intentions. If we stay on it, we won’t even be able to say that future historians considered us both a wonder (for our ability to create world-ending scenarios and put them into effect) and a disgrace (for our inability to face what we had done). By then, humanity might have arrived at the end of history, and so of historians.”
More:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175801/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_the_end_of_history/
LikeLike
From Thoreau to Rosa Parks, and from Ghandi to you – a successful strategy to protect your liberties requires non-compliance and peaceful resistance.
And, as Rosa Parks proved, saying “NO!” can change the world.
http://offnow.org/plan/
LikeLike
Successful? Are you kidding? Where is the success? Saying no, at home, while every day using up your own bit of coal? Changes nothing.
LikeLike
I’m not kidding anybody, Paul, I’m providing a public service by distributing information. Quite often I distribute information which is diametrically opposed to my personal views, because it is illustrative of some contemporary development.
Just because I post a link does not mean I endorse the content in any way at all. Or it may be because I think it is fantastic and thrilling. I expect educated adults to be smart enough to draw their own conclusions without me having to explain to them what to read between the lines, i.e. the definition of intelligence – inter legio, read between ( the lines ) ok ?
LikeLike
But you’ll surely jump on my shit when I post information that I may not completely agree with, which I present as a “public service”!
LikeLike
Not at all, you should have understood by now what my gripe was about, you asked a series of questions about ‘What do you guys want ?’ etc, and it was plain that you were a McK fan, etc, and I’ve been hammering you re that. I’ve made my point, I’m sure you’ll agree. No need to say more. I appreciate it when you post stuff that I havn’t seen elsewhere or that other readers will want to read. I’m sure xray is glad you’re here making a valuable contribution. What I’m trying to do is to educate people so they don’t get fooled by stuff that is specifically designed to fool us all.
I liked some of what Holmgren said. The only thing that has ever cut emissions was a massive global recession. Ok, lets have one ! 🙂
LikeLike
A massive global recession will only delay the inevitable a bit. The runaway global warming is still in the works. Permaculture can’t survive. Too bad. I sort of like my little try at permaculture, amateurish as it is. Man, I see a lot of birds around it all this winter.
By the way, wood chips…..best thing ever for a garden, orchard, berry bushes. Gotta have a source, and then build the chips up about six inches deep. It fertilizes, keeps moisture, keeps out strangling weeds. Simulates the forest floor that was taken away from here. And all sorts of critters live in it.
LikeLike
Holmgren on his essay ‘Crash on Demand’
David Holmgren on his essay 'Crash on Demand' by 21st Century Permaculture on Mixcloud
LikeLike
Mother Jones: I was fascinated by your discussion of the “perception of incongruity,” and how humans create more and more elaborate explanations to account for contradictory evidence. Where does this turn up in the modern debate on extinction?
Elizabeth Kolbert: Even very smart people can try to shoehorn new information that just doesn’t fit into an existing paradigm. For a long time the story that we’ve been telling ourselves is that humans are just another animal. We evolved from other animals and our place in the universe isn’t particularly special. What I’m trying to convey in the book is that we are unusual. We turn out to be the one species altering the planet like this, and that puts people back in the position of being responsible for what happens. There’s a big resistance to the idea that we could be such a big deal. The Earth is big. There are huge natural forces that have worked over geological time. But it turns out, when you look carefully at the geological time you can’t find anything like us.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/01/interview-elizabeth-kolbert-new-yorker-sixth-extinction
New book: The Sixth Extinction
LikeLike
This will drive you guys crazy, but here is an optimistic take on what could happen.
I don’t agree it can work, but I like the ideas. Like permaculture, not something that will help us avoid extinction, but a good way to go before we go.
Future near perfect: How humans can still save the day by 2050
In “The World We Made,” green guru Jonathon Porritt writes of a future where we fix the planet with renewable energy, smart food systems, and jetpacks. Bonus: It’s all possible. (Except maybe the jetpacks.)
BY AMELIA URRY
http://grist.org/climate-energy/future-near-perfect-how-humans-can-still-save-the-day-by-2050/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Daily%2520Feb%25204&utm_campaign=daily
LikeLike
Thanks to Speaking Truth To Power site:
“Of course, for us here at The Automatic Earth, we have our own private laugh track these days, because we’ve been saying for years that what is happening now, would. You can have faith in people like Keynes and Krugman and Bob Shiller until you’re blue in the face, but you can’t revive an economy that’s dying from a debt overdose by injecting more debt. It doesn’t work. Ever. Not even if you find some miracle new source of energy, or, pete forbid, you go to war. That’s how much debt there remains hidden, lurking and festering inside the global financial system.”
More:
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/debt-rattle-feb-4-2014-shower-scene-psycho/
LikeLike
And this:
“The Fed doesn’t care if other countries are hurt by its policies. What the Fed worries about is how the taper is going to effect Wall Street. If the slightest reduction in asset purchases causes this much turbulence abroad, then what’s it going to do to US stock and bond markets?
The answer, of course, is that stocks are going to fall…hard. It can’t be avoided. And while the amount of margin debt is not a reliable tool for calling a top; it’s safe to say that the recent spike in investor leverage has moved the arrow well into the red zone. Investors are going to cash out long before the Fed ends QE altogether, which means the selloff could persist for some time to come much like after the dot.com bubble popped and stocks drifted lower for a full year. Now check out this clip from Alhambra Investment Partners newsletter titled “The Year of Leverage”:
“For the year, total margin debt usage jumped by an almost incomprehensible $123 billion, while cash balances declined by $19 billion. That $142 billion leveraged bet on stocks far surpasses any twelve month period in history. The only times that were even close to as leveraged were the year leading up to June 2007 (-$89 billion) and the twelve months preceding February and March 2000 (-$77 billion). Both of those marked significant tops in the market.” ( Alhambra Investment Partners newsletter titled “The Year of Leverage“)
Repeat: “The $142 billion leveraged bet on stocks far surpasses any twelve month period in history.””
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/03/prelude-to-a-crash/
LikeLike
Thanks for this article, it was an interesting read. There are indeed great changes occurring in the world and the scenario you’ve described here may well become a reality. I’m curious, have you, or anyone else here, ever heard of a book called the Great Waves of Change? It’s very much about the changes that are occurring in the world today and details what people can do now to prepare and contribute to a new and challenging world environment. The book can be downloaded for free at the website: http://www.greatwavesofchange.org
LikeLike