Tags
Addiction to Fossil Fuels, Capitalism, Climate Change, Climate Change Feedback Loops, Collapse of Industrial Civilization, Corporate State, Eco-Apocalypse, Ecological Overshoot, Environmental Collapse, Extinction of Man, George Carlin, Hubris of Man, Mass Die Off, Overpopulation, Peak Oil
Even with all the environmental reports I read about the numerous species man is pushing off the face off the Earth, the biospheric havoc he is wreaking, and the violence he inflicts upon his fellow man, I still find the idea of human extinction surreal when I flip on the TV and see commercials for Viagra, breast augmentation, and ‘Hoveround’ power wheelchairs. I mean, we’ve managed to walk on the moon and send out exploratory space crafts and robots to other planets, yet we cannot even manage ourselves adequately enough here at home to keep from irrevocably fouling things up?!? How can that be? That we can achieve such feats of genius, but end up shooting ourselves in the proverbial foot with greenhouse gases just seems like one enormous and macabre cosmic joke to me. Doesn’t it strike you as tragically humorous? Oh, but the word is that we humans would be crazy if we didn’t reach deep down into our bag of technological tricks, if only for one last desperate time, to try to fix this doozy of a problem we’ve gotten ourselves into. Why not? We’ve already FUBARED the planet as it is, what with the chain of climate feedback loops irretrievably out of the genie’s bottle, making any mitigation and adaptation plans a day late and a dollar short. Faith in technological progress is certainly a myth that will not go down easily. We’ll keep trying to right this plane even as it does barrel rolls into the side of a mountain. What a horrible accounting error humans made by ignoring depletion and pollution in their calculations. Governments pretended that peak oil and global warming were simply figments of our imagination. If only their jobs didn’t depend on maintaining such an epic falsehood. Who knew 9 billion humans would become the next deposit of fossil fuels.
We had other things on our mind though, didn’t we. Money and the ability to generate it became the raison d’être for humans. Saving the environment simply was not profitable, unless you could convert it into some sort of tourist attraction. Wealthy people could hop on a CO2-belching airline and traipse around in those “protected areas” with their safari hat on and an assortment of modern electronic paraphernalia to record the momentous occasion, not too dissimilar to those annual climate change conferences the industrial world would put on. Humans always were great at maintaining appearances, even if it did cost them an entire civilization that spanned the planet. They were so good at detaching themselves from their surroundings that they could literally monitor a species into extinction while calling the whole process conservation. How’s that for self-delusion! As long as someone was getting paid, no one really cared about the end results. Biostitutes indeed!
So one could say that the human path to extinction was paved in greenbacks, if not gold. Nobody dared whisper that all the wealth humans had built up and accumulated over the last several hundred years since the industrial revolution was simply a grand illusion, a phantasmagoria of the fossil fuel age. It is said that there are two things certain in this world, but actually there are three: death, taxes, and ecological balance. Man may exploit, pollute, exterminate, and plunder all he wants, but in the end Mother Nature will always claw back what was taken without forethought or reflection. The first mistake made by man was to proclaim dominion over nature. From that point onward many other bonehead maneuvers were orchestrated by humans, but perhaps the biggest one was when they gave personhood to an economic entity devoid of feelings, morals, or conscience. How could anyone seriously think corporations were people??? Homo sapiens must suffer from an inferiority complex to have labeled its kind “wise”.
So this is my second eulogy to man, my first being ‘The Short Story of Carbon Man and Industrial Civilization‘. There are no Hollywood happy endings or cliff-hanger climaxes. Mother Earth will slowly take back what was stolen while billions of tiny humans scurry around to higher ground and find ways to temporarily hold off the gathering forces, but no mercy will be given to those who brushed off decades of warnings and prescient predictions. There will be no miracles here for a species that believes itself separate from and above the natural world.
Have you read craig dilworths too smart for our own good? The vicious circle principle goes back to our earliest origins.
LikeLike
Or the most successful species will manage to extinctify itself.
LikeLike
Ah, channeling lynn margulis…she lives!!!
LikeLike
And Charles C. Mann.
LikeLike
I have decided to continue fighting the corruption and insanity for the moment. This is this morning’s effort, prior to a face-to-face with our newly-elected mayor.
Dear Andrew,
This recently produced video, Arctic Death Spiral and the Methane Time Bomb, presents data which clearly demonstrates that the meltdown of everything is proceeding at a phenomenal, and accelerating, pace, and that continuation on the present course (the course that NPDC and all ‘official bodies’ are currently committed to) will result in utter mayhem globally very soon, dire circumstances for the people of Taranaki not far down the track, and a largely uninhabitable planet by around 2035.
Of particular note is the comment that ice melt is occurring 50 years ahead of the ‘worst case’ projections generated just seven years ago, i.e. in 2006 the projection was that the Arctic would be ice-free around 2070 but in practice it will occur well before 2020. Things are changing that fast.
The climate instability that fossil fuel addiction has generated has resulted in disruption of the jet stream air flows, and that is resulting in the kind of unprecedented weather chaos witnessed throughout the world recently: apart from Typhoon Haiyan, of particular note is the central US, which two years ago experienced record high summer temperatures and severe drought; earlier this year the region was subjected to unprecedented rain which caused massive infrastructure damage; a few days ago record low temperatures (around minus 29oC) were recorded.
In addition to climate disruption there is the matter is rapid sea level rise. Although most of Taranaki will not be seriously affected in the immediate future, the global ramifications will be catastrophic, and will impact economically.
Whilst NZ is to some extent cushioned by the vast expanse of relatively cool water around it, it would be utterly delusional to think that the NZ environment will not be very seriously affected in the near future. Indeed, recent NIWA data indicated that sea temperatures around NZ have been higher than normal for 11 consecutive months.
We should note that there is no discussion of anything of significance at the national (governmental) level, at the regional (TRC) level or at the local (NPDC) level. The so-called plans generated by Barbara McKerrow and the ‘clowns’ who pass as senior council officers are all fraudulent, contradictory, ‘full’ of omissions, and are ultimately self-destructive. This is because entire system is geared to ignoring everything that is happening in the real world and promoting short-term rorts based on fantasies and lies that facilitate looting, exploitation and destruction of what little remains of the systems that make life possible. Much of this is happening so that greedy individuals can accumulate even more fiat wealth.
The pretence that NZ is a Christian nation or even has any Christian values is long gone. The idea of being good custodians of God’s creation went by the board long ago too. Nevertheless, the phony Christian festivals will continue to be celebrated as commercial extravaganzas in order to sustain the rampant consumerism that is rapidly destroying the planet we live on. Short-term profit now overrides everything.
In addition to the environmental collapse, you will presumably be aware of the economic and social collapse that is occurring throughout the ‘developed’ world, as exemplified by ‘the biggest drop in living standards since records began’ in Britain:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-poorest-pay-the-price-for-austerity-workers-face-biggest-fall-in-living-standards-since-victorian-era-8991842.html
Whilst The Independent is less bad than most newspapers, we should note that it assiduously avoids making any connection with the peaking and decline of oil extraction both globally and locally for Britain; the money is not coming out the ground as it used to, due to the burn-it-all-up-as-quickly-as-possible policies implemented by Thatcher, Reagan and other saboteurs who have held high office over the decades.
As is the case throughout the western world, we have in NZ a system of government best described as by the rich and for the rich. Hence, a tiny group (usually described as the 1%) acquire more and more for themselves whilst systematically driving the rest of society ‘off the cliff’, as exemplified by the latest child poverty report for NZ. In addition, they destroy the future for everyone under the age of 60. Uninformed opportunists are encouraged to destroy everything that matters to keep the wealth flowing upwards. The corporate media and the local press are cheerleaders for this dysfunctional system which is predicated on destruction of the future, of course, since their short-term profits are dependent on continually misleading the general populace.
We can be absolutely certain that everything that matters will be in a worse state this time next year. And three years from now everything that matters will be in a far worse state than now. The degree of worsening will, to some extent, depend on policies implemented in the mean time. Whether the Ponzi financial system will hold together for another three years is anyone’s guess. It should have fallen over long ago but systematic fraud in high places is holding things together somehow. Many financial analysts talk of the collapse of the biggest bubble in history taking place in 2014.
Needles to say, phony Christians like Jonathan Young and phony socialists like Andrew Little deal with all of this by refusing to discuss it. And phony environment officers pretend none of it is happening or pretend that non-solutions promoted by corporations and money-lenders will somehow fix matters.
I must remind you that to date, NPDC policy has been geared to ensuring that no preparations whatsoever are made for the effect on the community of the various meltdowns, even though they have been underway for several years.
As mayor, you must decide whether you wish that policy, of ensuring no preparations for the real future are made, continues. As mayor, you must decide whether or not you can approve of policies based on fantasies and lies. As mayor, you have to decide how bad you want conditions to be three years from now and what degree of suffering, both locally and globally, you are willing to promote.
Regards
Kevin
LikeLike
Another great essay, Mike.
However, I tend to disagree with you about this:
‘What a horrible accounting error humans made by ignoring depletion and pollution in their calculations.’
My understanding is that at the time of Kuznet’s early work (1920s) depletion was not considered significant (despite Britain having peaked in coal extraction) because there were masses of untapped resources, and pollution was considered purely a local problem because there was lots of uncontaminated air and water..
However, by the late 1960s it was very evident that depletion and pollution were very significant factors.
I believe the bankers and industrialists deliberately chose to ignore the warnings given by resource specialists and ecologists in order to keep their Ponzi scheme expanding.
The massive increase in world population and the massive increase in per capita consumption over recent decades have catapulted us into the present dire predicament. .
.
LikeLike
We do agree, but you are simply elucidating that it was the choice of the psychopathic capitalists to ignore depletion and pollution… important point to know, and the masses went along with it (helped by copious amounts of corporate PR and greenwashing).
LikeLike
Specific to your point, a comment left here by Donald Campbell:
“Truth is told. To reinforce your argument, Mike, I suggest the following link for a partial history of the science of CO2 as it relates to environment:
Click to access annex2.carbon.diox.pdf
by The Conservation Foundation in March 1963.
Although evidence and warnings of the potential of irreparable environmental damage were published in the scientific literature, it was given little recognition elsewhere, illustrating the general distrust of such reports by the those who thought they knew better. Now we have to restructure our understanding of survival in ways that will be foreign to business-as-usual. Carbon tax, adapt as much as possible, and rebuild our infrastructure. It will not be a walk in the park.”
LikeLike
I think Genesis 1:28 was not translated properly.
“Be fruitful & multiply, creating Carbon Burners & destroy the environment.”
That’s the ticket! & easily accomplished.
LikeLike
Contrary to what most of the writers espouse on this excellent web site I disagree with one point. That there is no solution. That it’s game over time. Which I agree is a 90% probability. However there is one simple solution that will bring us back from the brink and hopefully mankind will embark on a more intelligent future in harmony with the planet. If 6 Billion people died off really soon there is a fighting chance that we can get this right, that we can be smarter than yeast. So it boils down to a decision. Accept that 6 billion must die soon or we become extinct. It really is that simple. Which leads to a rather curious thought. Do we believe that the handful of super rich elite running this planet do not know this? As a side bar I would love to know who was really behind the Georgia guide stones? Whoever it was has very clear understanding of how our world should operate.
LikeLike
To the extent that the “solution” to a terminal illness is for the patient to commit suicide, then you may be right. Then again, even your radical prescription may not be enough, after all it was not that long ago that the human population of the Earth was about 1 billion, around the year 1800 as I recall. In the span of just a few short generations we have more than quadrupled our population, aided by prodigious use of energy in the form of fossil fuels and the corresponding rapid build out of industrial infrastructure.
Indeed it is a testament to the scope and magnitude of our predicament that even your “solution” does not go nearly far enough. If enough infrastructure remains intact then even a small population of humans could easily pick up and continue our now familiar trajectory of overpopulation and overexplotation. A global nuclear holocaust might be enough to both eliminate population and incinerate infrastructure, but would also probably have the unfortunate side effect of taking out what’s left of the Earth’s biosphere with it.
Speaking of which, let’s not forget that even if every human disappeared tomorrow the climate would continue to destabilize and sea levels continue to rise for centuries if not millennia to come due to the prodigious amounts of carbon we have already spewed into the atmosphere. Not to mention the very real risk of mass extinction due to the worlds oceans becoming anoxic.
So, yes, 6 billion humans will of necessity have to die, but probably not by choice.
LikeLike
On 13 November 2013 WikiLeaks released the draft text of the crucial Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) Intellectual Property chapter during the lead-up to a TPP chief negotiators’ meeting in Salt Lake City on 19-24 November 2013. Today, 9 December 2013, WikiLeaks has released two more secret TPP documents that show the state of negotiations as the twelve TPP countries began supposedly final negotiations at a trade ministers’ meeting in Singapore this week.
One document describes deep divisions between the United States and other nations, and “great pressure” being exerted by the US negotiators to move other nations to their position. The other document lists, country-by-country, the many areas of disagreement remaining. It covers intellectual property and thirteen other chapters of the draft agreement. This suggests that the TPP negotiations can only be concluded if the Asia-Pacific countries back down on key national interest issues, otherwise the treaty will fail altogether.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Second_release_of_secret_Trans-Pacific_Partnership_Agreement_documents/31021/0/0/0/Y/M.html
LikeLike
Geoengineering the sky is not ‘normal’
12-9-2013
“…faculty from Johns Hopkins University and American University recently launched a new, Washington DC based “Climate Geoengineering Consortium”. The stated goal of the consortium, perhaps laudable, is “to generate space for perspectives from civil society actors and the wider public, to produce a heightened level of engagement around issues of justice, agency, and inclusion.” Perhaps I am too skeptical, but “generating space” for a debate seems a bit vague. This new consortium recently organized a meeting, slated as a “closed door” meeting of civil society representatives. Closed meetings for civil society always make me a little nervous. Especially when the topic is planetary scale interference with the global commons — the life support systems of our planet!
I’m not sure really how I ended up on the list of invitees, but I decided to attend. The meeting was held in a stark space at Johns Hopkins, with the requisite sleek furnishings and snack plates wrapped securely in sparkling plastic. Nobody in attendance was a shade darker than a bowl of oatmeal, all were dressed in drab, illuminated by glowing computers, tablets and smartphones. Represented were staff from Johns Hopkins and American University, as well as the conservative American Enterprise Institute (Lee Lane), Bipartisan Policy Center, NASA (Mike McCracken), the renowned blogger, Joe Romm, and long time (but now retired) Friends of the Earth director, Brent Blackwelder. There were representatives from U.S. Climate Action Network, Greenpeace, Food and Water Watch and various others. Certainly more diverse than some meetings, but even I could not avoid the sensation of being sort of a token.
Strikingly absent from the event was the single organization (ETC Group) that has been for years already working to raise awareness of climate geoengineering proposals among civil society via their “Hands Off Mother Earth” campaign, and also via their dogged and successful effort to promote a defacto ban on geoengineering through the Convention on Biodiversity. No other NGO has devoted anywhere near the attention to the issue, and yet oddly they were not behind these closed doors.
As expected, the opening remarks focused on reconfirming for us a sense of desperation, as we face global warming already on track to utter catastrophe. No disagreement there. We were told that climate scientists are running scared and so they are increasingly, even if reluctantly, turning to a “Plan B” for the planet. Plan B of course, being none other than, say, dumping sulphate particles into the stratosphere, pouring iron filings into the ocean, or perhaps charring and burying vast quantities of “biomass”.
After a brief review of the various technologies proposed and their potential to make things worse rather than better, one member of the audience asked: “If there is no silver lining to any of these approaches, then why are we even holding this conversation?” The organizers and most in the audience giggled, made jokes about adjourning the meeting right off the bat and heading home, and then settled in to discuss what were apparently more realistic questions, such as, “how do we get civil society more engaged in the discussion of geoengineering?” and “what form of governance would be most appropriate?”
But hang on! We are being shepherded into believing that it’s too late to seriously consider dropping consideration of geoengineering altogether? We are to assume that “the train has already left the station” and we now are obliged to engage in serious discussions about such outrageous proposals — or else just quietly disengage and accept the consequences.
Whose ideas are these anyway? Why are we being railroaded into accepting them as feasible and perhaps even desirable options? Are we somehow required to entertain and engage every nutty technofix idea that someone happens to dream up? If so, there are plenty out there and we could keep busy for all eternity if that is the case, meanwhile diverting our attention from implementing the straightforward, proven, low tech, low risk approaches to saving the planet. (Like halting deforestation, protecting biodiversity, putting a halt to overconsumption, ending the mining, fracking, clear cutting and burning of the planet, and providing real support to those coping with impacts of climate change, for example.)
This insistence that we engage in debate over climate geoengineering is part of the process of “normalization” that seems orchestrated — perhaps deliberately — with the intent of habituating people to the whole idea of climate geoengineering as an option.
It does in fact seem that we have commenced an out-of-control and ill-considered flight down the slippery slope, with a near dizzying onslaught of events, meetings, reports and debates on the topic where the more fundamental question is avoided and we are invited graciously to step right up and… go get lost in the weeds.
In a recent interview, Vandana Shiva, when asked her opinion on one proposed approach to climate geoengineering-spraying nanoparticles into the stratosphere, responded: “Each of these issues [geoengineering technologies] has a particular aspect that’s different but I think those particular aspects are very small compared to the overall damage and the overall irresponsibility. For me the first issue is, how dare you do this. How dare you. That has to be humanity’s response. Then the rest of the little things of how nano particles can harm or having too much sulphur in the atmosphere can harm — those are specific details but this is a civilizational issue. And in civilizational issues you don’t look at the tiny details as the debate. You have to look at the big picture!”
I personally have spent quite a lot of time in the weeds, critiquing the “particular aspects” of various technologies proposed for geoengineering (see for example our Biofuelwatch reports on biochar and bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration). But I must agree with Vandana. To a very large degree we only assist to “normalize” the issue by focusing on critique of the particular details.
What is clear is that climate geoengineering is opening new doors for many career seekers. From scientists with superman complexes, eager to be seen as doing “cutting edge” work with big important global consequence, to various environmental and other NGO careerists seeking grant support, status and a place at the table…”
LikeLike
I heed the ‘population loss’ argument: how much time do we have, before Nature takes its course? Question: assuming that this happens, who will run the surviving system, if there be one? Even a guided cull is fraught with unforeseen results, such as disease & the collapse of world trade, along with opportunistic power grabs, whether in the name of Freedom or Public Safety or some other grandiose idol. The surest thing about those who would rule by ruse or by ruthlessness, is that they lack imagination.
LikeLike
http://www.thealmagest.com/missing-heat-discovery-prompts-new-estimate-global-warming-2/6164
“An interdisciplinary team of researchers say they have found ‘missing heat’ in the climate system, casting doubt on suggestions that global warming has slowed or stopped over the past decade.
Observational data on which climate records are based cover only 84 per cent of the planet – with Polar regions and parts of Africa largely excluded.
Now Dr Kevin Cowtan, a computational scientist at the University of York, and Robert Way, a cryosphere specialist and PhD student at the University of Ottawa, have reconstructed the ‘missing’ global temperatures using a combination of observations from satellites and surface data from weather stations and ships on the peripheries of the unsampled regions.
The new research published in the Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society shows that the Arctic is warming at about eight times the pace of the rest of the planet. Previous studies by the UK Met Office based on the HadCRUT4 dataset, which only covers about five-sixths of the globe, suggest that global warming has slowed substantially since 1997. The new research suggests, however, that the addition of the ‘missing’ data indicates that the rate of warming since 1997 has been two and a half times greater than shown in the Met Office studies. Evidence for the rapid warming of the Arctic includes observations from high latitude weather stations, radiosonde and satellite observations of temperatures in the lower atmosphere and reanalysis of historical data.
A member of the Department of Chemistry at York, Dr Cowtan, whose speciality is crystallography, carried out the research in his spare time. This is his first climate paper.
He says: “There’s a perception that global warming has stopped but, in fact, our data suggests otherwise. But the reality is that 16 years is too short a period to draw a reliable conclusion. We find only weak evidence of any change in the rate of global warming.”
Robert Way adds: “Changes in Arctic sea ice and glaciers over the past decade clearly support the results of our study. By producing a truly global temperature record, we aim to better understand the drivers of recent climate change.””
LikeLike
Check out these pix, before and after, of glaciers:
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2013/12/shocking-before-and-after-photos-show-the-effects-of-climate-change/
LikeLike
LikeLike
ulvfugl…curious whether you’ve seen this film. I waited patiently until it appeared in my local Redbox a couple of months ago.
LikeLike
Inspiring.
LikeLike
No, Jacob, I’m not movie person, but I found the link here
View at Medium.com
I’ve been thinking a lot about all the crap I’ve been reading about Mandela, which has been nauseating.
People talk a lot about the virtues of non-violence. What we have at the moment is almost incalculable violence being inflicted upon non-humans and upon certain kinds of humans, minorities, and this is being completely overlooked, as if it was not happening.
And, it seems to me, it is inevitable, that soon, billions of people are going to be dying prematurely, because of what is coming in the future.
So who are those people going to be ?
This is a terrible question to ask and a ghastly question to think about. Do the people who are already loving in a region have priority over others ? In which case, you’re more or less going to have to stamp on the hands of people trying to get onto your life boat and watch them as they drown and get eaten by the sharks.
Looking at the forecasts as to which areas of the planet are expected to become uninhabitable… can it be expected that whole countries with hundreds of millions of people can just perish and vanish ?
They are going to understand that they will die if they stay and they will die if they move, so they will do something…
And we are headed towards 4, 5, 6 deg C unless we stop emissions NOW, which means leaving assets of fossil fuels worth hundreds of trillions of $ in the ground.
Does anybody think that will happen ? Unless it is FORCED to happen ?
It’s like telling people not to dig up gold. Every gold rush there has ever been, authorities have tried to control. It has NEVER worked. One in Australia, a ship called at a port, the passengers heard about newly discovered gold and left, the captain ordered the officers to shoot the crew if they tried to leave the ship, but the officers went too, the chance of instant riches was too tempting.
The people who want the oil and coal and methane hydrates want the money. They don’t care about anything else. How are they going to be stopped ? Some will agree, but others will cheat… unless they are deterred by fear of death. Same goes for the bankers and all the rest. But there is no global authority to control the corporations. The people will have to create their own, if they wish to survive. I don’t see any alternative, do you? But they will probably not survive anyway. We’re already too far gone…
LikeLike
I think Gerald Celente may see the economic situation clearly:
“When people lose everything & have nothing left to lose,they lose it.”
I think this statement could be extended to any segment of civilization.
My version goes beyond all laws,moral,cultural & religious value systems.
Be careful of who you piss off.
I’m having another great day. I woke up again.
LikeLike
The writers say they spent time in their youth with anarchists exploring different ways of living…
LikeLike
Wow.
LikeLike
http://www.gci.org.uk/cbat-domains/Domains.swf
LikeLike
Not that I am against democracy, but the system has been captured, pretty much worldwide, so it completely corrupted.
As we’ve just seen in Japan, a supposedly ‘democratic’ parliament votes to make anything it wants secret.
The NSA has got the dirt on all acting and potential leaders, and they can be blocked or blackmailed or assassinated so that the will of the electorate is never going to be expressed.
Democratic elections are not going to get us out of this mess. Perkins explains it well.
LikeLike
This is fun
we compare most of the popular translations of Sun Tzu’s The Art of War to give you an idea of how translations vary.
http://scienceofstrategy.org/main/content/comparing-english-translations
LikeLike
My central contention is that late capitalism not only accelerates the flow of capital, but also accelerates the rate at which subjects assume identities. Identity formation is inextricably linked to the urge to consume, and therefore the acceleration of capitalism necessitates an increase in the rate at which individuals assume and shed identities. The internet is one of many late capitalist phenomena that allow for more flexible, rapid, and profitable mechanisms of identity formation…
http://critical-theory.com/from-deleuze-to-lolcats-the-story-of-the-buzzfeed-guy/
LikeLike
Hey…thanks man. Interesting post, to be sure…but while checking out the site I quickly found this…
http://critical-theory.com/pussy-riot-members-freed/
…which then led me to this…
http://www.businessinsider.com/report-putin-plans-to-release-pussy-riot-members-2013-12
If true, a cynical person might take Putin’s mass pardon as a sly PR move in advance of February’s Olympic Games.
Well, PR or no, it would be great to see Nadezhda and Maria, and also the Greenpeace crew go free. Guess we’ll see in a couple of days.
LikeLike
Arctic territories, believed to hold vast untapped oil and gas reserves, have increasingly been at the center of disputes between the United States, Russia, Canada, Norway and Denmark as rising temperatures lead to a reduction in sea ice.
Russia has made claims on several Arctic shelf areas and is planning to defend its bid at the United Nations.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said Tuesday that a combined-arms force will be deployed in the Arctic in 2014 to protect the country’s interests in the region.
As part of the ambitious program, the Russian military is planning to reopen airfields and ports on the New Siberian Islands and the Franz Josef Land archipelago that were mothballed in 1993.
http://en.ria.ru/russia/20131210/185429796/Putin-Orders-Strong-Military-Presence-in-Arctic.html
Canada intends to lay claim to the North Pole as part of a bid to assert control over a large part of the resource-rich Arctic, Foreign Minister John Baird said on Monday.
Baird said Canada had filed a preliminary submission to a special United Nations commission collecting competing claims and would be submitting more data later.
The move could raise tensions with Denmark and Russia, both of which also look set to lay claim to the North Pole on the grounds it lies on a continental shelf they control.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/09/us-arctic-pole-idUSBRE9B811Y20131209
LikeLike
Staking a claim to the last (habitable)refuges of the future.
LikeLike
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel was in the Gulf on Friday at a conference of defense ministers from the region, including the Gulf Cooperation Council and Iran.
Hagel underlined American commitment to the security of the Arab states on the littoral of the Gulf, including Oman, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait (the six of which make up the Gulf Cooperation Council) and toward which he said the military balance of power had shifted. He said the US had sold $75 billion in sophisticated military equipment to those countries in recent years, more than in the previous 15.
Hagel said that the US had and would keep 35,000 military personnel in the Gulf region, some 10,000 of whom were army soldiers with armor or helicopter gunships. In addition, some 40 US naval vessels patrol the Gulf waters, including an aircraft carrier battle group.
The US commitment to the Gulf is because some 22% of the world’s petroleum is shipped out through its Strait of Hormuz. Qatari and other Liquefied Natural Gas is also shipped out by this route. While the US imports relatively little from this region, its military allies, including Japan and the NATO countries of Europe, heavily depend on it. (But so too does China, which imports from Iran, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries and is now the world’s largest oil importer. Beijing is getting a free ride on energy security because the US is paying for the costs of providing it.)
http://www.juancole.com/2013/12/cheaper-pentagon-trillion.html
LikeLike
Only a very sick society would treat sentient beings this way……
From Rolling Stone:
We’re sitting across the couch from a second undercover, a former military serviceman we’ll call Juan, in the open-plan parlor of an A-frame cottage just north of the Vermont-New York border. The house belongs to their boss, Mary Beth Sweetland, who is the investigative director for the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and who has brought them here, first, to tell their stories, then to investigate a nearby calf auction site. Sweetland trains and runs the dozen or so people engaged in the parlous business of infiltrating farms and documenting the abuse done to livestock herds by the country’s agri-giants, as well as slaughterhouses and livestock auctions. Given the scale of the business – each year, an estimated 9 billion broiler chickens, 113 million pigs, 33 million cows and 250 million turkeys are raised for our consumption in dark, filthy, pestilent barns – it’s unfair to call this a guerrilla operation, for fear of offending outgunned guerrillas. But what Juan and Sarah do with their hidden cams and body mics is deliver knockdown blows to the Big Meat cabal, showing videos of the animals’ living conditions to packed rooms of reporters and film crews. In many cases, these findings trigger arrests and/or shutdowns of processing plants, though the real heat put to the offending firms is the demand for change from their scandalized clients – fast-food giants and big-box retailers. “We’ve had a major impact in the five or six years we’ve been doing these operations,” says Sarah.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/feature/belly-beast-meat-factory-farms-animal-activists#ixzz2n61EERqW
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
LikeLike
More from RS:
ou are a typical egg-laying chicken in America, and this is your life: You’re trapped in a cage with six to eight hens, each given less than a square foot of space to roost and sleep in. The cages rise five high and run thousands long in a warehouse without windows or skylights. You see and smell nothing from the moment of your birth but the shit coming down through the open slats of the battery cages above you. It coats your feathers and becomes a second skin; by the time you’re plucked from your cage for slaughter, your bones and wings breaking in the grasp of harried workers, you look less like a hen than an oil-spill duck, blackened by years of droppings. Your eyes tear constantly from the fumes of your own urine, you wheeze and gasp like a retired miner, and you’re beset every second of the waking day by mice and plaguelike clouds of flies. If you’re a broiler chicken (raised specifically for meat), thanks to “meat science” and its chemical levers – growth hormones, antibiotics and genetically engineered feed – you weigh at least double what you would in the wild, but lack the muscle even to waddle, let alone fly. Like egg-laying hens – your comrades in suffering – you get sick young with late-life woes: heart disease, osteoporosis. It’s frankly a mercy you’ll be dead and processed in 45 days, yanked from your floor pen and slaughtered. The egg-layers you leave behind will grind on for another two years or so (or until they’re “spent” and can’t produce any more eggs), then they’re killed too.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/feature/belly-beast-meat-factory-farms-animal-activists#ixzz2n6209nET
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
LikeLike
WRT The East:
The revolution to overturn the American financial-industrial-military complex that the Weathermen attempted to trigger failed for a number of reasons including the ignorance and apathy of the masses, the determination of those who benefited from commercialisation of everything to remain in power, and the capacity of the state to seek out and destroy those who opposed it.
Everything I read and see indicates to me that the ignorance and apathy of the masses is greater now than in the 1960s, and the capacity of those in power to suppress dissent is greater.
It follows that there will be no revolution until a large number of people in western nations are suffering a lot more than they are now and they recognise who their real enemies are..
In the past the elites used religion and arbitrary regulations as a pretext for torturing and murdering people, or simply stealing from them. Nowadays the main pretext is national security.
In the not-too-distant past a nation was a collection of tribes with a common genetic heritage. What is a nation now? A pan-corporation that is geared to service of other corporations and destruction of the habitability of the Earth?
LikeLike
“Researcher Angela Hong said that over a century a single molecule of PFTBA, as it is catchily called, has an “equivalent climate impact” of more than 7,000 carbon dioxide molecules.”
LikeLike
Arctic thaw tied to European, US heatwaves and downpours
A thaw of Arctic ice and snow is linked to worsening summer heatwaves and downpours thousands of miles south in Europe, the United States and other areas, underlying the scale of the threat posed by global warming, scientists said on Sunday.
Their report, which was dismissed as inconclusive by some other experts, warned of increasingly extreme weather across “much of North America and Eurasia where billions of people will be affected”.
Thanks for killing the planet, boomers!
Unfortunately, the world as we know it is ending, and no one can reasonably hope to avoid the constellation of catastrophic, ecological and social disasters that are all but certain to manifest, exacerbating one another’s horrific, deadly consequences. And yet our politicians can’t be bothered to care, a substantial portion of Americans aren’t convinced that it’s even happening (despite overwhelming, unimpeachable evidence to the contrary), and the enormity of the issue is downplayed basically everywhere outside the bounds of the largely-ghettoized “environmental/green reporting,” uniformly marginalized and dismissed by the mainstream press.
Thanks for killing the planet, boomers! by Tim Donovan, Dec 2, 2013
———————————-
The apocalypse is coming — and technology can’t save us
Last week, Salon ran an article, “Thanks for killing the planet, boomers!,” where I argued that it’s wholly unrealistic to assume humanity will undertake the massive, world-changing, economy-disrupting policy solutions needed for us to even stand a chance of long-term survival. Given that our local political and economic systems are as fragile, stalled and polarized as they’ve been in most of American history, these predictions only seem more dire, and the problem only more intractable.
Which is why I’m constantly amazed by the notion that our technology will somehow save us, what I’ve come to consider the deus ex machina defense.
We are deluding ourselves: The apocalypse is coming — and technology can’t save us by Tim Donovan, Dec 9, 2013
LikeLike
TPP negotiators have been divided over a number of issues, including opening up Japan’s auto and farm markets and patent issues – in particular on medicines.
US negotiators, backed by the powerful pharmaceuticals industry, want drug companies to get longer patent protection for a new class of drugs called “biologics” which are developed from living tissue.
Drug companies say this is necessary to allow them to recoup investments and continue research for fresh cures.
But activist groups like humanitarian organisation Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) say such patent protection would restrict access to cheaper generic drugs for millions of poor people.
http://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2013/12/11/australian-news/tpp-trade-deal-misses-deadline
LikeLike
This is, basically, fascism. The end of democracy. You can’t have democratic governance when elected representatives sign laws when nobody has seen what’s being signed up to. There is supposed to be public debate and public accountability.
All the countries that are signing on to these Pacific and Atlantic ‘trade’ agreements being proposed by the USA and fronted by Obama are being pulled into a new fascist Empire.
If this happens, then that’s it. We are totally fucked for the foreseeable future. Everything will be done in secret and kept secret and the people of all these countries will have no knowledge or control over the future or their lives, or what happens in their countries. National governments and elections will be meaningless.
How many people even realise that this is happening ?
The negotiations have been held confidential, and text of the agreement has not been made public, despite calls from the Australian opposition for the full text to be tabled in the parliament. A motion was passed in the Senate last week calling for the text to be tables in full but it has been reported today that the Coalition will defy this order, stating it will only be made public once Australia has signed onto the agreement.
http://www.zdnet.com/au/tpp-countries-and-us-divided-over-ip-chapter-leak-7000024068/
LikeLike
LikeLike
It’s the last roll of the dice for them, do you think they don’t know what’s going to happen? Peak oil, global warming, the inevitable consequences overshoot generally? It’s all bad news, with no happy ending and they can’t let the masses understand that the grand human experiment is all over, bar the shouting. Just as long as it doesn’t occur on their watch they are content to keep shuffling the deckchairs, therefore we see more and intensifying bouts of can-kicking, obfuscation and wishful thinking, whereby something will come, like a superman, to save the day.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
Only in Australia could the phrase “public briefing” mean that the meeting will be held behind closed doors, where journalists are not welcome.
Yesterday, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) rescinded the invitations of several journalists to attend a public briefing regarding a multilateral trade agreement under negotiation called the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP).
The TPP is an extensive agreement that covers typical topics such as goods and services, but also contains chapters on labour laws, intellectual property, the environment and investor-state dispute settlement provisions. This agreement is currently being negotiated completely opaquely between the US, Japan, Australia, Peru, Malaysia, Vietnam, New Zealand, Chile, Singapore, Canada, Mexico, and Brunei Darussalam. DFAT claims that it will be finished negotiating by the end of the year.
If you’ve never heard of the TPP, here’s a summary of the major issues:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/30/trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-dfat
LikeLike
Best description of Obama I ever read, and the whole fucking thing in a nutshell.
Only place you can find any sense and truth these days is on the lunatic web forums.
Sovereignty was lost long ago with the passage of previous trade agreements. When the US was sued over it’s Marine Mammal Protection Act requiring dolphin safe tuna, it lost the case in the WTO. That was many years ago (like 20). With each trade agreement, more sovereignty is lost. The goal is one world government with multinational corporations making policy. That’s why all of these trade zones have been established. Once that’s achieved worldwide, the plan is to merge them into one, with all the laws, regulations and standards for the ease of multinationals doing business. It’s the British East India Company reincarnated on steroids. Barack Obama was groomed by these forces and he was put in office to carry out these goals. People are so damn stupid that they swoon over him and don’t think that when Obama was groomed that the brightest minds in marketing and psychology weren’t consulted on creating someone who was all things to all people (he’s black, he’s not black, he’s a progressive, he’s a fascist corporatist, he’s a Nobel Peace Prize winner, he tried to start WWIII in Syria, he’s a Muslim, he’s a Christian, he’s a Zionist, he’s screwing over Israel, he would prosecute the BushCo criminals, he won’t touch them, he would have the most transparent administration, he’s created the most opaque and secretive, he would deliver “social justice (lol, hate that stupid phrase), he’s in bed with the banksters, etc, etc, etc). Unlike his predecessors, he’s a chameleon, which is exactly what they wanted/needed as people are becoming more alert to what’s going down. He’s a “closer”, as in closing the deal. If he were in the private sector he’d be the best salesman in the world. He is the best salesman in the world.
http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Second-release-of-secret-Trans-Pacific-Partnership-Agreement-documents?pid=7073940#pid7073940
LikeLike
Yes U,
We in NZ are also being led down the garden path (yet again), this time via secret negotiations geared to eliminating the last vestiges of life as we knew it through yet more ‘freeing up’ of trade (TTP)..
Many people think that they can stop the saboteurs by signing petitions or lobbying politicians. What a joke.
LikeLike
Well, it’s a counterweight that politicians can use to excuse themselves. I don’t think that they allwant to give in to American bullying. Better than nothing at all.
To all the governments negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement:
As concerned global citizens, we call on you to make the TPP process transparent and accountable to all, and to reject any plans that limit our governments’ power to regulate in the public interest. The TPP is a threat to democracy, undermining national sovereignty, workers’ rights, environmental protections and Internet freedom. We urge you to reject this corporate takeover.
http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_corporate_death_star/
LikeLike
You may not be aware of the local history. In the early 1970s NZ was being set up as a semi-self-sufficient, to some extent socialist nation with an increasingly diverse economy; a high degree of egalitarianism and full employment etc. (Okay, we know that had its faults.).
The Muldoon government of the late-70s to early-80s went down the track of ‘Think Big’, which was code for giving away resources to global corporations and providing them with cheap electricity etc. Opposition was dealt with by ‘fast-tracking’ under the saboteur Bill Birch ( who was subsequently awarded an honour for quickly handing over the booty to global corporations; thank you, Sir ) In other words, we don’t care what you think, we are going to do this anyway. Muldoon became increasingly dictatorial as time went by, and the economy got into a worse and worse mess as more and more American dollars were borrowed to pay for the expenditure and the NZ dollar plummeted. .
In the early 1980s a gang of thieves and saboteurs, led by Richard Prebble and Roger Douglas, infiltrated the Labour Party (or were put there corporations and money-lenders). Under the false flag of a return to socialism, those saboteurs instigated a programme of selling off state assets, privatisation, deregulation and general pillaging of the nation. ‘Labour’ MPs voted for looting and dismemberment of the nation.
Since then NZ has endured a succession of National and then Labour governments which have all had one intent: the surreptitious sabotaging of the people’s welfare and the promotion of global corporatism. Prominent ‘leaders’ who wreak long term havoc, such as the eventually much-hated Helen Clark, get awarded positions at the UN or as ambassadors etc.
To imagine that either major political party (or indeed any of the minor parties) would act in the best interests of the people of NZ is to live in a world of fantasy. It is all an Orwellian circus.
Under John Key we have witnessed a great leap towards overt fascism, which has not surprised anyone who knows what is going on; there are still resources to be looted (albeit mostly off-shore) and those who wish to prevent looting or prevent planetary meltdown have to be crushed, and crushed quickly. The uninformed (misled) masses, on the other hand, believe in the slogans that announce ‘a better, brighter future’ [under National], which amounts to faster looting of resources and faster delivery of the trinkets of consumerism from China , resulting in faster meltdown of the environment. And there is a significant contingent of [mostly older] people who remember the treachery of ‘Labour’.
By the way, for much of this time Australia was something of a fortress, with strong unions and a very strong sense of entitlement, so it took somewhat longer to smash them up. It’s rather like the difference between trying to loot Greece and trying to loot Germany. Both are on the agenda but the looters pick the easier target first.
I think it is very clear that the corporations now have ‘the right man’ installed in Australia: a good climate change denier who wants rapid extraction and export of minerals and rapid exploitation and export of fossil fuel deposits.
. ..
. .
.
LikeLike
b4 replying to kevin, i wish to again heap praise/thanks upon xray for another great essay with beautiful clever eloquent illustrations, like the one of the evolution of man whose last image is a silhouette of a zombie seeking money…
now to kevin: ‘To imagine that either major political party (or indeed any of the minor parties) would act in the best interests of the people of NZ is to live in a world of fantasy. It is all an Orwellian circus.’
as u know kevin, the political situation u describe in new zealand is essentially similar to that found in the usa and all other ‘advanced’ industrialized nations: elites in charge, manipulating and exploiting, lying and coercing… u fail to mention that ‘the sheeple’ themselves are duped, overwhelmingly unaware of what our best interests are, as sheeple like u and i (scientific doomers) would define them. i’m sure u know this, but perhaps it’s harder to admit the role that sheeple in general play in facilitating their own being misled. it appears obvious in fact that the only way for any political party to be popular now is to be full of shit, continue with all the old lies and reassuring myths of infinite ‘progress’ and ‘growth’, etc.
in a related sphere, in an earlier comment u asserted something to the effect that there must be much more disaster and hardship from our inevitable collapse before p(sh)eeple come to (sur)realize who their (sur)real enemies are. again, i think u give sheeple far too much credit. i think the vast majority will never comprehend how and how much they’ve been lied to and exploited by tptb. instead, i think we’ll see all kinds of irrational scapegoating/persecution of various minorities and ‘troublemakers’, which of course will only play into the hands of tptb. right up to the bitter end.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Arctic Alaska Warmth
“Although the cold temperatures in the central and western contiguous U.S. have been remarkable this past week, the coldest since December 1990 for portions of California and Oregon, they are not as anomalous as the amazing warmth that briefly affected the Arctic region of Alaska. At around 9 p.m. local time on December 7th the temperature reached 39°F with rain falling at Deadhorse, the airport that serves Prudhoe Bay on the shore of the Arctic Ocean. This was the warmest December temperature ever measured at the site since it was established in 1968 (actually there have been three sites in the Prudhoe Bay area since 1968: Prudhoe Bay ARCO site 1968-1986, Prudhoe Bay WRCC/GHCN site 1986-1999, and the Deadhorse Airport site 1999-current). Prior to the 39° on Saturday night, the warmest temperature measured during December at any of the three sites was 35°F (1.7°C) on December 31, 1973 at the ARCO site. All-time December warmth records were also set or tied at Barter Island AFB (Kaktovik) which reached 37°F (2.8°C), tying its record for the month last set also on December 31, 1973 (POR 1949-current) and Wainright (POR since 1949) with a 32°C (0°C) reading (previous record 30°F on Dec. 1 and 2, 2006 and December 9, 1963). Barrow, which has the longest POR (since 1921) of any site on Alaska’s Arctic Ocean shore, reached 30°, short of their December record of 34° set on December 9, 1932. Checking the December data for ALL of the Arctic shore sites in Alaska (Barrow, Kuparuk, Prudhoe Bay (Deadhorse), Barter Island, Colville Village, Nuiqsut, Wainwright, and Point Lay) it appears the 39°F reading at Deadhorse was the warmest December temperature ever observed at any site along the shores of Alaska’s Arctic Ocean. Some RAWS sites along the Dalton Highway south of Prudhoe Bay measured temperatures into the 40°s according to Rick Thoman of NWS-Fairbanks.”
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/weatherhistorian/comment.html?entrynum=222#commenttop
LikeLike
“He came back to me about a week ago and told me that he, too, was very shocked by what he read,” Jones said. “I told him we need to join together and put in a resolution and get more members on both sides of the aisle involved and demand that the White House release this information to the public. The American people have a right to know this information.”
http://www.businessinsider.com/report-of-saudi-arabia-links-to-911-2013-12
LikeLike
Complete BS. It is like they are trying to find out what corporation Santa Claus really works for.
LikeLike
I’ve run out of words of late, just dumbfounded that it’s all continuing at an ever-faster rate, compounding and interrelating everything from space weather to the die-off off plankton, from radiation exposure to disease outbreaks, from storms and flooding to ridiculously complicated and aberrant weather locally.
Take the Tim Duncan article above. While i agree with his points, the title used to make me shout back at him: “Right oh, TimMAY! Like you had nothing to do with anything, never drove a car or used electricity or went to the foodstore. Stupid ass, you’re just as ‘born into captivity’ as the rest of us were.” Now, i don’t even bother. The whole situation is utterly hopeless and i’m spending my time doing what i can while i can.
i still post things, but i’ve given up on arguing, explaining, or trying to find a way out.
i’m really glad you guys haven’t and look forward to reading your comments and posts, until i’m back up to speed again from this depressed state that’s taken over.
LikeLike
It’s the blame game, Tom. A stage of denial that many people seem to get stuck in. I agree – there’s no point arguing or explaining anymore. People are constantly saying the equivalent of – if only we weren’t human, we wouldn’t be doing what humans do! Ha. (Sorry to hear of your depressed state. Personally, I feel like I’m in a waking nightmare. It’s abslutely surreal how fast things are coming apart at the seams, and how oblivious most people are. Especially here in sunny Palm Beach!)
LikeLike
Tom. I know the feeling, having got to that point some time ago. Every day is a nightmare for anyone who is awake to what is going on. . And it gets worse as time goes on.
http://guymcpherson.com/2011/05/this-must-be-a-nightmare/
LikeLike
Radioactive spill: uranium processing halted and mine audit under way
Gundjeihmi leader calls on government to seek international help in clean-up of spill at Ranger mine in Kakadu
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/09/radioactive-spill-full-audit-sought
LikeLike
LikeLike
Uruguay,
Far Out! Dudes
Here comes NTHE. Why not Roll One?
LikeLike
Expose the TPP
http://www.exposethetpp.org/
LikeLike
New site:
http://radcast.org/index.html
Welcome to RadCast
We bring you the most truthful information regarding radiation and radiation fallout. What you do with that information is your choice. But now you have a choice.
LikeLike
The pain and sadness of knowing. I’m not sure if I can continue this blog.
The Fire This Time
A few days ago I watched the documentary Chasing Ice, as part of our local Transition initiative’s film series. What really struck me in the film was the narrator’s four word comment about 1/3 through the film when he was discussing what we can/should do about arctic melting and runaway climate change:
“There is no time.”
Just that. He meant that there is no time for us to continue to do what we have been doing — the politicking, stalling, denial, endless debate and research. But what these four words mean to me, and I think at a visceral and perhaps subconscious level what they now mean to many people who are informed about what is happening in our world, is that there is no time for us to pull back from collapse, no time to avoid or even mitigate runaway climate change and the emergence, later this century, of a climate on Earth as different (7-8oC) from today’s (though in the opposite direction) as the climate during the most recent glacial maxima (colloquially, “Ice Ages”) 20 and 140 and 260 and 340 and 440 thousand years ago.
During these “Ice Ages” much of the planet’s land mass was covered in ice an average of 2 km thick, and the regions adjacent to the ice-covered areas suffered constant windstorms that transformed them into scrub and desert, and beyond that desert, what are now semi-tropical areas were covered in boreal forest. Equatorial areas then, in addition to being much cooler than today, see-sawed between prolonged periods of monsoon-like rains and periods of extended drought.
What will our planet be like with 7-8 degrees of warming in the next few decades? Weather will likely be more extreme (more flooding, desertification and fires, and, later, much higher sea levels) and much more turbulent, but instead of only the equatorial areas being habitable by significant human numbers, as happened during the “Ice Ages”, only the polar areas, with whatever vegetation will have emerged there in that short time, will likely be habitable in the coming “Fire Age”…
[…]
Best case (Eisenstein) scenario: Shift to Sharing Economy precipitates near-term, gradual collapse of the industrial growth economy, which will leave some of Earth’s energy and resources in the ground and delay and slightly lessen runaway climate change. [Or similarly, major early unexpected impacts of climate change (e.g. pandemic) precipitate near-term, gradual economic collapse, with the same results.]
Worst case (Ehrenfeld) scenario: Politicians ratchet up the economy to extend industrial growth a little longer, exhaust energy and other resources faster and more completely, then use nukes to try to mitigate energy exhaustion, all leading to faster and more severe runaway climate change and total economic collapse and energy/resource exhaustion.
All scenarios end with runaway climate change. This is kind of hard to comprehend, but once you realize how delicate the balance is that has kept our planet in a brief paradisiacal near-stasis climate for several millennia, and how often runaway climate change has happened in our planet’s past (for many reasons, mostly unknown), it’s not too hard to accept. We’ve just unwittingly accelerated the process this time…
There will be large scale species extinction — it’s already begun and it’s also not a new phenomenon on this planet. Life will go on. Some like it hot. There will be a steady exodus toward the poles by many species, with varying degrees of success. What will evolve in the planet’s new super-hot, super-stormy zones is anyone’s guess….
LikeLike
‘The pain and sadness of knowing. I’m not sure if I can continue this blog’
You cannot abandon one of the best sites there is, Mike.
Two years ago I described the feeling the informed and aware have as akin to living in a continuous state of grief.
That would be a normal human reaction to witnessing serial abuse and murder that never comes to an end.
.
LikeLike
Mike Please give Dave Pollard of How to Save the World credit for his essay The Fire This Time
LikeLike
Tom, the credit is there. Did you click on the title to see that it goes directly to his site? Also, my comment plainly says [excerpt].
Oh, it does not say excerpt, but as Gail says, it’s “indented” as well. Why would I want to plagiarize Pollard in the comments section? We always post lots of articles and links in the comments section here.
LikeLike
It’s indented – clearly a quote. And the title is linked. I ‘spose xray mike could have specifically written Dave’s name but I knew right away that it was a quote and where to find the source.
LikeLike
While the world burns
Some people say the end is near
and some say that it’s already here.
But I won’t feel the slightest fear,
if my arms are full of you.
Maybe we will suffocate
in poison fumes and clouds of hate.
But I don’t care about my fate,
if my arms are full of you.
I just want to hold you while the world burns.
Let it burn, burn, burn.
Crushed by the oceans mighty waves
or ripped apart by robotic slaves.
I won’t mind the crowded graves,
if my arms are full of you.
Burned alive by bitter ash
or a supernovas blinding flash.
I won’t feel that biting lash,
if my arms are full of you.
I just want to hold you while the world burns.
Let it burn, burn, burn.
The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire.
I just want to hold you while the world burns.
LikeLike
Previous estimates put the amount of heat accumulated by the world’s oceans over the past decade equivalent to about 4 Hiroshima atomic bomb detonations per second, on average, but Trenberth’s research puts the estimate equivalent to more than 6 detonations per second.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/dec/10/global-warming-unpaused-fast-forward
LikeLike
I had the meeting with our new mayor yesterday.
I don’t want to divulge too much at this stage. Let’s just say he has not gone over to the dark.
Whether he can actually do anything to counter the onslaught of the insane system we have had foisted on us is yet to be seen; the Orcs in central government and the Orcs in corporations are doing their best to bring about rapid environmental collapse via an orgy of overconsumption.
LikeLike
Just saw this on seemorerocks
Thursday, 12 December 2013
Die-off of sea creatures began spring, 2011
Study: Dead sea creatures covered 98% of seafloor last year about 150 miles off California coast
Unprecedented, had been below 1% prior to event — ‘Major’ changes began in spring 2011
ENENews,
11 December, 2013
National Geographic, Nov. 22, 2013: […] “In the 24 years of this study, the past 2 years have been the biggest amounts of this detritus by far,” said study leader Christine Huffard, a marine biologist at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute in California. […] In March 2012, less than one percent of the seafloor beneath Station M [located 145 miles west of the coast of California between Santa Barbara and Monterey] was covered in dead sea salps. By July 1, more than 98 percent of it was covered in the decomposing organisms, according to the study, published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. […] Although climate change is a leading contender for explaining the major increases in 2011 and 2012, Huffard says that these spikes could be part of a longer-term trend that scientists haven’t yet observed. She hopes to continue gathering data from Station M to try and figure it out.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nov. 11, 2013 (emphasis added): […] Two major peaks in POC [particulate organic carbon] flux occurred over the last 18 mo of the time series […] The peak POC flux in spring/summer 2011 was the highest recorded over the 24-y time series (Fig. 1D) […] The daily presence of detrital aggregates on the sea floor did not exceed 15% coverage over the period from 1990 to 2007. The highest sea-floor coverage by detrital aggregates measured throughout the 24-y time series occurred between March and August 2012, when salp detritus ranged from <1% cover in early March to a high of 98% cover on 1 July (Fig. 1E). This was the only measurable deposition event of salps observed during the entire time series. Following this salp pulse, phytodetrital aggregates combined with some salp detritus formed another major deposition event beginning in late August and peaking in mid-September. This pulse covered up to 61% of the sea floor (Fig. 1E), the largest primarily phytodetrital aggregate peak recorded during the time series. […] Although environmental variation, such as air temperature and winds, affect the physical dynamics of this upwelling ecosystem, the specific mechanisms behind the changes in food-supply composition and food-web processes corresponding with the peaks in 2011 and 2012 remain unknown. Such increases in food supply appear to change the structure and functioning of deep-sea communities. We already are observing significant changes in populations of benthic fauna […]
Study’s Supporting Information: Sea Floor Megafaunal Community Change […] Over an 18-mo period beginning in spring 2011, the densities of epibenthic animals increased by nearly an order-of-magnitude and diversity was considerably lower. Major faunal changes included a substantial reduction in sponge and other sessile animal abundance, and by late 2012 three holothurian species were at the highest densities recorded since mobile megafaunal investigations began in 1989.
See also: "Weird things" happening on California coast: Previously unknown toxic algae blooms proliferating; Unprecedented mass of oxygen-poor water near shore — TV: Mystery strandings of large squid covered miles and experts baffled… "essentially killing themselves, it’s just really weird" (VIDEO)
And: CBC News: Something very odd is happening in Pacific; Sea creatures acting strangely, species turning up where rarely seen — Related to Fukushima crisis? — L.A. Lifeguard: Used to be 2 shark sightings a year, now it's 2 a day (VIDEOS)
LikeLike
Study: Dead sea creatures covered 98% of seafloor last year about 150 miles off California coast; Unprecedented, had been below 1% prior to event — ‘Major’ changes began in spring 2011
http://enenews.com/study-dead-sea-creatures-covered-98-of-seafloor-last-year-150-miles-off-california-coast-had-been-less-than-1-previously
LikeLike
Hey Gail, Kevin, xraymike:
Thanks for your thoughts. I may have just arrived at the “it gets worse” part and am having a little trouble adjusting. It’s a shock discovering how bad it really is – all our estimates pale in comparison to reality, and yet our trajectory remains the same, gunning the engine while heading for the cliff (ala Thelma and Louise). People just refuse to see what’s plainly evident and keep saying “the future is unknown, so I don’t believe in NTHE.” What nonsense. It’s like not believing in gravity.
Volcanoes may be in our near-term future too as they’re popping off all over the world, even long dormant ones are coming alive. Just add it to the pile of factors causing our demise before 2030. At some point soon things are going to take a serious step down and we’ll be experiencing the fall of civilization.
To paraphrase Gil Scott Heron: our extinction will not be televised.
LikeLike
Tom sez: I may have just arrived at the “it gets worse” part and am having a little trouble adjusting. It’s a shock discovering how bad it really is – all our estimates pale in comparison to reality, and yet our trajectory remains the same, gunning the engine while heading for the cliff (ala Thelma and Louise). People just refuse to see what’s plainly evident and keep saying “the future is unknown, so I don’t believe in NTHE.” What nonsense. It’s like not believing in gravity.
I struggle daily with these same issues. My own awakening is now 6+ years old, yet I’ve been unable to come to terms with it fully, whatever that might mean. (Ignoring and dismissing Kubler-Ross here.) What galls me most is the disbelief and denial, though many plausible explanations exist for how and why the masses can stare reality in the face and still not recognize it.
Whereas some commentators and writers at this site (and others) continue to churn out comments and posts, I find I must disengage and turn my attentions elsewhere before re-engaging. What keeps some sane is reinforcement of falsity, others reinforcement of truth. Of course, falsity breeds its own special brand of insanity, which is one of the things that got us to where we are. For me, the grace of not having to face the immensity of our predicament 24/7/365 keeps me relatively whole. I can appreciate xraymike’s desire for time off and away from the blog.
LikeLike
Latest from ENE:
CNN: The Pacific has seen its fair share of weird recently — Bay in California “now a massive soup bowl” — “Miles of anchovies, mountains deep” — It’s like none ever recorded… Old timers have never seen anything like this — “We may be experiencing ‘global weirding’” (VIDEO)
LikeLike
Mike: don’t stop the blog. That’s an order!
LikeLike
“Nuclear fuel rod expert Gundersen says the pool at unit 3 is in much worse shape than at 4:
Unit 3 is worse [than No. 4]. Mechanically its rubble, the pool is rubble. It’s got less fuel in it [than unit 4, but] structurally the pool has been dramatically weakened. And, god nobody has even gotten near it yet.
He’s right. It’s too radioactive for Tepco to even get a look at what’s going on in the reactor pools at units 1 through 3, and they have no idea how to do it. Indeed, the technology does not even exist to approach those reactors, as the high radiation levels quickly destroy even robots.
Heck of a job, GE …
Postscript: Unfortunately, there are 23 virtually-identical GE Mark 1 reactors in the U.S.
This is not to say that Tepco and the Japanese government are not to blame also. They are.
But GE and the American government are largely responsible as well.”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/fukushima-general-electric-knew-its-nuclear-reactor-design-was-unsafe-so-why-isnt-ge-getting-any-heat-for-fukushima/5361300
LikeLike
The Escalating Catastrophe
Japan’s New ‘Fukushima Fascism’
by HARVEY WASSERMAN
Fukushima continues to spew out radiation. The quantities seem to be rising, as do the impacts.
The site has been infiltrated by organized crime. There are horrifying signs of ecological disaster in the Pacific and human health impacts in the U.S.
But within Japan, a new State Secrets Act makes such talk punishable by up to ten years in prison.
Taro Yamamoto, a Japanese legislator, says the law “represents a coup d’etat” leading to “the recreation of a fascist state.” The powerful Asahi Shimbun newspaper compares it to “conspiracy” laws passed by totalitarian Japan in the lead-up to Pearl Harbor, and warns it could end independent reporting on Fukushima.
More: http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/12/12/japans-new-fukushima-fascism/
LikeLike
Tom/Brutus.
There have been many occasions when I have been completely lost for words. After reading an article I have sat and thought, and have been unable to write anything, largely because there was nothing new to say. It had all been said before…… going right back to Jonathan Swift’s ‘Gulliver’s Travels’ (and before)..
Much of this comes down to insanity being fairly rare in individuals but more or less the norm in societies. And sadly, agricultural-industrial societies seem to foster many of the worst aspects of human nature.
Realising the truly horrific behaviour of humans in the not-too-distant past makes me feel extremely grateful I have lived through one of the most peaceful and comfortable periods in the history of agricultural/industrial humans, and in one of the least polluted regions of the world..
The barbarity of humans towards one another in the past almost defies belief..
Empire -making a fortune
Torture machines
Clearly we cannot make the world a better place, so our efforts (if we still have any energy left) need to be directed towards making it less worse for our descendants. Even attempting that seems futile at times because we are living in societies that, as well as encouraging devastation of the natural environment, encourage self-harm.
Fortunately I have several people I can discuss these matters with on a fairly regular basis, so that helps me maintain sanity. .
LikeLike
A few interesting comments from the intelligentisia
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/12/will-opposition-us-overseas-derail-toxic-transpacific-partnership.html
LikeLike
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/12/global-power-project-group-thirty-architects-austerity-see-httpwww-occupy-comarticleglobal-power-project-group-thirty-architects-austeritysthash-rjlsiona-dpuf.html
Global Power Project: The Group of Thirty, Architects of Austerity
The Group of Thirty, a preeminent think tank that brings together dozens of the world’s most influential policy makers, central bankers, financiers and academics, has been the focus of two recent reports for Occupy.com’s Global Power Project. In studying this group, I compiled CVs of the G30′s current and senior members: a total of 34 individuals. The first report looked at the origins of the G30, while the second examined some of the current projects and reports emanating from the group. In this installment, I take a look at some specific members of the G30 and their roles in justifying and implementing austerity measures.
LikeLike
Brutus, Kevin – yeah. It’s somehow “comforting” (probably not the correct word) being able to commiserate with all of you here: pfgetty, ulvfugl, Gail (I miss your posts but understand), Jacob Horner, others, and of course our host xraymike who, like Guy, puts it out there every day. Brave, honest people.
It’s gonna be really hard when there’s no more internet, and I have to live 24/7 in the insanity of brainwashed, taken by surprise, freaking-out-hysterical ’cause-there’s-no-more-Starbucks zombies who have NO idea what to do and HAVE GUNS.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-future-of-planet-earth-are-we-the-last-surviving-generations-radioactivity-and-the-gradual-extinction-of-life/5361283
The Future of Planet Earth. Are We the Last Surviving Generations? Radioactivity and the Gradual Extinction of Life?
Original-text of the 2010 interview with the late Dr. Rosalie Bertell
(chosen quote, well worth the read)
When you are talking about constant low radiation exposure, what you are doing is introducing mistakes into the gene-pool. And those mistakes will eventually turn up by killing that line, that cell line, that species line. The amount of damage determines whether this happens in two generations or in seven generations or 10 generations. So what we are doing by introducing more mistakes into the DNA or the Gene pool is we are shortening the number of generations that will be viable on the planet.
We have shortened the number of generations that will follow us. We have shortened that already. So we reduced the viability of living systems on this planet, whether it can recover or not. We don’t have any outside source to get new DNA. So have the DNA we have, whoever will live on this planet in the future is present right now in the DNA. So if we damage it we don’t have another place to get it.
There will be no living thing on earth in the future that is not present now in a seed, in a sperm and the ovum of all living plants and animals. So it is all here now. It is not going to come from Mars or somewhere. Living things come from living things. So we carry this very precious seed for the future. And when you damage it you do two things. You produce a less viable harmonized organism with the environment; at the same time we are leaving the toxic and radioactive waste around. So you are going to have a more hazardous environment and a less capable organism. That is a death syndrome for the species, not only for the individual. It is going to be harder to live. And the body will be less able to take stress and you are increasing the stress at the same time.
LikeLike
Tom, you bring up a good point. While none of us will handle collapse awfully well, the masses still clinging onto the old “modern” world will go absolutely bonkers. I don’t know how people will take it where you live, but here, in Carteret County, NC, people are already a bit demented with radical fundamentalist Christianity: Pentecostals, Free Will Baptists, and all kinds of offshoots from those even more extreme. And that is NOW, when things are going smoothly. They hope for crazy stuff as it is, like quakes and regional fires and floods, and are ecstatic about wars that seem to wipe out Muslims, leaving the Chosen as victors….and all kinds of other things my patients tell me. They will be putty in any crazy maniacal charismatic leader’s hands when the shit really hits the fan, and they all hoard lots of guns and other weapons. Maybe it is for the best. Thy will come to my little farm and quickly blow me away so I don’t have to be a witness to their nutball solutions to worsening problems.
LikeLike
Paul. I laughed when I read your comment about people going ‘absolutely bonkers’.
From what you say,many are already ‘absolutely bonkers’.
Around here we don’t have many fundamentalist nutcases, but we seem to have quite a few ‘Satanists’, especially in the corridors of power.
The predominant religion in NZ these days seems to be Consumerism, which seems to be displacing Rugby-player worship. .
There are not many guns in urban districts, so people may adopt ‘Einstein’s solution’ when things turn nasty and their Star Wars swords prove ineffective.
LikeLike
pfgetty: I’ve posted a bit about the local delusions around me here in Secular-land, but I have to admit I much prefer them to the delusions around you!
I think Ian Kershaw makes his case that Germany ‘yearned’ for a Hitler, something my own grandmother confirmed when we discussed her real life experience of that time. He wasn’t some maniac who took over good people’s minds. He told many people exactly what they wanted to hear, they loved him like the second coming of jesus. Its impossible not to see how desperately many americans yearn for someone like a Hitler to make them feel good and validate their endless hates and fears and make it clear to the heathen world that its gotta be The American Way to the bitter end. I suspect you live around lots of those types.
We’ve been lucky enough–so far–that our wannabe Hitlers are too ridiculous even for brainless yearning masses in this country, just barely, like Palin, Bachman, Santorum or Buchanan. Obama may be evil in his calculating corporate way but he’s not quite up to Hitler standards, despite what they say on Faux News and hate radio. Who knows what that cipher really believes, he’s creepy and false but I doubt he’s some fanatic. I think the real Hitler wannabes are wise enough to stay mostly behind the scenes, so far.
Check out Ben Judah’s book on Putin and Russia, very thought provoking and a great read.
http://www.amazon.com/Fragile-Empire-Russia-Vladimir-Putin/dp/0300181213/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1386955988&sr=8-1&keywords=fragile+empire
For all the loneliness I feel at times here in hipster progressive heaven, its good to know that if something more sudden and apocalyptic happens, my neighbors mostly don’t own guns and don’t really have the usual american hatreds and fears and won’t be shooting each other, we’ll have lots of meetings instead. Along with good live acoustic music, gluten free baked goods, as we smoke legal pot and celebrate our gay cross-cultural marriages (that includes me and I’m very grateful lol). And as we slowly get hungrier and hungrier, despite quickly planting gardens in the few tiny remaining scraps of condo-free space and something many would love to do already, people will get more and more anxious but we’ll find a way to justly and socialistically divide the massive pharmaceutical coping mechanisms (pills) stored within in the many health care facilities within walking distance.
But mostly many locals will be sitting around crying and confused, caressing all the techie gadgets they love so much, weeping because they don’t work anymore, and unable to comprehend that technology really didn’t save them after all. Pathetic maybe, but it could be worse.
If you haven’t already, check out the latest from Adam Curtis (its long but take the time to go through the whole thing), love his stuff and the connections he makes. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/posts/WHAT-THE-FLUCK
And Morris Berman’s latest on Mandela, America and the Dulles brothers, great little essay http://morrisberman.blogspot.com/2013/12/home-of-brave.html
And an essay I only just found tho’ its not new, but worth reading in light of the loneliness that comes up constantly on these sites where people try to talk about what is real. http://christyrodgers.wordpress.com/2012/08/14/life-in-the-margins/#more-204
Maybe I’m weird, but it helps calm my mind to read the words of others who try to face the worst and express their thoughts about that. It makes it easier to cope with the escapism all around me and takes the place of the real world conversations I wish I could have but don’t. (Brutus wrote that great essay on what it’s like to bring up the ‘real’ in social situations, I avoid it now.) I’m making beer and cheese this weekend and I will enjoy it immensely, despite starting off my days with the usual catastrophic truths. Go figure;)
LikeLike
“We’ve been lucky enough–so far–that our wannabe Hitlers are too ridiculous even for brainless yearning masses in this country, just barely, like Palin, Bachman, Santorum or Buchanan.”
That’s a priceless observation.
LikeLike
Ditto.
LikeLike
Here’s an interview (67.5 min.) with Nicole Foss and (someone Kevin may know) Laurence Boomert (says he’s from NZ) presenting some positive steps local people can take now so that when the economic collapse hits they’ll have a working community-based working economic system based on trust and come in various flavors like time-banks, barter systems and more. It’s something to work on, but I have to listen more to get an idea how to begin.
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/teaser-podcast-prelude-to-upcoming-tae-holiday-presentation/
LikeLike
Yes, I do know Laurence.
I first met him at a ‘sustainability’ event held in Inglewood, not far from New Plymouth, in 2007. He’s a nice chap but is still living in state of partial denial despite getting a copy of TEW a couple of years ago. I suppose having a young family forces many people into denial.
I followed Nicole Foss for a while, but then realised she did not actually understand Peak Oil and was promoting ‘solutions’ that would not work.
It is interesting for me that the ‘monster’ keeps moving along and as it does it leaves a lot of people stuck in self-made traps centred on denial or redundant thinking.
.
LikeLike
Tom says: Thelma and Louise
Minimizing Suffering with Thelma and Louise
Of course we’ll fly over the cliff:
It’s a question of when, not of if;
But perhaps that way could
Be the greatest good
For the most folks before we go stiff.
Hang in there, dude! 🙂
LikeLike
A new interpretation of Easter Island from recent findings…
What Happened On Easter Island — A New (Even Scarier) Scenario
[excerpt]…
The Danger Of ‘Success’
What if the planet’s ecosystem, as J.B. MacKinnon puts it, “is reduced to a ruin, yet its people endure, worshipping their gods and coveting status objects while surviving on some futuristic equivalent of the Easter Islanders’ rat meat and rock gardens?”
Humans are a very adaptable species. We’ve seen people grow used to slums, adjust to concentration camps, learn to live with what fate hands them. If our future is to continuously degrade our planet, lose plant after plant, animal after animal, forgetting what we once enjoyed, adjusting to lesser circumstances, never shouting, “That’s It!” — always making do, I wouldn’t call that “success.”
The Lesson? Remember Tang, The Breakfast Drink
People can’t remember what their great-grandparents saw, ate and loved about the world. They only know what they know. To prevent an ecological crisis, we must become alarmed. That’s when we’ll act. The new Easter Island story suggests that humans may never hit the alarm.
It’s like the story people used to tell about Tang, a sad, flat synthetic orange juice popularized by NASA. If you know what real orange juice tastes like, Tang is no achievement. But if you are on a 50-year voyage, if you lose the memory of real orange juice, then gradually, you begin to think Tang is delicious.
On Easter Island, people learned to live with less and forgot what it was like to have more. Maybe that will happen to us. There’s a lesson here. It’s not a happy one.
As MacKinnon puts it: “If you’re waiting for an ecological crisis to persuade human beings to change their troubled relationship with nature — you could be waiting a long, long time.”
LikeLike
Thanks for posting that, excellent essay, very much in line with my darkest fears about human adaptability. I only recently read the alternative version of Easter Island (the non-Diamond one, its a good read) and had felt a bit uneasy about it. Too close to romanticizing ‘indigenous’ cultures the way the Jensen types do.
We are cursed to be so flexible. My grandmother lived through many of the horrors of the last century: childhood during competing revolutions in post WWI Munich, the rise of Hitler, life as an adult in the Nazi state, a move to Japan right before the blitzkrieg and Pearl Harbor where she lived with her young family during the entire WWII in an internment camp for foreigners (that included allies like germans), refugee status in the US, poverty and near starvation and discrimination during the war in Japan and for many years after in the US, a drastic loss of social and economic status for the majority of her life until the relative security of retirement. She told me (during her 90’s) that her best decade was her 80’s, most of the previous decades were all too difficult to live through, even in memory!
When we’d talk about how she survived her life, she told me she would have committed suicide far in advance of the many things she actually had to live through if she had had any idea of just how terrible they would be. Her ignorance, and she used that word in gratitude and laughing out loud, saved her. She simply did not know life would get as bad as it did, and at each stage she just survived and adapted, nothing heroic about it. She felt horror and stress on an almost constant basis, but it was normal.
During the post 9/11 hyper patriotism and paranoia of the Bush years, she told me with horror that it was too like Germany and she couldn’t bear to live through it again and was glad she would die sooner rather than later. To have been more aware during her last years of life (she only died recently at 101) of the unfolding environmental catastrophe would have crushed her, even though she was deeply committed to being informed and living a conscious life, and I’m glad we didn’t talk about it much. She studied buddhism for over half of her life and we talked about meditation, attachment, suffering, and death but in a way that was incredibly influential on me and positive for both of us. She hated illusions, which of course would make her laugh as she was the first to tell me how essential they were in her own survival.
Adaptation isn’t just as drastic as surviving stuff we all think we’d be afraid to face like war and starvation. Look at the hideousness of much of America today, as Kunstler has described so well. Yet, most people think its normal, if they think about it at all other than as convenient or inconvenient for their cars and need for efficiency and safety.
In my progressive walkable ghetto, which is far far far more liveable and human scale than the vast majority of american built environments, people complain about needing more parking, about overly narrow streets, crowding–especially too many poor people, and messy street trees and weedy unkempt growth. (Visitors I’ve had from more normal america, with its chain link fences and toxic green lawns and regimented plantings/bark ensembles tended by friendly brown people, think my neighborhood is ugly because of all the variety of landscaping and gardens, the very thing that I love most about it.) Its hip and convenient to live here and party here (if you can afford it) but many residents really wish it was more suburban (they would never admit that’s what it is but the values are the same): less shared space that isn’t somehow controlled by the ‘right people’, less density, more SUV/car friendly, more manicured.
Every year more of my favorite old trees, the few we still have, come down, and mostly there is no replanting except with tiny little ‘ornamentals’ poorly suited to narrow planting strips but allowing for bigger condo driveways and easier maintenance with motorized ‘tools’ from Home Depot. Rich youngsters buy the old mansions and modest old houses (they cost about the same I think lol), then tear out the beautiful mature landscaping and put in what looks like low maintenance big box parking lot plantings and vast new driveways. Why not? They will be inside with their electronics, not outside with even the tiny artificial remnants of nature. You see so few kids playing outside I get worried when I do, like something is wrong. Isn’t that insane? Our parks are being ‘daylighted’ and cleaned up, so the rich can feel ‘safe’, the marginals don’t camp out too obviously in the bushes, and the police can drive by with floodlights and see everything without having to get out of their cars. What plenty of people here want in their parks is fewer trees and more off-leash areas for their dogs, plus sports facilities and of course more parking.
What makes parts of my city beautiful are merely the ever decreasing and rather shabby remnants of the past, and of the values of the past. If the neighborhood were flattened by our inevitable earthquake and rebuilt by even its more progressive residents, I doubt it would be even remotely as appealing as it is now. There would be a lot more shiny condos and commercial spaces, hip hangouts and places to consume organic food and locally distilled booze, plus a good chance at some decent public infrastructure (even the market worshipers here like good public transport because traffic and landscape constraints make driving so unbearable), and hopefully some affordable housing of some kind (we need to house a few shrewd artists to keep the place hip, right?) It wouldn’t be the soul sucking sprawl of Houston or Atlanta, nothing so vile. But it still wouldn’t make for a place where real humans live in a social way beyond working and shopping. It would merely be a pleasant enough ‘space’ to pass through as everyone lives their private fantasy life of consumption with toys and gadgets, greenish in comparison but not sustainable. And even more lonely than it is now, despite the acceptance of ever-better pills and therapies as normal and without stigma.
That Bacigalupi story I linked to a while back, the real horror of it to me was how ‘normal’ the characters in it saw their utterly devastated surroundings and their own post-human selves. Its all too plausible, that we might not experience how truly degraded and monstrous things have become. I wonder if the humans left alive as capitalism eats everything won’t mostly think things aren’t too bad, when they aren’t just surviving like my grandmother did during the worst moments. Their grandparents might feel suicidal with grief at what has been lost, but only if they aren’t pumped full of meds in their assisted living centers as they are now (will those even survive? maybe staffed by robots the way Turkle describes).
I’m sort of relieved to know its likely that Fukushima will do me in. I’m in my late 40’s, I eat healthy and spend lots of time at the gym, but even giving up salmon and local surfing probably won’t prevent me from getting some sort of cancer in the end. I truly don’t foresee myself living through much of what is to come, and that’s good. During the last birthday gathering held for my grandmother, not one single person attending didn’t say at some point how absolutely appalled they were at the thought of living 101 years. And that included even the most deluded members of my family (plenty of those, sad to say). Perhaps some awareness of the awfulness of what is happening now and what is to come does seep into the consciousness of even the most brainless and unconscious of our fellow citizens, I mean consumers.
Sorry for the length, I type way too fast and like I said, this is my replacement for conversation, hope it isn’t inappropriate (but tell me if it is).
LikeLike
As MacKinnon puts it: “If you’re waiting for an ecological crisis to persuade human beings to change their troubled relationship with nature — you could be waiting a long, long time.”
I’ve got this feeling it’s to late for change. How many feedback loops are interrelated & how many do we not know about?
On a positive note, What’s for dinner? Rat.
LikeLike
BtD: you’re amazing and I appreciate the limerick. Thanks for being around.
xraymike: I saw that article and thought about posting it here – poof, here it is!
Kevin: yeah, I caught the gist of what was going on at the very beginning but listened to it anyway. I understand what they’re doing, and it certainly beats doing nothing, but their assumption of a slow, drawn out collapse to me is suspect and the problem.
Civilization is in an analogous position to years of fallen tinder in a forest just waiting for the lightening strike. Once it becomes apparent to a tipping point of the zombie-fied (like when it affects them directly – oil spills in towns, volcano erupting, outbreak of bubonic plague on your island, ‘unexplained’ explosions and sinkholes happening globally), and they see the infrastructure that they pay taxes for and vote in isn’t going to be able to support their once-upon-a-time lifestyle (like in one day it goes from lavish housing with all the possessions, bells and whistles, to homeless and living in a tent for the foreseeable future, as insurance companies and the government have less and less resources to keep up with it all) the chaos will feed on this and expand to many more like an out-of-control forest fire.
http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/site/?pageid=event_desc&edis_id=BH-20131211-41914-MDG
Biological Hazard in Madagascar on Wednesday, 11 December, 2013 at 04:22 (04:22 AM) UTC.
A deadly outbreak of the bubonic plague is running rampant on the island of Madagascar, medical experts have confirmed. Tests established the disease was responsible for the deaths of at least 20 villagers in the northwestern town of Mandritsara. The island nation last year recorded the world’s highest number of plague-related casualties, with 60 lives claimed by the flea-borne disease. Bubonic plague – also known as the Black Death – wiped out an estimated 25 million people in Europe during the Middle Ages but there have been few instances reported in recent years. Health officials are investigating the cause of the outbreak, thought to have originated in prisons with a prevalence of rats that carry the disease. The Pasteur Institute said towns and cities faced increased risk of infection as ongoing political crises took its toll on living conditions. It is hoped a second round of presidential elections on December 20 will end the political deadlock.
So, to bring the point home, the lack of a working government is compounding the problem, which the disease will exploit naturally. Perhaps bring this to the attention of your new mayor.
LikeLike
3 Ways the Super-Rich Suck Wealth out of the Rest of Us
…
1. They’ve Taken $1.6 Million Per Family in New Wealth Since the Recession
…To briefly summarize, the richest 5% (six million households) own about two-thirds of the wealth, or about $10 trillion of the $15 trillion in financial wealth gained since the recession. That’s $1,667,000 per household. Calculations based on alternate sources resulted in a gain of over $2 million per household…
…It is noteworthy that most of their windfall came from stock market gains rather than from job-creating business ventures. The stock market has, once again, been forming an overblown bubble of wealth that does not reflect the relative degrees of productivity of workers around America. The market has more than doubled in value since the recession, and the richest 5% own about 80% of all non-pension stocks.
2. They Create Imaginary Money That Turns Real
The world’s wealth has doubled in a little over ten years. The financial industry has, in effect, created a whole new share of global wealth and redistributed much of it to itself.
In the U.S., financial sector profits as a percentage of corporate profits have been rising steadily over the past 30 years. The speculative, non-productive, and fee-generating derivatives market has increased to an unfathomable level of over $1 quadrillion — a thousand trillion dollars, twenty times more than the world economy.
With the U.S. driving the expansion of this great bubble of wealth, our nation has become the fifth-most wealth-unequal country in the world, while global inequality (between rather than within countries) has become even worse than for any one country. Just 250 individuals have more money than the total annual living expenses of almost half the world – three billion people.
3. They’ve Stopped Payment on Productive Americans
Reputable sources agree that the working class has not been properly compensated for its productivity, and that the “rent-seeking” behavior of the financial industry, rather than changes in technology, is extracting wealth from society.
As a result, our median inflation-adjusted household wealth has dropped from $73,000 to $57,000 in a little over 25 years. We’ve lost another five percent of our wealth since the recession.
Shockingly, only one out of four Americans, according to a survey by Bankrate.com, “have six months’ worth of expenses for use in emergency, the minimum recommended by many financial planning experts.”
The End Result? That suction-like sound is the financial industry soaking up our country’s wealth.
DGT says…
“…Firms are sitting on mountains of cash, so exactly how do those shares of stock provide capital? Many of the most profitable companies are doing the opposite, using their capital to buy back stocks, thus inflating the stock price. The original intent of Wall Street was to provide capital as a service to business, but over the past few decades, the reverse has become true. The goal of business has been to funnel profits to Wall Street, which creates even more profit through casino-like financial gambles, paper-shuffling trades that create no benefit other than creating wealth for financiers.
The problem with… supply-side economics is that, with all of that capital, there is no demand for products, so it is not used “to expand production, open new facilities, buy new equipment, hire and train new employees.” Rather, it is extracted as profit and goes directly into the pockets of the 1%. Furthermore, stock prices rise with the company’s bottom line, which benefits from low labor costs (fewer jobs at lower wages), so the stock market has an inverse relationship with employment.
To claim that stock market gains necessarily come from job-creating activities… is either blatant lies or stunning ignorance.”
LikeLike
Nate Hagens’ reply to me:
Mike
What this article describes is the effect, not the cause. Our financial system – ‘free market’ if you will ended in 2008. It has become marriage of state and corporations (and rich) since then. To keep things afloat governments had no choice but to guarantee large institutions, have artificially low interest rates, buy their own debt, bail out key companies, etc. They didnt do this ‘to hand money to the rich’ they did this to prevent everything from going to zero. This is because our energy gains have been declining for 1/2 century, and debt productivity had almost gone to zero by 2009. I agree with the general thrust of that article, but this is exactly what you would expect near the end of a Ponzi – the amount of (perceived) wealth claims far outpaces our ability to pay them back. At issue now is whether we can service them. There is a large hole in net energy research because we focus on fixed EROI when what powers the system is marginal EROI. In many ways, physical and digital, we are turning our wealth into income. The money spigot has to be turned open wider, as cheap BTUs from coal and gas can only go so far. Those closest to the spigot (the already wealthy who own paper assets) will naturally benefit.
btw the fact that firms are sitting on mountains of cash is a pretty telling factoid that technology isnt coming to the rescue…
LikeLike
New essay coming soon by Darbikrash:
“I do have a new essay that I hope to complete and post this weekend – I have been following with some interest the various commentary of Pope Francis regarding capitalism and find some fascinating contradictions which I hope to bring forward.”
LikeLike
Eric’s comment highlighted the fact that those of us who happened to be born in the right place at the right time have lived through one of the most peaceful and comfortable periods in the history of agricultural/industrial humans, brought about by rising extraction of fossil fuels and significant leaps in technology (few people appreciate the staggering effect of the shift from thermionic valves of the 50s to transistors of the 60s).
The triple whammy for people under the age of 60 is that most of them have little or no experience of having to make-do with few material possessions and little food, and yet they will have to endure all the consequences of declining fossil fuel extraction plus collapse of the natural systems that made the emergence of civilisation possible.
.
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
http://roarmag.org/2013/12/heather-marsh-binding-chaos-review/
Binding Chaos’: a vision for a compassionate society
(from the article)
After the author highlights the inevitable demise of representative democracy and its inherent inequality and injustice, she grapples with the idea of direct democracy. She challenges its oft-discussed promise as an alternative form to electoral politics; a view held adamantly by some on the left and anarchists who came forward in the wake of Occupy. Along with a realistic assessment of the challenges that lie in the actual application of having everyone fully participate in decision-making processes and the attendant time constraints, Marsh points out how “‘true’ democracy is at best only one step removed from ochlocracy or mob rule”. She claims that “pure direct democracy is a pure tyranny of the majority,” and when the majority rules, the needs of minorities are ignored. She shows how such a system has the potential to jeopardize individual rights.
I’m about to try something I’ve never done, so wish me luck.
(baking cookies)
LikeLike
The key word here is positive feedback loops.
Sadly, even the scientists who have spent years in the field and are the most knowledgeable of our predicament are still delusional about mankind’s prospects of containing this climate change catastrophe, entrapped as they are by industrial civilization’s myth of eternal progress (go to this link and listen to what Shakhova says at the end of the brief podcast interview).
A thawing ocean floor pours methane into the atmosphere — and it’s only getting worse
Living on Earth December 12, 2013 · 8:30 AM EST
There are millions of tons of the powerful greenhouse gas methane trapped underwater in the continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean.
This methane had been held in place for thousands of years by a cap of frozen soil on the seabed. But now research at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks has found this methane is escaping into the atmosphere at faster and faster rates, adding to global warming in a feedback loop that accelerates the warming.
The study concentrated on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Natalia Shakhova, lead author on the study, says this particular area makes up about 25% of the Arctic shelf.
“Because the permafrost was thought to be stable and reliably preventing this methane escaping from the seabed deposits, this area has never been considered a source of methane to the atmosphere, never until very recently when we started investigating this area 10 years ago,” she says.
Roughly 17 million tons of methane are released into the environment annually from this shelf.
“Arctic tundra is thought to be the major source of methane, natural methane, in the northern hemisphere, so it’s kind of comparable to terrestrial sources,” Shakhova says. “For hundreds of thousands of years … the permafrost on top of the sediment has been serving as a cap, as a seal, preventing the escape.”
As the permafrost thaws, a phenomenon happening on land and under the sea, it becomes less efficient at containing greenhouse gases, like methane. And methane is a particularly nasty greenhouse gas, with one ton of methane packing the climate changing potential of at least 20 tons of carbon dioxide, Shakhova adds.
“The concentration of methane in the atmosphere is increasing much faster than that of carbon dioxide,” she says. “The last 200 years, the concentration of methane in the atmosphere increased about three times.
Methane has a relatively short lifespan, 10 to 30 years, but it is converted to carbon dioxide — so still dangerous to the atmosphere.
One of the biggest concerns is this Arctic methane will create a dangerous loop, with the methane raising the temperatures, melting more of the permafrost and releasing more methane.
But, it’s still possible this situation could be stemmed, or at least slowed.
“We better believe in science and in ourselves because I’m sure that we will be able to come up with ideas how to solve this problem, how to fix it, how to mitigate, how to maybe recover this methane,” Shakhova says.
LikeLike
Don’t panic! The Japanese have been working on systems to collect methane from continental shelves for many years and may be able to put technological solutions in place that convert methane into carbon dioxide once they have sorted out the Fukushima site.
World War III, featuring spats between Japan and China over who gets to exploit fossil fuel deposits under the South China Sea and spats between the US/Canada and Russia over who gets to exploit fossil fuel deposits under the Arctic region, may cause a delay in ‘saving the planet’..
.
LikeLike
LikeLike
From Democratic Underground…
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/cafe/the-biggest-public-health-threat-nobody-is-talking-about
Talking Points Memo
Doug Brugge – December 10, 2013, 6:00 AM EST1942
What people cannot see can be very harmful. In 2012, a report on the Global Burden of Disease found that pollution from dangerous tiny particles and droplets in the air – what scientists call “fine particulate matter” – is among the leading causes of death and severe disability. According to estimates in this report, over 3.2 million deaths per year may be attributable to people breathing dangerous particles in their general environment.
The good news is that over many decades, America has figured out how to reduce emissions of fine particulate matter from smoke stacks and tail pipes, phasing in increasingly effective pollution-reducing technologies.
The bad news is that there is another kind of air pollution from even tinier particles – “ultrafine particles” – that are concentrated next to freeways and other places with a lot of motor vehicle traffic. Pockets of this kind of invisible, odorless and often overlooked pollution may be especially dangerous for people who live and work next to busy highways. Researchers are only just beginning to quantify the dangers and find ways to protect people’s health.
Many people suppose that respiratory diseases are the main risk from breathing in polluted air, but in fact the major health risks are from cardiovascular diseases. Breathing in particles from vehicle emissions, power plants, or burning fuels causes inflammation that spreads throughout the body in the blood, contributing to hardening of the arteries and increased risks for heart attacks and strokes.
________________________________________________________
Why aren’t people talking about this…I will tell you why. Lots and lots of people live near freeways. Lots of businesses are near freeways. So, what would happen to real estate values if it were found out that people were much more likely to get heart disease if they breath in “ultrafine particles” that exist in very high quantities near freeways?
This is not a “nice story” but it is the truth. The story speaks for itself.
LikeLike
Published on Saturday, December 14, 2013 by Common Dreams
‘Spiral of Rebellion’ Sweeps Italy
Pitchfork movement organizers vow ‘peaceful invasion’ of Rome until ruling regime steps down
– Lauren McCauley, staff writer
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/12/14
“There are millions of us and we are growing by the hour,” said Danilo Calvani, a farmer who has emerged as one of the protest leaders. “This government has to go.”
LikeLike
http://transitionvoice.com/2013/12/6-ways-to-become-more-miserable-about-climate-change-and-peak-oil/
“Nobody can say how much time humanity, industrial society or any one of us has left. Even without world-threatening catastrophes, you or I could get hit by a bus while crossing the street to work tomorrow morning. We’re all under sentence of death. And if we can deal with that, it can set us free.
So it makes good sense to follow the advice of religious teachers and secular sages alike, including our own Guy McPherson and Carolyn Baker. That is, to live each day as if it were our last. And then, to make the most of that day. Part of that is being grateful for the pleasures and even the pain of just living.
As John Keats said, “Do you not see how necessary a world of pains and troubles is to school an intelligence and make it a soul?””
– Erik Curren, Transition Voice
– See more at: http://transitionvoice.com/2013/12/6-ways-to-become-more-miserable-about-climate-change-and-peak-oil/#sthash.4XTFUnkr.dpuf
LikeLike
Extreme summer weather in northern mid-latitudes linked to a vanishing cryosphere
From Nature: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2065.html
LikeLike
From Sploid:
“I thought I knew all the dreadful effects of climate change, but this new discovery has truly surprised me: “Climate change is causing the North Pole’s location to drift, owing to subtle changes in Earth’s rotation that result from the melting of glaciers and ice sheets.” The entire Earth is tilting because this change.
One example:
The influx of fresh water from shrinking ice sheets also causes the planet to pitch over. Landerer and colleagues estimate that the melting of Greenland’s ice is already causing Earth’s axis to tilt at an annual rate of about 2.6 centimetres – and that rate may increase significantly in the coming years.
During the this century, ocean warming will make the north pole’s spin axis to move towards Alaska and Hawaii about 1.5 centimers per year. The newly redistributed mass will also make our planet to spin faster.”
LikeLike
Good God!
LikeLike
Published on Sunday, December 15, 2013 by The Guardian
Awesome Fossil Fuel Burning is Defying the Past and Defining the Future
More fossil fuel projects approved in Australia as geologists say there’s no precedent for current speed of carbon dioxide releases
by Graham Readfern
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/12/15-3
This week, Australia showed its mettle again, when Environment Minister Greg Hunt approved four projects on the Great Barrier Reef coastline that are part of an attempt to liberate hundreds of millions of tonnes of coal and gas.
Two of the approvals help the expansion of the Abbot Point coal export facilities in north Queensland, near Bowen and the Whitsunday Islands. This is mainly to dig coal from massive planned mines in the Galilee Basin for export and burning.
The T0 coal terminal, if built, is a project of the Indian energy group Adani and will be able to export as much as 70 million tonnes of coal per year. The coal would come from Adani’s planned giant Carmichael mine in the Galilee Basin, which, if built, would be one of the biggest coal mines in the world.
As I’ve outlined before, the coal planned to be dug up from two other Galilee mines would emit about 3.7 billion tonnes of CO2 – that’s about six years worth of the emissions of Australia or the UK.
With a long list of conditions which it is claimed will protect the reef and local habitat, Hunt has approved the dredging of up to three million cubic metres of material from the ocean bottom for the new coal terminal. The dredged material will be dumped in the ocean, putting more pressure on the Great Barrier Reef which already has an uncertain future.
The other two approvals are part of Queensland’s rapid multi-billion dollar expansion of the contentious coal seam gas industry.
Given the go ahead are a nine-kilometre pipeline to get the gas from Gladstone to Curtis Island and a new plant there to compress the gas and export up to 18 million tonnes a year of liquified natural gas. Both projects are owned by Arrow Energy (jointly owned by Shell and PetroChina).
More, at website.
LikeLike
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2013
Shakhova: methane in atmosphere is increasing 3x faster than carbon dioxide
Living on Earth, December 12, 2013
The sea surface above the East Siberian continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean is made up of broken ice and methane bubbling to the surface. Credit: Courtesy of Igor Semiletov, University of Alaska Fairbanks.
There are millions of tons of the powerful greenhouse gas methane trapped underwater in the continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean.
Player utilities
Popout
Share
00:3406:23
download
This methane had been held in place for thousands of years by a cap of frozen soil on the seabed. But now research at the University of Alaska in Fairbanks has found this methane is escaping into the atmosphere at faster and faster rates, adding to global warming in a feedback loop that accelerates the warming.
The study concentrated on the East Siberian Arctic Shelf. Natalia Shakhova, lead author on the study, says this particular area makes up about 25% of the Arctic shelf.
“Because the permafrost was thought to be stable and reliably preventing this methane escaping from the seabed deposits, this area has never been considered a source of methane to the atmosphere, never until very recently when we started investigating this area 10 years ago,” she says.
Roughly 17 million tons of methane are released into the environment annually from this shelf.
“Arctic tundra is thought to be the major source of methane, natural methane, in the northern hemisphere, so it’s kind of comparable to terrestrial sources,” Shakhova says. “For hundreds of thousands of years … the permafrost on top of the sediment has been serving as a cap, as a seal, preventing the escape.”
As the permafrost thaws, a phenomenon happening on land and under the sea, it becomes less efficient at containing greenhouse gases, like methane. And methane is a particularly nasty greenhouse gas, with one ton of methane packing the climate changing potential of at least 20 tons of carbon dioxide, Shakhova adds.
“The concentration of methane in the atmosphere is increasing much faster than that of carbon dioxide,” she says. “The last 200 years, the concentration of methane in the atmosphere increased about three times.”
Methane has a relatively short lifespan, 10 to 30 years, but it is converted to carbon dioxide — so still dangerous to the atmosphere.
One of the biggest concerns is this Arctic methane will create a dangerous loop, with the methane raising the temperatures, melting more of the permafrost and releasing more methane.
But, it’s still possible this situation could be stemmed, or at least slowed.
“We better believe in science and in ourselves because I’m sure that we will be able to come up with ideas how to solve this problem, how to fix it, how to mitigate, how to maybe recover this methane,” Shakhova says.
http://www.pri.org/stories/2013-12-12/thawing-ocean-floor-pours-methane-atmosphere-and-its-only-getting-worse
LikeLike
A Science Icon Died 17 Years Ago. In His Last Interview, He Made A Warning That Gives Me Goosebumps.
Rajiv Narayan
Carl Sagan inspired a generation of scientists with his work in and out of the classroom. But he didn’t always present science with cheer. In this clip, he passionately defends science with a grave warning. It’s something we all need to hear.
http://www.upworthy.com/a-science-icon-died-17-years-ago-in-his-last-interview-he-made-a-warning-that-gives-me-goosebumps-5?c=fea
LikeLike
The earth needs to get a life.It’s entirely too sensitive.
http://www.climatecentral.org/news/new-climate-records-focus-on-earths-sensitivity-16834
LikeLike
Global Warming: Four Degree Rise Will End Vegetation ‘Carbon Sink’, Research Suggests
Dec. 16, 2013 — Latest climate and biosphere modelling suggests that the length of time carbon remains in vegetation during the global carbon cycle — known as ‘residence time’ — is the key “uncertainty” in predicting how Earth’s terrestrial plant life — and consequently almost all life — will respond to higher CO2 levels and global warming, say researchers.
Carbon will spend increasingly less time in vegetation as the negative impacts of climate change take their toll through factors such as increased drought levels — with carbon rapidly released back into the atmosphere where it will continue to add to global warming.
Researchers say that extensive modelling shows a four degree temperature rise will be the threshold beyond which CO2 will start to increase more rapidly, as natural carbon ‘sinks’ of global vegetation become “saturated” and unable to sequester any more CO2 from the Earth’s atmosphere.
They call for a “change in research priorities” away from the broad-stroke production of plants and towards carbon ‘residence time’ — which is little understood — and the interaction of different kinds of vegetation in ecosystems such as carbon sinks.
Carbon sinks are natural systems that drain and store CO2 from the atmosphere, with vegetation providing many of the key sinks that help chemically balance the world — such as the Amazon rainforest and the vast, circumpolar Boreal forest.
As the world continues to warm, consequent events such as Boreal forest fires and mid-latitude droughts will release increasing amounts of carbon into the atmosphere — pushing temperatures ever higher.
Initially, higher atmospheric CO2 will encourage plant growth as more CO2 stimulates photosynthesis, say researchers. But the impact of a warmer world through drought will start to negate this natural balance until it reaches a saturation point.
The modelling shows that global warming of four degrees will result in Earth’s vegetation becoming “dominated” by negative impacts — such as ‘moisture stress’, when plant cells have too little water — on a global scale.
Carbon-filled vegetation ‘sinks’ will likely become saturated at this point, they say, flat-lining further absorption of atmospheric CO2. Without such major natural CO2 drains, atmospheric carbon will start to increase more rapidly — driving further climate change.
The researchers say that, in light of the new evidence, scientific focus must shift away from productivity outputs — the generation of biological material — and towards the “mechanistic levels” of vegetation function, such as how plant populations interact and how different types of photosyntheses will react to temperature escalation.
Particular attention needs to be paid to the varying rates of carbon ‘residence time’ across the spectrum of flora in major carbon sinks — and how this impacts the “carbon turnover,” they say.
The Cambridge research, led by Dr Andrew Friend from the University’s Department of Geography, is part of the ‘Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project’ (ISI-MIP) — a unique community-driven effort to bring research on climate change impacts to a new level, with the first wave of research published today in a special issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“Global vegetation contains large carbon reserves that are vulnerable to climate change, and so will determine future atmospheric CO2,” said Friend, lead author of this paper. “The impacts of climate on vegetation will affect biodiversity and ecosystem status around the world.”
“This work pulls together all the latest understanding of climate change and its impacts on global vegetation — it really captures our understanding at the global level.”
The ISI-MIP team used seven global vegetation models, including Hybrid — the model that Friend has been honing for fifteen years — and the latest IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) modelling. These were run exhaustively using supercomputers — including Cambridge’s own Darwin computer, which can easily accomplish overnight what would take a PC months — to create simulations of future scenarios:
“We use data to work out the mathematics of how the plant grows — how it photosynthesises, takes-up carbon and nitrogen, competes with other plants, and is affected by soil nutrients and water — and we do this for different vegetation types,” explained Friend.
“The whole of the land surface is understood in 2,500 km2 portions. We then input real climate data up to the present and look at what might happen every 30 minutes right up until 2099.”
While there are differences in the outcomes of some of the models, most concur that the amount of time carbon lingers in vegetation is the key issue, and that global warming of four degrees or more — currently predicted by the end of this century — marks the point at which carbon in vegetation reaches capacity.
“In heatwaves, ecosystems can emit more CO2 than they absorb from the atmosphere,” said Friend. “We saw this in the 2003 European heatwave when temperatures rose six degrees above average — and the amount of CO2 produced was sufficient to reverse the effect of four years of net ecosystem carbon sequestration.”
For Friend, this research should feed into policy: “To make policy you need to understand the impact of decisions.
“The idea here is to understand at what point the increase in global temperature starts to have serious effects across all the sectors, so that policy makers can weigh up impacts of allowing emissions to go above a certain level, and what mitigation strategies are necessary.”
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/12/131216154851.htm
LikeLike
Amazing that this is in what I would call mainstream alternative media:
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175785/tomgram%3A_dahr_jamail%2C_the_climate_change_scorecard/#more
LikeLike
one more thing: http://www.salon.com/2013/12/18/7_ways_to_shut_down_a_climate_change_denier_partner/
LikeLike