Tags
Arab Spring, Capitalism, Collapse of Industrial Civilization, Corporate State, Corporatocracy, Empire, Ethnic Cleansing, Financial Elite, Globalization, Gross Inequality, Inverted Totalitarianism, Iran, Iraq, Military Industrial Complex, Misogyny, Police State, President Bashar Assad, Saudi Arabia, Security and Surveillance State, Sharia Law, Social Unrest, Syria, The Elite 1%, The Global Perambulator, Turkey, unwashed public, War for Profit, War on Terror, World War III
On the eve of what could be WWIII and the further barbarization of the Middle East at the hands of the American Empire and its vassal states, I think it’s important we look behind the wall of pro-war corporate media and understand what the facts on the ground really are. The following essay is a reblog from a website I just discovered and it gets into the nitty-gritty of the blowback from America’s perverse foreign policy in regards to Syria. When a nation supports democracy in name only and crawls in bed with terrorists to carry out regime change, then an entire region eventually becomes destabilized and thrown back into the hands of those dark forces which America purports to be fighting against in its so-called “global war on terror”. In reality, the American corporate state would rather have foreign nations with brutal dictators installed who will carry out America’s bidding rather than a democracy which looks after the best interests of the local people. Why else would the U.S. have overthrown Prime Minister Mossadeq of Iran or become the strongman for the corrupt House of Saud if not for the black oily stuff to which we are so addicted? When it is said that “women are literally blacked-out in the public sphere” in Saudi Arabia, the connotations are quite literal. Below is a picture taken by a friend who has worked in Saudi Arabia. It depicts a department store advertisement display which has been altered to conform to their brutally misogynistic society.
‘Humanitarian concerns’ and ‘social justice issues’ are merely empty rhetoric used by our sociopathic leaders as cover for protecting the grossly unjust social hierarchy of global capitalism. Some call this “corporate feudalism” while others say it is endemic to capitalism. One only has to look at the growing global wealth disparity to know this is true. The elite are drooling for war while the world races towards catastrophic resource depletion, environmental apocalypse, collapse of industrial civilization, and a new Dark Age.
Excerpt from
Syria: A Critique Of Joshua Landis
Rights of Women
One important issue that was missing from his talk (and is missing in almost all discussions on Syria) is the threat to the rights of women if the Assad regime falls. This is no small issue. One thing that surprised me during my visit to Syria is how Western it was compared to other Arab and Muslim countries in the region. Women’s dress is not restricted in Syria and they play a very important public role in society when compared to other Arab countries. Muslim fundamentalists and suicide bombers in Syria do have a Sharia Law agenda that they want to impose on the country. This is not theory. All one has to do is look to neighboring Iraq to see the deterioration of women’s rights in the post-Saddam era. Women used to wear miniskirts, show their hair and walk without fear in Baghdad. Now the situation has completely reversed. Women are forced to cover and are expected to stay at home. If they do not abide by this social practice, they are publicly shamed, and, in more extreme forms of Sharia justice, are raped and murdered.
An Iraqi friend told me that when he returned to Baghdad after the war he was stunned that women were no longer even comfortable speaking to him in public for fear of being thought of as whores. His experience of the status of women in public before the war was the polar opposite of the reality that one is now faced with in Iraq.
One should also note that the situation in neighboring Turkey has taken a turn for the worse in recent years under the Sunni AKP government. The rate of violence against women has sky-rocketed. Wives, fiancés and girlfriends have been murdered by their male partners at a rate that is 1400 percent higher than 7 years ago. This is the same AKP government that is supplying their Sunni rebel ‘brothers’ in Syria with weapons.
There is a severe lack of discourse about what the consequences are for women if and when the Assad regime falls in Syria. It is clear why the Muslim extremists working in concert with Al-Qaeda in Syria do not talk about women in their fight for ‘democracy’. Women for them are marginal, servile and functional creatures who are to be neither seen nor heard in public life.
Christians, Kurds and Minorities
In the question and answer period after Mr. Landis’ you will note that there is a Syrian Christian man asking a question about the rights and status of Christians in Syria after a Sunni extremist takeover of the country. He is very concerned about this issue and he has good reason to be. Since the beginning of the so-called ‘revolution’ there have been many incidents of rebels killing Christians and bombing churches all over Syria. The chant of the fighters has been: “The Alawite and Christians to Beirut!” The intentions can’t be made any clearer. Nobody will be safe in Syria after Assad except orthodox Sunni Muslims. Mr. Landis made this very clear to the Christian man when he said that the solution for Turkey was ethnic cleansing. The reason there is no problem in Turkey with Christians is because there are no more Christians. They used to be 20% of the population. Those who were not killed or deported were forced to convert to Islam. All that is left of Christianity in Turkey are ancient Christian sites that are advertised to attract tourists to the country. Istanbul, which is still the seat of the Eastern Orthodox Church, barely tolerates what is left of the Christian community there. The Church has virtually no sovereignty and is at the mercy of the government and its flock has dwindled to almost nothing, when compared to its vibrant past.
If ethnic cleansing and forced conversion has been Turkey’s solution for diversity, take a look at the other country that is supplying weapons and Islamist fighters to topple Assad: Saudi Arabia. There is no country in the world that is as intolerant and anti-democratic as Saudi Arabia. Churches are illegal in that country. Women are literally blacked-out in the public sphere in dress. Saudi is also the only country in the world where women are not allowed to drive. Women are subservient to men in the name of extreme Islam and Bedouin tradition. If Turkey and Saudi are the main suppliers of weapons and training of the rebels in Syria, one needs to reflect on what kind of culture is intended to be put in place after the fall of the secular and tolerant regime that is currently hanging on to power.
The Kurdish issue is an extremely volatile issue in Syria. Assad extended greater freedoms and autonomy to the Kurds via political reforms passed after the initial protests had begun. The Kurdish leadership in Syria has already openly stated that if Syria is attacked by Turkey, they will fight on the side of Assad. This issue presents potentially grave consequences of blowback for Turkey. In recent days the Turkish Prime Minister stated that Turkey may need to invade northeastern Syria to crush the Kurds there if they get too powerful. This would mean that Turkey would be fighting its war with the Kurds on three fronts. It is already battling a guerrilla insurgency within its borders and regularly attacks Kurds in northern Iraq…. Read the entire essay
Pingback: ‘Friendly’ Dictators Are Welcome
Syrian Woman Confronts McCain at Town Hall: ‘I … – Crooks and Liars
LikeLike
Dear Syria War Hawks: Being Angry About America’s Destruction of Iraq Is Not A ‘Syndrome’
Overwhelming public opposition to bombing Syria has been repeatedly attributed to the Iraq war by various media outlets. They’ve even come up with clever terms, like “Iraq fatigue” and “Iraq syndrome”, to describe the supposed illness that afflicts an overwhelming majority of the American public—because, it turns out, not wanting to drop bombs on people is a horrific disease that must be eradicated…
…The [Iraq]war might be a thing of the past for most Americans (with the exception of military veterans with PTSD), but for Iraqis, the war never ended. The overwhelming birth defects, another despotic regime, a lack of the basic services (electricity, clean running water, healthcare), endless bloodshed from US-fueled sectarian violence, not to mention the millions killed, injured, displaced, widowed and orphaned—this is what the United States did to Iraq. If anybody can claim to suffer from Iraq war fatigue, it is Iraqis.
LikeLike
After WW2 the Americans took over from the British as prime guardians of resource control and looting but it was till the oil shocks of the 1970s (and the peaking of US oil extraction) that things started to get really serious..
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
‘Carter Doctrine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Carter Doctrine was a policy proclaimed by President of the United States Jimmy Carter in his State of the Union Address on January 23, 1980, which stated that the United States would use military force if necessary to defend its national interests in the Persian Gulf.
It was a response to the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan in 1979, and was intended to deter the Soviet Union—the United States’ Cold War adversary—from seeking hegemony in the Gulf.
The following key sentence, which was written by Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter’s National Security Adviser, concludes the section:
Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force.
Brzezinski modeled the wording on the Truman Doctrine,[1] and insisted that the sentence be included in the speech “to make it very clear that the Soviets should stay away from the Persian Gulf”.[2]
In The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and Power, author Daniel Yergin notes that the Carter Doctrine “bore striking similarities” to a 1903 British declaration, in which British Foreign Secretary Lord Landsdowne warned Russia and Germany that the British would “regard the establishment of a naval base or of a fortified port in the Persian Gulf by any other power as a very grave menace to British interests, and we should certainly resist it with all the means at our disposal”.[3]’
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
Interestingly, 160 years ago the British and French fought to protect the Turkish empire. But the construction of the Berlin to Baghdad railway in the early 1900s was just too much to bear.
This mess has been 2,000 years in the making, and it seems that it will only be resolved when NTE arrives.
All the indications are that NTE will arrive in the Middle East somewhat before other regions of the world.
LikeLike
History repeats…

and a good breakdown of the current situation:
A war economy makes…? WAR
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
LMFAO… worth every second.
LikeLike
Syrian President Assad’s strongest international backer, Iran, said it has warned the US about chemical weapons in rebel hands for more than a year.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/0909/Leaked-Iranian-letter-warned-US-that-Syrian-rebels-have-chemical-weapons
LikeLike
In pursuit of nothing more ennobling than raw self-perpetuation, the propaganda machinery of the warfare state—along with its media affiliates such as the War Channel (CNN) and the War Press (The Washington Post)—have over recent decades churned out a stream of vastly exaggerated “threats,” falsely transforming tin-pot dictators and tyrants like Ho Chi Minh, Daniel Ortega, Slobodan Milosevic, the Taliban, Ayatollah Khomeini, Saddam Hussein, and now Bashar al-Assad into dangerous enemies. At length, triggering incidents are concocted such as the phony Gulf of Tonkin episode, the Madison Avenue–based fabrications about Iraqi soldiers stealing babies from incubators in Kuwait, the vastly exaggerated claims of ethnic cleansing in Kosovo, and Saddam’s reputed WMDs. Eventually, the drumbeat for military intervention is cranked to a fever pitch, and cable TV drives it home with nonstop telestrators and talking heads. Only after the fact, when billions in taxpayer resources have been squandered and thousands of American servicemen have been killed and maimed, do we learn that it was all a mistake, that the collateral destruction vastly exceeded the ostensible threat, and that there remains not a trace of long-term-security benefit to the American people.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/09/03/the-end-of-u-s-imperium-finally.html
LikeLike
LikeLike
Harold Pinter,
Political language, as used by politicians, does not venture into any of this territory since the majority of politicians, on the evidence available to us, are interested not in truth but in power and in the maintenance of that power. To maintain that power it is essential that people remain in ignorance, that they live in ignorance of the truth, even the truth of their own lives. What surrounds us therefore is a vast tapestry of lies, upon which we feed.
As every single person here knows, the justification for the invasion of Iraq was that Saddam Hussein possessed a highly dangerous body of weapons of mass destruction, some of which could be fired in 45 minutes, bringing about appalling devastation. We were assured that was true. It was not true. We were told that Iraq had a relationship with Al Quaeda and shared responsibility for the atrocity in New York of September 11th 2001. We were assured that this was true. It was not true. We were told that Iraq threatened the security of the world. We were assured it was true. It was not true.
The truth is something entirely different. The truth is to do with how the United States understands its role in the world and how it chooses to embody it.
But before I come back to the present I would like to look at the recent past, by which I mean United States foreign policy since the end of the Second World War. I believe it is obligatory upon us to subject this period to at least some kind of even limited scrutiny, which is all that time will allow here.
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/2005/pinter-lecture-e.html
LikeLike
9/11 was the strangest day in the entire history of the Earth. If we are to believe the official narrative, it was the only day in 4.5 billion years on which the laws of physics and chemistry did not apply in certain places.
A few years ago a group of truth-tellers thought that by exposing the lies of 9/11 they would be able to bring about the paradigm shift necessary to end the madness.
It turned out that most people prefer lies to truth.
LikeLike
I think you’ve gone off the deep end there.
LikeLike
Livin’ Beyond Doom
LikeLike
Ah yes, I think most of us need this advice:
LikeLike
Stand Up if You Are Opposed to This War!
Protesting Senator Tammy Baldwin (D) Wisconsin
Stand Up if You Are Opposed to This War! “Which Side Are You On! to Sen Tammy Baldwin Anti-War Protest At Fighting Bob 2013 9.7.13 #Syria
Friendly Dictators- INDEED!
LikeLike
Oil and Gas Limits Underlie Syria’s Conflict
…Syria’s population grew from 8.8 million in 1980 to 22.8 million in 2012, at least in part because of the wealth available from oil extraction.
Now Syria’s oil production is dropping. The drop between 1996 and 2010 reflects primarily the effect of depletion. The especially steep drop in the last two years reflects the disruption of civil war and international sanctions, in addition to the effect of depletion.
When oil exports drop, the government finds itself suddenly less able to pay for programs that people have been expecting, such as food subsidies and new irrigation programs to support agriculture. If revenue from oil exports is sufficient, desalination of sea water is even a possibility. In Syria, wheat prices doubled between 2010 and 2011, for a combination of reasons, including drought and a cutback in subsidies. When basic commodities become too high priced, citizens tend to become very unhappy with the status quo. Civil war is not unlikely. Thus, oil depletion is likely a significant contributor to the current unrest…
…
3. Oil pipelines from Iraq through Syria would be helpful if Iraq is to greatly ramp up its oil output in the next few years.
…
4. The possibility of natural gas pipelines through Syria to alleviate potential shortages in Europe and elsewhere is contentious.
…
5. Need for America to prove its might, to maintain the US dollar’s reserve currency status.
…
LikeLike
You liked the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the Vietnam War, the Kuwaiti incubators and the first Gulf War, the Racak massacre and the war in Kosovo, Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction and the second Gulf War and the threats to Benghazi and the Libyan war? You will just love the gassing of civilians in Ghouta and the bombing of Syria.
http://www.voltairenet.org/article180149.html
LikeLike
The intelligence gathered against Syria’s Assad was manufactured by elements within the spy community in order to mislead the US President to take punitive action, Ray McGovern, a veteran CIA analyst, told RT.
McGovern was among the signatories to the letter from veteran intelligence professionals to Obama, warning the US president that Assad is not responsible for the chemical attack, and that “CIA Director John Brennan is perpetrating a pre-Iraq-War-type fraud on members of Congress, the media, [and] the public.”
http://rt.com/op-edge/us-syria-cia-fabrication-620/
LikeLike
xraymike, i think you’ll find yourself in the minority, everntually, if you actually believe 9-11 happened the way the government explained it to everyone.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/poll-more-americans-believe-world-trade-center-7-was-demolished-on-911-than-believe-the-governments-explanation.html
(from the article)
“Even the government’s own computer model disproves its theory. It looks nothing like the actual collapse,” said Tony Szamboti, a mechanical engineer from the Philadelphia area. “Not only that, they refuse to release the data that would allow us to verify their model. In the world of science, this is as bad as it gets. I’m glad most people can look at the collapse and see the obvious.”
(my comment)Steel framed high-rise buildings don’t just fall down on their own, out of fear or maybe bad vibes or even fire.
LikeLike
We’ve looked down into that rabbit hole and it leads straight to a padded cell in the loony bin.
LikeLike
I shared this link with a discussion group in which I participate and was promptly pilloried for being a conspiracy theorist. It may be true that online polls in particular attract some of the loony fringe, but if the sample is large enough, those effects wash out and the poll more nearly reflects public sentiment. That’s a methodological question I’m unqualified to address.
There are plenty of psychological aspects to bring to bear with disdain on the purported holders of secret knowledge, as opposed to the barking-mad mainstream. We doomers are not exactly contemplating future events anymore. Effects are clearly observable in our own time. But by focusing on the end result (collapse, apocalypse, doom, NTE, etc.), deniers can see only the remaining forest still standing, none of the dead trees, which are multiplying.
LikeLike
Ha ! What about Israel’s chemical weapons ?
Can’t view the FP page but I’ve seen that info before
http://www.moonofalabama.org/2013/09/no-need-for-un-in-syrias-chemical-weapon-solution.html#c6a00d8341c640e53ef019aff521f56970c
LikeLike