Tags
"David Cay Johnston: The Perils Of Our Growing Inequality", Capitalism, Corporate State, Corporatocracy, David Cay Johnston, ExxonMobile, Financial Elite, Free Trade Agreements, Governmental Capture, Gross Inequality, Inverted Totalitarianism, Maldistribution of Wealth, Reaganism, Regulatory Capture, Steve Coll's 'Private Empire', The Elite 1%, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Wall Street Fraud
David Cay Johnston is, as he states, not a socialist, but a capitalist who believes in fair and competitive markets and integrity. My blog concentrates quite a bit on environmental issues and David only passingly mentions the deregulation and rolling back of environmental laws in the interview below, but he has been writing about inequality since the 1960’s and does a great job of describing the “governmental capture” by multinational corporations. An overwhelming proportion of environmental destruction is being caused by these mammoth corporations that are literally a state within a state, so it’s important to make the connection between inequality/political disenfranchisement and the destruction of the environment driven by a “business aristocracy” which has usurped the institutions of society. There can be no social, environmental, and climate justice if there is no government to serve the people. Of particular interest is the interview with Steve Coll and the power that ExxonMobile wields. Three notable examples of government acting as an insurance agency for corporations while leaving a mess for the common people to deal with are the BP oil spill, TEPCO’s Fukushima disaster, and the mortgage crisis created by the Too-Big-To-Fail Banks.
Government rules and policies have been put in place to create the huge wealth gap in America:
– political economy, an amplifying feedback loop where wealth begets access to the rules in politics which begets changes in the rules which reinforce wealth.
– 45 years ago the media was staffed by blue-collar intellectuals. TV news media is now filled with people from wealthy households whose life experience tells them that things are just fine in the world. We’re not hearing about those exploiting the system for their benefit. Very little coverage of poverty as well. The U.S. has the highest % of children who go to bed hungry of any modern country.
– The most important period of determining your lifetime health and well-being is from conception to the first 6 months of life. Little to nonexistent programs and support for mothers and newborn babies in America. Just as the U.S. is neglecting its infrastructure by not maintaining and investing in it, we are also stealing from the future by not nurturing and providing proper care for small children. There will be a price and it will be very high.
– U.S. has been living under Reaganism since 1981 in which we worship money and our measure of the country is money. The purposes of our country were written down for us in the preamble of the Constitution: justice, the general Welfare, common defense, domestic tranquility, liberties. Nothing in the preamble talks about getting rich. That’s a byproduct of these other things, but we have gotten a distorted view of what’s happening and now have 33 years of evidence that Reaganism has made the rich richer at the expense of the 90%. We are mining the 90% to benefit the super-rich rather than creating an economy that benefits everyone.
– The number one driver of this crooked system is campaign finance. There are over 100,000 people in this country whose job it is to mine the public treasury or the rules for their benefit. This corrupt system has to be changed.
– The way we think about this country and its society needs to change. The founders actually wrote a great deal about their concerns over inequality. John Adams, the second President, wrote that his fear was that a business aristocracy would arise to destroy the country, making workers mere wage earners instead of craftsmen owning their own tools. These wage earners, not being truly independent, would be manipulated into voting for policies that would benefit the business aristocracy and we would lose both our liberties and democracy. Adam Smith, in The Theory of Moral Sentiments, talks about inequality being corrosive to the very fabric of society and says that “the greatest corruption of our moral sentiments is the tendency to almost worship the rich and to hold in bad regard people who are poor.” Our politicians reflect this even though many of them will tell you at any moment how religious they are. They obviously have not studied their religious text because if they did they would know that, in the case of the Christians for example, you were required to “give all that thou hast to the poor.”
– Reaganism has led to an enormous concentration of wealth amongst a small minority who cannot possibly consume that wealth and instead are investing it in financial instruments to extract more wealth rather than investing it in the economy. We don’t have to burn more fossil fuels to grow the economy; there are other ways to do that.
– We pay big corporations to not pay their taxes. The way this happens is that corporations are limited in the amount of money they can hold in the U.S., so the corporations get around this by offshoring their money in foreign bank accounts and then turn around and buy U.S. treasuries. The interest they earn from these treasuries will eventually exceed the value of the tax on that money, when and if these corporations decide to bring the money back into the U.S.. This scheme has literally become a profit center for the corporations.
– When this country was founded, there had been only seven corporations in the old british colonial United States at the time of the Declaration of Independence. Six of them were what today we would either call a charity or a utility. The Boston Water Works is a good example; it was the very first one and was essentially a utility. One corporation created in the colony of New Haven was set up solely to make profit. It was such a scandal they had to shut it down within a year and it took ten years to clean up the mess. The founders disliked and distrusted corporations, but they believed in collective bargaining because in 1792, Congress passed the first significant labor law and subsidy law based on a study conducted by Thomas Jefferson. It was to revive and protect the cod fishing industry ravaged by the British Navy. The class of fisherman known as “sharesmen” were able to negotiate with the wealthy ship owners in order to share in the profits. Those ships who participated in sharing their profits with the fishermen were given the subsidy and those who did not were exempt from the subsidy.
– Violent, explosive rise in executive pay which diverts CEOs from the welfare of the company. All large pools of capital that are owned collectively (charitable endowments, pension funds, etc) are systematically being predated. The assets of utility companies are being worn down and stripped.
– We now have a government that does not go after people who are engaged in criminal frauds because they are considered so powerful that if they were prosecuted it would “damage the economy”. The government has become an insurance agency for the rich and powerful and the common people pay the premiums.
– We have gotten the results that Mr. Reagan said, if you listen to him carefully in 1980, that we would get which is that those people who are wealth holders would realize the income from that wealth, and they have. The actual tax rates of the people at the very top are 60% lower than what they paid in the 1980’s, but at the same time by getting rid of unions, by having these “free trade deals” which are really deals to drive down the cost of labor, we have driven down the wages and salaries of the vast majority of Americans as well as the environmental conditions (laws to protect the environment). A whole mechanism has been put in place that favors profit over labor and when you look at the data you can see it. The returns to labor in the Fed reserve data show a marked decline and returns to capital have been rising and since 2009 it has skyrocketed. Because labor returns have gone down, there is not enough aggregate demand in the economy for people to buy goods and services. The next thought would be that capitalists would change because people have to be able to buy their goods and services. No, if you are a global capitalist it does not matter. As long as there are no riots in the streets, you can sell your goods in other countries. We have lots of corporations now that are bigger than governments. Steve Coll’s book on ExxonMobile basically describes a private foreign service and a private military:
The scope of the market has become larger than the domain of the sovereignty of nation-states.
– The ultimate solution is very simple: the 90% of Americans who are worse off, who are back to the income level of 1966, can vote in a new government and start with the state legislatures because they are the ones that set the boundaries for the congressional districts but it will take many decades to get to a better path. The fundamental question about this division between the super-rich and everyone else is, “Are we going to revise the rules?” Right now you are seeing the rise of oligarchical thinking such as Tom Perkins saying the number of votes you should have should be based on the amount of money you have. The founders explicitly rejected that kind of thinking.
– This idea that if you make a lot of money, you should pay more in taxes is the most conservative idea in western civilization if your standard is something that’s been tested through time and works which is the classic meaning of conservative. Progressive taxation was invented 2,500 years ago in Athens when they invented democracy. The people of the city-state of Athens concluded that the only way one could become wealthy is by following the rules and laws set down to protect everyone. The infrastructure of Athens, its military, and government services that were provided to benefit everyone meant that those who did become wealthy were expected to bear a greater burden for those costs of society to ensure that Athens would endure. Society made their fortunes possible. This idea has been embraced by every classic worldly philosopher.
– The game doesn’t just comfortably and stably go on if people don’t become active and we keep driving towards deeper and deeper hollowing out and inequality. Isn’t there a dark scenario here also? Yes, we’re giving up on democracy and our descendents will read history books that begin with these words: “The United States of America was… ” It became a failed experiment where cynicism is used to mock anyone who is idealistic, a foolish romantic…
– We have governmental capture. We literally have a federal government that responds to the political donor class, which is a narrow group of very wealthy people, in how it taxes, how it doesn’t regulate, how it doesn’t enforce laws, how it makes trade agreements with other countries, and that imbalance should worry us a great deal. What did Plutarch tell us 2,000 years ago? “An imbalance between rich and poor is the most frequent and fatal ailment of all republics.”
The elite just spent 40 years and billions of dollars to create the conditions we see today. It is a multi-generational project. These people will never give up their power. Power never gives itself up and those who have it will do anything they can get away with to maintain it. So what options are left to the 90%? David Cay Johnston sounds like a decent man, but I think it’s naive to suggest that you can still change things by voting. Before the American Revolution, the founding fathers and many others tried appealing to the British, but all they got was a big fuck you…..nothing has changed, same shit, different century.
“There’s no way vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs”
Chris Hedges
“Elect who you want! We own them all!”
Donald Trump?
LikeLike
David Cay Johnston says it will take decades to change course and he’ll be long dead before then. The human race does not have that kind of time, and a strong case can already be made that we are all dead men walking. I find his analysis valuable for reasons that don’t include his unrealistic solution.
LikeLike
I agree, he is worth listening to. Even if we are done for, people still need to decide if they want to spend their (and their families) remaining years or decades as servants and cannon fodder for the amusement of a happy few.
LikeLike
Quality of Dying
Once you’ve resolved any doubt
That extinction is here, just about,
And there’s no point in feigning,
The question remaining
Is “What’s the best way to go out?”
LikeLike
via America2.0…
“everybody knows detroit as the poster child for the end of industrialism. i was just kinda surprised at how fast the process of going feral can be.”
http://goobingdetroit.tumblr.com/page/2
LikeLike
LikeLike
LikeLike
This is the absolute pits.The message being sent here is that if you don’t have the money to provide your own shelter,society would like you to die.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Is that last set for real???
LikeLike
http://www.treehugger.com/eco-friendly-furniture/pay-sit-park-bench-is-a-libertarian-dream.html
LikeLike
LikeLike
“Fukushima is fucked. There’s no end to the nuclear meltdown & nowhere to store the constant surge of radioactive water.”
LikeLike
LikeLike
“The human race is too stupid to survive. He knows it, I know it, you know it. Buh-bye.”
LikeLike
Whenever the subject of corps. arises I go right back to this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad
and then there’s this one.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of_Boston_v._Bellotti
In 1976, when several corporations, including the First National Bank of Boston, were barred from contributing to a referendum regarding tax policy, they appealed to the Supreme Court. In November 1977, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments. On April 26, 1978, they ruled 5-4 against the Massachusetts law, effectively extending First Amendment freedom of speech protections to corporate speech.
Precedent upon precedent, the law is a very finicky thing, rather like a spider web, one little tremor influences the entire structure.
It should be stressed that the entire project of globalization depends upon burning fuel; for shipping, for manufacture, for control systems. The point of “free trade” for the Oligarchy is to crush the working class, of course this project is sold as “innovation” and “efficiency”, when the whole point is to be able to cut costs. Costs are most easily cut by getting rid of those pesky laborers who want to be paid a living wage. Food can be grown by hand, roads can be built by hand, but then the working class would be needed once again, and capitalists would have to deal with the poor ignorant proles who they detest.
Burning massive quantities of fuel is essential to the functioning of the global kleptocracy, we all know it, they all know it; and just to be fair, a good part of the underclass knows it also, and are content to be trod upon if it insures a somewhat comfortable life of a pauper. The class struggle actually has quite a bit to do with the state of today’s world.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Caught On Tape: Nancy Pelosi Squirms As Teen Questions Her On The NSA
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-08/caught-tape-nancy-pelosi-squirms-teen-questions-her-nsa
LikeLike
GOP leaders in Fla. dismiss risks to state of rising sea levels
Efforts to address climate change seen as alarmist
By Michael J. Mishak
| ASSOCIATED PRESS JUNE 08, 2014
LikeLike
LikeLike
http://read.thestar.com/?origref=#!/article/5393ab5aec06919d5c00027b-riots-hostage-takings-in-india-triggered-by-extreme-heat-wave
Riots, hostage takings in India triggered by extreme heat wave
LikeLike
Metal spikes have been installed outside a block of luxury flats in London to deter homeless people from sleeping there.
But the installation of the studs has provoked criticism from some after a picture was uploaded to Twitter, the social networking site.
Users said the use of the studs meant homeless people were being treated the same way as pigeons, as similar metal spikes are used to deter them.
Andrew Horton, 33, of Woking, Surrey, took the picture of the inch long studs outside the flats on Southwark Bridge Road as he walked to work on Wednesday.
Mr Horton said: “I can’t say for certain but it certainly looked like they were placed there to deter homeless people.
“It’s dreadful.”
David Wells said on Twitter: “These Anti homeless studs are like the spikes they use to keep pigeons off buildings. The destitute now considered vermin [sic].
More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/propertynews/10883541/Homeless-spikes-installed-outside-London-flats.html?mc_cid=fbfd0e9a54&mc_eid=f0754ee742
LikeLike
I just posted that story up above.
LikeLike
Sorry. I see articles in between patients and haven’t always followed, but want to pass along what I see. Delete as needed.
LikeLike
The Russian are leaving! The Russian are leaving!
The Russian government has ordered the evacuation of North Pole-40 Arctic Station.
http://siberiantimes.com/ecology/others/news/arctic-emergency-as-scientific-stations-ice-sheet-breaks-up-putting-16-researchers-in-jeopardy/
LikeLike
Reconstructing Economics: Why Nations Fail, Part One
…The human brain is a beautifully repurposed kluge like every other biological system. We Homo sapiens are limited by our irrationality and the maladaptation of our cognitive abilities to the science-based economy we have constructed for ourselves. In fact we are surprisingly scientifically illiterate. The cognitive psychologist Daniel Kahan wrote in the journal Nature that believing what our associates believe is rational because we are a communal animal who in the savannah depended on cooperation and trust in order to survive. This is true even if the beliefs themselves are irrational provided they are inconsequential and relatively harmless. We have an evolutionary imperative to believe the same nonsense that all the people on our bowling team or our political party believe. And the less rational it is and the more we unquestionably accept it the more we can be trusted by the group. It is only irrational if it is harmful to ourselves and our social group…
Reconstructing Economics: Why Nations Fail, Part Two
…Human societies organize hierarchically with one or a few powerful and wealthy individuals owning nearly everything, a small class of specialized professionals such as warriors, engineers, priests, sycophants, merchants and accountants owning the rest, and everybody else existing in some form of bondage, i.e. serfdom or slavery, or destitution. Democratic republics are rare, short lived and vulnerable to exploitation by concentrated wealth and power. This state of affairs is described by the economists Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson in their remarkable book Why Nations Fail.
This book covers the breadth and depth of human economic history. Their thesis is that successful human societies are nurtured by inclusive institutions. Such institutions are democratic, communal and progressive, which encourage or enable large segments of society to assimilate or participate. Nations which fail are dominated by extractive institutions with limited democratic participation. Slavery is a good example of an extractive institution. Unfortunately, such institutions are favored by wealthy and powerful elites who benefit. The economist Dave Grusky observes [8] “The human condition has so far been a fundamentally unequal one; indeed, all known societies have been characterized by inequalities of some kind, with the most privileged individuals or families enjoying a disproportionate share of the total wealth, power, and prestige.”
Acemoglu and Robinson note that the Soviet Union despite being an extractive society grew the economy under Josef Stalin at a remarkable rate for a short time. This rate of growth scared the devil out of capitalists while being embraced by socialists, to the embarrassment of both groups in hindsight. Acemoglu and Robinson’s theory cannot by itself explain this growth but if we combine their theory with biophysical economics an explanation falls out. While Stalinist Russia was totalitarian and extractive compared to the Czarist Russia it was a breath of fresh air and it opened up Russia’s vast resources for exploitation. Also while many people were murdered or exiled to Siberia, many more were also educated. That it eventually failed may be due to the way people were exploited and to the inherent failure of central planning. While it is certainly more complicated, my suggestion here is that a systems approach to economics including many factors may be a better analytic tool than the ideological methodology or instrumentalism favored by the Friedmanites. An holistic systems analysis is not absent in Acemoglu and Robinson’s work, nor is it in other works of ecologists, economists and writers such as Vaclav Smil, Charles Mann and Jared Diamond. These authors tend to be realistic both about human behavior and resource limits.
The importance of the work of Acemoglu and Robinson is the identification of the role inclusive institutions play in fostering healthy societies. Inclusive institutions include free public education, free public libraries and other access to knowledge, public parks and recreation areas, broadly participatory democratic elections, progressive taxation, limited corporate size, corporate regulation, labor and consumer unions, minimum wage laws, guarantees of free speech and the rule of law and protection of limited private property rights. These are much the same institutions which already existed or were enabled at the beginning of the twentieth century by America’s progressive movement.
At the end of their book, Acemoglu and Robinson forecast possible future outcomes for several countries including China but ignore the United States. I’ve asked Acemoglu if he had any prognosis for our country. He was kind enough to send me a paper which he and Robinson had written with a note that he probably should have included it in his book [9]. It sees a ray of hope in the Occupy Wall Street movement and compares it to the great progressive movement at the beginning of the twentieth century. The paper highlights the differences both in the movements themselves and in the social organization in which they operated. Unfortunately, since they wrote that paper the Occupy Wall Street movement has failed.
Economists Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page have recently published a paper, from which I extracted my introductory quote, which quantifies the idea that democracy is already dead or dysfunctional in the United States. Hedrick Smith traces its demise to the late 1970’s and early 1980’s in his revealing book Who Killed the American Dream. As he describes, this is when our plutocrats and corporations organized to run our country for their personal benefit. They were aided by sycophants and Georgewillian logicians like Milton Friedman. This is when we let our democracy get away from us.
The ecologist Garrett Hardin describes three ways we think [10]. We are all literate, even those of us who cannot read and write think and communicate with words. We are vulnerable to stories and misinformation. It is possible but more difficult to lie with data. Referring to Figure 1, note that right around 1980 is when median family incomes stagnated while productivity continued to increase, a logical outcome of our evolution to a plutocracy. The economic elites seized wealth and power. The second figure shows rather dramatically that they don’t know what they are doing any more than the economists who advise them. Total credit market debt is accelerating much faster than the creation of wealth. Last quarter GDP was -1 percent while debt increased by $484 Billion [11]. This same thing happened during the twenties leading up to the Great Crash and Depression.
LikeLike
In my opinion, one of the biggest problems facing the world is that the vast majority of people have misguided values. Often it seems that wants are mistaken for needs, no doubt due to social programming.
My brother likes to watch some show about zombies on tv. I thought it was silly and pointless at first, like most pursuits of the average clueless american. But the more i thought about it, the more i realized how close to home the story of the zombie hits…
Wherever i go, i often wonder just what it is that the normal clueless person values.
And everywhere i go, i see mindless heaps of human flesh wandering around, always searching for “MOOOORRRRRRE!!!!”. Only, in the case of the average capitalist consumer-zombie, MORE isn’t brains- it seems to be a number of things like more money, more power, cars, jewelry, more respect, more control, more status in the pecking order, more good feelings from buying more junk, more drugs, more subjugation of fellow human beings, etc. Their lust for more is insatiable. Even the billionaires seek more… This virus is spreading, it’s endemic to this economic model… It’s infecting more and more people around the world every day.
Throughout my wanderings across soon-to-be-post-apocalyptic america, I’ve tried to cure some zombies. I tell them about the state of the environment, why it’s likely everyone will be dead in less than 2 decades, and why they’re stuck in grinding poverty or servitude to economic masters. But they refuse to see it. Their complexion instantly turns lighter, they turn away and look as if they’re going to vomit, or they look at me like i just slaughtered a litter of kittens (How dare you suggest an alternative lifestyle!) and afterward avoid me like I’m the one with a disease.
I’ve been on the run from zombie culture for over a year now, and it’s taxed me heavily. The zombies harass me, look down on me, and try to convince me that i’m the crazy one, because i value a habitable environment for future generations. I’ve lost all family, all friends, and probably my mind too. It’s difficult to carry on. I’m not homeless yet, but i might be soon, because i just don’t want to be a slave of empire.
I’m a survivor, searching for others, but i know not one personally. I hear that they’re out there somewhere, and it would be nice to meet one someday. But it’s likely i’ll spend the rest of my days alone, tormented and distressed, forever on the run. I’m ready now to say fuck it, and retire to self-imposed exile on some uninhabited island to grow my own food and shit. It would be better than running all the time, feeling persecuted. The only peace i get is in my sleep, and even then, i still have dreams. My dreams aren’t always bad tho- sometimes in them i find a colony of normal, awakened people existing in autonomy, far from the zombies of empire.
I’m so fucked…
LikeLike
LikeLike
Here’s a line from the Eagles that can work for some if they can get there.
“’cause I gotta peaceful easy feeling
and I know you won’t let me down
’cause I’m already standing on the
ground”
LikeLike
Well since you showed me yours, I can tell you your not the only one who’s life is surreal. I do not personally know anyone who talks about any of the issues we are (not) facing. Ever. I still see my family often, but when I try and bring things up I get the subject change or silent treatment. Cooking and shopping are what’s usually talked about and there is always one of those stupid cooking shows on their TV’s. Is there any point in me trying anymore? I was talking to the woman I loved and who loved me for 20 years, about many things. That ended 6 months ago when she said were done. One big reason was because I had become so negative (Doomer). Oh and also because she can not be “unequally yoked” even though I told her I was atheist 20 years ago. I know my family knows. Maybe not all the details, but they know trouble is coming. My brother and his wife are university educated and somewhat liberal. Their twin daughters will be 7 next week. They are typical middle class debt slaves, so last week they got $2500.00 worth of patio stone from Home Depot at no interest for 18 months. They had to tear up the existing concrete patio at their 4 year old McMansion to get the look they want. My sister has a good heart (lots of volunteer time) and works hard, but she has been smoking 5-6 joints a day for decades and it impairs her thinking, although she says it doesn’t. She had been complaining about paying taxes for a bunch of free riding welfare recipients for the last few years, so I had to remind her that she was a welfare mom at 16 and never worked until in her 30s and that the tax payers of this province paid to raise her kids. Probably around a half million. The blame the poor meme has migrated to Canada, it’s just not as loud as in the US. Now my mom is educated as well, but she just watches fantasy TV, shops and drinks a bottle of vodka most every night and cries. I won’t even phone her after 6pm cause it’s too painful. She is very sad, because my dad died 2 years ago of cirrhosis. He liked his vodka too. He was a well loved and respected elementary school teacher. My dad did not want a funeral or anything, so the school had a ceremony for him and many parents took time off work to be with their kids paying respect. I love my family dearly, yet I do not think it is necessary for me to try and warn them anymore. I feel so powerless when know one seems to care (except here of course). Like xraymike said a few weeks ago, I would like to enjoy some life while there is still time. I wish I could meet a nice Doomer lady.
LikeLike
My sympathies. I hope things take a turn for the better.
LikeLike
Thanks David. I still have much to be grateful for.
LikeLike
Apneaman, why don’t you put up a classified at NBL?
LikeLike
Post-Acceptance Rethinking
Resources we need keep on shrinking,
So hope for improvement is sinking,
Forcing all that we knew
To a new point of view
Based on post-acceptance rethinking.
LikeLike
…The feudal system of the Dark Ages was the social and economic exploitation of peasants by lords. This led to an economy always marked by poverty, sometimes famine, extreme exploitation and wide gaps between rich and poor. The feudal era relation of a serf to his lord is essentially identical to the relation of a so-called WalMart associate to a heir of the Walton family. If one looks objectively at the power stratum in the US circa 2013, and the one of, let’s say, France circa 1750, it is hard to ignore the startling similarity. For example, attendance at Ivy-League schools in the US is principally an inherited privilege; the same can be said for elected positions in Congress. The concept of dynasties rules, not personal merit.
A powerful network of oligarchs worldwide seems to be pursuing the objective to set back the social clock to before the era of Enlightenment so as to return us to the Dark Ages of lords and serfs: a new era of global slavery to benefit Wall Street’s “masters of the universe.” Compared to the Middle Ages, today’s servitude is more insidious: the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank, and many private banks operate like mega drug dealers. The IMF and World Bank do so with countries, while the banks do so with individuals. Once Greece, Detroit or John Doe is addicted to its fix — loans in this case — the trick is done. After a while, money must be borrowed even to service the debt.
In a recent cynical opinion piece titled “Detroit, the New Greece”, New York Times columnist and Nobel-prize winning economist Paul Krugman reasoned more like a callous Wall Street operator than someone with the self-proclaimed humanist “conscience of a liberal” by casually calling Detroit a “victim of market forces.”
“Sometimes the losers from economic change are individuals whose skills have become redundant; sometimes they are companies serving a market niche that no longer exist; and sometimes they are whole cities that lose their place in the economic ecosystem,” writes Krugman, forgetting Greece in his laundry list of “innocent victim of these mysterious “market forces.” Krugman concludes his paragraph with: “Decline happens,” as if this is a physical phenomenon, like gravity or magnetism. Like most of the leading international economists, Krugman has adamantly supported the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). Detroit and Greece are not some sort of collateral damage of “market forces” in Krugman’s “decline happens” scenario. Detroit was demolished wholesale by NAFTA, and Greece was enticed to borrow money to join the EURO zone.
The IMF itself recently conceded that the policies it has implemented for Greece resulted in “notable failures.” The IMF failed to push for an immediate restructuring of Greece’s debt, but didn’t prevent money owed by the country before 2010 to private-sector creditors from being fully repaid at the onset of the fiscal crisis. Greece’s overall debt level remained the same, except it was now owned to the Euro-zone taxpayers and the IMF instead of banks and hedge funds. Both Greece and Detroit were targets of a predatory capitalism that sought to downgrade and then shut down all public sectors of an economy.
The “market forces” are not physical phenomena; they are the hyenas and vultures from Wall Street who dismantle and then feed on the carcasses of a city or country. Decline does not just happen; it is engineered by the corporate entities of global capitalism to maximize profit without regard for human costs. It is ultimately up to us, for the common good of human kind, to put wrenches into the well-oiled wheels of this global corporate machine that is breaking our backs by grinding and crushing our accomplishments of more than 250 years to return us to the servitude of feudalism.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Oh, no, not Parson Hedges, the ascetic Christian martyr here to dirge his Harvard Divinity self to the top of the rehash charts, intoning and lecturing the masses on his great, messianic psychic plans for worldwide folkish anti-Black Bloc 60’s Jesus freak revivalism.
First, Michael Shermer, now lessons in how to overthrow the entire world’s power structure from this former Timesman?
LikeLike
Indeed. With “liberals” like these, who needs conservatives..?
LikeLike
Oooh boy, I’ll never quote from Hedges or Shermer ever again. (heavy sarcasm)
LikeLike
I was referring to Krugman.. just shot that off without thinking of the context. Sorry for any confusion.
LikeLike
Mike mentioned in a comment that we could be dead men walking. You lucky people in the U.S.are about to see an example of a brain dead man walking, our (Australia) prime minister, who I believe is meeting Obama in à day or two. I have read a report here that Abbott is teaming up with Harper to try to convince more leaders to adopt their window dressing approach to climate disruption. I feel more and more each day that I am spectator at a freak show.
LikeLike
You mean this Bozo…
[youtube:www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3IaKVmkXuk]
LikeLike
http://www.crikey.com.au/2014/06/10/abbott-and-harper-renew-a-blinkered-coalition-of-denialism/ I wished that the ceiling would fall on them, but it was not so. There is no death penalty in Oz, & I am an old man… Comfortable Retirement?
LikeLike
http://www.echo.net.au/2014/06/barry-jones-slams-war-science/
LikeLike
If course,that would be pointless:he will be out of Parliament like a bad smell on a windy day.
LikeLike
…
…Anyone who has read a newspaper in recent years knows how important debt is to contemporary politics. As David Graeber among others has shown, we live in debtocracies, not democracies. Debt, rather than popular will, is the governing principle of our societies, through the devastating austerity policies implemented in the name of debt reduction. Debt was also a triggering cause of the most innovative social movements in recent years, the Occupy movement.
If it were shown that public debts were somehow illegitimate, that citizens had a right to demand a moratorium – and even the cancellation of part of these debts – the political implications would be huge. It is hard to think of an event that would transform social life as profoundly and rapidly as the emancipation of societies from the constraints of debt. And yet this is precisely what the French report aims to do.
The audit is part of a wider movement of popular debt audits in more than 18 countries. Ecuador and Brazil have had theirs, the former at the initiative of Rafael Correa’s government, the latter organised by civil society. European social movements have also put in place debt audits, especially in countries hardly hit by the sovereign debt crisis, such as Greece and Spain. In Tunisia, the post-revolutionary government declared the debt taken out during Ben Ali’s dictatorship an “odious” debt: one that served to enrich the clique in power, rather than improving the living conditions of the people.
The report on French debt contains several key findings. Primarily, the rise in the state’s debt in the past decades cannot be explained by an increase in public spending. The neoliberal argument in favour of austerity policies claims that debt is due to unreasonable public spending levels; that societies in general, and popular classes in particular, live above their means.
This is plain false. In the past 30 years, from 1978 to 2012 more precisely, French public spending has in fact decreased by two GDP points. What, then, explains the rise in public debt? First, a fall in the tax revenues of the state. Massive tax reductions for the wealthy and big corporations have been carried out since 1980. In line with the neoliberal mantra, the purpose of these reductions was to favour investment and employment. Well, unemployment is at its highest today, whereas tax revenues have decreased by five points of GDP.
The second factor is the increase in interest rates, especially in the 1990s. This increase favoured creditors and speculators, to the detriment of debtors. Instead of borrowing on financial markets at prohibitive interest rates, had the state financed itself by appealing to household savings and banks, and borrowed at historically normal rates, the public debt would be inferior to current levels by 29 GDP points.
Tax reductions for the wealthy and interest rates increases are political decisions. What the audit shows is that public deficits do not just grow naturally out of the normal course of social life. They are deliberately inflicted on society by the dominant classes, to legitimise austerity policies that will allow the transfer of value from the working classes to the wealthy ones.
A stunning finding of the report is that no one actually knows who holds the French debt. To finance its debt, the French state, like any other state, issues bonds, which are bought by a set of authorised banks. These banks then sell the bonds on the global financial markets. Who owns these titles is one of the world’s best kept secrets. The state pays interests to the holders, so technically it could know who owns them. Yet a legally organised ignorance forbids the disclosure of the identity of the bond holders.
This deliberate organisation of ignorance – agnotology – in neoliberal economies intentionally renders the state powerless, even when it could have the means to know and act. This is what permits tax evasion in its various forms – which last year cost about €50bn to European societies, and €17bn to France alone.
Hence, the audit on the debt concludes, some 60% of the French public debt is illegitimate.
An illegitimate debt is one that grew in the service of private interests, and not the wellbeing of the people. Therefore the French people have a right to demand a moratorium on the payment of the debt, and the cancellation of at least part of it. There is precedent for this: in 2008 Ecuador declared 70% of its debt illegitimate.
The nascent global movement for debt audits may well contain the seeds of a new internationalism – an internationalism for today – in the working classes throughout the world. This is, among other things, a consequence of financialisation. Thus debt audits might provide a fertile ground for renewed forms of international mobilisations and solidarity.
This new internationalism could start with three easy steps.
1) Debt audits in all countries
The crucial point is to demonstrate, as the French audit did, that debt is a political construction, that it doesn’t just happen to societies when they supposedly live above their means. This is what justifies calling it illegitimate, and may lead to cancellation procedures. Audits on private debts are also possible, as the Chilean artist Francisco Tapia has recently shown by auditing student loans in an imaginative way.
2) The disclosure of the identity of debt holders
A directory of creditors at national and international levels could be assembled. Not only would such a directory help fight tax evasion, it would also reveal that while the living conditions of the majority are worsening, a small group of individuals and financial institutions has consistently taken advantage of high levels of public indebtedness. Hence, it would reveal the political nature of debt.
3) The socialisation of the banking system
The state should cease to borrow on financial markets, instead financing itself through households and banks at reasonable and controllable interest rates. The banks themselves should be put under the supervision of citizens’ committees, hence rendering the audit on the debt permanent. In short, debt should be democratised. This, of course, is the harder part, where elements of socialism are introduced at the very core of the system. Yet, to counter the tyranny of debt on every aspect of our lives, there is no alternative.
LikeLike
LikeLike
My husband had never seen Monty Python’s “The Meaning of Life” (he’s Italian), so last week he fired it up on Netflix.
“…me mind’s made up. I’ve given this long and careful thought, and it has to be medical experiments for the lot of you.
CHILDREN: Ohh. Oh. Oh…
CHILDREN: [singing mournfully]
Every sperm is sacred.
Every sperm is great.
If a sperm is wasted… “
LikeLike
…The CIA might try and LOL away its record, but given the world is still dealing with the consequences of its many disastrous postwar interventions, it shouldn’t be allowed to get away with it. “Terrorism” is normally used when referring to acts of violence committed by non-white people hostile to the west. But if we’re understanding the term to mean acts of terror committed for political ends, then the CIA is surely the greatest terrorist organisation on earth.
Last year, days after the Assad regime’s heinous gas attacks had killed hundreds, it was revealed that the CIA had helped Saddam Hussein with his own chemical weapons slaughter in 1988. Fearful of an imminent military breakthrough by Iran, the agency passed on Iranian troop positions to the Iraqi tyrant, “fully aware that Hussein’s military would attack with chemical weapons, including sarin“. As a former US military attache to Baghdad put it: “The Iraqis never told us that they intended to use nerve gas. They didn’t have to. We already knew.”
The CIA’s catastrophic involvement in Iraq goes back much further. In 1963 Saddam’s Ba’ath party violently deposed the leftist administration of Abd al-Karim Qasim, slaughtering thousands of communists with the help of lists provided courtesy of the CIA. “We came to power on a CIA train,” boasted Al Saleh Sa’adi, the new regime’s interior minister. Today, Iraq lies shattered and bloodied…
LikeLike
Doom du jour.
Civilization is brought about by evolution and the circumstance of significant untouched resource gradients. Mankind evolved very quickly to build expanding tumors by metabolizing these gradients. The soft, molluscan-like humans that have ensconced themselves within technology’s protective shell will soon be expelled back into an environment severely damaged by their own inordinate growth. They will stay within their protective enclosures as long as possible, until the services that make them livable cease functioning or become unaffordable. Then they will crawl across the landscape like great white grubs searching for any still functioning technological habitats in which to shelter. Many will end-up in tents or cardboard boxes or dead after being excluded from the relatively few enclaves where environmental and social conditions remain liveable. Government and businesses and their captive media will silence talk of collapse while filling their pockets with loot necessary to insulate their families from adverse conditions. In an effort to prevent financial collapse, central banks and governments will devise great energy-wasting projects like settlements on Mars, underwater automotive tunnels to nowhere. Just use your imagination, they certainly do. This will finally bring about collapse, the mismatch between exponential financial growth and decreasing availability of energy and other resources. When the jig is up there will be a sudden and massive slaughter of financial assets as everyone tries to obtain some bit of resource gradient that hasn’t already been used up. Then we will likely see war on many levels as many desperate losers try to displace those that have been lucky in the game of musical chairs.
All of the features of human evolution that have resulted in civilization are fascinating, just take a look at a baboon skull, about where we started and compare it to that of a modern human and then imagine what got packed into that cranial space to enable our evolutionary transformation. It all happened very fast, like a cell becoming malignant and growing exponentially.
LikeLike
LOL. My favorite part:
“…The soft, molluscan-like humans that have ensconced themselves within technology’s protective shell will soon be expelled back into an environment severely damaged by their own inordinate growth. They will stay within their protective enclosures as long as possible, until the services that make them livable cease functioning or become unaffordable. Then they will crawl across the landscape like great white grubs searching for any still functioning technological habitats in which to shelter…”
That begs to be illustrated by the cartoonist’s pen.
LikeLike
Ditto on the LOL. You always warm my cynical heart, James.
Peak Oil Irony Du Jour.
Barge Traffic Increases Along Erie Canal
“The Margot will pass through three locks this morning. Much of the corn is destined for an ethanol plant five miles inland, though the trip takes about two hours. Despite the slow going of canal travel, moving freight by water has its advantages, namely fuel costs. What can be moved 60 miles by truck on a gallon of fuel can go more than 500 miles by tug and barge.”
http://www.npr.org/2013/06/25/195426326/commercial-shipping-revived-along-erie-canal
LikeLike
This was a long exciting read. It will make everyone’s day.
I really need my straitjacket.
http://arctic-news.blogspot.com/2014/06/arctic-atmospheric-methane-global-warming-veil.html
BTW xrm79,
I really enjoy this site.
LikeLike
I’m working on the Fukushima post…
LikeLike
xrm79,
If you do an in-depth essay on Fukushima,it might be like adding a cherry on top of the
Arctic News link that will make for a really sweet sundae that we will all have to eat.
Sometimes it can be hard to fight depression.
LikeLike
Debt Rattle Jun 9 2014: Stupidity Is Not A Valid Defense For Us
http://www.theautomaticearth.com/debt-rattle-jun-9-2014-stupidity-is-not-a-valid-defense-for-us/
When I see a headline like this one at Bloomberg today, World Needs Record Saudi Oil Supply as OPEC Convenes, there’s just one thought that pops into my head: what the world needs is for us to stop doing this thing we’re doing. Even apart from peak oil concerns, it’s obvious we’re going to run out at some point or another, and it doesn’t matter whether that’s tomorrow or at some other point in the future, though we do know it’s not going to take another 100 years, or even 50.
And nothing will ever take the place of oil; once those unique carbons are gone, that’s it, we’ll have to find a completely different way of running our societies, and if we’re not smart enough to prepare for that beforehand, we’ll be cats fighting in a sack and use the last scraps to kill off each other. And our legacy won’t be the Greek thinkers and Picasso and Dostoyevsky and Walt Whitman and Maria Callas, since there won’t be the means for our children anymore to share what makes man great between them. Our main legacy will instead be bloodshed, we will have gone the exact same path that any non-thinking or even primitive organism would have taken, who don’t have opera or philosophy or poetry to their name.
The reason a reporter chooses to say the world ‘needs’ all that oil may tell us a lot about ourselves, about where we are and where we’re going. The word ‘need’ is a choice we make, but that does not mean it reflects reality. ‘Want’ sounds far more applicable. We may ‘need’ the oil to continue on our chosen path, but that doesn’t mean the path is well-chosen. And we have the ability to think about different paths, and what each might mean for us, our children and our species going forward. The path we’re on is an obvious dead end, even if there are many amongst us who think they, and we, are so smart we can find our way out of any dead end predicament, including the loss of the carbons that have shaped our world for a 150 year long, even for mankind, fleeting moment in time.
There is no other energy source waiting in the wings to take over, and even if there were we can’t escape thermodynamics. Which we have understood – we can do that – and which spells out very clearly that there is a price attached to all use of energy, and the only thing sane and wise (don’t you want to be sane and wise?) to do is to use it sparingly, to only use what we need. And we don’t need to use all that oil, even if we might want to. Our economic system needs for us to use it, and in ever larger quantities, but we don’t need either the economic system nor the oil in order to survive. We have packed our homes with things we don’t need, produced with the energy and building blocks the oil provides. For our economic system to survive we’ll have to buy a whole lot more stuff we don’t need, because it’s based on more, on growth and more growth, till death do us part.
We can lead very wonderful and fulfilling lives without economic growth, people have done it for 100,000 years and more. What makes us special and worthwhile, the paintings, the songs, the words that evoke emotions and stir our hearts and souls, are not based on economic growth. We have invented many things that enhance the quality of our lives, but we haven’t conceived of the limits to use them with. It appears we are incapable of recognizing what makes our lives, our very existence, worth living. Most of us today seem to think it’s oil, or money, or cars or airco’s or processed food, but that’s not it. It may be a matter of taste, and it’s all really democratic, but we might still take Oscar Wilde to heart who said that everything popular is wrong. We might want to make scrutinizing ourselves, our behavior, our needs and demands, a major part of every school’s curriculum and every day on the job.
We know we can do it, that we can look at ourselves and say maybe so and so is not the way to go, maybe I should hold off on this or that, and many of us do just that – though not nearly enough-. But holding back, not using something when we have the opportunity to use it, is not our strength. Perhaps as individuals, and only at times, but certainly not as part of a group, even if there are specific groups dedicated to just that. In general, we will follow the leaders that promise us the optimal ways to use as much as we can, provided we purchase as many things we don’t need as we possibly can, and encourage us to venture into debt to do it.
What that ‘World Needs Record Saudi Oil Supply as OPEC Convenes’ headline tells us, and what many other things do as well, is that we need to make up our minds about where we want to go, because the clock is ticking. If we want poetry instead of warfare, and Puccini instead of fields filled with rotting corpses, then we still have the option to make those choices. To do that, though, we need to realize that we are drowning in things we don’t need, produced with oil we don’t need nearly as much of as we’re using, and that if we don’t snap out of whatever mindset it is that got us in this situation, we won’t even have the things we actually do need anymore. Because we will have used them up to stuff our lives and our homes with things we don’t need. It’s not even rocket science, is it?
So the next time you see someone claim the world needs more oil, or a pundit or politician tries to tell you we need economic growth, know for yourself that both claims are nonsensical bogus. We just about literally need these things like we need a hole in our heads. Or, since we haven’t run out of oil and credit yet, perhaps it would be more accurate to say a hole in our children’s heads. But do we really see those two options as different outcomes? Are holes in our kids’ heads less bad than our own? We can’t plead stupidity, because we know we are capable of understanding the consequences of our actions well enough to apply a precautionary principle to our lives and to be sufficiently careful about putting holes in our children’s heads.
Which begs the question, if we can’t plead stupidity, what else is there? How do we live with ourselves? Is it all the stuff we buy that manages to numb our brains and consciences? Do you ever stand in front of a mirror and ask yourself for a long enough time why you are where you are, why you think that having an X amount of money in the bank is a good thing for you, and at the same time ponder the damage the life you live does to the planet, to everything alive on it, to the people you share it with, and those who will come after you? Do you think economic growth is a good thing when you look around your home, your street, your town, and see all the things in there that you know very well you don’t need and neither do the others? How did you get here?
LikeLike
An old quote from Darbikrash pulled from the wreckage of another site:
From the haze of tumult and confusion of the financial crisis, an ill informed populace of Fox News watchers has been led to personify the en masse failures of late stage capitalism as a failure of governance, perpetuated by government officials, supposedly to advance fiefdoms and terrorize the public.
The rise of the Tea Party and a resurgence in Libertarian ideology, nearly in unison with the onset of the financial crisis, is part of a connected effort for moneyed interests to “not let any crisis go to waste” and advance their neo-liberal agendas- which they are doing with a vengeance. Using the haze and confusion of crisis, these interests, to which ALEC is firmly centered – are channeling barely contained public hysteria and scapegoating to focus on governmental misdeeds as primary causation. This strategy proffers the notion that big government “is the problem” and the “only” solution is a complete and total deconstruction of our current system, as well as any and all entitlement programs, as these are flagged (by the same groups) as significant contributors.
To follow this logic, we must investigate some fundamental assumptions to challenge the validity of what many of us can see is intuitively wrong. The first challenge we must address is to properly identify what this strategy is, and what are the philosophical repercussions. It is less interesting to consider who it is, than what it is. What we are referring to is in fact Neoliberalism on a global scale, a phenomena that has been in place and building since the Reagan administration (although some claim that the first vestiges of Neoliberalism was seen in Chile in the ‘70’s).
One of the main philosophies of Neoliberalism is privatization.
Sober minds will make the statement that Neoliberalism is the enemy of democracy, a claim I would wholeheartedly agree with, for it is democracy that suffers in the hands of privatization, as we shall see.
The main argument against big government is inefficiency. The conventional wisdom is that you want to avoid any government run enterprise because the lack of a profit motive can often yield an organizational structure that is not optimized for efficiency of expense. The fear is a world of $1500 toilet seats and bloated, internecine employment rolls.
While there are many examples of large government structures that are in fact just this, there are many that are not, and there are shining examples of large scale organizations that could not be replicated in private sector, the early days of NASA for example. But perhaps the largest argument is proof by contradiction, where we can cite companies like Enron, Countrywide, and WorldCom as shining examples of colossal private sector organizational failures despite quite significant profit motive.
So the truth is that large collections of people, be they under mantle of government title, or private sector, all experience the gravitational pull of corruption, incompetence, and inefficiency. It is possible to organize and run certain types of things more efficiently under a government structure that answers to the peoples’ best interests and not a profit motive. But not all.
1.) Efficiency or Freedom- you choose.
If the argument against government structure is indeed inefficiency, as I suggest, then we have entered into a moral conundrum. The counterpoint then, to privatization is the intrinsic trade off between “freedom” and efficiency. This is very important. To expand the point, consider the argument from the Neoliberal crowd that privatization of some nationalized entity is beneficial in the name of efficiency, in effect a cost saving measure. If this privatization results in a loss of freedom, a loss of access to the general populace, or a loss in quality of life, than a solid case exists we have simply exchanged liberty for efficiency.
Despite the vocal claims to the contrary, this runs absolutely counter to the principles of governance laid out by our forefathers, and speaks loudly to the massive intellectual comprises made in the pursuit of end stage capitalism. Liberty and freedom-unless it costs too much? Liberty and freedom, for those that can afford it?
Society has long accepted the notion that freedom does in fact have a cost, often expressed as a military cost or a cost of personal sacrifice. The Neoliberal agenda has bulldozed this ethic and replaced it with the Objectivist notion that:
– People who cannot pay for their own services, even at the level of basic infrastructure, are somehow deficient, and not only unworthy of said services, but are deserving of criticism and in some cases, persecution.
– The price of liberty may have been won with the price of lives lost, but it will be surrendered if entitlement benefits get too high.
– The price of war trumps all other costs, while supporting one’s citizens is summarily discounted, there is money aplenty for costs of global war.
2.) Constitutional oversight or commercial law- you choose.
The end game to privatization is removal of the day to day contractual obligations from the public sector, where it can be monitored and overlaid with constitutional provision, into the private sector where no such oversight exists. As all capitalists are wont to do, the objective is opacity. Contract law replaces constitutional law, and we reduce the interactions from the many to the few to the rules of the Universal Commercial Code, in effect, creating and administering a series of individual (supposedly voluntary) contracts between a service provider (the capitalist) and the consumer.
As these contracts are supposedly voluntary, and ostensibly are the result of free choice, the notion of constitutional rights is supplanted by an agreement, any agreement, that is satisfactory to both sides. And any recourse may well be excluded from the courts entirely, through the ubiquitous arbitration clause. These contracts are normally further hampered by non-disclosure agreements forbidding you to disclose the terms and conditions that you agreed to.
These are not just hypotheticals-they exist in some form in the vast majority of commercial contracts today, contracts that may someday govern citizen policing, fire, public school systems, and virtually every other government entity that succumbs to privatization.
This is now well past the topic of efficiency, this is a manifestly oblique dismissal of our freedoms, an end run around the constitution in the pursuit of a profit motive.
3.) Management by the people or by for profit corporations- you choose.
In the schema of privatization, the essential rule making and oversight is now capitulated to the for profit capitalists, and the notion of liberty and fairness is introduced to the unblinking balance of the profit motive. Which will carry the day?
It is a rare case indeed when profit and liberty are coincident vectors. The framework of the constitutional republic acknowledges that the only level arbiter of liberty and justice is officials elected to represent the people. The people in this example is us, government by us for us, through the channel of elected officials complying with a constitution. It is a fair illustration of just how far off course we are when privatization, a de facto corporate rule governed not by the people but by a profit motive, has taken hold of an electorate that most likely could not pass an 8th grade civics class.
An electorate which by all appearances seems hell bound to push this mission along, blindly waving flags and portraying truth to the pinheads and patriots, as those that shout the loudest about liberty and freedom are those that most wish to destroy it.
dk
LikeLike
Amazon tribal chief’s SOS: the white man is destroying everything
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/green-living/amazon-tribal-chiefs-sos-the-white-man-is-destroying-everything-9524549.html?mc_cid=a97e040200&mc_eid=f0754ee742
The Brazilian tribal leader who enlisted Sting to help save the Amazon rainforest has accused the developed world of being intent on “destroying everything” and urged its citizens to fundamentally change the way they think.
Twenty-five years ago, Chief Raoni Metuktire, of the indigenous Kayapo population, shot to international prominence as his campaign against hydroelectric dams on the Xingu river galvanized The Police’s frontman.
With the help of Sting and his wife, Trudie Styler, Chief Raoni generated so much publicity he was able to defeat a series of proposed dams along the Xingu, a major tributary of the Amazon where this tribe lives, in the early 1990s.
But the threat has resurfaced, and at a far greater magnitude, with proposals to build up to 60 hydroelectric dams now at various stages of development across the Amazon, including at least six on the Xingu.
Speaking to The Independent through a translator, Chief Raoni, said: “The white man seems to be destroying everything. Try to change the way you think and tell your children while they’re growing up that it’s very important to respect nature, to respect indigenous peoples, and not to destroy everything, not to finish everything.
“All over the world indigenous people are having problems with the destruction of their land and forest. Everywhere I look there is occupation and destruction of the natural balance.
“We should be finding a solution together to preserve the forest for the future of our children and our grandchildren and our great-grandchildren. What’s going to happen when it’s all gone, when it’s all destroyed and there’s nothing left?”
The Kayapo population numbers about 8,500, most of them living in a handful of villages in the eastern part of the rainforest.
LikeLike