Tags
America's Gun Culture, Barack Obama, Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, Capitalism, Collapse of Industrial Civilization, Corporate State, Global Small-Arms Sales, Government-Corporate-Lobbyist Complex, Gun Control, Inverted Totalitarianism, Military Industrial Complex, Military Keynesianism, NRA, Police State, Right Wing Wingnuts, Sandy Hook Elementary School, Security and Surveillance State, Semi-Automatic Weapons, War for Profit, War on Terror
Obama’s history on gun control has been long on rhetoric and nonexistent on results. Politics was always the primary concern for him. Having studied Obama’s political behavior in Illinois, Ralph Nader said very discerningly in a recent speech that Obama is risk averse. He avoids confrontation with the powerful interests and caves in to their demands. From the too-big-to-fail banks to the for-profit healthcare insurance industry, Obama has shown himself to be a milktoast and socket-puppet of the corporate elite. Wow, what a surprise. Who knew you had to sell your soul to get into the White House? His tear-drenched words aside, Obama’s abysmal record speaks for itself:
…the president received a dismal review from the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, one of the most visible gun-control advocacy groups.
“President Obama’s first-year record on gun violence prevention has been an abject failure,” the group wrote in a 2010 report, adding, “his campaign promises have gone unfulfilled and a year’s worth of opportunities to bring sanity to the gun issue have been lost.”
Should he want to bring forward legislation now, Obama faces a major obstacle: Congress. Even the Democratic-controlled Senate has shown little appetite to touch the controversial issue.
Multiple gun control bills have been introduced in recent years, but not a single one has advanced to a floor vote…. – link
And the ‘MericanPeople don’t wan’t nobody touchin’ their guns. Even after particularly horrific massacres of children, any uptick in favor of gun control quickly dies in the lesion-riddled brain of the United States of Amnesia:
With an economy predicated on growth, we’ll take it anyway we can, i.e. war and military Keynesianism. And the belief that every ‘Merican needs a gun is a part of that militarized American culture. Guns are the norm just like cars and televisions.
Clearly, increased gun availability has not protected America’s civil rights which have been whittled away in the age of the Security and Surveillance State. And it has not prevented the corporate takeover of the government either. I can, however, readily see that the profits of an active gun industry have been protected. This firearms industry then uses those profits to lobby state and federal legislatures for relaxation of restrictions on gun ownership and the de-criminalization of gun use – a familiar refrain in our government-corporate-lobbyist complex.
According to data from Sunlight:
The NRA has spent 73 times what the leading pro-gun control advocacy organization, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, has spent on lobbying in the 112th Congress ($4.4 million to $60,000, through the second quarter of 2012), and 4,143 times what the Brady Campaign spent on the 2012 election ($24.28 million to $5,816). (One caveat on the data is that the NRA itself does a very poor job of accurately reporting its spending, and we must rely on its self-reports.)
As I pointed out in my last two blog entries, guns are a big and growing business for America, just like the metastatic growth of the military industrial complex over the last half century. The NSSF (the trade association for the gun industry), located just across the highway from Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut, touts this fact in its 2012 Firearms and Ammunition Industry Economic Impact Report:
…During difficult economic times and high unemployment rates nationally, our industry has grown and created over 26,325 new, well-paying jobs over the past two years. Our industry is proud to be one of the bright spots in this economy.Take a look for yourself and see the impact we have nationally and on your home state.
The Firearms Industry Creates Jobs in AmericaUnited States companies that manufacture, distribute and sell sporting firearms, ammunition and supplies are an important part of the country’s economy. Manufacturers of firearms, ammunition and supplies, along with the companies that sell and distribute these products, provide well paying jobs in America and pay significant amounts in tax to the state and Federal governments. Economic Impact of the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Industry in the U.S. ![]() An Important Part of America’s Economy Companies in the United States that manufacture, distribute and sell firearms, ammunition and hunting equipment employ as many as 98,752 people in the country and generate an additional 110,998 jobs in supplier and ancillary industries. These include jobs in companies supplying goods and services to manufacturers, distributors and retailers, as well as those that depend on sales to workers in the firearms and ammunition industry. [1]… |
So the predictable outcome of a country awash in lethal guns would be more gun deaths. Oh that’s right, the NRA says “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” Guns are just the handy instrument that is so effective for someone bent on maximum destruction. Is there political will to try to stop the toxic effects of this flourishing gun industry, a by-product of our war economy and militarized society? I doubt it. The sheer number of guns already in circulation will guarantee a continuum of grisly mass murders throughout the country far into the future. And as long as there’s money to be made from guns and weapons, nothing will ever really change:
Illustrating the sickness of this culture:
It’s always been very odd to look at the gun culture in USA and no doubt the idea of weapons everywhere must do something with peoples psyche over there?
But people do go nuts now and then, and easy access to weapons will most likely involve more deaths than if they didn’t have that easy access. In spite of this, in Norway where I come from, we also had that terrible experience with that right wing dude going nuts killing 77 people, many young people executed one at a time with guns. We don’t have a particular noticeable gun culture here (I have never owned a gun and I don’t think many of my friends does either), and the only ones I know that has one are active deer hunters. But with the right nutty ideas and the means anyone can really kill lots of people. But I guess access to weapons increases the chance of this considerably.
I like to think of it like this: If you buy 10 lottery tickets your chances of winning are 10 times as big as with 1 ticket. With 10 times as many weapons around you most likely increase the chance of killings thereafter, although an individual might observe that even 10 lottery tickets gives a very low chance of winning. But it doesnt dispute the math that there is a 10x chance. Just like CO2 emissions, its an unseen threat that many brush off as something [not] to worry about. Only when the house falls over their head or their daughter is shot at school, will they be able to see the facts appear in all its monstrosity.
LikeLike
Brilliant analogy with CO2 emissions and gun proliferation – death by numbers.
LikeLike
Interesting commentary here, linking the proliferation of guns not just to profits for that industry but as a way of maintaining a passive civilian population hunkered down with a siege mentality instead of politically active:
http://lists.portside.org/cgi-bin/listserv/wa?A2=PORTSIDE;640229b9.1212c
LikeLike
Great read! Ames is one of my favorite journalists. I had to look up Harlon Carter to see if his head really was shaped like a bullet:

Yeah, looks like a bullet.
LikeLike
Here is a better formatted version of that article:
FROM “OPERATION WETBACK” TO NEWTOWN: TRACING THE HICK FASCISM OF THE NRA
LikeLike
One can not have (or implement) a Police State AND also have an armed populous. Period. Full stop.
LikeLike
Quaint, but the observable facts would contradict that statement.
LikeLike
I have noticed that the pro-gun population really is bat shit crazy. When faced with the facts, they retort with twisted logic like the following:
“Taking my gun away because I might shoot someone is like cutting my tongue out because I might yell `Fire!’ in a crowded theater.” — Peter Venetoklis
Oh really. Do they actually think the mass murderer in Aurora would have made worldwide headlines if he had yelled “fire!” in the theater?
LikeLike